Please note that the copy function is not enabled for this field.
If you wish to
modify
existing outcomes, please copy and paste the current outcome text into the Update field.
LOGIN
CREATE ACCOUNT
LOGIN
CREATE ACCOUNT
MY TRIALS
REGISTER TRIAL
FAQs
HINTS AND TIPS
DEFINITIONS
Trial Review
The ANZCTR website will be unavailable from 1pm until 3pm (AEDT) on Wednesday the 30th of October for website maintenance. Please be sure to log out of the system in order to avoid any loss of data.
The safety and scientific validity of this study is the responsibility of the study sponsor and investigators. Listing a study does not mean it has been endorsed by the ANZCTR. Before participating in a study, talk to your health care provider and refer to this
information for consumers
Download to PDF
Trial registered on ANZCTR
Registration number
ACTRN12616000467437
Ethics application status
Approved
Date submitted
18/03/2016
Date registered
8/04/2016
Date last updated
22/03/2017
Type of registration
Prospectively registered
Titles & IDs
Public title
Further enabling care at home for people living with dementia
Query!
Scientific title
Further Enabling Care at Home for people with dementia discharged home from hospital: A randomised controlled trial of a family carer support program
Query!
Secondary ID [1]
288788
0
Nil known
Query!
Universal Trial Number (UTN)
Query!
Trial acronym
Query!
Linked study record
Query!
Health condition
Health condition(s) or problem(s) studied:
Dementia
298055
0
Query!
Condition category
Condition code
Neurological
298232
298232
0
0
Query!
Dementias
Query!
Intervention/exposure
Study type
Interventional
Query!
Description of intervention(s) / exposure
There are three steps to the intervention; each one is implemented by the Further Enabling Care at Home nurse. This nurse needs to be experienced in the care of people living with dementia and the support of their family carers and requires a background in acute care for people living with dementia with medical comorbidities. A two-day training course is also provided to familiarise the nurse with the Further Enabling Care at Home program protocols. This training is face-to-face and one-on-one; it is provided by up to three members of the investigating team with relevant expertise and covers (a) structure of the Further Enabling Care at Home program, (b) assessing caregivers' support needs, (c) identifying existing services and how these may be accessed, and (d) record keeping.
First the Further Enabling Care at Home nurse contacts the carer by telephone within 6-10 days of the discharge from hospital of the person living with dementia (ie, the care recipient). This contact is for the nurse to make a telephone appointment – during the following week - for establishing and addressing the carer’s support needs. Immediately following this, preliminary, call the nurse provides the carer with a copy of the Carer Support Needs Assessment Tool(1) to be used during the next appointment, so that the carer has time to reflect upon the questions. This first call takes approximately 10-15 minutes.
Second, the nurse telephones at the appointed time and administers the Carer Support Needs Assessment Tool(1), also addressing up to three needs identified as priorities by the carer - guiding the carer’s access to appropriate existing services. This step is supported by the Further Enabling Care at Home manual, developed during an earlier study.(2) This appointment can be expected to take at least 30 minutes and may take longer or need to involve ‘call backs’.
Finally, at two time points – 4 weeks after the discharge and 8 weeks after the discharge -the nurse telephones to check the carer’s access to services as planned, advising of alternative strategies if access has proved problematic. Each of these two sessions can be expected to last for approximately 15 minutes.
Adherence to these steps will be examined as part of process evaluation, which will also inform calculation of costs of the intervention. Each contact will be recorded in a database that records the timing of the contact with respect to the discharge date, the length of the contact, and services recommended/accessed. Barriers to/facilitators of service access will also be recorded.
1. Ewing G, Grande G. The Carer Support Needs Assessment Tool (CSNAT) for end-of-life care practice at home: A qualitative study. Palliative Medicine. 2013;27(3):244-56.
2. Toye C, Moorin R, Slatyer S, Aoun S, Parsons R, Hill, K. Protocol for randomised controlled trial of an outreach support program …BMC Geriatr June 25 2015; 15:70
Query!
Intervention code [1]
294251
0
Behaviour
Query!
Intervention code [2]
294411
0
Treatment: Other
Query!
Comparator / control treatment
Usual discharge care..
Usual discharge includes a letter from the hospital doctor to the GP (ie, family doctor - copy to patient), medications organised. ‘At risk’ carers - determined via social workers' evaluation - have social work assessment/links to services. Patients may be linked with care programs. Carers information packs are available.
Query!
Control group
Active
Query!
Outcomes
Primary outcome [1]
297718
0
The primary outcome is carers' preparedness for caregiving, to be measured with the Preparedness for Caregiving Scale (PCS)(1)
Reference:
. 1. Archbold PG, Stewart BJ, Greenlick MR, Harvath T. Mutuality and preparedness as predictors of caregiver role strain. Research in Nursing & Health. 1990;13(6):375-84.
Query!
Assessment method [1]
297718
0
Query!
Timepoint [1]
297718
0
Time 1 (T1) will be up to 5 days after discharge, T2 will be 5 weeks after discharge, T3 will be 10 weeks after discharge. Preparedness will be measured at all time points.
Query!
Secondary outcome [1]
322050
0
Carers' caregiving appraisal scores will be documented using the Family Appraisal of Caregiving Questionnaire (2)
Reference:
2. Cooper B, Kinsella GJ, et al. Development and initial validation of a family appraisal of caregiving questionnaire for palliative care, Psychooncology 2006; 15(7):613.
Query!
Assessment method [1]
322050
0
Query!
Timepoint [1]
322050
0
Up to 5 days after discharge, 5 weeks after discharge, 10 weeks after discharge.
Query!
Secondary outcome [2]
322051
0
Carer health will be measured using the Optum SF-12v2 Health Survey
Query!
Assessment method [2]
322051
0
Query!
Timepoint [2]
322051
0
Up to 5 days after discharge, 5 weeks after discharge, 10 weeks after discharge.
Query!
Secondary outcome [3]
322052
0
Patients' emergency department attendance will be established from carers' reports
Query!
Assessment method [3]
322052
0
Query!
Timepoint [3]
322052
0
Within 10 weeks post-discharge
Query!
Secondary outcome [4]
322053
0
Patients' re-hospitalizations (and associated length of stay) will be established from carers' reports
Query!
Assessment method [4]
322053
0
Query!
Timepoint [4]
322053
0
Within 10 weeks of discharge
Query!
Secondary outcome [5]
322054
0
Patients' admissions into residential care will be established from carer reports
Query!
Assessment method [5]
322054
0
Query!
Timepoint [5]
322054
0
Within 10 weeks of discharge
Query!
Secondary outcome [6]
322055
0
Patients' use of ambulance services will be documented from carers' reports
Query!
Assessment method [6]
322055
0
Query!
Timepoint [6]
322055
0
Within 10 weeks of discharge
Query!
Secondary outcome [7]
322583
0
Experiences of the intervention
Query!
Assessment method [7]
322583
0
Query!
Timepoint [7]
322583
0
Carers who have experienced the intervention will be invited to participate in a qualitative exit interview after all quantitative data collection (from them) is completed. This will be at approximately 11 weeks after the discharge.
Query!
Secondary outcome [8]
322584
0
Staff perceptions of the feasibility of translation into practice
Query!
Assessment method [8]
322584
0
Query!
Timepoint [8]
322584
0
A focus group will be held at the end of the study (ie, after all data have been collected from carers).
Query!
Eligibility
Key inclusion criteria
Patient/carer dyads when the patient has a documented diagnosis of dementia and is being discharged from the included hospital, the discharge destination is their home or that of the family carer, and when the (family) carer can speak, read, and understand English
Query!
Minimum age
18
Years
Query!
Query!
Maximum age
No limit
Query!
Query!
Sex
Both males and females
Query!
Can healthy volunteers participate?
No
Query!
Key exclusion criteria
Patient being discharged to another hospital or into residential aged care, Family carer not able to speak, read, and understand English.
Query!
Study design
Purpose of the study
Educational / counselling / training
Query!
Allocation to intervention
Randomised controlled trial
Query!
Procedure for enrolling a subject and allocating the treatment (allocation concealment procedures)
Group allocation not known to staff undertaking recruitment. The allocation involved contacting the holder of the allocation schedule at a central administration site.
Query!
Methods used to generate the sequence in which subjects will be randomised (sequence generation)
Computer generated random allocation of blocks of numbers that are also randomly selected using a computer program
Query!
Masking / blinding
Blinded (masking used)
Query!
Who is / are masked / blinded?
The people assessing the outcomes
Query!
Query!
Query!
Query!
Intervention assignment
Parallel
Query!
Other design features
Carers receiving the intervention will be interviewed to investigate feasibility/usefulness, a staff focus group will address the feasibility of translation into practice. Process evaluation will establish fidelity, carer resources accessed, barriers/facilitators related to access. Process evaluation will also inform economic analyses.
Query!
Phase
Query!
Type of endpoint/s
Query!
Statistical methods / analysis
Intention to Treat regression analyses for patients and carers. The primary outcome is the total score on the Preparedness for Caregiving Scale(1 ). An improvement of 2 points in this score is clinically relevant, given that this would mean a change such as progressing to ‘very well prepared’ from ‘well prepared’ in 25% of items. To detect a change of this magnitude with 80% power, assuming that the standard deviation of the change in mean score is approximately 0.5, as in previous work(2), 63 dyads per group will be required. Based upon our previous studies, we expect attrition of 20%, so will recruit 154 carers.
Cost consequence analysis related to costs of implementing the intervention and any changes in costs of health service use for patients in the 10-week post-discharge period.
Thematic analysis of qualitative data.(recruitment until data saturation).
1. Archbold PG, Stewart BJ, Greenlick MR, Harvath T. Mutuality and preparedness as predictors of caregiver role strain. Research in Nursing & Health. 1990;13(6):375-84.
2. Henriksson A, Andershed B, et al. Adaptation & psychometric evaluation of the Preparedness for Caregiving Scale …. Palliative Medicine. 2012;26(7):930.
Query!
Recruitment
Recruitment status
Withdrawn
Query!
Reason for early stopping/withdrawal
Lack of funding/staff/facilities
Query!
Date of first participant enrolment
Anticipated
2/05/2016
Query!
Actual
Query!
Date of last participant enrolment
Anticipated
30/03/2017
Query!
Actual
Query!
Date of last data collection
Anticipated
Query!
Actual
Query!
Sample size
Target
308
Query!
Accrual to date
Query!
Final
Query!
Recruitment in Australia
Recruitment state(s)
WA
Query!
Funding & Sponsors
Funding source category [1]
293168
0
Self funded/Unfunded
Query!
Name [1]
293168
0
Funding being sought
Query!
Address [1]
293168
0
Funding not yet sourced
Query!
Country [1]
293168
0
Query!
Primary sponsor type
Individual
Query!
Name
Christine Toye
Query!
Address
Curtin University, Kent St, Bentley Western Australia 6102
Query!
Country
Australia
Query!
Secondary sponsor category [1]
291963
0
None
Query!
Name [1]
291963
0
Query!
Address [1]
291963
0
Query!
Country [1]
291963
0
Query!
Ethics approval
Ethics application status
Approved
Query!
Ethics committee name [1]
294659
0
Sir Charles Gairdner Group Human Research Ethics Committee
Query!
Ethics committee address [1]
294659
0
Sir Charles Gairdner Hospital, Hospital Avenue, Nedlands, Western Australia, 6009
Query!
Ethics committee country [1]
294659
0
Australia
Query!
Date submitted for ethics approval [1]
294659
0
16/03/2016
Query!
Approval date [1]
294659
0
26/04/2016
Query!
Ethics approval number [1]
294659
0
Query!
Ethics committee name [2]
297264
0
Curtin University Human Research Ethics Committee
Query!
Ethics committee address [2]
297264
0
GPO Box U1987, Perth WA 6845
Query!
Ethics committee country [2]
297264
0
Australia
Query!
Date submitted for ethics approval [2]
297264
0
03/05/2016
Query!
Approval date [2]
297264
0
04/05/2016
Query!
Ethics approval number [2]
297264
0
83/2016
Query!
Summary
Brief summary
Negative outcomes for the person living with dementia and their family carer can be anticipated from inadequate carer support. The Further Enabling Care at Home program involves systematic assessment of the carer’s support needs plus guidance to access existing services. We aim to test this program with family carers of people with dementia upon hospital discharge. Objectives are to: 1. Test how well the Further Enabling Care at Home program supports preparedness to care – and subsequent caregiving sustainability - in family carers of people living with dementia. 2. Determine the feasibility of translating the program into routine practice. Hypotheses for this study are that the program will help prepare families to sustain their caregiving role and reduce hospital/residential care use by the people with dementia receiving their care; also that costs of providing the program will be outweighed by savings. Research plan The 154 included dyads will each comprise a person living with dementia being discharged home from hospital and their family carer. In a single-blind randomised controlled trial, dyads will be assigned to receive either usual care or usual care plus the new program. Data will be collected from all carers at discharge, 5 weeks post-discharge, and 10 weeks post-discharge using questionnaires administered over the telephone. The primary outcome evaluated for carers is their preparedness to provide care. Carer data will establish patients’ use of health/residential services during the 10-week period. Intention-to-treat regression analyses will determine differences in carer and patient outcomes over time associated with group assignment. Cost consequence analyses plus qualitative and process evaluations will further inform recommendations for translation into practice.
Query!
Trial website
Query!
Trial related presentations / publications
Query!
Public notes
Query!
Contacts
Principal investigator
Name
64478
0
A/Prof Christine Toye
Query!
Address
64478
0
School of Nursing, Midwifery and Paramedicine
Curtin University
GPO Box U1987
Perth
Western Australia
6845
Query!
Country
64478
0
Australia
Query!
Phone
64478
0
+61 8 9266 1756
Query!
Fax
64478
0
Query!
Email
64478
0
[email protected]
Query!
Contact person for public queries
Name
64479
0
Christine Toye
Query!
Address
64479
0
School of Nursing, Midwifery and Paramedicine
Curtin University
GPO Box U1987
Perth
Western Australia
6845
Query!
Country
64479
0
Australia
Query!
Phone
64479
0
+61 8 9266 1756
Query!
Fax
64479
0
Query!
Email
64479
0
[email protected]
Query!
Contact person for scientific queries
Name
64480
0
Christine Toye
Query!
Address
64480
0
School of Nursing, Midwifery and Paramedicine
Curtin University
GPO Box U1987
Perth
Western Australia
6845
Query!
Country
64480
0
Australia
Query!
Phone
64480
0
+61 8 9266 1756
Query!
Fax
64480
0
Query!
Email
64480
0
[email protected]
Query!
No information has been provided regarding IPD availability
What supporting documents are/will be available?
No Supporting Document Provided
Results publications and other study-related documents
Documents added manually
No documents have been uploaded by study researchers.
Documents added automatically
No additional documents have been identified.
Download to PDF