Please note that the copy function is not enabled for this field.
If you wish to
modify
existing outcomes, please copy and paste the current outcome text into the Update field.
LOGIN
CREATE ACCOUNT
LOGIN
CREATE ACCOUNT
MY TRIALS
REGISTER TRIAL
FAQs
HINTS AND TIPS
DEFINITIONS
Trial Review
The ANZCTR website will be unavailable from 1pm until 3pm (AEDT) on Wednesday the 30th of October for website maintenance. Please be sure to log out of the system in order to avoid any loss of data.
The safety and scientific validity of this study is the responsibility of the study sponsor and investigators. Listing a study does not mean it has been endorsed by the ANZCTR. Before participating in a study, talk to your health care provider and refer to this
information for consumers
Download to PDF
Trial registered on ANZCTR
Registration number
ACTRN12616000356460
Ethics application status
Approved
Date submitted
10/03/2016
Date registered
18/03/2016
Date last updated
8/01/2020
Date data sharing statement initially provided
17/01/2019
Type of registration
Prospectively registered
Titles & IDs
Public title
Comparing the Old with the New: Randomised controlled trial of three different treatments for mild to moderate impetigo in children
Query!
Scientific title
Randomised controlled trial assessing the efficacy of topical fusidic acid and topical hydrogen peroxide cream for mild impetigo in school children.
Query!
Secondary ID [1]
288728
0
none
Query!
Universal Trial Number (UTN)
Query!
Trial acronym
Query!
Linked study record
Query!
Health condition
Health condition(s) or problem(s) studied:
Impetigo
297969
0
Query!
Condition category
Condition code
Infection
298126
298126
0
0
Query!
Other infectious diseases
Query!
Skin
298159
298159
0
0
Query!
Dermatological conditions
Query!
Intervention/exposure
Study type
Interventional
Query!
Description of intervention(s) / exposure
The intervention will be randomised between 3 possible interventions described below; children with 3 or less impetigo lesions will be enrolled and all lesions will be managed
1. Topical fusidic acid ointment 2% twice a day for 5 days - Fusidic acid 2% ointment (15g tube supplied) with single occasion wound cleaning by a nurse and topical fusidic acid ointment applied to each lesion then covered with occlusive dressing. Ongoing twice daily ointment and dressings twice daily will be done by parent/carer with instructions supplied with no adherence monitoring other than verbal review with nurse on Day 2 and day 7
Intervention 2. Topical hydrogen peroxide 1% (10g tube) applied twice a day for 5 days. Initial wound cleaning by nurse and H2O2 cream applied to each lesion then covered with an occlusive dressing. The topical antiseptic and sufficient dressings will be supplied to the family along with instructions with no adherence monitoring other than verbal review with nurse on Day 2 and day 7
Intervention 3: Wound care: the wound will be cleansed, scab softened and removed where possible, then covered with an occlusive dressing. Sufficient dressings will be supplied to the family along with instructions to cleanse and reapply dressing twice a day for 5 days with no adherence monitoring other than verbal review with nurse on Day 2 and day 7.
Assessment of lesions will be done ongoing at day 2 and day 7 after enrollment
Query!
Intervention code [1]
294166
0
Treatment: Drugs
Query!
Comparator / control treatment
Simple wound care: the wound will be cleansed, scab softened and removed where possible, then covered with an occlusive dressing. Sufficient dressings will be supplied to the family along with instructions to cleanse and reapply dressing twice a day for 5 days.
Query!
Control group
Active
Query!
Outcomes
Primary outcome [1]
297631
0
The primary outcome is treatment success as evaluated by review of digital images on day 0-7.
Independent reviewers (clinician including paediatrician x4, dermatologist x2) masked to treatment allocation will compare digital images of skin lesions from days 0 and 7. The order of the images when reviewed will be randomly assigned to ensure further blinding. Outcomes will be scored as success if they have healed or improved and failure if same or worse, or if the reviewer was unable to determine success or failure compared to day 0. Assessment criteria will be adapted from trial and methodology published by Bowen et al. Lancet ID 2014 Dec 13;384(9960):2132-40.
Query!
Assessment method [1]
297631
0
Query!
Timepoint [1]
297631
0
Primary time endpoint is outcome at Day 7
Digital images of skin lesions will be taken on Days 0 and 7
Query!
Secondary outcome [1]
321646
0
Secondary outcome
Number of treatment failures on both Day 2 and Day 7
This includes children assessed as needing change management of lesions such as escalation to oral antibiotics, visiting their general practitioner for concerns over the skin infection, or admission to hospital or medical review.
.
Query!
Assessment method [1]
321646
0
Query!
Timepoint [1]
321646
0
Treatment failures will be assessed by clinical review at day 2 and day 7 post treatment commencement by school/study nurse.
Query!
Secondary outcome [2]
321863
0
Clinical success at Day 7 based on nurse assessment using clinical notes, lesion size, patient report and clinical nursing assessment
Query!
Assessment method [2]
321863
0
Query!
Timepoint [2]
321863
0
Clinical success will be assessed by clinical review (at day 2) and day 7 post treatment commencement by school/study nurse.
Query!
Secondary outcome [3]
321864
0
Secondary outcome microbiologic based on detection of skin pathogens at Day 0 and Day 7 and comparison of antibiograms of isolated S.aureus and S.pyogenes from skin swabs
Query!
Assessment method [3]
321864
0
Query!
Timepoint [3]
321864
0
Swabs and cultured Day 0 and Day 7 of a single lesion
Query!
Eligibility
Key inclusion criteria
Consented children aged 5-13 years presenting with primary non-bullous impetigo in participating schools who currently are part of sore throat national programme to prevent rheumatic fever and have on site school nurses for this programme.
Query!
Minimum age
5
Years
Query!
Query!
Maximum age
13
Years
Query!
Query!
Sex
Both males and females
Query!
Can healthy volunteers participate?
No
Query!
Key exclusion criteria
Immunocompromised, extensive lesions (>3) requiring oral antibiotics at presentation, known allergy to study drugs, cellulitis, temperature >38.5 C, patients who had used topical or oral antibiotics in the previous 5 days, and patients for whom informed consent is not obtained. T
Query!
Study design
Purpose of the study
Treatment
Query!
Allocation to intervention
Randomised controlled trial
Query!
Procedure for enrolling a subject and allocating the treatment (allocation concealment procedures)
central randomisation by phone and computer
Query!
Methods used to generate the sequence in which subjects will be randomised (sequence generation)
simple randomisation using computer generation
Query!
Masking / blinding
Blinded (masking used)
Query!
Who is / are masked / blinded?
The people assessing the outcomes
Query!
Query!
Query!
Query!
Intervention assignment
Parallel
Query!
Other design features
non inferiority
Query!
Phase
Phase 4
Query!
Type of endpoint/s
Efficacy
Query!
Statistical methods / analysis
To show no difference between treatment regimens and a predicted fusidic acid efficacy of 75% (as per previous published trials)we calculated that 160 participants per group are required: 480 children in total
This would provide 80% power and a one-sided a=0.05 to show non-inferiority (10% margin) between the groups
Query!
Recruitment
Recruitment status
Recruiting
Query!
Date of first participant enrolment
Anticipated
6/03/2017
Query!
Actual
4/09/2017
Query!
Date of last participant enrolment
Anticipated
30/03/2020
Query!
Actual
Query!
Date of last data collection
Anticipated
Query!
Actual
Query!
Sample size
Target
480
Query!
Accrual to date
400
Query!
Final
Query!
Recruitment outside Australia
Country [1]
7664
0
New Zealand
Query!
State/province [1]
7664
0
Query!
Funding & Sponsors
Funding source category [1]
293080
0
Charities/Societies/Foundations
Query!
Name [1]
293080
0
Cure Kids
Query!
Address [1]
293080
0
PO Box 90 907
Victoria Street West
Auckland 1142
Query!
Country [1]
293080
0
New Zealand
Query!
Primary sponsor type
Individual
Query!
Name
Dr Alison Leversha
Query!
Address
Community Child Health and Disability Services
Starship Children’s Health
2 Park Road
Grafton
Auckland 1023
Query!
Country
New Zealand
Query!
Secondary sponsor category [1]
291865
0
Other Collaborative groups
Query!
Name [1]
291865
0
NZ Wound Care Society
Query!
Address [1]
291865
0
Contact via Administrator
74 Fergusson Road, RD9
Fielding
4779
New Zealand
Query!
Country [1]
291865
0
New Zealand
Query!
Secondary sponsor category [2]
301397
0
Charities/Societies/Foundations
Query!
Name [2]
301397
0
A+ Trust
Query!
Address [2]
301397
0
ADHB Research Office,
Level 14, Support Building
Auckland City Hospital
Grafton
Auckland 1023
Query!
Country [2]
301397
0
New Zealand
Query!
Ethics approval
Ethics application status
Approved
Query!
Ethics committee name [1]
294590
0
Health and Disability Ethics committee
Query!
Ethics committee address [1]
294590
0
Ministry of Health Ethics Department Freyberg Building Reception – Ground Floor 20 Aitken Street Wellington 6011
Query!
Ethics committee country [1]
294590
0
New Zealand
Query!
Date submitted for ethics approval [1]
294590
0
21/03/2016
Query!
Approval date [1]
294590
0
26/10/2016
Query!
Ethics approval number [1]
294590
0
16/NTA/113
Query!
Summary
Brief summary
Skin sepsis is a common problem among children and severe skin infections are the most common reason for hospitalisation in NZ children. Pacific and Maori children are more likely to develop cellulitis than their NZ European counterparts and hospital admissions for skin sepsis occur at more than twice the rate in NZ compared with other developed countries. Evidence-based clinical guidelines for the treatment of mild to moderate impetigo recommend the use of fusidic acid cream, currently funded topical antimicrobial in NZ. Recent data, however, have identified a high rate of community resistance to this medication amongst Staphylococcus aureus (SA) ; resistance >30%. This is linked to widespread community use of this topical antibiotic. The evidence base for alternative treatment strategies for mild impetigo is limited and judicious use of topical antibacterials is needed. Alternative therapies must be urgently found to prevent increasing resistance. The overall aim of the research is to compare two alternative treatments with the current standard of care treatment for mild-to-moderate impetigo among school children. Aims To undertake a non-inferiority trial comparing topical fusidic acid with (i) topical hydrogen peroxide, and (ii) with simple wound care in a community with both high rates of impetigo and increasing fusidic acid resistance. The results of this trial will inform evidence-based skin infection guidelines locally, nationally, and internationally including funding of best treatments.
Query!
Trial website
none
Query!
Trial related presentations / publications
None
Query!
Public notes
Query!
Contacts
Principal investigator
Name
64286
0
Dr Alison Leversha
Query!
Address
64286
0
Community Child Health and Disability Services
Starship Children’s Health
Park Road Grafton
Auckland 1023
Query!
Country
64286
0
New Zealand
Query!
Phone
64286
0
+64 9 307 4949
Query!
Fax
64286
0
Query!
Email
64286
0
[email protected]
Query!
Contact person for public queries
Name
64287
0
Alison Leversha
Query!
Address
64287
0
Community Child Health and Disability Services
Starship Children’s Health
Park Road Grafton
Auckland 1023
Query!
Country
64287
0
New Zealand
Query!
Phone
64287
0
+64 9 307 4949
Query!
Fax
64287
0
Query!
Email
64287
0
[email protected]
Query!
Contact person for scientific queries
Name
64288
0
Alison Leversha
Query!
Address
64288
0
Community Child Health and Disability Services
Starship Children’s Health
Park Road Grafton
Auckland 1023
Query!
Country
64288
0
New Zealand
Query!
Phone
64288
0
+ 64 9 3074949
Query!
Fax
64288
0
Query!
Email
64288
0
[email protected]
Query!
Data sharing statement
Will individual participant data (IPD) for this trial be available (including data dictionaries)?
Yes
Query!
What data in particular will be shared?
Indvidual anonymised data on primary outcome and microbiology
Query!
When will data be available (start and end dates)?
Approximately Jan 2020- Jan 2025
Query!
Available to whom?
Researchers in relevant fields
Query!
Available for what types of analyses?
To be discussed
Query!
How or where can data be obtained?
On request to Primary named researcher
Query!
What supporting documents are/will be available?
No Supporting Document Provided
Results publications and other study-related documents
Documents added manually
No documents have been uploaded by study researchers.
Documents added automatically
Source
Title
Year of Publication
DOI
Embase
Impetigo: A need for new therapies in a world of increasing antimicrobial resistance.
2018
https://dx.doi.org/10.1111/jcpt.12639
Embase
Treatment of Impetigo with Antiseptics-Replacing Antibiotics (TIARA) trial: a single blind randomised controlled trial in school health clinics within socioeconomically disadvantaged communities in New Zealand.
2022
https://dx.doi.org/10.1186/s13063-022-06042-0
N.B. These documents automatically identified may not have been verified by the study sponsor.
Download to PDF