Please note that the copy function is not enabled for this field.
If you wish to
modify
existing outcomes, please copy and paste the current outcome text into the Update field.
LOGIN
CREATE ACCOUNT
LOGIN
CREATE ACCOUNT
MY TRIALS
REGISTER TRIAL
FAQs
HINTS AND TIPS
DEFINITIONS
Trial Review
The ANZCTR website will be unavailable from 1pm until 3pm (AEDT) on Wednesday the 30th of October for website maintenance. Please be sure to log out of the system in order to avoid any loss of data.
The safety and scientific validity of this study is the responsibility of the study sponsor and investigators. Listing a study does not mean it has been endorsed by the ANZCTR. Before participating in a study, talk to your health care provider and refer to this
information for consumers
Download to PDF
Trial registered on ANZCTR
Registration number
ACTRN12616000358448
Ethics application status
Approved
Date submitted
15/03/2016
Date registered
21/03/2016
Date last updated
27/02/2017
Type of registration
Prospectively registered
Titles & IDs
Public title
Can an emailed questionnaire successfully ascertain information about falls in people over 60 years?
Query!
Scientific title
The Tasmanian electronic falls ascertainment tool (TASeFALL) – pilot study: Evaluating the efficacy of an email format falls questionnaire for improving response rates in older people attending a blood pressure clinic.
Query!
Secondary ID [1]
288768
0
None
Query!
Secondary ID [2]
288792
0
Nil known
Query!
Universal Trial Number (UTN)
Query!
Trial acronym
TASeFALL
Query!
Linked study record
Query!
Health condition
Health condition(s) or problem(s) studied:
falls
298029
0
Query!
Condition category
Condition code
Public Health
298183
298183
0
0
Query!
Epidemiology
Query!
Injuries and Accidents
298217
298217
0
0
Query!
Other injuries and accidents
Query!
Intervention/exposure
Study type
Interventional
Query!
Description of intervention(s) / exposure
Intervention group: The intervention group will receive the a questionnaire about falls (type, location, time and injury) and their circumstances that will be sent by email each month (TASeFALL). The responses and number of reminder emails sent will be automatically recorded in a database. Reminder emails will be sent every 3 days.
Query!
Intervention code [1]
294209
0
Diagnosis / Prognosis
Query!
Comparator / control treatment
Control (Usual approach) group: The control group will be sent a paper-based falls questionnaire (modified version of the falls questionnaire in Lord et al Fall in Older People Cambridge Press 2004) each month asking the same questions as the email questionnaire. They will post this back each month with the daily falls calendar. Participants will be telephoned if they do not return the questionnaire or daily falls calendar. This will occur 2 weeks after the questionnaire has been sent.
Query!
Control group
Active
Query!
Outcomes
Primary outcome [1]
297688
0
Number of reminders to answer the questionnaires: Number of telephone calls (paper-based questionnaire group) or number of email reminders (TASeFALL group)
Query!
Assessment method [1]
297688
0
Query!
Timepoint [1]
297688
0
12 months
Query!
Secondary outcome [1]
321842
0
Cost of each method: Total costs of postage, envelopes, stationary and research assistant time will be done by review of study cost records.
Query!
Assessment method [1]
321842
0
Query!
Timepoint [1]
321842
0
12 months
Query!
Secondary outcome [2]
321843
0
Acceptability and usability of each method will be assessed with a modified version of the System Usability Scale
Query!
Assessment method [2]
321843
0
Query!
Timepoint [2]
321843
0
12 months
Query!
Secondary outcome [3]
321844
0
Response proportion = number who participated in the study/number eligible
Query!
Assessment method [3]
321844
0
Query!
Timepoint [3]
321844
0
After recruitment of 80 participants
Query!
Secondary outcome [4]
321845
0
Reason for non-participation=number with no email access; number with dementia; number with severe visual impairment; number refused
Query!
Assessment method [4]
321845
0
Query!
Timepoint [4]
321845
0
End of recruitment
Query!
Eligibility
Key inclusion criteria
>=60 years
Attending the Menzies Institute for Medical Research Blood Pressure Clinic
Query!
Minimum age
60
Years
Query!
Query!
Maximum age
No limit
Query!
Query!
Sex
Both males and females
Query!
Can healthy volunteers participate?
Yes
Query!
Key exclusion criteria
Exclusion criteria: Dementia (Self-reported history of dementia or less than 18/30 on the Montreal Cognitive Assessment (MOCA) – routinely obtained at the blood pressure clinic); no email access or severe visual impairment so as unable to complete a questionnaire.
Query!
Study design
Purpose of the study
Diagnosis
Query!
Allocation to intervention
Randomised controlled trial
Query!
Procedure for enrolling a subject and allocating the treatment (allocation concealment procedures)
sealed opaque envelopes
Query!
Methods used to generate the sequence in which subjects will be randomised (sequence generation)
Simple randomisation using a randomisation table created by computer software.
Permuted block
Query!
Masking / blinding
Blinded (masking used)
Query!
Who is / are masked / blinded?
The people assessing the outcomes
The people analysing the results/data
Query!
Query!
Query!
Query!
Intervention assignment
Parallel
Query!
Other design features
Query!
Phase
Not Applicable
Query!
Type of endpoint/s
Efficacy
Query!
Statistical methods / analysis
The main outcomes of this study relate to feasibility of TASeFALL. This will be achieved by reporting the response proportion and numbers and reasons that participants were ineligible . For each group descriptive data will be used to describe participant characteristics, number of reminders required to obtain falls data, costs and participant acceptability of each method.
Query!
Recruitment
Recruitment status
Recruiting
Query!
Date of first participant enrolment
Anticipated
25/04/2016
Query!
Actual
6/05/2016
Query!
Date of last participant enrolment
Anticipated
4/05/2017
Query!
Actual
Query!
Date of last data collection
Anticipated
Query!
Actual
Query!
Sample size
Target
80
Query!
Accrual to date
Query!
Final
Query!
Recruitment in Australia
Recruitment state(s)
TAS
Query!
Funding & Sponsors
Funding source category [1]
293133
0
Charities/Societies/Foundations
Query!
Name [1]
293133
0
Royal Hobart Hospital Research Foundation
Query!
Address [1]
293133
0
17 Liverpool Street, Hobart, Tasmania 7000
Query!
Country [1]
293133
0
Australia
Query!
Primary sponsor type
Individual
Query!
Name
Michele Callisaya
Query!
Address
Menzies Institute for Medical Research
17 Liverpool Street
Hobart, Tasmania 7000
Query!
Country
Australia
Query!
Secondary sponsor category [1]
291928
0
None
Query!
Name [1]
291928
0
Query!
Address [1]
291928
0
Query!
Country [1]
291928
0
Query!
Ethics approval
Ethics application status
Approved
Query!
Ethics committee name [1]
294631
0
Tasmanian Human Research Ethics Committee
Query!
Ethics committee address [1]
294631
0
Private Bag 01 Hobart Tasmania 7001
Query!
Ethics committee country [1]
294631
0
Australia
Query!
Date submitted for ethics approval [1]
294631
0
14/12/2011
Query!
Approval date [1]
294631
0
15/03/2016
Query!
Ethics approval number [1]
294631
0
H0015459
Query!
Summary
Brief summary
Over 40% of older people living in the community fall each year. In clinical practice, recent guidelines recommend that older people be regularly asked about falls and their circumstances. Ascertaining falls is also important to measure the success of any intervention. In research settings previous studies have found that asking about falls 3- or 12-monthly results in under reporting of falls compared with a daily calendar returned monthly with telephone or paper-based questionnaire follow-up to determine the circumstances of falls. This method of a daily falls calendar and monthly follow-up by questionnaire or telephone call has been well validated and is now considered to be the gold standard in falls ascertainment. However, this method is labour and cost intensive as every month there are postage costs, need to manually check that the calendar has been returned (previous studies have reported 30% need follow-up), telephoning to determine circumstances of falls and data or medical file entry by a research assistant or clinician. Therefore there is an important need to improve the way falls ascertainment is conducted. We aim to undertake the world first testing of a novel emailed electronic falls ascertainment tool (TASeFALL) that reminds participants to complete the electronic questionnaire, with responses automatically fed into a database or clinicians email.
Query!
Trial website
No
Query!
Trial related presentations / publications
Nil
Query!
Public notes
Nil
Query!
Contacts
Principal investigator
Name
64418
0
Dr Michele Callisaya
Query!
Address
64418
0
Menzies Institute for Medical Research
University of Tasmania
17 Liverpool Street
Hobart Tasmania 7000
Query!
Country
64418
0
Australia
Query!
Phone
64418
0
+61 3 6226 4785
Query!
Fax
64418
0
Query!
Email
64418
0
[email protected]
Query!
Contact person for public queries
Name
64419
0
Michele Callisaya
Query!
Address
64419
0
Menzies Institute for Medical Research
University of Tasmania
17 Liverpool Street
Hobart Tasmania 7000
Query!
Country
64419
0
Australia
Query!
Phone
64419
0
+61 3 6226 4785
Query!
Fax
64419
0
Query!
Email
64419
0
[email protected]
Query!
Contact person for scientific queries
Name
64420
0
Michele Callisaya
Query!
Address
64420
0
Menzies Institute for Medical Research
University of Tasmania
17 Liverpool Street
Hobart Tasmania 7000
Query!
Country
64420
0
Australia
Query!
Phone
64420
0
+61 3 62264785
Query!
Fax
64420
0
Query!
Email
64420
0
[email protected]
Query!
No information has been provided regarding IPD availability
What supporting documents are/will be available?
No Supporting Document Provided
Results publications and other study-related documents
Documents added manually
No documents have been uploaded by study researchers.
Documents added automatically
No additional documents have been identified.
Download to PDF