Please note that the copy function is not enabled for this field.
If you wish to
modify
existing outcomes, please copy and paste the current outcome text into the Update field.
LOGIN
CREATE ACCOUNT
LOGIN
CREATE ACCOUNT
MY TRIALS
REGISTER TRIAL
FAQs
HINTS AND TIPS
DEFINITIONS
Trial Review
The ANZCTR website will be unavailable from 1pm until 3pm (AEDT) on Wednesday the 30th of October for website maintenance. Please be sure to log out of the system in order to avoid any loss of data.
The safety and scientific validity of this study is the responsibility of the study sponsor and investigators. Listing a study does not mean it has been endorsed by the ANZCTR. Before participating in a study, talk to your health care provider and refer to this
information for consumers
Download to PDF
Trial registered on ANZCTR
Registration number
ACTRN12616000953437
Ethics application status
Approved
Date submitted
18/04/2016
Date registered
20/07/2016
Date last updated
20/07/2016
Type of registration
Retrospectively registered
Titles & IDs
Public title
A comparison of Attention Bias Modification and the Attention Training Technique on pain: Efficacy and mechanisms
Query!
Scientific title
A comparison of Attention Bias Modification and the Attention Training Technique on pain: Efficacy and mechanisms
Query!
Secondary ID [1]
289034
0
Nil known
Query!
Universal Trial Number (UTN)
n/a
Query!
Trial acronym
n/a
Query!
Linked study record
Query!
Health condition
Health condition(s) or problem(s) studied:
Acute pain
298449
0
Query!
Condition category
Condition code
Musculoskeletal
298550
298550
0
0
Query!
Other muscular and skeletal disorders
Query!
Intervention/exposure
Study type
Interventional
Query!
Description of intervention(s) / exposure
There are three interventions.arms
(1) Attention Bias Modification (ABM): Attention Bias Modification is a 15 minute experimental manipulation of attentional bias. It is computer-administered and based on the dot-probe paradigm and implicitly trains participants to attend to non-painful stimuli (words) by changing contingencies.
(2) Attention Training Technique (ATT): ATT is an explicit training technique where participants listen to a sound array with the instruction to pay attention directly to one sound or another, switch attention and divide attention. The intervention is explicit and also takes about 15 minutes.
Query!
Intervention code [1]
294515
0
Treatment: Other
Query!
Comparator / control treatment
The control treatment will be a placebo that will use the same sound array as ATT (above) but will inform participants that the aim is to relax by listening to the sound array with no other instruction.
Query!
Control group
Placebo
Query!
Outcomes
Primary outcome [1]
298035
0
Threshold: The time taken to report pain after the participant has inserted their arm in a cold tank of water (5 degrees celcius). Timed with a stopwatch.
Query!
Assessment method [1]
298035
0
Query!
Timepoint [1]
298035
0
This is a single session trial. Participants do the cold pressor on one occasion at the end of the study and this is when the outcome is measured.
Query!
Secondary outcome [1]
322982
0
Pain: We will ask pain to be recorded on a Visual Analogue Scale (0 - 10) at threshold, 30 seconds later and at tolerance. An average will be used.
Query!
Assessment method [1]
322982
0
Query!
Timepoint [1]
322982
0
This is a single session trial. Participants do the cold pressor on one occasion at the end of the study and it is during this task when the outcome is measured.
Query!
Secondary outcome [2]
322984
0
Hesitance: The time taken (recorded by stopwatch) from when the person is given the instruction to place their hands in the cold pressor until when their arm is fully submerged.
Query!
Assessment method [2]
322984
0
Query!
Timepoint [2]
322984
0
This is a single session trial. Participants do the cold pressor on one occasion at the end of the study and this is when the outcome is measured.
Query!
Secondary outcome [3]
322985
0
Tolerance: The time that participants can keep their arm in the cold pressor (maximum 4 minutes, timed with a stopwatch).
Query!
Assessment method [3]
322985
0
Query!
Timepoint [3]
322985
0
This is a single session trial. Participants do the cold pressor on one occasion at the end of the study and this is when the outcome is measured.
Query!
Secondary outcome [4]
322986
0
Distress: Participant rating of subjective Unit of Distress (0 - 10) at the end of the cold pressor task.
Query!
Assessment method [4]
322986
0
Query!
Timepoint [4]
322986
0
This is a single session trial. Participants do the cold pressor on one occasion at the end of the study and this is when the outcome is measured.
Query!
Eligibility
Key inclusion criteria
Participants in this study are first year Psychology students at The University of Sydney.
Query!
Minimum age
18
Years
Query!
Query!
Maximum age
No limit
Query!
Query!
Sex
Both males and females
Query!
Can healthy volunteers participate?
Yes
Query!
Key exclusion criteria
Participants will be excluded if they consume excessive caffeine, alcohol or analgesics in the 24 hours prior to participating (According to current NHMRC guidelines), or if they have current moderate pain (a rating of 4 or higher on an 11-point numerical scale, where 0 is no pain and 10 is extreme pain). We will also exclude participants with Reynauld's phenomena or a history of chronic pain.
Query!
Study design
Purpose of the study
Treatment
Query!
Allocation to intervention
Randomised controlled trial
Query!
Procedure for enrolling a subject and allocating the treatment (allocation concealment procedures)
A series of numbers (1-3) will be generated (see below) and linked to consecutive participant numbers. The random allocation schedule will be concealed using opaque envelopes until the participant has completed the baseline assessment.
Query!
Methods used to generate the sequence in which subjects will be randomised (sequence generation)
We will use randomizer.org to generate the sequence and the sequence will be generated by someone not involved in the testing of participants.
Query!
Masking / blinding
Open (masking not used)
Query!
Who is / are masked / blinded?
Query!
Query!
Query!
Query!
Intervention assignment
Parallel
Query!
Other design features
Query!
Phase
Not Applicable
Query!
Type of endpoint/s
Efficacy
Query!
Statistical methods / analysis
A series of one-way AN(C)OVAs will be conducted to determine whether the pain outcomes differ between groups.
Query!
Recruitment
Recruitment status
Recruiting
Query!
Date of first participant enrolment
Anticipated
Query!
Actual
5/05/2016
Query!
Date of last participant enrolment
Anticipated
19/08/2016
Query!
Actual
Query!
Date of last data collection
Anticipated
Query!
Actual
Query!
Sample size
Target
90
Query!
Accrual to date
Query!
Final
Query!
Recruitment in Australia
Recruitment state(s)
NSW
Query!
Recruitment postcode(s) [1]
13094
0
2006 - The University Of Sydney
Query!
Funding & Sponsors
Funding source category [1]
293403
0
University
Query!
Name [1]
293403
0
The University of Sydney
Query!
Address [1]
293403
0
Brennan MacCallum Building A18
The University of Sydney
NSW 2006
Query!
Country [1]
293403
0
Australia
Query!
Primary sponsor type
University
Query!
Name
The University of Sydney
Query!
Address
Brennan MacCallum A18
The University of Sydney
NSW 2006
Query!
Country
Australia
Query!
Secondary sponsor category [1]
292232
0
None
Query!
Name [1]
292232
0
Query!
Address [1]
292232
0
Query!
Country [1]
292232
0
Query!
Ethics approval
Ethics application status
Approved
Query!
Ethics committee name [1]
294855
0
The University of Sydney
Query!
Ethics committee address [1]
294855
0
Research Integrity Human Research ethics Committee Jane Foss Russell Building City Rd. The University of Sydney NSW 2006
Query!
Ethics committee country [1]
294855
0
Australia
Query!
Date submitted for ethics approval [1]
294855
0
21/03/2016
Query!
Approval date [1]
294855
0
15/04/2016
Query!
Ethics approval number [1]
294855
0
Query!
Summary
Brief summary
This study compares two interventions that aim to modify attention (Attention Training Technique: ATT and Attention Bias Modification: ABM) with a placebo. The aim of the study is to determine the relative efficacy of the explicit training (ATT) compared to the implicit training (ABM) in terms of their impact on pain and to examine the likely mechanisms of treatment by assessing changes in attentional control (targeted by ATT) and attentional bias (targeted by ABM).
Query!
Trial website
Query!
Trial related presentations / publications
Query!
Public notes
Query!
Contacts
Principal investigator
Name
65242
0
Prof Louise Sharpe
Query!
Address
65242
0
Brennan MacCallum Building A 18
The University of Sydney
NSW 2006
Query!
Country
65242
0
Australia
Query!
Phone
65242
0
61293514558
Query!
Fax
65242
0
61293517328
Query!
Email
65242
0
[email protected]
Query!
Contact person for public queries
Name
65243
0
Louise Sharpe
Query!
Address
65243
0
Brennan MacCallum Building A 18
The University of Sydney
NSW 2006
Query!
Country
65243
0
Australia
Query!
Phone
65243
0
61293514558
Query!
Fax
65243
0
61293517328
Query!
Email
65243
0
[email protected]
Query!
Contact person for scientific queries
Name
65244
0
Louise Sharpe
Query!
Address
65244
0
Brennan MacCallum Building A 18
The University of Sydney
NSW 2006
Query!
Country
65244
0
Australia
Query!
Phone
65244
0
612 93514558
Query!
Fax
65244
0
612 93517328
Query!
Email
65244
0
[email protected]
Query!
No information has been provided regarding IPD availability
What supporting documents are/will be available?
No Supporting Document Provided
Results publications and other study-related documents
Documents added manually
No documents have been uploaded by study researchers.
Documents added automatically
No additional documents have been identified.
Download to PDF