Please note that the copy function is not enabled for this field.
If you wish to
modify
existing outcomes, please copy and paste the current outcome text into the Update field.
LOGIN
CREATE ACCOUNT
LOGIN
CREATE ACCOUNT
MY TRIALS
REGISTER TRIAL
FAQs
HINTS AND TIPS
DEFINITIONS
Trial Review
The ANZCTR website will be unavailable from 1pm until 3pm (AEDT) on Wednesday the 30th of October for website maintenance. Please be sure to log out of the system in order to avoid any loss of data.
The safety and scientific validity of this study is the responsibility of the study sponsor and investigators. Listing a study does not mean it has been endorsed by the ANZCTR. Before participating in a study, talk to your health care provider and refer to this
information for consumers
Download to PDF
Trial registered on ANZCTR
Registration number
ACTRN12617000484347
Ethics application status
Approved
Date submitted
12/02/2017
Date registered
3/04/2017
Date last updated
3/04/2017
Type of registration
Retrospectively registered
Titles & IDs
Public title
Influence of central venous pressure reducing manouvres on the postoperative outcome in patients undergoing major liver surgery
Query!
Scientific title
The influence of two different central venous pressure (CVP) reducing regimes used in patients undergoing liver resection using low CVP anesthesia principle on their clinical outcome, hemodynamic stability and global oxygen balance.
Query!
Secondary ID [1]
290511
0
None
Query!
Universal Trial Number (UTN)
U1111-1189-6855
Query!
Trial acronym
HOLIRES (Hemodynamic Optimization in LIver REsection Surgery)
Query!
Linked study record
Query!
Health condition
Health condition(s) or problem(s) studied:
perioperative outcomes
300912
0
Query!
liver resection
300913
0
Query!
low central venous pressure anesthesia
302026
0
Query!
hemodynamic stability
302027
0
Query!
Condition category
Condition code
Anaesthesiology
300727
300727
0
0
Query!
Other anaesthesiology
Query!
Oral and Gastrointestinal
301774
301774
0
0
Query!
Other diseases of the mouth, teeth, oesophagus, digestive system including liver and colon
Query!
Intervention/exposure
Study type
Interventional
Query!
Description of intervention(s) / exposure
Comparison of two strategies of reaching low central venous pressure (Low-CVP; below 5 mmHg) during liver resection surgery.
One strategy is using absolute fluid restriction (Arm 1 - intervention), the other one relative volume redistribution caused by systemic vasodilation (Arm 2 - control). Treatments in both groups will be administered by treating anaesthesiologist (member of the study team) according to the randomization during the preoperative (from morning till surgery) and intraoperative period. Treatments in both arms will be graded into predefined steps.
In the Arm 1 absolute restriction of circulating volume will be provided by reduction of preoperative fluids (neither intravenous nor oral intake 6 hours prior surgery) coupled with minimal (1ml/kg/hour, Ringerfundin solution - B´Braun) intraoperative intravenous supplementation. If needed, given the CVP value assessed by the treating anaesthesiologist, diuretics will be further administered (Furosemide 10mg intravenous per step, maximum 3 doses allowed i.e. up to three steps) to reach the low-CVP target. Participants will receive only the minimal number of steps required to reach the 5mmHg CVP target.
Query!
Intervention code [1]
296365
0
Treatment: Other
Query!
Intervention code [2]
297358
0
Treatment: Drugs
Query!
Comparator / control treatment
In the Arm 2 standard preoperative intravenous fluid replacement for fasting (6 hours prior surgery, 100ml/hour Plasmalyte solution - Baxter) will be provided coupled with restrictive fluid loading in the pre-resection period (2ml/kg/hour, Ringerfundin solution- B´Braun). Relative fluid redistribution using volatile anesthetics (inhaled sevoflurane in O2 + N2O mixture; 1.6 and 2 times minimal alveolar concentrations as steps 1 and 2) and continuous infusion of vasodilators (isosorbid dinitrate 0.1% 5ml/hour intravenous – step 3) will be used to decrease the central venous pressure till the end of liver resection phase. Participants will receive only the minimal number of steps required to reach the 5mmHg CVP target.
Query!
Control group
Active
Query!
Outcomes
Primary outcome [1]
300136
0
Ease of reaching low central venous pressure (CVP lower 5 mmHg) measured as number of predefined protocol steps needed
Query!
Assessment method [1]
300136
0
Query!
Timepoint [1]
300136
0
intraoperatively, prospectively - number of predefined steps of intervention needed to reach the target
Query!
Primary outcome [2]
300137
0
Composite postoperative outcome (rate of postoperative complications and/or death). Postoperative complications will be assessed by clinical, radiological or laboratory examination; screened events: death of any origin, complications - infectious (pneumonia, abdominal, urinary, catheter related blood stream infections), respiratory (respiratory failure, fluidothorax, atelectasis), cardiovascular or thrombotic (myocardial infarction, deep vein thrombosis, pulmonary embolization, stroke, postoperative bleeding), acute kidney injury and gastrointestinal (biliary leakage, hepatic dysfunction, ileus).
Query!
Assessment method [2]
300137
0
Query!
Timepoint [2]
300137
0
30 days,assessed by daily observation by member of the study group unaware of patients group allocation
Query!
Primary outcome [3]
300138
0
Hospital length of stay
Query!
Assessment method [3]
300138
0
Query!
Timepoint [3]
300138
0
till discharge, assessed by daily observation by member of the study group unaware of patients group allocation
Query!
Secondary outcome [1]
329173
0
Intraoperative blood loss
Query!
Assessment method [1]
329173
0
Query!
Timepoint [1]
329173
0
Intraoperatively, prospectivelly collcted by the treating anesthesiologist
Query!
Secondary outcome [2]
329174
0
Composite secondary outcome concerning oxygen debt markers (serum lactate levels and mixed venous oxygen saturation)
Query!
Assessment method [2]
329174
0
Query!
Timepoint [2]
329174
0
In the end of operation and 4, 8, 24 hours postoperatively
Query!
Secondary outcome [3]
331931
0
Intraoperative hemodynamic stabíility
Query!
Assessment method [3]
331931
0
Query!
Timepoint [3]
331931
0
Assessed prospectivelly during the operation in 3 minutes intervals using advanced hemodynamic monitoring (Vigileo/FloTrac). Time spent in hypodynamic state (Cardiac index below 2 l/min/m2) will be collected.
Query!
Eligibility
Key inclusion criteria
patients scheduled for hepatic resection of more than 2 liver segments, general anesthesia, regullar heart rhythm, signed informed consent
Query!
Minimum age
18
Years
Query!
Query!
Maximum age
No limit
Query!
Query!
Sex
Both males and females
Query!
Can healthy volunteers participate?
No
Query!
Key exclusion criteria
body weight less than 50 kg or more than 150 kg, irregular heart rythm, severe cardiovascular disease (chronic heart failure, valvular abnormality, cardiomyopathy etc.), severe liver dysfunction (Child Pugh score B or C)
Query!
Study design
Purpose of the study
Treatment
Query!
Allocation to intervention
Randomised controlled trial
Query!
Procedure for enrolling a subject and allocating the treatment (allocation concealment procedures)
Sealed opaque envelopes
Query!
Methods used to generate the sequence in which subjects will be randomised (sequence generation)
Simple randomization be performed by random drafting of sealed envelopes containing group allocation (Intervention vs. Control; 1:1 ratio)
Query!
Masking / blinding
Blinded (masking used)
Query!
Who is / are masked / blinded?
The people receiving the treatment/s
The people assessing the outcomes
Query!
Query!
Query!
Query!
Intervention assignment
Parallel
Query!
Other design features
As the treating anesthesiologist will provide the intervention he cannot be blinded to the group allocation. All other members and hospital staff will be unaware of the group allocation (partial blinding).
Query!
Phase
Not Applicable
Query!
Type of endpoint/s
Efficacy
Query!
Statistical methods / analysis
Study is designed as a hypothesis and sample size generating for further research. It is limited by study time, no calulation of minimal number of participants has been made.
The analysis will be performed using the MedCalc software (Frank Schoonjans, MedCalc Software, Broekstraat 52, 9030, Mariekerke, Belgium). The Kolmogorov –Smirnov test will be used for normality assessment. Difference in normaly distributed data will be assessed using paired or unpaired student´s t test and Mann Whitney test will be used for abnormally distributed data. For time-dependent variables, repeated measures ANOVA test or Friedman test will be performed. Categorical variables will be tested using the Chi-square test.
Query!
Recruitment
Recruitment status
Completed
Query!
Date of first participant enrolment
Anticipated
Query!
Actual
11/01/2012
Query!
Date of last participant enrolment
Anticipated
Query!
Actual
4/02/2015
Query!
Date of last data collection
Anticipated
Query!
Actual
4/03/2015
Query!
Sample size
Target
30
Query!
Accrual to date
Query!
Final
34
Query!
Recruitment outside Australia
Country [1]
8383
0
Czech Republic
Query!
State/province [1]
8383
0
Query!
Funding & Sponsors
Funding source category [1]
294925
0
University
Query!
Name [1]
294925
0
Charles University Research Fund (project number P36)
Query!
Address [1]
294925
0
The Faculty of Medicine in Plzen
Charles University in Prague
Husova 3
Plzen
306 05
Query!
Country [1]
294925
0
Czech Republic
Query!
Primary sponsor type
University
Query!
Name
Dpt. of Anesthesia and Intensive Care of The Faculty of Medicine Plzen - Charles University Prague)
Query!
Address
The University hospital and The Faculty of Medicine in Plzen
Charles University Prague
alej Svobody 80
Plzen
304 06
Query!
Country
Czech Republic
Query!
Secondary sponsor category [1]
294433
0
None
Query!
Name [1]
294433
0
Query!
Address [1]
294433
0
Query!
Country [1]
294433
0
Query!
Ethics approval
Ethics application status
Approved
Query!
Ethics committee name [1]
296301
0
Local ethics committee of the Charles University hospital in Plzen
Query!
Ethics committee address [1]
296301
0
Charles University hospital in Plzen E. Benese 13 Plzen 305 99
Query!
Ethics committee country [1]
296301
0
Czech Republic
Query!
Date submitted for ethics approval [1]
296301
0
04/08/2010
Query!
Approval date [1]
296301
0
12/08/2010
Query!
Ethics approval number [1]
296301
0
Query!
Summary
Brief summary
The aim of the study is to compare the effectivity of two methods of lowering central venous pressure (CVP) on the ease to reach the predefined target of CVP lower than 5 mmHg. Patients´ postoperative outcome assessed via composite morbidity (complications rate) and mortality till 30 days and hospital length of stay as well as intraoperative safety outcomes (hemodynamic stability, markers of global oxygen debt, blood loss,) will be assessed, allowing to define simple, standardized and safe approach of low-CVP anesthesia.
Query!
Trial website
Query!
Trial related presentations / publications
Query!
Public notes
Query!
Contacts
Principal investigator
Name
70370
0
A/Prof Jan Benes, M.D. Ph.D.
Query!
Address
70370
0
Dpt. of Anesthesiology and Intensive Care Medicine
Faculty of Medicine and Hospital in Plzen, Charles University
alej Svobody 80
Plzen, 32300
Query!
Country
70370
0
Czech Republic
Query!
Phone
70370
0
+420377104381
Query!
Fax
70370
0
+420377104359
Query!
Email
70370
0
[email protected]
Query!
Contact person for public queries
Name
70371
0
Jan Zatloukal
Query!
Address
70371
0
Dpt. of Anesthesiology and Intensive Care Medicine
Faculty of Medicine and Hospital in Plzen, Charles University
alej Svobody 80
Plzen, 32300
Query!
Country
70371
0
Czech Republic
Query!
Phone
70371
0
+420377104381
Query!
Fax
70371
0
+420377104359
Query!
Email
70371
0
[email protected]
Query!
Contact person for scientific queries
Name
70372
0
Jan Zatloukal
Query!
Address
70372
0
Dpt. of Anesthesiology and Intensive Care Medicine
Faculty of Medicine and Hospital in Plzen, Charles University
alej Svobody 80
Plzen, 32300
Query!
Country
70372
0
Czech Republic
Query!
Phone
70372
0
+420377104381
Query!
Fax
70372
0
+420377104359
Query!
Email
70372
0
[email protected]
Query!
No information has been provided regarding IPD availability
What supporting documents are/will be available?
No Supporting Document Provided
Results publications and other study-related documents
Documents added manually
No documents have been uploaded by study researchers.
Documents added automatically
No additional documents have been identified.
Download to PDF