Please note that the copy function is not enabled for this field.
If you wish to
modify
existing outcomes, please copy and paste the current outcome text into the Update field.
LOGIN
CREATE ACCOUNT
LOGIN
CREATE ACCOUNT
MY TRIALS
REGISTER TRIAL
FAQs
HINTS AND TIPS
DEFINITIONS
Trial Review
The ANZCTR website will be unavailable from 1pm until 3pm (AEDT) on Wednesday the 30th of October for website maintenance. Please be sure to log out of the system in order to avoid any loss of data.
The safety and scientific validity of this study is the responsibility of the study sponsor and investigators. Listing a study does not mean it has been endorsed by the ANZCTR. Before participating in a study, talk to your health care provider and refer to this
information for consumers
Download to PDF
Trial registered on ANZCTR
Registration number
ACTRN12616000190404
Ethics application status
Approved
Date submitted
24/12/2015
Date registered
12/02/2016
Date last updated
12/02/2016
Type of registration
Retrospectively registered
Titles & IDs
Public title
Comparison between different circumcision techniques in neonates and infants
Query!
Scientific title
Comparison of post-operative pain between the Bone Cutter with Thermal Cautery, Gomco and Plastibell for Circumcision in Neonates and Infants: A prospective randomized trial
Query!
Secondary ID [1]
288216
0
none
Query!
Universal Trial Number (UTN)
Query!
Trial acronym
Query!
Linked study record
Query!
Health condition
Health condition(s) or problem(s) studied:
circumcision
297124
0
Query!
Condition category
Condition code
Surgery
297360
297360
0
0
Query!
Surgical techniques
Query!
Intervention/exposure
Study type
Interventional
Query!
Description of intervention(s) / exposure
three different techniques were used for circumcision:
Group 1: Bone Cutter with Thermal Cautery... the technique started by holding the skin by two hemostat was done to elevate the foreskin then application of the bone cutting forceps at the level of skin to be removed for circumcision. Cutting the excess foreskin was done using the heated thermal cautery. the skin was retracted proximally after cutting the excess foreskin to expose the glans. it usually takes 3-5 minutes.
Group 2: will be circumcised using Gomco clamp. the procedure involves placement of special metal device formed of 2 parts; the first one cover the glans to protect it and the second one applied pressure at the line of supposed to be incised then removal of the excess skin was done. it usually takes 5-10 minutes.
Group 3: will be circumcised using Plastibell device. its use involves the placement of a clear plastic ring over the glans, followed by trimming of the excess skin during a surgical procedure, and the device falls off within 3 to 7 days.
Query!
Intervention code [1]
293510
0
Treatment: Surgery
Query!
Intervention code [2]
293865
0
Treatment: Devices
Query!
Comparator / control treatment
control group is circumcised using bone cutting forceps and heat cautery (Group 1)
Query!
Control group
Active
Query!
Outcomes
Primary outcome [1]
296913
0
postoperative pain:
Postoperative analgesia (Acetaminophen 40 mg/kg/dose) was prescribed only on demand if the baby was continuously crying and refusing feeds.
parents were told to record how many times they gave analgesic each day for the first three days separately, and then, if there was still need for analgesia after these three days until the first postoperative clinic visit 1 week later.
Query!
Assessment method [1]
296913
0
Query!
Timepoint [1]
296913
0
1 week
Query!
Secondary outcome [1]
319685
0
cosmetic outcome
will be done by a blinded peer assessment by evaluating 4 items
1- Glans ulceration or injury (Absent or Present)
2- Length of mucosal cuff (3 – 5 mm or < 3mm or > 5mm)
3- Length of penile shaft skin (Appropriate or Excess skin or under skin)
4- Peno-scrotal & peno-pubic angles (Preserved or not preserved)
Query!
Assessment method [1]
319685
0
Query!
Timepoint [1]
319685
0
4 weeks
Query!
Secondary outcome [2]
320646
0
postoperative complications e.g. bleeding, infection, urinary retention
by reviewing the medical records
Query!
Assessment method [2]
320646
0
Query!
Timepoint [2]
320646
0
1 week
Query!
Secondary outcome [3]
320647
0
parent satisfaction
it will be assessed by asking the parent to give a score from 0 to 4
Parent satisfaction score Interpretation:
0 Unacceptable
1 Bad
2 Fair
3 Good
4 Excellent
Query!
Assessment method [3]
320647
0
Query!
Timepoint [3]
320647
0
1 month
Query!
Secondary outcome [4]
320648
0
intraoperative details; operative time in minutes, intraoperative bleeding, glans injury (composite secondary outcome)
assessment was done by reviewing the records of the operative notes.
Query!
Assessment method [4]
320648
0
Query!
Timepoint [4]
320648
0
at the time of the procedure
Query!
Eligibility
Key inclusion criteria
Babies presented for routine circumcision
Query!
Minimum age
1
Days
Query!
Query!
Maximum age
90
Days
Query!
Query!
Sex
Males
Query!
Can healthy volunteers participate?
Yes
Query!
Key exclusion criteria
Bleeding tendency
Liver diseases
Neurological impairment
Query!
Study design
Purpose of the study
Treatment
Query!
Allocation to intervention
Randomised controlled trial
Query!
Procedure for enrolling a subject and allocating the treatment (allocation concealment procedures)
Query!
Methods used to generate the sequence in which subjects will be randomised (sequence generation)
Query!
Masking / blinding
Blinded (masking used)
Query!
Who is / are masked / blinded?
The people assessing the outcomes
Query!
Query!
Query!
Query!
Intervention assignment
Parallel
Query!
Other design features
Query!
Phase
Query!
Type of endpoint/s
Query!
Statistical methods / analysis
Query!
Recruitment
Recruitment status
Completed
Query!
Date of first participant enrolment
Anticipated
Query!
Actual
1/01/2014
Query!
Date of last participant enrolment
Anticipated
Query!
Actual
1/01/2015
Query!
Date of last data collection
Anticipated
Query!
Actual
Query!
Sample size
Target
150
Query!
Accrual to date
Query!
Final
150
Query!
Recruitment outside Australia
Country [1]
7486
0
Egypt
Query!
State/province [1]
7486
0
Cairo
Query!
Funding & Sponsors
Funding source category [1]
292603
0
University
Query!
Name [1]
292603
0
Ain shams university
Query!
Address [1]
292603
0
Ain Shams University Hospitals, 56 Ramsis st., El-Abbasia, Cairo, Egypt (postal code: 11566)
Query!
Country [1]
292603
0
Egypt
Query!
Primary sponsor type
University
Query!
Name
Ain shams university
Query!
Address
Ain Shams University Hospitals, 56 Ramsis st., El-Abbasia, Cairo, Egypt (postal code: 11566)
Query!
Country
Egypt
Query!
Secondary sponsor category [1]
291320
0
None
Query!
Name [1]
291320
0
Query!
Address [1]
291320
0
Query!
Country [1]
291320
0
Query!
Ethics approval
Ethics application status
Approved
Query!
Ethics committee name [1]
294084
0
Ethical committee of pediatric surgery department of Ain Shams University
Query!
Ethics committee address [1]
294084
0
Ain Shams University Hospitals, 56 Ramsis st., El-Abbasia, Cairo, Egypt (postal code: 11566)
Query!
Ethics committee country [1]
294084
0
Egypt
Query!
Date submitted for ethics approval [1]
294084
0
01/10/2013
Query!
Approval date [1]
294084
0
11/11/2013
Query!
Ethics approval number [1]
294084
0
Query!
Summary
Brief summary
this prospective randomized trial was conducted on 150 babies presented for routine circumcision. They were randomized and equally allocated into 3 groups; babies circumcised using the bone cutter forceps with thermal cautery (Group I), Gomco clamp 'Registered Trademark' (Group II) and the Plastibell device 'Registered Trademark' (Group III). Intraoperative details, postoperative pain and complications, cosmetic outcome, and parent satisfaction were recorded
Query!
Trial website
Query!
Trial related presentations / publications
Abdel Hay S. The Use of Thermal Cautery for Male Circumcision. JKAU: Med. Sci. 2009; 16(1): 89-93. Taeusch HW, Martinez AM, Partridge JC, et al. Pain during Mogen or Plastibell circumcision. J Perinatol 2002;22(3):214-218
Query!
Public notes
Query!
Contacts
Principal investigator
Name
62390
0
Dr Khaled El-Asmar
Query!
Address
62390
0
pediatric surgery department, Ain Shams University
14 Mostafa Sadek El-Rafeay, Heliopolis, Cairo, Egypt (postcode 11361)
Query!
Country
62390
0
Egypt
Query!
Phone
62390
0
+201001222624
Query!
Fax
62390
0
Query!
Email
62390
0
[email protected]
Query!
Contact person for public queries
Name
62391
0
Khaled El-Asmar
Query!
Address
62391
0
pediatric surgery department, Ain Shams University
14 Mostafa Sadek El-Rafeay, Heliopolis, Cairo, Egypt (postcode 11361)
Query!
Country
62391
0
Egypt
Query!
Phone
62391
0
+201001222624
Query!
Fax
62391
0
Query!
Email
62391
0
[email protected]
Query!
Contact person for scientific queries
Name
62392
0
Khaled El-Asmar
Query!
Address
62392
0
pediatric surgery department, Ain Shams University
14 Mostafa Sadek El-Rafeay, Heliopolis, Cairo, Egypt (postcode 11361)
Query!
Country
62392
0
Egypt
Query!
Phone
62392
0
+201001222624
Query!
Fax
62392
0
Query!
Email
62392
0
[email protected]
Query!
No information has been provided regarding IPD availability
What supporting documents are/will be available?
No Supporting Document Provided
Results publications and other study-related documents
Documents added manually
No documents have been uploaded by study researchers.
Documents added automatically
No additional documents have been identified.
Download to PDF