Please note that the copy function is not enabled for this field.
If you wish to
modify
existing outcomes, please copy and paste the current outcome text into the Update field.
LOGIN
CREATE ACCOUNT
LOGIN
CREATE ACCOUNT
MY TRIALS
REGISTER TRIAL
FAQs
HINTS AND TIPS
DEFINITIONS
Trial Review
The ANZCTR website will be unavailable from 1pm until 3pm (AEDT) on Wednesday the 30th of October for website maintenance. Please be sure to log out of the system in order to avoid any loss of data.
The safety and scientific validity of this study is the responsibility of the study sponsor and investigators. Listing a study does not mean it has been endorsed by the ANZCTR. Before participating in a study, talk to your health care provider and refer to this
information for consumers
Download to PDF
Trial registered on ANZCTR
Registration number
ACTRN12616000726459
Ethics application status
Approved
Date submitted
26/05/2016
Date registered
2/06/2016
Date last updated
19/05/2017
Type of registration
Prospectively registered
Titles & IDs
Public title
A randomised trial of krill oil for osteoarthritis of the knee
Query!
Scientific title
A randomised placebo controlled trial to evaluate the effect of krill oil on pain and effusion size in patients with knee osteoarthritis
Query!
Secondary ID [1]
288952
0
Nil
Query!
Universal Trial Number (UTN)
U1111-1181-7087
Query!
Trial acronym
KARAOKE Trial
Query!
Linked study record
Query!
Health condition
Health condition(s) or problem(s) studied:
osteoarthritis
298319
0
Query!
Condition category
Condition code
Musculoskeletal
298442
298442
0
0
Query!
Osteoarthritis
Query!
Intervention/exposure
Study type
Interventional
Query!
Description of intervention(s) / exposure
130 patients with clinical knee osteoarthritis, significant knee pain and effusion on imaging will receive 2g (2 capsules of 1 g each) of krill oil per day for 24 weeks. Adherence to treatment will be monitored by counting the return capsules at 12 and 24 week visits.
Query!
Intervention code [1]
294434
0
Treatment: Other
Query!
Comparator / control treatment
130 patients with clinical knee osteoarthritis, significant knee pain and effusion on imaging will receive 2g (2 capsules of 1 g each) of placebo (microcrystalline cellulose) per day for 24 weeks. Adherence to treatment will be monitored by counting the return capsules at 12 and 24 week visits.
Query!
Control group
Placebo
Query!
Outcomes
Primary outcome [1]
297932
0
Change in knee pain (assessed by 100mm VAS) over 24 weeks in patients with clinical knee OA, significant knee pain and effusions.
Query!
Assessment method [1]
297932
0
Query!
Timepoint [1]
297932
0
Mixed model accounting for overall pain at baseline, 4, 12, 16, 20 and 24 weeks
Query!
Primary outcome [2]
298456
0
Change in effusion size from baseline to 24 weeks measured using MRI quantitative measurements in patients with symptomatic OA of the knee and knee effusion.
Query!
Assessment method [2]
298456
0
Query!
Timepoint [2]
298456
0
Baseline and 24 weeks
Query!
Secondary outcome [1]
322676
0
Change in knee pain from baseline to each of the following visits at 4, 8, 12, 16, 20 and 24 weeks (assessed by 100mm VAS) in patients with clinical knee OA and effusion.
Query!
Assessment method [1]
322676
0
Query!
Timepoint [1]
322676
0
Linear regression using change in knee pain from baseline to each time point (4, 8, 12, 16, 20 and 24 weeks)
Query!
Secondary outcome [2]
323514
0
Change in WOMAC knee pain (total, weight bearing and non-weight bearing) from baseline to 4, 8, 12, 16, 20, and 24 weeks in patients with clinical knee OA, significant knee pain and effusions.
Query!
Assessment method [2]
323514
0
Query!
Timepoint [2]
323514
0
baseline and 4, 8, 12, 16, 20 and 24 weeks
Query!
Secondary outcome [3]
323515
0
Change in effusion-synovitis score (assessed using modified WORMS semi-quantitative scoring system) from baseline to 24 weeks in patients with clinical knee OA, significant knee pain and effusions.
Query!
Assessment method [3]
323515
0
Query!
Timepoint [3]
323515
0
baseline and 24 weeks
Query!
Secondary outcome [4]
323516
0
Change in bone marrow lesion size (assessed using MRI semi-quantitative and quantitative methods) from baseline to 24 weeks in patients with clinical knee OA, significant knee pain and effusions.
Query!
Assessment method [4]
323516
0
Query!
Timepoint [4]
323516
0
baseline and 24 weeks
Query!
Secondary outcome [5]
323517
0
Change in hand pain (assessed by 100mm VAS) from baseline to 4, 8, 12, 16, 20, and 24 weeks in patients with clinical knee OA, significant knee pain and effusions.
Query!
Assessment method [5]
323517
0
Query!
Timepoint [5]
323517
0
baseline and 4, 8, 12, 16, 20 and 24 weeks
Query!
Secondary outcome [6]
323518
0
Change in WOMAC knee function (assessed by WOMAC scoring system) from baseline to 4, 8, 12, 16, 20 and 24 weeks in patients with clinical knee OA, significant knee pain and effusions.
Query!
Assessment method [6]
323518
0
Query!
Timepoint [6]
323518
0
baseline and 4, 8, 12, 16, 20 and 24 weeks
Query!
Secondary outcome [7]
323519
0
OMERACT-OARSI responders at 4, 8, 12, 16, 20 and 24 weeks in patients with clinical knee OA, significant knee pain and effusions.
Query!
Assessment method [7]
323519
0
Query!
Timepoint [7]
323519
0
4,8,12,16,20 and 24 weeks
Query!
Secondary outcome [8]
323520
0
Change in CRP (assessed as hsCRP from serum assay) from baseline in patients with clinical knee OA, significant knee pain and effusions.
Query!
Assessment method [8]
323520
0
Query!
Timepoint [8]
323520
0
Baseline, 12 and 24 weeks
Query!
Secondary outcome [9]
323521
0
Change in blood lipids from baseline in patients with clinical knee OA, significant knee pain and effusions
Query!
Assessment method [9]
323521
0
Query!
Timepoint [9]
323521
0
Baseline, 12 and 24 weeks
Query!
Secondary outcome [10]
323522
0
Change in leg muscle strength (assessed by dynamometer) from baseline to 12, and 24 weeks in patients with clinical knee OA, significant knee pain and effusions.
Query!
Assessment method [10]
323522
0
Query!
Timepoint [10]
323522
0
baseline and 12, and 24 weeks
Query!
Secondary outcome [11]
323523
0
Change in analgesic use (assessed using the questionnaire designed for this study) from baseline to 12, and 24 weeks in patients with clinical knee OA, significant knee pain and effusions.
Query!
Assessment method [11]
323523
0
Query!
Timepoint [11]
323523
0
Baseline, 12, and 24 weeks
Query!
Secondary outcome [12]
323524
0
Change in quality of life (assessed by AQoL-6D) from baseline to 12 and 24 weeks in patients with clinical knee OA, significant knee pain and effusions.
Query!
Assessment method [12]
323524
0
Query!
Timepoint [12]
323524
0
Baseline, 12 and 24 weeks
Query!
Secondary outcome [13]
323525
0
Safety (assessed by recording any new symptoms, changes in medications and hospital admissions) of treatment and placebo will be assessed over 24 weeks in patients with clinical knee OA, significant knee pain and effusions.
Krill oil is a very safe medication, with few known side effects.
1. Krill oil may reduce insulin sensitivity by a small amount, although whether this would be large enough to make a difference to blood sugar control in people with diabetes is not clear. However, if the participant has diabetes, they will be advised to discuss this with the study doctor and their GP before starting the study. We will be collecting the fasting blood glucose levels at baseline and 12 weeks and any incident diagnosis will be recorded in the medications and safety questionnaire forms.
2. Krill oil is not suitable for people who already use anticoagulants (eg warfarin), high dose aspirin or non-steroidal anti–inflammatory drugs (NSAIDs). If they are already using these medications, they will be excluded. Incident medical conditions and the use of these medications will be recorded in the medications and safety questionnaire forms.
3. Krill oil is not suitable for people who have allergies to seafood, and they will be excluded. Any incident allergic reaction will be recorded as new symptoms using the medications and safety questionnaire forms.
Query!
Assessment method [13]
323525
0
Query!
Timepoint [13]
323525
0
4, 8, 12, 16, 20 and 24 weeks
Query!
Secondary outcome [14]
335088
0
Change in T2 map values (assessed using non-contrast compositional MRI) from baseline to 24 weeks in patients with clinical knee OA, significant knee pain and effusions.
Query!
Assessment method [14]
335088
0
Query!
Timepoint [14]
335088
0
baseline and 24 weeks
Query!
Eligibility
Key inclusion criteria
1. Aged over 40 years old.
2. Men and women with significant knee pain on most days (defined as a VAS >40mm).
3. Knee effusion–synovitis on MRI: In TASOAC study the proportion of participants who had effusion–synovitis on MRI was high (67%), suggesting that localised knee inflammation is common and that MRI is an appropriate screening tool.
4. Meet American College of Rheumatology (ACR) clinical criteria for knee OA confirmed by a rheumatologist.
Query!
Minimum age
40
Years
Query!
Query!
Maximum age
No limit
Query!
Query!
Sex
Both males and females
Query!
Can healthy volunteers participate?
No
Query!
Key exclusion criteria
1. Inability to have an MRI (claustrophobia, metal in eyes or selected knee, pacemakers).
2. Severe knee OA (joint space narrowing (JSN) on X-ray of Grade 3 using the Osteoarthritis Research Society International (OARSI) atlas).
3. Use of anticoagulants, high dose aspirin or non-steroidal anti–inflammatory drugs (NSAIDs), as krill oil is contra–indicated in such people.
4. Unwillingness to stop taking krill oil and fish oil medications 30 days prior to the trial and during the trial.
5. Other forms of inflammatory arthritis (especially rheumatoid arthritis and gout).
6. Seafood allergy.
7. Significant knee injury within the last 6 months.
8. Arthroscopy or open surgery in the index knee in the last 12 months, or planned.
9. Injections of corticosteroids (last 3 months) or hyaluronic acid (last 6 months) in the index knee.
10. Pregnancy or breastfeeding.
11. Use of any investigational drug(s) and/or devices within 30 days prior to randomisation
12. Presence of any serious medical illness that may preclude 24 week follow up.
13. Inability to provide informed consent.
Query!
Study design
Purpose of the study
Treatment
Query!
Allocation to intervention
Randomised controlled trial
Query!
Procedure for enrolling a subject and allocating the treatment (allocation concealment procedures)
central randomisation by computer
Query!
Methods used to generate the sequence in which subjects will be randomised (sequence generation)
Simple randomisation using a randomisation table created by computer software
Query!
Masking / blinding
Blinded (masking used)
Query!
Who is / are masked / blinded?
The people receiving the treatment/s
The people administering the treatment/s
The people assessing the outcomes
The people analysing the results/data
Query!
Query!
Query!
Query!
Intervention assignment
Parallel
Query!
Other design features
Query!
Phase
Phase 4
Query!
Type of endpoint/s
Efficacy
Query!
Statistical methods / analysis
Visual Analog Scale knee pain scores and WOMAC scores will be analyzed using a repeated-measures mixed model with terms for age, sex, body mass index (calculated as weight in kilograms divided by height in meters squared), treatment, week, and trial center. The correlation within the repeated measures will be addressed by using an individual participant identification as a random effect. The effect of treatment will be evaluated by the month × treatment interaction.
Linear regression will be used to compare changes in maximal effusion size and function in univariate and multivariable modelling (if groups are not well matched at baseline) between groups using intention to treat analysis for all outcomes. Per protocol analyses will be completed for study participants consuming >=80% of capsules. Significance will be p < 0.05 (two tailed). Missing data will be accounted for by using propensity weighting, as appropriate.
Based on in–house data, assuming 10mm difference between krill oil and placebo on the VAS pain scale (reduction in VAS pain scores in the placebo group by -15.5 +/- 25.5 mm over 12 weeks), 90% power, and 5% probability of type 1 error (alpha=0.05), we will need 234 participants. Adjusting for 10% loss to follow up, we need 260 participants (130 in each arm). Based on data from Tasmanian Older Adult Cohort (TASOAC) and Vitamin D Effects on Osteoarthritis (VIDEO) trial , this will give us 96% power to detect a difference in effusion size of 20% (mean 2.24cm2, SD of change 1.35).
Query!
Recruitment
Recruitment status
Recruiting
Query!
Date of first participant enrolment
Anticipated
20/06/2016
Query!
Actual
6/12/2016
Query!
Date of last participant enrolment
Anticipated
1/11/2017
Query!
Actual
Query!
Date of last data collection
Anticipated
Query!
Actual
Query!
Sample size
Target
260
Query!
Accrual to date
Query!
Final
Query!
Recruitment in Australia
Recruitment state(s)
NSW,SA,TAS,WA,VIC
Query!
Recruitment hospital [1]
5844
0
Royal Hobart Hospital - Hobart
Query!
Recruitment hospital [2]
5845
0
The Alfred - Prahran
Query!
Recruitment hospital [3]
5846
0
The Queen Elizabeth Hospital - Woodville
Query!
Recruitment hospital [4]
5847
0
Royal North Shore Hospital - St Leonards
Query!
Recruitment hospital [5]
5848
0
Fiona Stanley Hospital - Murdoch
Query!
Funding & Sponsors
Funding source category [1]
293674
0
Government body
Query!
Name [1]
293674
0
National Health and Medical Research Council Australia
Query!
Address [1]
293674
0
Level 1
16 Marcus Clarke Street
Canberra ACT 2601
Query!
Country [1]
293674
0
Australia
Query!
Funding source category [2]
296520
0
Charities/Societies/Foundations
Query!
Name [2]
296520
0
Tasmanian Community Fund
Query!
Address [2]
296520
0
Tasmanian Community Fund
GPO Box 1350
HOBART TAS 7001
Query!
Country [2]
296520
0
Australia
Query!
Primary sponsor type
University
Query!
Name
University of Tasmania
Query!
Address
Menzies Institute for Medical Research
17 Liverpool street
Hobart
Tasmania 7000
Query!
Country
Australia
Query!
Secondary sponsor category [1]
292538
0
Individual
Query!
Name [1]
292538
0
Graeme Jones
Query!
Address [1]
292538
0
Menzies Institute for Medical Research
17 Liverpool Street
Hobart
Tasmania 7000
Query!
Country [1]
292538
0
Australia
Query!
Ethics approval
Ethics application status
Approved
Query!
Ethics committee name [1]
295111
0
Tasmania Health & Medical Human Research Ethics Committee (EC00337)
Query!
Ethics committee address [1]
295111
0
Sarah Day Menzies Institute for Medical Research University of Tasmania 17 Liverpool Street Hobart Tasmania 7000
Query!
Ethics committee country [1]
295111
0
Australia
Query!
Date submitted for ethics approval [1]
295111
0
15/12/2015
Query!
Approval date [1]
295111
0
07/03/2016
Query!
Ethics approval number [1]
295111
0
H0015465
Query!
Summary
Brief summary
Background: Knee osteoarthritis (OA) is a significant and increasing cause of pain and disability in the Australian population. So far, interventions aimed at structural modification have been disappointing. OA affects the whole joint, and inflammation of the joint lining (synovitis and joint fluid) is now recognised as a key part of OA. Animal studies suggest that krill oil is anti–inflammatory. Pilot data in humans shows that krill oil reduces knee pain and systemic inflammation after 30 days, suggesting that an approach targeted at specific mechanisms of disease may be effective for OA. However, this study was of short duration, did not collect any data on structural factors, and included patients with a variety of disorders. Longer, larger follow up studies are required. Aim: To compare, using a randomised, placebo–controlled double–blind design over six months, the efficacy of krill oil vs identical placebo to treat knee osteoarthritis (OA) (both pain and structure) in 260 patients with clinical knee OA, significant knee pain and effusion on imaging. Primary hypothesis: 1) Krill oil decreases pain (assessed by 100mm VAS) by 10mm more than identical placebo over 24 weeks in patients with clinical knee OA, significant knee pain and effusions. 2) Krill oil decreases effusion size by 20% over 24 weeks in patients with symptomatic OA of the knee and knee effusion. Significance and Innovation: If krill oil can both improve symptoms and decrease effusion in OA it has the potential to slow progression to joint replacement. The proposed study represents an innovative approach to this and lends itself to easy implementation as krill oil is already available over–the–counter in Australian pharmacies.
Query!
Trial website
Query!
Trial related presentations / publications
Query!
Public notes
Query!
Contacts
Principal investigator
Name
65026
0
Prof Graeme Jones
Query!
Address
65026
0
Menzies Institute for Medical Research
17 Liverpool Street
Hobart
Tasmania 7000
Query!
Country
65026
0
Australia
Query!
Phone
65026
0
+61 3 6226 7705
Query!
Fax
65026
0
Query!
Email
65026
0
[email protected]
Query!
Contact person for public queries
Name
65027
0
Laura Laslett
Query!
Address
65027
0
Menzies Institute for Medical Research
17 Liverpool Street
Hobart
Tasmania 7000
Query!
Country
65027
0
Australia
Query!
Phone
65027
0
+61 417 865 075
Query!
Fax
65027
0
Query!
Email
65027
0
[email protected]
Query!
Contact person for scientific queries
Name
65028
0
Graeme Jones
Query!
Address
65028
0
Menzies Institute for Medical Research
17 Liverpool Street
Hobart
Tasmania 7000
Query!
Country
65028
0
Australia
Query!
Phone
65028
0
+61 3 6226 7705
Query!
Fax
65028
0
Query!
Email
65028
0
[email protected]
Query!
No information has been provided regarding IPD availability
What supporting documents are/will be available?
No Supporting Document Provided
Results publications and other study-related documents
Documents added manually
No documents have been uploaded by study researchers.
Documents added automatically
Source
Title
Year of Publication
DOI
Embase
KARAOKE: Krill oil versus placebo in the treatment of knee osteoarthritis: Protocol for a randomised controlled trial.
2020
https://dx.doi.org/10.1186/s13063-019-3915-1
N.B. These documents automatically identified may not have been verified by the study sponsor.
Download to PDF