Trial Review

The safety and scientific validity of this study is the responsibility of the study sponsor and investigators. Listing a study does not mean it has been endorsed by the ANZCTR. Before participating in a study, talk to your health care provider and refer to this information for consumers
Trial registered on ANZCTR


Registration number
ACTRN12616000334404
Ethics application status
Approved
Date submitted
10/03/2016
Date registered
15/03/2016
Date last updated
29/01/2019
Date data sharing statement initially provided
29/01/2019
Type of registration
Prospectively registered

Titles & IDs
Public title
Determining normal anorectal physiology values in healthy females.
Scientific title
Determining normal anorectal physiology values in healthy females.
Secondary ID [1] 288727 0
None
Universal Trial Number (UTN)
Trial acronym
Linked study record

Health condition
Health condition(s) or problem(s) studied:
Anorectal physiology in healthy subjects 297968 0
Condition category
Condition code
Oral and Gastrointestinal 298125 298125 0 0
Normal oral and gastrointestinal development and function

Intervention/exposure
Study type
Observational
Patient registry
False
Target follow-up duration
Target follow-up type
Description of intervention(s) / exposure
All eligible volunteers will be invited for a one hour, single visit, anorectal physiology testing. No follow up is planned.
.
After obtaining informed consent, patients will perform anorectal manometry (ARM) and balloon expulsion testing (BET) according to a standard protocol. Briefly, after rectal examination, a 7-lumen water-perfused manometry catheter with 0.5 cm spaced sideholes and a compliant balloon attached to the end is used (Dentsleeve International, Canada). The catheter is connected to calibrated pressure transducers and data from the pressure transducers is displayed in digital form on a computer using data conversion software (Neomedix, Sydney Australia). Each individual study comprises assessments of the following parameters: (i) resting anal sphincter pressure, (ii) maximum anal sphincter squeeze pressure, cough pressure and duration of maximum anal squeeze and (iii) rectal pressure on strain and concomitant anal relaxation or paradoxical contraction. Neurophysiology testing using surface EMG is used to asses for squeeze and anal relaxation on strain. This takes approximately 15 minutes.

Sensation thresholds will be tested using two different techniques:
1- Using a 50ml syringe air continuously injected at a rate of 100ml/minute into a balloon at the end of an anorectal catheter, as is standard in the Unit
2- Using an infinitely compliant balloon continuously injected in a rapid barostat protocol, as recently been suggested to be a more reliable measure of sensation

All patients will perform both techniques. In both techniques:
a. The patient is told to report when they first feel the sensation of the balloon inside the rectum, which is recorded as the rectal sensitivity threshold.
b. Continuing to fill the balloon with air the patient then reports when they have the urge to defecate.
c. Still continuing to fill the balloon with air the patient then reports when they cannot tolerate the inflation of the balloon any more, which is recorded as the maximum tolerated volume.

The balloon is quickly deflated (manually or automatically) at the time of reported maximal tolerated volume or at a maximum volume of 300 ml, whatever is reached sooner. Sensation testing will takes approximately 25 minutes.

Dyssynergic defecation using the balloon expulsion test will be tested using three different techniques:
1- Using a 50 ml water filled party balloon tied to a catheter, as is standard protocol in the Unit
2- Using a 16F Foley catheter filled with 50 ml water as has been recently suggested
3- Using a commercially available non-latex rectal balloon.

All patients will perform these techniques, while the order of performance will be equally distributed. In both techniques:
a. The patients try to push the balloon out while sitting over a private toilet.
b. The time it takes to expel the balloon is noted. If the patient is unable to expel balloon after 3 minutes the balloon is deflated and removed.
This will take approximately 10 minutes.

Anorectal ultrasound will be performed as standard to ensure no major breaks in the internal or external sphincter that may undermine the normal exam. This involves 10 minutes of testing.
Intervention code [1] 294165 0
Diagnosis / Prognosis
Comparator / control treatment
No control group
Control group
Uncontrolled

Outcomes
Primary outcome [1] 297630 0
For the primary outcome of determining the normal range of values of anorectal sensorimotor physiological testing in healthy volunteers, the outcome measures are the results of the test performed. These include mean (+-SD) of anal resting pressure, anal pressure on squeeze, anal squeeze duration, rectal pressure on strain, anal relaxation on strain, sensory thresholds and balloon expulsion time.
Timepoint [1] 297630 0
end of study procedure
Secondary outcome [1] 321635 0
For the secondary outcome of determining the best method of measuring rectal sensitivity, the outcome measure will be the correlation between elastic balloon measurements and the barostat measurements of rectal sensitivity.
Timepoint [1] 321635 0
end of study procedure
Secondary outcome [2] 321636 0
For the optimum method of diagnosing dyssenergic defecation using balloon expulsion time, the outcome measure will be time taken to evacuate the different balloons using the three methods described above.
Timepoint [2] 321636 0
end of study procedure

Eligibility
Key inclusion criteria
Inclusion criteria include:
1- Age between 20 and 75
2- Females
3- English speakers
4- Willingness to answer screening questionnaire
5- Willingness to give written informed consent
6- Willingness to comply with the study.
Minimum age
20 Years
Maximum age
75 Years
Sex
Females
Can healthy volunteers participate?
Yes
Key exclusion criteria
All volunteers will be requested to answer a screening questionnaire. This will not be reimbursed.

Exclusion criteria include:
1. Women lactating or pregnant
2. Definable gastrointestinal disorder based on the ROME questionnaire componenet of the screening questionnaire. .
3. Presence of overt organic anorectal disorder
4. Medications that alter motility of the GI tract such as loperamide.
5. History of anorectal or distal colon surgery.
6. History of complicated delivery
7. Previous anorectal physiological testing.
8. Patients with a history of psychological illness or condition such as to interfere with the patient’s ability to understand the requirements of the study. Psychological illness or condition will be assessed by: (1) HAD, (2) screening questionnaire questions about medical conditions, current medications, and (3) brief physician interview and discussion of PISCF before patients consent

Study design
Purpose
Screening
Duration
Cross-sectional
Selection
Convenience sample
Timing
Prospective
Statistical methods / analysis
For the primary aim, there is no hypothesis to test so statistical power considerations do not apply. A sufficiently large sample is however needed to estimate the standard deviation accurately. A sample size >30 is typically considered large enough for small random sampling variations to be smoothed out and a sample size of 40 is proposed.

For the secondary aims of sensory testing, the smallest clinically relevant correlation between measurements obtained by the two methods is defined as 0.5 (Pearson correlation). To achieve statistical power 0.8 at the 0.01 level of statistical significance requires n=40 individuals.
For the secondary aim of dyssynergic defecation, sample size requirements for a dichotomous measure are typically larger than for quantitative measures. For a difference between discordant pair probabilities of 0.2, n=120 patients are required to achieve statistical power 0.8 at the 0.05 level of statistical significance. We are aware that this may not be achievable in this study but this being a secondary aim we deem this reasonable.

Normal range determination will employ Normal theory to estimate the range of values either side of the sample mean within which 95% of individuals are expected to fall. If the measure follows an approximately Normal distribution this is known to be +- 2 standard deviations either side of the sample mean (more precisely -1.96 < z < +1.96 on a Unit Normal scale). If the measure’s distribution is substantially non-Normal the measure will first be transformed to an approximately Normal distribution, normal range boundaries established then those boundaries back-transformed to the original scale. In the case of a log-transformed measure this would be similar to the geometric mean.

For the secondary aim of sensory testing, measurements taken by the two procedures considered are hypothesized to be highly proportional rather than to agree numerically. Statistical analysis will therefore focus on correlations between measurements taken by the two methods.
For the secondary aim of defining dyssnergic defecation, concordance of diagnosis according to the two methods will be assessed using McNemar’s test and described using the Kappa coefficient of concordance

Recruitment
Recruitment status
Recruiting
Date of first participant enrolment
Anticipated
1/04/2016
Actual
1/11/2016
Date of last participant enrolment
Anticipated
31/12/2019
Actual
Date of last data collection
Anticipated
31/12/2019
Actual
Sample size
Target
80
Accrual to date
44
Final
Recruitment in Australia
Recruitment state(s)
NSW
Recruitment hospital [1] 5415 0
Royal North Shore Hospital - St Leonards
Recruitment postcode(s) [1] 12905 0
2065 - St Leonards

Funding & Sponsors
Funding source category [1] 293079 0
Hospital
Name [1] 293079 0
Royal North Shore Hospital (Public)
Country [1] 293079 0
Australia
Primary sponsor type
Government body
Name
Northern Sydney Local Health District
Address
Royal North Shore Hospital
Reserve Road
St Leonards, NSW 2065
Country
Australia
Secondary sponsor category [1] 291864 0
None
Name [1] 291864 0
None
Address [1] 291864 0
None
Country [1] 291864 0

Ethics approval
Ethics application status
Approved
Ethics committee name [1] 294589 0
Northern Sydney Local Health District HREC
Ethics committee address [1] 294589 0
Ethics committee country [1] 294589 0
Australia
Date submitted for ethics approval [1] 294589 0
15/01/2016
Approval date [1] 294589 0
08/02/2016
Ethics approval number [1] 294589 0
NSLHD reference RESP/15/347

Summary
Brief summary
Constipation and faecal incontinence (FI) are major health problems associated with significant personal and economic burden. First line treatment for these disorders is conservative and includes dietary modification and medication. If these fail, current guidelines recommend assessing physiological abnormalities by anorectal manometry (ARM) and balloon expulsion testing (BET). The results of these are then used to guide further management of the patients, including biofeedback therapy, neuromodulation and surgical interventions.
Given the central role of ARM, a relative surprisingly lack of standardization is apparent in the literature. Factors such as catheter type, study protocol and analysis of results vary widely. With regards to FI, a wide range of values is reported as ‘normal’ for anal sphincter function, and experts recommend that each unit have their own range of values for defining abnormalities. For patients with constipation, ARM and BET are required for diagnosing dyssenrgic defecation, which has been shown to be a strong predictor of biofeedback success. Nevertheless, making this diagnosis, which includes evidence of an uncoordinated defection manoeuvre, is controversial at best, with conflicting data on the specifics of the procedure and diagnosis.
The sensory component of the defecation process is also slowly being elucidated. Whereas patients with constipation may display rectal hyposensitivity, patients with FI may display either hypo or hyper sensitivity. This may have implications for the treatment of these disorders, as anorectal biofeedback can be used to teach patients how to modulate their sensory thresholds, leading to improved outcomes. Notwithstanding, how best to assess for these rectal sensory abnormalities, and what are the normal cut-offs that should be used, is still unclear.
We thus aim to describe the normal sensorimotor physiology as assessed by ARM in healthy volunteers. Specifically, we aim to (1) establish normal range of values for our specific equipment and protocol and (2) evaluate comparative methods for assessing sensorimotor function. These results will be used to enhance our ability to define normal and abnormal defecatory physiology and help treat future patients with these distressing chronic conditions.
Trial website
Trial related presentations / publications
Public notes
Study Ad:

Normal Volunteers Needed
We are conducting a study on normal bowel function.
The study involves one hour of testing.
Females aged between 20 and 75 years are required.
If you are in good general health, without symptoms, are not pregnant or breastfeeding, and are interested in participating, please contact the following number 02 94632460
You will be reimbursed for your time.

Contacts
Principal investigator
Name 64282 0
Dr Allison Malcolm
Address 64282 0
Gastroenterology Department
Royal North Shore Hospital,
Reserve Road
St Leonards, NSW 2065
Country 64282 0
Australia
Phone 64282 0
+61296432450
Fax 64282 0
+61294632041
Email 64282 0
[email protected]
Contact person for public queries
Name 64283 0
Dr Allison Malcom
Address 64283 0
Gastroenterology Department
Royal North Shore Hospital,
Reserve Road
St Leonards, NSW 2065
Country 64283 0
Australia
Phone 64283 0
+61296432450
Fax 64283 0
+61294632041
Email 64283 0
[email protected]
Contact person for scientific queries
Name 64284 0
Dr Yoav Mazor
Address 64284 0
Gastroenterology Department
Royal North Shore Hospital,
Reserve Road
St Leonards, NSW 2065
Country 64284 0
Australia
Phone 64284 0
+61294632460
Fax 64284 0
+61294632041
Email 64284 0
[email protected]

Data sharing statement
Will individual participant data (IPD) for this trial be available (including data dictionaries)?
No
No/undecided IPD sharing reason/comment
As per ethics, only investigators will have access to patient data. Furthermore, the coding used in our raw data is specific to our unit and will unable to be interpreted by others.


What supporting documents are/will be available?

No Supporting Document Provided



Results publications and other study-related documents

Documents added manually
No documents have been uploaded by study researchers.

Documents added automatically
SourceTitleYear of PublicationDOI
EmbaseAnorectal physiology in health: A randomized trial to determine the optimum catheter for the balloon expulsion test.2019https://dx.doi.org/10.1111/nmo.13552
N.B. These documents automatically identified may not have been verified by the study sponsor.