Please note that the copy function is not enabled for this field.
If you wish to
modify
existing outcomes, please copy and paste the current outcome text into the Update field.
LOGIN
CREATE ACCOUNT
LOGIN
CREATE ACCOUNT
MY TRIALS
REGISTER TRIAL
FAQs
HINTS AND TIPS
DEFINITIONS
Trial Review
The ANZCTR website will be unavailable from 1pm until 3pm (AEDT) on Wednesday the 30th of October for website maintenance. Please be sure to log out of the system in order to avoid any loss of data.
The safety and scientific validity of this study is the responsibility of the study sponsor and investigators. Listing a study does not mean it has been endorsed by the ANZCTR. Before participating in a study, talk to your health care provider and refer to this
information for consumers
Download to PDF
Trial registered on ANZCTR
Registration number
ACTRN12616000522415
Ethics application status
Approved
Date submitted
19/04/2016
Date registered
21/04/2016
Date last updated
5/06/2019
Date data sharing statement initially provided
5/06/2019
Type of registration
Retrospectively registered
Titles & IDs
Public title
Cervical Ripening Using Misoprostol vs Dinoprostone: A randomised, triple-blinded, interventional study comparing safety and efficacy in primiparous women
Query!
Scientific title
Cervical Ripening Using Misoprostol vs Dinoprostone: A randomised, triple-blinded, interventional study comparing safety and efficacy in primiparous women
Query!
Secondary ID [1]
289040
0
Nil Known
Query!
Universal Trial Number (UTN)
U1111-1182-0920
Query!
Trial acronym
CRUMD
Query!
Linked study record
Query!
Health condition
Health condition(s) or problem(s) studied:
Cervical Ripening
298457
0
Query!
Induction of Labour
298458
0
Query!
Condition category
Condition code
Reproductive Health and Childbirth
298558
298558
0
0
Query!
Childbirth and postnatal care
Query!
Intervention/exposure
Study type
Interventional
Query!
Description of intervention(s) / exposure
Misoprostol 200microgram slow release pessary is placed per vagina on admission to hospital. This occurs 48 hours prior to planned induction of labour. The cervix is reassessed 24 hours post administration and misoprostol pessary removed unless indicated earlier. (indications for early removal include active labour, ruptured membranes, abnormal fetal cardiotocography, uterine hyperstimulation)
Query!
Intervention code [1]
294523
0
Treatment: Drugs
Query!
Comparator / control treatment
Dinoprostone 10mg slow release pessary is placed per vagina on admission to hospital. This occurs 2 days prior to planned induction of labour. The cervix is reassessed 24 hours post administration and dinoprostone pessary removed unless indicated earlier. (indications for early removal include active labour, ruptured membranes, abnormal fetal cardiotocography, uterine hyperstimulation)
Query!
Control group
Active
Query!
Outcomes
Primary outcome [1]
298041
0
Number of women requiring further cervical ripening with cervical ripening balloon following treatment as assessed by Bishops' Score less than or equal to 7 following removal of treatment drug
Query!
Assessment method [1]
298041
0
Query!
Timepoint [1]
298041
0
24 hours post insertion of treatment
Query!
Primary outcome [2]
298042
0
Number of women requiring induction of labour with oxytocin as assessed by the number of women who have not achieved spontaneous labour following treatment
Query!
Assessment method [2]
298042
0
Query!
Timepoint [2]
298042
0
48 hours post treatment
Query!
Primary outcome [3]
298043
0
Number of women requiring intervention for uterine hyperstimulation that is assessed by the number of women having 6 or more contractions in 10 minutes who require tocolysis or other intervention for fetal cardiotocography changes
Query!
Assessment method [3]
298043
0
Query!
Timepoint [3]
298043
0
within 24 hours of treatment
Query!
Secondary outcome [1]
322998
0
Number of women requiring delivery by caesarean section as determined by review of medical record
Query!
Assessment method [1]
322998
0
Query!
Timepoint [1]
322998
0
within 4 days of treatment
Query!
Secondary outcome [2]
322999
0
Time gap from treatment to vaginal delivery as assessed by review of medical record
Query!
Assessment method [2]
322999
0
Query!
Timepoint [2]
322999
0
within 4 days of treatment
Query!
Secondary outcome [3]
323000
0
Neonatal morbidity or mortality as assessed by presence of hypoxic ischaemic encephalopathy, 5 minute apgar score <7, Neonatal Intensive Care admission
Query!
Assessment method [3]
323000
0
Query!
Timepoint [3]
323000
0
within 24 hours of birth
Query!
Eligibility
Key inclusion criteria
1) Pregnant women between 37+0 and 41+4 weeks gestation
2) Having first baby
3) Induction of labour deemed medically indicated
4) Bishops score less than or equal to 4
5) age >=18
6) BMI <50 at booking visit
Query!
Minimum age
18
Years
Query!
Query!
Maximum age
No limit
Query!
Query!
Sex
Females
Query!
Can healthy volunteers participate?
No
Query!
Key exclusion criteria
1) Active labour
2) Ruptured membranes
3) Non-cephalic presentation
4) Previous caesarean section or other uterine surgery
5) Unexplained vaginal bleeding >24 weeks gestation
6) Suspected or known chorioamnionitis
7) Suspected or known fetal compromise (abnormal antenatal fetal heart rate pattern, ultrasound showing fetal growth <10th centile, oligohydramnios, polyhydramnios, abnormal dopplers)
8) Unable to read or speak English without the aid of an interpreter
Query!
Study design
Purpose of the study
Treatment
Query!
Allocation to intervention
Randomised controlled trial
Query!
Procedure for enrolling a subject and allocating the treatment (allocation concealment procedures)
Vaginal pessaries identical in appearance
Sealed unidentified packaging
Numbered packaging
Randomisation conducted by 3rd party external to study
Query!
Methods used to generate the sequence in which subjects will be randomised (sequence generation)
Computer generated random allocation sequence
Query!
Masking / blinding
Blinded (masking used)
Query!
Who is / are masked / blinded?
The people receiving the treatment/s
The people administering the treatment/s
The people assessing the outcomes
The people analysing the results/data
Query!
Query!
Query!
Query!
Intervention assignment
Parallel
Query!
Other design features
Query!
Phase
Phase 4
Query!
Type of endpoint/s
Safety/efficacy
Query!
Statistical methods / analysis
There will be 200 women per arm, 400 total population
Misoprostol has been compared to dinoprostone in a phase III trial called the EXPIDITE study.
Based on the number of primiparous births we have at John Hunter Hospital, to replicate Wing et al with a 26% reduction in the use of oxytocin with a power of 90% and a p value <0.05 we would need 72 women per arm
In order to reduce the rate of CRB use at John Hunter Hospital from 28% to 14% with a power of 90% and p value <0.05 we would need 173 women per arm.
To replicate the difference in tachysystole rates of 13% and 4% with a 90% power and a p value <0.05 we will need 200 women per arm
5 of the 6 endpoints of this trial are dichotomous variables and so the chi-square test will be used to test for differences between groups
Time to vaginal delivery will be tested using Cox Proportional Hazards Regression
Wing D, Brown R, Plante L, Miller H, Rugarn O, Powers B; Misoprostol Vaginal Insert and Time to Vaginal Delivery (Obstet Gynecol 2013;122:201–9)
Query!
Recruitment
Recruitment status
Stopped early
Query!
Data analysis
Data collected is being analysed
Query!
Reason for early stopping/withdrawal
Other reasons/comments
Query!
Other reasons
Misoprostol vaginal insert withdrawn from market world wide by Ferring Pharmaceuticals. TGA approval withdrawn 30.04.2019
Query!
Date of first participant enrolment
Anticipated
Query!
Actual
13/10/2015
Query!
Date of last participant enrolment
Anticipated
20/12/2019
Query!
Actual
14/04/2019
Query!
Date of last data collection
Anticipated
28/06/2019
Query!
Actual
Query!
Sample size
Target
400
Query!
Accrual to date
Query!
Final
208
Query!
Recruitment in Australia
Recruitment state(s)
NSW
Query!
Recruitment hospital [1]
5637
0
John Hunter Hospital Royal Newcastle Centre - New Lambton
Query!
Recruitment postcode(s) [1]
13095
0
2305 - New Lambton Heights
Query!
Funding & Sponsors
Funding source category [1]
293411
0
Hospital
Query!
Name [1]
293411
0
John Hunter Hospital
Query!
Address [1]
293411
0
Lookout Rd
New Lambton Heights
NSW 2305
Query!
Country [1]
293411
0
Australia
Query!
Funding source category [2]
293412
0
Commercial sector/Industry
Query!
Name [2]
293412
0
Ferring Pharmaceuticals PTY Ltd
Query!
Address [2]
293412
0
20 Bridge Street,
Pymble NSW,2073
Query!
Country [2]
293412
0
Australia
Query!
Primary sponsor type
Hospital
Query!
Name
John Hunter Hospital
Query!
Address
Lookout Rd
New Lambton Heights
NSW 2305
Query!
Country
Australia
Query!
Secondary sponsor category [1]
292238
0
None
Query!
Name [1]
292238
0
Query!
Address [1]
292238
0
Query!
Country [1]
292238
0
Query!
Ethics approval
Ethics application status
Approved
Query!
Ethics committee name [1]
294860
0
Hunter New England Human Research Ethics Committee
Query!
Ethics committee address [1]
294860
0
Locked Bag 1 New Lambton NSW 2305
Query!
Ethics committee country [1]
294860
0
Australia
Query!
Date submitted for ethics approval [1]
294860
0
30/04/2015
Query!
Approval date [1]
294860
0
02/06/2015
Query!
Ethics approval number [1]
294860
0
15/05/20/3.03
Query!
Summary
Brief summary
Misoprostol and Dinoprostone are both medications used to ripen a woman's cervix in preparation for labour. In a phase III trial by Wing et al misoprostol vaginal insert, when compared to dinoprostone vaginal insert, was thought to reduce the time from insert to vaginal delivery and decrease the number of women needing further intervention by oxytocin for induction of labour by 26% without an increase in the complications of caesarean section or neonatal morbidity. Misoprostol was found to increase the rate of tachysystole (too frequent uterine contractions) to 13% compared with 4% for dinoprostone. Wing et al used both primiparous women and multiparous women in their study. We hypothesize that by using misoprostol in primiparous women only we may still be able to achieve the significant reduction in need for other interventions for induction of labour but without the significant increase in rates of uterine tachysystole. Women admitted to the study will have either the misoprostol or dinoprostone inserted for cervical ripening and data collected on whether or not they then needed to have a cervical ripening balloon for further ripening, whether they needed oxytocin for induction of labour, whether they had too many contractions that required intervention to control, what their mode of delivery was, what the time interval between when the pessary was inserted and when they delivered and whether or not there were any neonatal complications.
Query!
Trial website
Query!
Trial related presentations / publications
Query!
Public notes
Query!
Contacts
Principal investigator
Name
65262
0
Dr Angela Boulton
Query!
Address
65262
0
John Hunter Hospital
Lookout Rd
New Lambton Heights
NSW 2305
Query!
Country
65262
0
Australia
Query!
Phone
65262
0
+61 2 4921 4385
Query!
Fax
65262
0
Query!
Email
65262
0
[email protected]
Query!
Contact person for public queries
Name
65263
0
Angela Boulton
Query!
Address
65263
0
John Hunter Hospital
Lookout Rd
New Lambton Heights
NSW 2305
Query!
Country
65263
0
Australia
Query!
Phone
65263
0
+61 2 4921 4385
Query!
Fax
65263
0
Query!
Email
65263
0
[email protected]
Query!
Contact person for scientific queries
Name
65264
0
Gracia Chong
Query!
Address
65264
0
John Hunter Hospital
Lookout Rd
New Lambton Heights
NSW 2305
Query!
Country
65264
0
Australia
Query!
Phone
65264
0
+61 2 4921 4385
Query!
Fax
65264
0
Query!
Email
65264
0
[email protected]
Query!
Data sharing statement
Will individual participant data (IPD) for this trial be available (including data dictionaries)?
Yes
Query!
What data in particular will be shared?
de-identified individual participant data underlying published trial results
Query!
When will data be available (start and end dates)?
immediately following publication to no end date determined
Query!
Available to whom?
Ferring pharmaceuticals as per funding agreement. It will also be made available to researchers on a case-by-case basis who provide a methodologically sound proposal
Query!
Available for what types of analyses?
meta-analyses
Query!
How or where can data be obtained?
access subject to approvals by principal investigator
Query!
What supporting documents are/will be available?
No Supporting Document Provided
Doc. No.
Type
Citation
Link
Email
Other Details
Attachment
2199
Clinical study report
This will be available when completed
Results publications and other study-related documents
Documents added manually
No documents have been uploaded by study researchers.
Documents added automatically
No additional documents have been identified.
Download to PDF