Please note that the copy function is not enabled for this field.
If you wish to
modify
existing outcomes, please copy and paste the current outcome text into the Update field.
LOGIN
CREATE ACCOUNT
LOGIN
CREATE ACCOUNT
MY TRIALS
REGISTER TRIAL
FAQs
HINTS AND TIPS
DEFINITIONS
Trial Review
The ANZCTR website will be unavailable from 1pm until 3pm (AEDT) on Wednesday the 30th of October for website maintenance. Please be sure to log out of the system in order to avoid any loss of data.
The safety and scientific validity of this study is the responsibility of the study sponsor and investigators. Listing a study does not mean it has been endorsed by the ANZCTR. Before participating in a study, talk to your health care provider and refer to this
information for consumers
Download to PDF
Trial registered on ANZCTR
Registration number
ACTRN12616000478415
Ethics application status
Approved
Date submitted
5/04/2016
Date registered
12/04/2016
Date last updated
12/04/2016
Type of registration
Retrospectively registered
Titles & IDs
Public title
Efficacy of 48-hour intravenous (IV) lidocaine infusions in open colorectal surgery.
Query!
Scientific title
Intravenous (IV) lidocaine infusions for 48 hours in open colorectal surgery: a prospective, randomised, double-blinded, placebo-controlled trial.
Query!
Secondary ID [1]
288935
0
None
Query!
Universal Trial Number (UTN)
Query!
Trial acronym
Query!
Linked study record
Query!
Health condition
Health condition(s) or problem(s) studied:
bowel cancer
298285
0
Query!
inflammatory bowel disease
298286
0
Query!
colorectal surgery
298287
0
Query!
Ileus
298321
0
Query!
Condition category
Condition code
Anaesthesiology
298419
298419
0
0
Query!
Pain management
Query!
Surgery
298443
298443
0
0
Query!
Other surgery
Query!
Intervention/exposure
Study type
Interventional
Query!
Description of intervention(s) / exposure
Patients undergoing elective open colorectal surgery were randomised into the lidocaine group or control group.
The lidocaine group received 1.5 mg/kg i.v. bolus at induction of anaesthesia immediately followed by 1 mg/kg/hr i.v. infusion for a total of 48 hours duration.
On arrival at the post-anaesthesia care unit (PACU), all patients were connected to an i.v. fentanyl patient-controlled analgesia (PCA) pump (20 mcg bolus, 5 min lockout, maximum dose 240 mcg/hr). PCA fentanyl consumption and numerical pain rating scale (NRS, 0-10) at rest were recorded by a blinded non-study nurse at 30min, 1, 2, 4, 8, 12, 24, 36, 48, 60, and 72 hours post-surgery. A blinded non-study pain physician monitored the patient daily, and adjusted the PCA dose if pain was not controlled.
Query!
Intervention code [1]
294406
0
Treatment: Drugs
Query!
Comparator / control treatment
Patients undergoing elective open colorectal surgery were randomised into the lidocaine group or control group.
The control group was administered intravenous saline infusion of equal volume to the lidocaine group. Patients were given a fentanyl opioid PCA for pain management.
Query!
Control group
Placebo
Query!
Outcomes
Primary outcome [1]
297897
0
Time to first bowel movement.
The nurse caring for the patient filled out a study-specific questionnaire form documenting time of return of first bowel movement and flatus, and adverse effects.
Query!
Assessment method [1]
297897
0
Query!
Timepoint [1]
297897
0
Time (hours) from arrival in the post-anaesthesia care unit (PACU).
Query!
Secondary outcome [1]
322568
0
Time to first flatus.
The nurse caring for the patient filled out a study-specific questionnaire form documenting time of return of first bowel movement and flatus, and adverse effects.
Query!
Assessment method [1]
322568
0
Query!
Timepoint [1]
322568
0
Time (hours) from arrival in the post-anaesthesia care unit (PACU).
Query!
Secondary outcome [2]
322569
0
Time to hospital discharge.
Duration was measured from time of beginning of surgical procedure, until the documented time of hospital discharge from the ward. This was measured by review of medical records. No specific tests were used.
Query!
Assessment method [2]
322569
0
Query!
Timepoint [2]
322569
0
Time (days) from the beginning of procedure.
Query!
Secondary outcome [3]
322570
0
Cumulative rest numerical rating scale pain scores (NRS, 0-10).
The nurse caring for the patient filled out a PCA study data form documenting the PCA opioid consumption and NRS pain scores.
Query!
Assessment method [3]
322570
0
Query!
Timepoint [3]
322570
0
NRS at rest were recorded by a blinded non-study nurse at 30min, 1, 2, 4, 8, 12, 24, 36, 48, 60, and 72 hours post-surgery.
Query!
Secondary outcome [4]
322571
0
Cumulative opioid use.
The nurse caring for the patient filled out a PCA study data form documenting the PCA opioid consumption and NRS pain scores.
Query!
Assessment method [4]
322571
0
Query!
Timepoint [4]
322571
0
PCA opioid consumption (mcg fentanyl) was recorded by a blinded non-study nurse at 30min, 1, 2, 4, 8, 12, 24, 36, 48, 60, and 72 hours post-surgery.
Query!
Secondary outcome [5]
322710
0
Adverse effects. Examples include: nausea, vomiting, itch, confusion, tremor, anxiety, and palpitations.
The nurse caring for the patient filled out a study-specific questionnaire form documenting time of return of first bowel movement and flatus, and adverse effects. No specific tools were used.
Query!
Assessment method [5]
322710
0
Query!
Timepoint [5]
322710
0
Adverse effects were documented by name and date/time. This was performed by the nurse caring for the patient, who assessed for adverse effects from the end of the procedure, every 4 hours up to 72 hours post procedure.
Query!
Eligibility
Key inclusion criteria
Patients aged 18-80 undergoing elective open colorectal surgery
Query!
Minimum age
18
Years
Query!
Query!
Maximum age
80
Years
Query!
Query!
Sex
Both males and females
Query!
Can healthy volunteers participate?
No
Query!
Key exclusion criteria
ASA classification status IV or above; liver cirrhosis; severe chronic renal impairment (serum creatinine > 200 umol L-1); pregnancy; cardiac conduction abnormalities; congestive heart failure; epilepsy; allergy to any of the study medications; opioid or alcohol abuse; and reported bowel movement frequencies greater than 3 per day, or less than 3 per week.
Query!
Study design
Purpose of the study
Treatment
Query!
Allocation to intervention
Randomised controlled trial
Query!
Procedure for enrolling a subject and allocating the treatment (allocation concealment procedures)
The allocation sequence was concealed from the study team and kept in an opaque envelope in the locked possession of the in-charge operating room nurse (not otherwise involved in the study).
Query!
Methods used to generate the sequence in which subjects will be randomised (sequence generation)
Patients were allocated into two groups (lidocaine or control) by an independent statistician using a computer-generated randomisation number list in Microsoft Excel with a 1:1 ratio.
Query!
Masking / blinding
Blinded (masking used)
Query!
Who is / are masked / blinded?
The people receiving the treatment/s
The people administering the treatment/s
The people assessing the outcomes
The people analysing the results/data
Query!
Query!
Query!
Query!
Intervention assignment
Parallel
Query!
Other design features
Placebo-controlled trial
Query!
Phase
Phase 4
Query!
Type of endpoint/s
Efficacy
Query!
Statistical methods / analysis
To detect a difference in mean time to first bowel movement of 12 hours, a sample size of 28 patients in each group was calculated as sufficient, with 80% power at a two-tailed 5% significance level. This estimation was based on a meta-analysis (Sun et al. 2012) reporting a reduction in mean time to first bowel movement by 15.1 hours. Twenty-nine patients per group were enrolled to compensate for possible dropouts.
Statistical analysis was conducted with Stata 14 (Statacorp, College Station, TX, USA). The primary outcome measure was time to first bowel movement. Secondary outcome measures were time to first flatus, duration of hospital stay, pain scores, and cumulative opioid use up to 72 hours post-operatively. The Normality of study endpoint distributions were assessed graphically and with the Shapiro–Wilk test. Normally distributed variables were reported as mean (SD) and comparisons made by calculating the mean difference and 95%CI between the lidocaine and placebo arms. Non-normally distributed data were reported as the median and inter-quartile range (IQR) and analysed using the Wilcoxon test. Post-operative pain scores and cumulative opioid use were compared between treatment arms at 1, 4, 12, 24, 48, and 72 hours post-operatively. Categorical characteristics were summed as n (%), and analysed using a chi-square or Fisher’s exact test, as appropriate. A formal comparison of the post-operative pain scores over the total duration of follow-up was made with a generalised estimating equation (GEE).
Query!
Recruitment
Recruitment status
Completed
Query!
Date of first participant enrolment
Anticipated
Query!
Actual
4/03/2014
Query!
Date of last participant enrolment
Anticipated
Query!
Actual
22/07/2015
Query!
Date of last data collection
Anticipated
Query!
Actual
Query!
Sample size
Target
56
Query!
Accrual to date
Query!
Final
58
Query!
Recruitment in Australia
Recruitment state(s)
NSW
Query!
Recruitment hospital [1]
5550
0
St Vincent's Private Hospital (Darlinghurst) - Darlinghurst
Query!
Recruitment hospital [2]
5551
0
St Vincent's Hospital (Darlinghurst) - Darlinghurst
Query!
Recruitment postcode(s) [1]
13023
0
2010 - Darlinghurst
Query!
Funding & Sponsors
Funding source category [1]
293288
0
Hospital
Query!
Name [1]
293288
0
St Vincent's Hospital Sydney Department of Anaesthesia
Query!
Address [1]
293288
0
Level 4, Aikenhead Building, St Vincent's Hospital, 390 Victoria Street, Darlinghurst NSW, Australia 2010
Query!
Country [1]
293288
0
Australia
Query!
Primary sponsor type
Hospital
Query!
Name
St Vincent's Hospital Sydney Department of Anaesthesia
Query!
Address
Level 4, Aikenhead Building, St Vincent's Hospital, 390 Victoria Street, Darlinghurst NSW, Australia 2010
Query!
Country
Australia
Query!
Secondary sponsor category [1]
292090
0
None
Query!
Name [1]
292090
0
Query!
Address [1]
292090
0
Query!
Country [1]
292090
0
Query!
Ethics approval
Ethics application status
Approved
Query!
Ethics committee name [1]
294762
0
St Vincent's Hospital HREC
Query!
Ethics committee address [1]
294762
0
St Vincent's Research Office Level 6 De Lacy Building 390 Victoria Street Darlinghurst NSW 2010
Query!
Ethics committee country [1]
294762
0
Australia
Query!
Date submitted for ethics approval [1]
294762
0
08/11/2012
Query!
Approval date [1]
294762
0
10/12/2013
Query!
Ethics approval number [1]
294762
0
HREC/12/SVH/297
Query!
Summary
Brief summary
Background Although i.v. lidocaine is used as a perioperative analgesic in abdominal surgery, evidence of efficacy in terms of surgical recovery, pain scores, and opioid use is limited. The infusion dose and duration remain unclear. This study aimed to investigate the effect of a longer low-dose 48-hour infusion regimen on these outcomes. Methods Fifty-eight adult patients undergoing elective open colorectal surgery were randomised into the lidocaine group (1.5 mg kg-1 followed by 1 mg kg-1 h-1 infusion for 48 hours) and control group (administered equal volumes of normal saline). After surgery, patients were given a patient-controlled analgesia (PCA) machine and time to first bowel movement (primary outcome) and flatus were recorded. Postoperative pain scores (numeric rating scale) and fentanyl PCA consumption were assessed for 72 post-operative hours. Results There was no significant difference in time to first bowel movement [80.1 (42.2) vs 82.5 (40.4) hours; (P=0.83)], time to first flatus [64.7 (38.5) vs 70.0 (31.2) hours; P=0.57], length of hospital stay [9 (8–13) vs 11 (9–14) days; P=0.53], nor post-operative pain scores in the lidocaine vs control arms. Cumulative opioid consumption was significantly lower in the lidocaine vs the control group from 24 hours onwards. At 72 hours, cumulative opioid consumption (mcg fentanyl) in the lidocaine group [1570 (825-3587)] was over 40% lower than in the placebo group [2730 (1778-5327); P=0.039]. Conclusion A 48-hour low-dose i.v. lidocaine infusion reduces postoperative opioid consumption. This is not associated with faster return of bowel function, hospital discharge, or lower pain scores.
Query!
Trial website
Query!
Trial related presentations / publications
Sun Y, Li T, Wang N, et al. Perioperative systemic lidocaine for postoperative analgesia and recovery after abdominal surgery: a meta-analysis of randomized controlled trials. Dis Colon Rectum 2012; 55: 1183–94.
Query!
Public notes
Query!
Contacts
Principal investigator
Name
64962
0
Dr Matthew LJ Ho
Query!
Address
64962
0
St Vincent's Hospital Sydney
390 Victoria St
Darlinghurst NSW 2010
Australia
Query!
Country
64962
0
Australia
Query!
Phone
64962
0
+612 83823200
Query!
Fax
64962
0
+612 83823981
Query!
Email
64962
0
[email protected]
Query!
Contact person for public queries
Name
64963
0
Matthew LJ Ho
Query!
Address
64963
0
St Vincent's Hospital Sydney
390 Victoria St
Darlinghurst NSW 2010
Australia
Query!
Country
64963
0
Australia
Query!
Phone
64963
0
+612 83823200
Query!
Fax
64963
0
+612 83823981
Query!
Email
64963
0
[email protected]
Query!
Contact person for scientific queries
Name
64964
0
Matthew LJ Ho
Query!
Address
64964
0
St Vincent's Hospital Sydney
390 Victoria St
Darlinghurst NSW 2010
Australia
Query!
Country
64964
0
Australia
Query!
Phone
64964
0
+612 83823200
Query!
Fax
64964
0
+612 83823981
Query!
Email
64964
0
[email protected]
Query!
No information has been provided regarding IPD availability
What supporting documents are/will be available?
No Supporting Document Provided
Results publications and other study-related documents
Documents added manually
No documents have been uploaded by study researchers.
Documents added automatically
Source
Title
Year of Publication
DOI
Embase
Intravenous lidocaine infusions for 48 hours in open colorectal surgery: A prospective, randomized, double-blinded, placebo-controlled trial.
2018
https://dx.doi.org/10.4097/kjae.2018.71.1.57
N.B. These documents automatically identified may not have been verified by the study sponsor.
Download to PDF