Please note that the copy function is not enabled for this field.
If you wish to
modify
existing outcomes, please copy and paste the current outcome text into the Update field.
LOGIN
CREATE ACCOUNT
LOGIN
CREATE ACCOUNT
MY TRIALS
REGISTER TRIAL
FAQs
HINTS AND TIPS
DEFINITIONS
Trial Review
The ANZCTR website will be unavailable from 1pm until 3pm (AEDT) on Wednesday the 30th of October for website maintenance. Please be sure to log out of the system in order to avoid any loss of data.
The safety and scientific validity of this study is the responsibility of the study sponsor and investigators. Listing a study does not mean it has been endorsed by the ANZCTR. Before participating in a study, talk to your health care provider and refer to this
information for consumers
Download to PDF
Trial registered on ANZCTR
Registration number
ACTRN12617000088347
Ethics application status
Approved
Date submitted
10/11/2016
Date registered
17/01/2017
Date last updated
17/01/2017
Type of registration
Retrospectively registered
Titles & IDs
Public title
Listening to preferred music to reduce risky wandering: A feasibility study
Query!
Scientific title
Listening to preferred music to reduce risky wandering in people with severe dementia in residential aged care
Query!
Secondary ID [1]
290469
0
Nil other
Query!
Universal Trial Number (UTN)
U1111-1189-5507
Query!
Trial acronym
Query!
Linked study record
Query!
Health condition
Health condition(s) or problem(s) studied:
Dementia
300835
0
Query!
Wandering
300836
0
Query!
Condition category
Condition code
Neurological
300662
300662
0
0
Query!
Dementias
Query!
Neurological
301152
301152
0
0
Query!
Alzheimer's disease
Query!
Intervention/exposure
Study type
Interventional
Query!
Description of intervention(s) / exposure
Non-drug trial
Participants with severe dementia living in long term care with a history of wandering will listen to a selection of preferred music as selected by the participants next of kin. The music will be downloaded on to an iPod shuffle and listened to through head phones or speakers depending on preference. There are 2 conditions (2 participating facilities):
Condition 1: Each participant will listen to their selection of music in a quiet area for 20 mins, 5 days per week (Mon-Fri), for 3 weeks, 30 minutes before an individuals unique peak activity period.
Condition 2: Each participant will listen to their selection of music in a quiet area for 20 mins, 5 days per week (Mon-Fri), for 3 weeks, at a randomized time not including 30 minutes before an individuals unique peak activity period. Participants will be randomised to any 20 minute time period not 30 mins prior to peak activity periods or during scheduled meal times between 8am-6.30pm Mon-Fri.
Cluster randomization at the level of the facility was used to assign conditions - Facility 1 assigned condition 1; Facility 2 assigned condition 2. Condition assignment was chosen by a colleague not associated with the project. Participants only received 1 condition
The intervention will be delivered by trained research assistants who will remain with the participant during the intervention to observe reaction to the music (duration of time listening to music) and mood using Lawton's Modified Behavior Stream. To measure protocol fidelity, the person conducting the music session completed a checklist of essential protocol items (pre music session checklist (asked participant if they would like to listen to music, wearing appropriate clothing, elimination needs attended to, offered a drink), time music session commenced, duration of music session, mood that participant listen to music (headphones/speaker), location that music session was conducted, and comments about deviations from protocol). 10% of all interventions were observed by the principle investigator or project manager for inter rater reliability.
Query!
Intervention code [1]
296321
0
Behaviour
Query!
Intervention code [2]
296552
0
Prevention
Query!
Comparator / control treatment
Comparisons will be made between the two conditions as well between weeks (Baseline (1 week before intervention), weekly during the 3 week intervention, week after the 3 week intervention)
Pre and post measures of wandering behaviour (steps taken, intrusion into private space, pattern of ambulation) by direct observation 2 x 2hr/week/participant, agitation, mood (Lawton's Modified Behavior Stream - collected during each intervention and pre or post wandering observations)
Query!
Control group
Active
Query!
Outcomes
Primary outcome [1]
300083
0
Feasibility of following the intervention protocol through checklist completed at the end of each intervention session and congruence with a second observer of 10% of all interventions delivered
Query!
Assessment method [1]
300083
0
Query!
Timepoint [1]
300083
0
During each listening to music session the RA will observe the participant's mood to assess acceptability . At the end of each listening to music session the RA will complete a checklist of items included in the protocol
Query!
Secondary outcome [1]
328983
0
Composite outcomes
Characteristics of wandering: frequency of ambulation (steps taken using Actigraph activity monitor), boundary transgression (frequency and duration of entry into private space collected by direct observation), pattern of ambulation (lapping, pacing, random, direct collected using direct observation).
Query!
Assessment method [1]
328983
0
Query!
Timepoint [1]
328983
0
Baseline (pre intervention - Week 1), during intervention (Week 2-4) and post intervention (week 5).
RA observe each participant for 2 hours 2 x per week - 1 x in peak activity periods, 1 x outside peak activity periods. For IRR 10% of all observations have 2 observers - aim for 95% congruence. re training to occur if not acheived
Query!
Secondary outcome [2]
329846
0
Agitation - Cohen Mansfield Agitation Inventory - Short Form (CMAI-SF)
Query!
Assessment method [2]
329846
0
Query!
Timepoint [2]
329846
0
Baseline (pre intervention - start Week 1), during intervention (Start Weeks 2-4) and post intervention (start week 5).
Query!
Secondary outcome [3]
329851
0
Staff and family perceptions of benefits and acceptability of music program: Composite secondary outcome
Query!
Assessment method [3]
329851
0
Query!
Timepoint [3]
329851
0
Interviews conducted in the weeks after the 3 week listening to music program is completed with staff present during the listen ting to music program.
Query!
Secondary outcome [4]
330320
0
Acceptability of the use of headphones or speakers (mode of listening to music directed by person with dementia or family member) to listen to music
Query!
Assessment method [4]
330320
0
Query!
Timepoint [4]
330320
0
The duration of time that the participant listen s to music will be recorded at the end of each listening to music session by the RA observing the session
Query!
Secondary outcome [5]
330783
0
Are participants able to listen to music for a period of 20 minutes per day five times per week for 3 weeks?
Query!
Assessment method [5]
330783
0
Query!
Timepoint [5]
330783
0
During each listening to music session, the participant will be observed by the research assistant who will note when the session is ended and why it ends i.e. by participant or research assistant
Query!
Secondary outcome [6]
330784
0
Do participants enjoy listening to music?
Query!
Assessment method [6]
330784
0
Query!
Timepoint [6]
330784
0
At the end of each listening to music session, participants will be asked if they enjoyed the music session.
Query!
Secondary outcome [7]
330785
0
Immediate pleasure
Query!
Assessment method [7]
330785
0
Query!
Timepoint [7]
330785
0
During each listening to music session the RA will observe the participant and collect data related to positive (pleasure, interest), neutral and negative (sadness, worry/anxiety, anger) affect will be collected (Lawton's Modified Behavior Stream)
Query!
Secondary outcome [8]
330787
0
Reliability of staff to identify residents with dementia who wander and exhibit BT at an intensity that is observable
Query!
Assessment method [8]
330787
0
Query!
Timepoint [8]
330787
0
Congruence between identified potential participants with inclusion criteria
Query!
Eligibility
Key inclusion criteria
> 55 years
Severe dementia as documented in medical history and confirmed with Global Deterioration Scale
Positive history of wandering as reported by care staff and confirmed using Revised Algase Wandering Scale
Independently ambulant (wheelie walker and walking stick acceptable
Not experiencing an acute mental illness
Able to listen to music
Enjoys listening to music
Walks > 5000 step per day
Query!
Minimum age
55
Years
Query!
Query!
Maximum age
No limit
Query!
Query!
Sex
Both males and females
Query!
Can healthy volunteers participate?
No
Query!
Key exclusion criteria
Not severe dementia
Not independently ambulant
Does not walk > 5000 steps per day
Experiencing an acute psychotic episode
Query!
Study design
Purpose of the study
Prevention
Query!
Allocation to intervention
Randomised controlled trial
Query!
Procedure for enrolling a subject and allocating the treatment (allocation concealment procedures)
Allocation concealed
Query!
Methods used to generate the sequence in which subjects will be randomised (sequence generation)
A colleague not associated with the project chose one of two folded pieces of paper with condition 1 and condition 2 written on them. The first one chosen was allocated to Facility 1 and Facility 2 received the other.
Query!
Masking / blinding
Open (masking not used)
Query!
Who is / are masked / blinded?
Query!
Query!
Query!
Query!
Intervention assignment
Parallel
Query!
Other design features
Query!
Phase
Not Applicable
Query!
Type of endpoint/s
Efficacy
Query!
Statistical methods / analysis
To compare effect of intervention, repeated measures ANOVA will be used to compare mean frequency of CMAI scores and wandering observations across the 5 weeks of the program
Query!
Recruitment
Recruitment status
Recruiting
Query!
Date of first participant enrolment
Anticipated
Query!
Actual
1/09/2016
Query!
Date of last participant enrolment
Anticipated
28/02/2017
Query!
Actual
Query!
Date of last data collection
Anticipated
31/05/2017
Query!
Actual
Query!
Sample size
Target
15
Query!
Accrual to date
Query!
Final
Query!
Recruitment in Australia
Recruitment state(s)
QLD
Query!
Recruitment postcode(s) [1]
14552
0
4022 - Rothwell
Query!
Funding & Sponsors
Funding source category [1]
294882
0
Other Collaborative groups
Query!
Name [1]
294882
0
Dementia Collaborative Research Centre
Query!
Address [1]
294882
0
QUT
Level 6 N Block
Victoria Park Rd
Kelvin Grove, Qld 4059
Query!
Country [1]
294882
0
Australia
Query!
Primary sponsor type
University
Query!
Name
Queensland University of Technology
Query!
Address
Victoria Park Rd
Kelvin Grove, Qld 4059
Query!
Country
Australia
Query!
Secondary sponsor category [1]
293720
0
None
Query!
Name [1]
293720
0
Query!
Address [1]
293720
0
Query!
Country [1]
293720
0
Query!
Ethics approval
Ethics application status
Approved
Query!
Ethics committee name [1]
296260
0
Queensland University of Technology
Query!
Ethics committee address [1]
296260
0
Victoria Park Rd Kelvin Grove, Qld 4059
Query!
Ethics committee country [1]
296260
0
Australia
Query!
Date submitted for ethics approval [1]
296260
0
12/05/2016
Query!
Approval date [1]
296260
0
25/07/2016
Query!
Ethics approval number [1]
296260
0
1600000627
Query!
Summary
Brief summary
In the absence of effective alternatives, residential aged care (RAC) still resort to using pharmacological interventions, such as antipsychotic and sedating medications, to manage behaviours of dementia despite there being strong evidence that these are ineffective and are associated with severe adverse outcomes for the person with dementia. Non-pharmacological interventions are recommended as best practice to mitigate adverse outcomes associated with behaviours of dementia. There is considerable evidence that listening to preferred music reduces agitation in dementia. However, there is also robust evidence that dementia-related wandering and agitation are distinct phenomenon. Therefore we cannot assume that an intervention effective in reducing agitation will also reduce aspects of wandering that incur risk or result in negative outcomes for the person with dementia. There have been no known trials of music based interventions for people with dementia who wander, despite the pressing need for non-pharmacological interventions in this area. The goal of this applied research is to test the feasibility of using an intervention protocol, previously found to be effective in reducing agitation for people with dementia, to determine if it can be used with people who wander. Therefore the aims of this feasibility study are: 1) For people with dementia who wander and exhibit boundary transgression (BT) (entry into out of bounds and hazardous areas) in residential aged care (RAC): a. Is listening to music for a period of 20 minutes five times per week for 3 weeks tolerated? b. Is listening to the music via ear bud head phones tolerated? c. Do participants enjoy listening to the music? 2) Does listening to preferred music daily for 20 minutes under two conditions: a) Reduce risky aspects of wandering including frequent ambulation and boundary transgression (BT)? b) Reduce participant agitation? c) Provide immediate pleasure to the participant? 3) Are facility care staff able to reliably identify residents with dementia who wander and exhibit BT at an intensity that is observable? 4) Do care staff and family members perceive the music intervention to be beneficial for resident with dementia who wander? This feasibility study will use cluster randomisation (Facility 1 and Facility 2) to trial two intervention conditions: Condition 1: Daily (Mon-Fri) session of listening to preferred music for 20 minutes, 30 minutes before unique peak activity period Condition 2: Daily (Mon-Fri) session of listening to preferred music for 20 minutes at a randomly selected time between 10 am-7pm not including 30 mins prior to individual peak activity periods. Pre, during and post intervention measures of wandering characterisitics (frequency, boundary transgression, pattern), mood and agitation will be collected.
Query!
Trial website
Query!
Trial related presentations / publications
Query!
Public notes
Participating nursing homes Beaumont Care Rothwell and Seabrae Manor Rothwell
Query!
Contacts
Principal investigator
Name
70178
0
Dr Margaret MacAndrew
Query!
Address
70178
0
QUT
Victoria Park Rd
Level 3 N Block
Kelvin Grove, Qld 4059
Query!
Country
70178
0
Australia
Query!
Phone
70178
0
+61 7 31385956
Query!
Fax
70178
0
Query!
Email
70178
0
[email protected]
Query!
Contact person for public queries
Name
70179
0
Margaret MacAndrew
Query!
Address
70179
0
QUT
Victoria Park Rd
Level 3 N Block
Kelvin Grove, Qld 4059
Query!
Country
70179
0
Australia
Query!
Phone
70179
0
+61 7 31385956
Query!
Fax
70179
0
Query!
Email
70179
0
[email protected]
Query!
Contact person for scientific queries
Name
70180
0
Margaret MacAndrew
Query!
Address
70180
0
QUT
Victoria Park Rd
Level 3 N Block
Kelvin Grove, Qld 4059
Query!
Country
70180
0
Australia
Query!
Phone
70180
0
+61 7 31385956
Query!
Fax
70180
0
Query!
Email
70180
0
[email protected]
Query!
No information has been provided regarding IPD availability
What supporting documents are/will be available?
No Supporting Document Provided
Results publications and other study-related documents
Documents added manually
No documents have been uploaded by study researchers.
Documents added automatically
No additional documents have been identified.
Download to PDF