Please note that the copy function is not enabled for this field.
If you wish to
modify
existing outcomes, please copy and paste the current outcome text into the Update field.
LOGIN
CREATE ACCOUNT
LOGIN
CREATE ACCOUNT
MY TRIALS
REGISTER TRIAL
FAQs
HINTS AND TIPS
DEFINITIONS
Trial Review
The ANZCTR website will be unavailable from 1pm until 3pm (AEDT) on Wednesday the 30th of October for website maintenance. Please be sure to log out of the system in order to avoid any loss of data.
The safety and scientific validity of this study is the responsibility of the study sponsor and investigators. Listing a study does not mean it has been endorsed by the ANZCTR. Before participating in a study, talk to your health care provider and refer to this
information for consumers
Download to PDF
Trial registered on ANZCTR
Registration number
ACTRN12616001463460
Ethics application status
Approved
Date submitted
14/10/2016
Date registered
19/10/2016
Date last updated
12/10/2021
Date data sharing statement initially provided
12/10/2021
Type of registration
Retrospectively registered
Titles & IDs
Public title
Accelerated Rehabilitation After Anterior Cruciate Ligament (ACL) Hamstring Reconstruction
Query!
Scientific title
Accelerated Versus Conventional Rehabilitation After Double Bundle Remnant Sparing Anterior Cruciate Ligament (ACL) Hamstring Reconstruction: A Prospective Randomised Controlled Trial
Query!
Secondary ID [1]
290338
0
Nil
Query!
Universal Trial Number (UTN)
Query!
Trial acronym
Query!
Linked study record
Query!
Health condition
Health condition(s) or problem(s) studied:
Anterior cruciate ligament tears
300610
0
Query!
Condition category
Condition code
Musculoskeletal
300459
300459
0
0
Query!
Other muscular and skeletal disorders
Query!
Injuries and Accidents
300491
300491
0
0
Query!
Other injuries and accidents
Query!
Physical Medicine / Rehabilitation
300492
300492
0
0
Query!
Other physical medicine / rehabilitation
Query!
Intervention/exposure
Study type
Interventional
Query!
Description of intervention(s) / exposure
All patients will undergo double bundle remnant sparing anterior cruciate ligament reconstruction (ACLR). This is the preferred operative technique of the orthopaedic surgeon involved in this research.
After surgery, all patients will be initially placed in a resting extension splint (removed only to undertake exercises) for 2 weeks allowing crutch weight bearing (WB) as tolerated. In-patient exercises will be undertaken by a physiotherapist in hospital once prior to discharge, which will be the next day (i.e. generally only one night spent in hospital). These exercises will then be undertaken by all patients unsupervised 2-3 times per day at home upon hospital discharge, and up until the time of their first scheduled out-patient rehabilitation visit. These early in-patient exercises will focus on regaining knee range of motion (ROM), patella mobility and pain/swelling reduction. Patients are allowed to cease the use of the brace once their knee effusion had resolved.
For out-patient rehabilitation, patients will attend the Hollywood Functional Rehabilitation Clinic for post-operative out-patient rehabilitation, and appropriate monitoring of their program and ensuring adherence to the protocol. Patients will attend the clinic for one supervised session per week (of 1-2 hours duration) for the first 11 weeks (weeks 1-12), and then once every two weeks between 12 weeks and 6 months. In addition to their supervised sessions, all patients will undertake a structured home-based supplemental program an additional 3-4 times per week, which which evolve as time permits. The supervised sessions will be undertaking by one (of two) Accredited Exercise Physiologists (AEPs), each with more than 10 years of clinical experience and with a clinical and research interest in ACLR.
Based on their pre-operative randomisation (conservative or accelerated rehabilitation), they will undergo one of two progressive rehabilitation programs as follows.
Patients randomised to the conservative (CR) rehabilitation protocol will commence closed kinetic chain (CKC) exercises, hydrotherapy and stationary cycling at 6 weeks post-surgery, following clearance to do so by the primary surgeon. At 4 months post-surgery, a structured strengthening program inclusive of these exercises will continue, though they will also commence jogging, progressing to change of direction exercise and sport specific exercises by 6 months. They will be permitted to commence full sport and pivoting activities at 9-12 months post-operatively.
Patients randomised to the accelerated (AR) rehabilitation protocol will initiate the majority of exercises at an earlier post-operative time line. CKC exercises, hydrotherapy and stationary cycling will begin at 3 weeks post-surgery, jogging at 2 months, agility activities at 4 months and a planned return to sport by 6 months post-surgery.
While specific exercises and activities will indeed be undertaken by both groups eventually through their rehabilitation timeline, the 'timing' and 'introduction' of certain activities and rehabilitation exercises is the only variable that will differ between these two groups. A weekly monitoring activity and rehabilitation plan will be undertaken for all patients, in order to best attempt to maintain compliance to the respective interventions. In addition to this activity log which will be discussed with patients each week, email correspondence weekly will also permit monitoring.
Query!
Intervention code [1]
296150
0
Rehabilitation
Query!
Intervention code [2]
296160
0
Treatment: Surgery
Query!
Comparator / control treatment
Patients randomised to the control treatment will undergo a conservative (CR) rehabilitation protocol, commencing with closed kinetic chain (CKC) exercises, hydrotherapy and stationary cycling at 6 weeks post-surgery. At 4 months post-surgery, they will commence jogging, progressing to change of direction exercise and sport specific exercises by 6 months. They will be permitted to commence full sport and pivoting activities at 9-12 months post-operatively.
Query!
Control group
Active
Query!
Outcomes
Primary outcome [1]
299895
0
ACL graft stiffness/laxity evaluated as side to side difference (ssd) in anterior translation of the operated knee versus the native contra-lateral knee, using the KT-1000 arthrometer.
Query!
Assessment method [1]
299895
0
Query!
Timepoint [1]
299895
0
24 months post-surgery
Query!
Secondary outcome [1]
328416
0
Graft re-rupture assessed via Magentic Resonance Imaging
Query!
Assessment method [1]
328416
0
Query!
Timepoint [1]
328416
0
24 months post-surgery
Query!
Secondary outcome [2]
328417
0
Time taken to return to sport (Level 1, 2 and 3 sports) – this will be reported via a previously developed ‘ACL Recovery Score’ that evaluates the time taken to return to common daily activities and sports activities. For sport return, this is classified as either Level 1 (i.e. golf, cricket, tennis), Level 2 (i.e. squash, basketball, netball) or Level 3 (i.e. football, rugby, soccer, hockey) sports.
Query!
Assessment method [2]
328417
0
Query!
Timepoint [2]
328417
0
6, 12 and 24 months post-surgery
Query!
Secondary outcome [3]
328418
0
Isokinetic maximal knee extensor strength using an isokinetic dynamometer (Isosport International, Gepps Cross, South Australia).
Query!
Assessment method [3]
328418
0
Query!
Timepoint [3]
328418
0
6, 12 and 24 months post-surgery
Query!
Secondary outcome [4]
328480
0
Knee re-injury rate
Query!
Assessment method [4]
328480
0
Query!
Timepoint [4]
328480
0
6, 12 and 24 months (or anytime throughout the initial 24 month post-operative period), assessed via clinical examination and MRI if required
Query!
Secondary outcome [5]
328542
0
Knee Outcome Survey
Query!
Assessment method [5]
328542
0
Query!
Timepoint [5]
328542
0
6, 12 and 24 months post-surgery
Query!
Secondary outcome [6]
328543
0
Knee Injury and Osteoarthritis Outcome Score (KOOS)
Query!
Assessment method [6]
328543
0
Query!
Timepoint [6]
328543
0
6, 12 and 24 months post-surgery
Query!
Secondary outcome [7]
328544
0
Modified Cincinnati Knee Rating System Questionnaire
Query!
Assessment method [7]
328544
0
Query!
Timepoint [7]
328544
0
6, 12 and 24 months post-surgery
Query!
Secondary outcome [8]
328545
0
Lysholm Knee Score
Query!
Assessment method [8]
328545
0
Query!
Timepoint [8]
328545
0
6, 12 and 24 months post-surgery
Query!
Secondary outcome [9]
328546
0
Tegner Activity Score
Query!
Assessment method [9]
328546
0
Query!
Timepoint [9]
328546
0
6, 12 and 24 months post-surgery
Query!
Secondary outcome [10]
328547
0
Short Form Health Survey (SF-36)
Query!
Assessment method [10]
328547
0
Query!
Timepoint [10]
328547
0
6, 12 and 24 months post-surgery
Query!
Secondary outcome [11]
328548
0
International Knee Documentation Committee (IKDC) Subjective Knee Form
Query!
Assessment method [11]
328548
0
Query!
Timepoint [11]
328548
0
6, 12 and 24 months post-surgery
Query!
Eligibility
Key inclusion criteria
1. The individual has reached skeletal maturity (closure of the epiphyses, generally 16 years of age) and under the age of 45 years.
2. The individual clinically qualifies for ACL reconstructive surgery based on clinical examination and MRI
3. The individual has sustained the ACL tear within the last four months
4. The individual is not currently being treated for a psychiatric disorder, senile dementia, Alzheimer’s disease, presence of alcohol/substance abuse.
Query!
Minimum age
16
Years
Query!
Query!
Maximum age
45
Years
Query!
Query!
Sex
Both males and females
Query!
Can healthy volunteers participate?
No
Query!
Key exclusion criteria
1. The individual is unable or unwilling to sign the Patient Informed Consent, specific to this study, and approved by the Institutional Ethics Review Board
2. The individual is unable or unwilling to follow the designated rehabilitation protocol
3. The individual is classified as morbidly obese (>40 BMI)
4. The individual is skeletally immature.
Query!
Study design
Purpose of the study
Treatment
Query!
Allocation to intervention
Randomised controlled trial
Query!
Procedure for enrolling a subject and allocating the treatment (allocation concealment procedures)
A different investigator to the investigator who recruits participants conducts participant randomization and allocation.
Query!
Methods used to generate the sequence in which subjects will be randomised (sequence generation)
The randomization process employed a ‘random number generator’ via Microsoft Excel. Participants for whom a '1' was assigned were allocated to the conservative rehabilitation group, while participants for whom for whom a '2' was assigned were allocated to the accelerated rehabilitation group.
Query!
Masking / blinding
Blinded (masking used)
Query!
Who is / are masked / blinded?
The people assessing the outcomes
The people analysing the results/data
Query!
Query!
Query!
Query!
Intervention assignment
Parallel
Query!
Other design features
Query!
Phase
Not Applicable
Query!
Type of endpoint/s
Safety/efficacy
Query!
Statistical methods / analysis
For this RCT, a priori power calculation has been determined based on our primary outcome variable, which is graft stiffness/laxity evaluated as side to side difference (ssd) in anterior translation of the operated knee versus the native contra-lateral knee. Graft stiffness will be evaluated via the KT-1000 arthrometer at 6, 12 and 24 months post-surgery. The KT-100 has demonstrated validity and is used routinely in the evaluation of ACL tears and following ACLR. Based on the recommendations of Cohen, which indicates that for an anticipated large effect size (d = 0.80) in the primary outcome variable (anterior translation in mm), a total of 36 patients (18 in each group) are required to reveal differences at the 5% significance level, with 80% power. Therefore, 40 patients (20 per group) will be recruited to allow for attrition.
In order to analyze the primary endpoint, a series of repeated measures ANCOVAs will be used to investigate differences in graft laxity between the two patient groups. A Tukeys post-hoc statistic will be used to determine time-points at which the two groups differ, given any significant main effects. Statistical analysis will be performed using SPSS software (SPSS, Version 11.5, SPSS Inc., USA). A series of repeated measures ANCOVAs will be used to investigate differences in these secondary measures between the two patient groups, as per the above statistical procedures.
Query!
Recruitment
Recruitment status
Completed
Query!
Date of first participant enrolment
Anticipated
Query!
Actual
8/12/2015
Query!
Date of last participant enrolment
Anticipated
1/10/2018
Query!
Actual
15/04/2018
Query!
Date of last data collection
Anticipated
1/10/2020
Query!
Actual
17/04/2020
Query!
Sample size
Target
40
Query!
Accrual to date
Query!
Final
44
Query!
Recruitment in Australia
Recruitment state(s)
WA
Query!
Recruitment hospital [1]
6828
0
Hollywood Private Hospital - Nedlands
Query!
Recruitment postcode(s) [1]
14492
0
6009 - Nedlands
Query!
Funding & Sponsors
Funding source category [1]
294720
0
Commercial sector/Industry
Query!
Name [1]
294720
0
Smith & Nephew Surgical Pty Ltd
Query!
Address [1]
294720
0
85 Waterloo Road, North Ryde NSW Australia 2113
Query!
Country [1]
294720
0
Australia
Query!
Primary sponsor type
Commercial sector/Industry
Query!
Name
Smith & Nephew Surgical Pty Ltd
Query!
Address
Smith & Nephew Surgical Pty Ltd
85 Waterloo Road
North Ryde, NSW, Australia, 2113
Query!
Country
Australia
Query!
Secondary sponsor category [1]
293564
0
None
Query!
Name [1]
293564
0
Query!
Address [1]
293564
0
Query!
Country [1]
293564
0
Query!
Ethics approval
Ethics application status
Approved
Query!
Ethics committee name [1]
296139
0
Hollywood Private Hospital
Query!
Ethics committee address [1]
296139
0
Monash Avenue, Nedlands, Western Australia, 6009
Query!
Ethics committee country [1]
296139
0
Australia
Query!
Date submitted for ethics approval [1]
296139
0
16/03/2015
Query!
Approval date [1]
296139
0
26/05/2015
Query!
Ethics approval number [1]
296139
0
HPH414
Query!
Summary
Brief summary
This is a prospective randomized controlled trial (RCT) investigating the graft stiffness of a Double Bundle (DB) remnant sparing Anterior Cruciate Ligament Reconstruction. The patients receiving this graft configuration will be randomized to either an accelerated rehabilitation program or a conventional rehabilitation program. Six months and one and two year graft laxity measures will be used as the primary outcome measure of the graft stiffness and its response to two forms of rehabilitation loads. Our overall hypothesis is that accelerated rehabilitation culminating in a return to sport at 6 months post-surgery will have no adverse effects on the graft laxity after ACLR, evaluated primarily by graft laxity measures at 1 and 2 years and secondarily by the time taken to return to sport, patient satisfaction, validated functional scores and patient-reported outcome (PRO) measures.
Query!
Trial website
Query!
Trial related presentations / publications
Query!
Public notes
Query!
Contacts
Principal investigator
Name
69702
0
Dr Peter Annear
Query!
Address
69702
0
Perth Orthopaedic and Sports Medicine Centre
31 Outram Street
West Perth WA 6005
Query!
Country
69702
0
Australia
Query!
Phone
69702
0
+61 8 9212 4200
Query!
Fax
69702
0
Query!
Email
69702
0
[email protected]
Query!
Contact person for public queries
Name
69703
0
Jay Ebert
Query!
Address
69703
0
The School of Sport Science, Exercise and Health
The University of Western Australia
35 Stirling Highway, Crawley, 6009, Western Australia
Query!
Country
69703
0
Australia
Query!
Phone
69703
0
+61 8 9386 9961
Query!
Fax
69703
0
Query!
Email
69703
0
[email protected]
Query!
Contact person for scientific queries
Name
69704
0
Jay Ebert
Query!
Address
69704
0
The School of Sport Science, Exercise and Health
The University of Western Australia
35 Stirling Highway, Crawley, 6009, Western Australia
Query!
Country
69704
0
Australia
Query!
Phone
69704
0
+61 8 9386 9961
Query!
Fax
69704
0
Query!
Email
69704
0
[email protected]
Query!
Data sharing statement
Will individual participant data (IPD) for this trial be available (including data dictionaries)?
No
Query!
No/undecided IPD sharing reason/comment
Query!
What supporting documents are/will be available?
No Supporting Document Provided
Results publications and other study-related documents
Documents added manually
No documents have been uploaded by study researchers.
Documents added automatically
No additional documents have been identified.
Download to PDF