Please note that the copy function is not enabled for this field.
If you wish to
modify
existing outcomes, please copy and paste the current outcome text into the Update field.
LOGIN
CREATE ACCOUNT
LOGIN
CREATE ACCOUNT
MY TRIALS
REGISTER TRIAL
FAQs
HINTS AND TIPS
DEFINITIONS
Trial Review
The ANZCTR website will be unavailable from 1pm until 3pm (AEDT) on Wednesday the 30th of October for website maintenance. Please be sure to log out of the system in order to avoid any loss of data.
The safety and scientific validity of this study is the responsibility of the study sponsor and investigators. Listing a study does not mean it has been endorsed by the ANZCTR. Before participating in a study, talk to your health care provider and refer to this
information for consumers
Download to PDF
Trial registered on ANZCTR
Registration number
ACTRN12616001034426
Ethics application status
Approved
Date submitted
1/08/2016
Date registered
4/08/2016
Date last updated
4/08/2016
Type of registration
Retrospectively registered
Titles & IDs
Public title
Evaluation of Partnered Pharmacist Charting at Admission and Discharge
Query!
Scientific title
Evaluation of Partnered Pharmacist Charting at Admission and Discharge
Query!
Secondary ID [1]
289808
0
nil
Query!
Universal Trial Number (UTN)
Query!
Trial acronym
Query!
Linked study record
Query!
Health condition
Health condition(s) or problem(s) studied:
Hospital admission
299726
0
Query!
Condition category
Condition code
Public Health
299660
299660
0
0
Query!
Health service research
Query!
Intervention/exposure
Study type
Interventional
Query!
Description of intervention(s) / exposure
Partnered pharmacist charting: on admission to selected General Medical or Emergency Short Stay Units at a major tertiary institution (Alfred Hospital), patients' regular medications will be charted by a credentialled clinical pharmacist, and endorsed by a medical officer.
At time of discharge from hospital, patients from selected General Medicical units will have the medication management section of their discharge summary completed by a credentialed clinical pharmacist, and endorsed by a medical officer.
Procedure:
Medication reconciliation on admission and discharge medication counselling both include face-to-face sessions with the patient as routine care. Admission medication charting and discharge summary completion do not replace this, nor do they add extra patient contact.
Admission:
The pharmacist takes a medication history (routine care), performs VTE risk assessment, has a discussion with the admitting medical officer about current problems and the medication management plan is agreed upon. Pre-admission medications and VTE prophylaxis are charted by the pharmacist; followed by a discussion between the treating nurse and pharmacist about the plan, including urgent medications to be administered, drug-related monitoring and reasons for any changes.
Discharge:
Following discharge medication and prescription review (routine care) and discussion with the medical team, the pharmacist electronically enters the following into the medication management section of the discharge summary:
-current list of all medications the patient should be taking on discharge, listed according to whether they are new (including indication), changed (including reason), or unchanged.
-a list of all medications ceased during admission, including reasons
-medication allergies
-smoking status, and management during admission
-actions required by the GP, including medications requiring review
Once complete, the discharge summary is reviewed and endorsed by the discharging medical officer
Admission medication charting takes approximately 15-20 minutes depending on the number and complexity of medications
Discharge summary completion takes approximately 5-15 minutes depending on the number and complexity of medications.
The duration of the observation period is four months.
Based on the allocation of units to interventions, patients will receive either the admission or discharge intervention, but not both, per admission. Patients readmitted to hospital during the study period may be allocated to receive the same or different intervention during their next admission, as each admission is considered a new event.
For patients in ESSU, only the admission charting intervention is applicable.
Regular auditing of medication charts and discharge summaries was undertaken. Charts or summaries completed by a medical officer in the pharmacist-arm units were excluded (including charts completed outside of pharmacist working hours).
Query!
Intervention code [1]
295481
0
Other interventions
Query!
Comparator / control treatment
Patients admitted to the remaining General Medical or Emergency Short Stay Units will have their regular medications charted by a medical officer on admission, with pharmacist review occurring within 24 hours, as is usual care.
At time of discharge from hospital, patients from remaining General Medical units will have the medication management section of their discharge summary completed by a medical officer as usual.
Query!
Control group
Active
Query!
Outcomes
Primary outcome [1]
299123
0
Medical errors identified within 24 hours of admission, collected by clinical pharmacists during clinical care (at this institution, daily medication review is carried out by clinical pharmacists for all patients)
Query!
Assessment method [1]
299123
0
Query!
Timepoint [1]
299123
0
24 hours after admission
Query!
Primary outcome [2]
299124
0
Medical errors identified in the discharge medication summary at time of discharge from hospital, retrospectively collected by an independent data collector reviewing medical records
Query!
Assessment method [2]
299124
0
Query!
Timepoint [2]
299124
0
Discharge from hospital
Query!
Secondary outcome [1]
326249
0
Severity of admission medical errors identified as above, assessed using a risk matrix by an independent panel made up of a general medical physician, emergency medicine physician, and clinical pharmacist.
Query!
Assessment method [1]
326249
0
Query!
Timepoint [1]
326249
0
Within 24 hours of admission
Query!
Secondary outcome [2]
326250
0
Severity of discharge medical errors identified as above, assessed using a risk matrix by an independent panel made up of a general medical physician, emergency medicine physician, and clinical pharmacist.
Query!
Assessment method [2]
326250
0
Query!
Timepoint [2]
326250
0
Discharge from hospital
Query!
Eligibility
Key inclusion criteria
Admission charting: All patients admitted as an inpatient under the general medical unit (GMU) or emergency short stay unit (ESSU) at the Alfred Hospital within pharmacist working hours (7am to 9pm, Monday to Sunday)
Discharge charting: All patients discharged from an inpatient stay under the general medical unit (GMU) at the Alfred Hospital within pharmacist working hours (7am to 9pm, Monday to Sunday)
Query!
Minimum age
18
Years
Query!
Query!
Maximum age
No limit
Query!
Query!
Sex
Both males and females
Query!
Can healthy volunteers participate?
No
Query!
Key exclusion criteria
Patients not admitted under General Medicine or Emergency Short Stay.
(For admission charting): patients admitted outside of pharmacist working hours
(For discharge charting): patients discharged outside of pharmacist working hours
Query!
Study design
Purpose of the study
Treatment
Query!
Allocation to intervention
Randomised controlled trial
Query!
Procedure for enrolling a subject and allocating the treatment (allocation concealment procedures)
This was a cluster randomised trial.
The GMU is divided into four geographically-based subunits, each with equivalent rostering of clinicians, participating in an equivalent rostering of admitting days. Admitted patients are allocated to teams according to geographical bed availability. This allocation is carried out by inpatient bed managers who were unaware that the study was taking place. There were no differences among number or seniority of staff among the four subunits. The four GMU subunits were randomised to receiving a discharge summary with a medication management plan completed by a pharmacist in one cluster of two subunits, with standard medical discharge summaries continuing in the other cluster of the remaining two subunits.
Units were randomly selected using a random number generator to correspond to the four units by the primary investigator.
Query!
Methods used to generate the sequence in which subjects will be randomised (sequence generation)
Units were randomly selected using a random number generator to correspond to the four units by the primary investigator.
Query!
Masking / blinding
Blinded (masking used)
Query!
Who is / are masked / blinded?
The people assessing the outcomes
Query!
Query!
Query!
Query!
Intervention assignment
Parallel
Query!
Other design features
Query!
Phase
Not Applicable
Query!
Type of endpoint/s
Safety/efficacy
Query!
Statistical methods / analysis
Normally distributed continuous data are presented using means (standard deviation) while ordinal and skewed data are presented using medians (inter-quartile range). Statistical significance was defined by a p-value of <0.05. Statistical significance of difference in proportions was determined using a cluster-weighted chi-squared test or where value in a cell was less than 5, Fisher’s Exact test was used. Differences in the primary outcome were presented using risk of an error and the number needed to treat (NNT) to prevent one error. Statistical significance of difference in means was evaluated using the Student’s t-test and difference in medians was evaluated using the Wilcoxon Rank-Sum test.
For sample size calculation, the proportion of standard medical charted patients with an error was assumed to be 0.30. We aimed to detect a minimum clinically significant absolute difference of 0.10. Using a power of 90% and a two-sided significance (alpha) level of 0.05, the total sample size required was 824, with 412 in each arm and 206 patients within each cluster. The inter-cluster correlation coefficient was expected to be very small, approaching zero and an adjustment for the design effect was not performed. All analyses were conducted using Stata v 12.0 (College Station, Texas).
Query!
Recruitment
Recruitment status
Completed
Query!
Date of first participant enrolment
Anticipated
Query!
Actual
16/03/2015
Query!
Date of last participant enrolment
Anticipated
Query!
Actual
27/07/2015
Query!
Date of last data collection
Anticipated
2/10/2015
Query!
Actual
3/11/2015
Query!
Sample size
Target
600
Query!
Accrual to date
Query!
Final
832
Query!
Recruitment in Australia
Recruitment state(s)
VIC
Query!
Recruitment hospital [1]
6345
0
The Alfred - Prahran
Query!
Recruitment postcode(s) [1]
13887
0
3004 - Prahran
Query!
Funding & Sponsors
Funding source category [1]
294195
0
Government body
Query!
Name [1]
294195
0
Department of Health and Human Services (DHHS)
Query!
Address [1]
294195
0
50 Lonsdale Street
Melbourne Victoria 3000
Query!
Country [1]
294195
0
Australia
Query!
Primary sponsor type
Hospital
Query!
Name
Alfred Health Pharmacy Department
Query!
Address
Pharmacy Department
55 Commercial Road
Melbourne Victoria 3004
Query!
Country
Australia
Query!
Secondary sponsor category [1]
293019
0
None
Query!
Name [1]
293019
0
Query!
Address [1]
293019
0
Query!
Country [1]
293019
0
Query!
Ethics approval
Ethics application status
Approved
Query!
Ethics committee name [1]
295598
0
Alfred Human Research Ethics Committee
Query!
Ethics committee address [1]
295598
0
55 Commercial Road Melbourne Victoria 3004
Query!
Ethics committee country [1]
295598
0
Australia
Query!
Date submitted for ethics approval [1]
295598
0
25/11/2014
Query!
Approval date [1]
295598
0
19/12/2014
Query!
Ethics approval number [1]
295598
0
539/14
Query!
Summary
Brief summary
Objectives - The aim of this study was to evaluate the effectiveness of pharmacists completing the medication management plan in the medical discharge summary for preventing medication errors. Design - We conducted a cluster randomised controlled trial comparing pharmacist completed medication management plans in the discharge summary to standard medical discharge summaries among patients discharged following an inpatient stay under a general medical unit. Setting - This trial was conducted at an adult major referral hospital in metropolitan Melbourne, Australia with an annual Emergency Department (ED) attendance of approximately 60,000 patients Participants The evaluation included patients’ discharge summaries written in the period of 16th March 2015 to 27th July 2015. Interventions - Patients randomised to the intervention had their medication management plan completed by a pharmacist. Main outcome measures - The primary outcome variable was an erroneous discharge summary related to a medication error as identified by an independent assessor, who was not part of the patient’s admission process.
Query!
Trial website
Query!
Trial related presentations / publications
Query!
Public notes
Query!
Contacts
Principal investigator
Name
67882
0
Prof Michael Dooley
Query!
Address
67882
0
Pharmacy Department
Alfred Hospital
55 Commercial Road
Melbourne Victoria 3004
Query!
Country
67882
0
Australia
Query!
Phone
67882
0
+61390762061
Query!
Fax
67882
0
Query!
Email
67882
0
[email protected]
Query!
Contact person for public queries
Name
67883
0
Erica Tong
Query!
Address
67883
0
Pharmacy Department
Alfred Hospital
55 Commercial Road
Melbourne Victoria 3004
Query!
Country
67883
0
Australia
Query!
Phone
67883
0
+61390762061
Query!
Fax
67883
0
Query!
Email
67883
0
[email protected]
Query!
Contact person for scientific queries
Name
67884
0
Erica Tong
Query!
Address
67884
0
Pharmacy Department
Alfred Hospital
55 Commercial Road
Melbourne Victoria 3004
Query!
Country
67884
0
Australia
Query!
Phone
67884
0
+61390762061
Query!
Fax
67884
0
Query!
Email
67884
0
[email protected]
Query!
No information has been provided regarding IPD availability
What supporting documents are/will be available?
No Supporting Document Provided
Results publications and other study-related documents
Documents added manually
No documents have been uploaded by study researchers.
Documents added automatically
Source
Title
Year of Publication
DOI
Dimensions AI
Reducing medication errors in hospital discharge summaries: a randomised controlled trial
2017
https://doi.org/10.5694/mja16.00628
N.B. These documents automatically identified may not have been verified by the study sponsor.
Download to PDF