Please note that the copy function is not enabled for this field.
If you wish to
modify
existing outcomes, please copy and paste the current outcome text into the Update field.
LOGIN
CREATE ACCOUNT
LOGIN
CREATE ACCOUNT
MY TRIALS
REGISTER TRIAL
FAQs
HINTS AND TIPS
DEFINITIONS
Trial Review
The ANZCTR website will be unavailable from 1pm until 3pm (AEDT) on Wednesday the 30th of October for website maintenance. Please be sure to log out of the system in order to avoid any loss of data.
The safety and scientific validity of this study is the responsibility of the study sponsor and investigators. Listing a study does not mean it has been endorsed by the ANZCTR. Before participating in a study, talk to your health care provider and refer to this
information for consumers
Download to PDF
Trial registered on ANZCTR
Registration number
ACTRN12617000246381
Ethics application status
Approved
Date submitted
13/02/2017
Date registered
17/02/2017
Date last updated
8/03/2017
Type of registration
Prospectively registered
Titles & IDs
Public title
Is there educational value in providing individualised feedback in addition to generic feedback to online course participants?
Query!
Scientific title
The effectiveness of individualised and generic feedback compared to generic feedback alone on participation, satisfaction, knowledge acquisition and change in practice in fitness professionals enrolled in an online course.
Query!
Secondary ID [1]
291160
0
Nil known
Query!
Universal Trial Number (UTN)
U1111-1192-8399
Query!
Trial acronym
Query!
Linked study record
Query!
Health condition
Health condition(s) or problem(s) studied:
Older adults at risk of falls
302021
0
Query!
Condition category
Condition code
Injuries and Accidents
301660
301660
0
0
Query!
Other injuries and accidents
Query!
Public Health
301692
301692
0
0
Query!
Health promotion/education
Query!
Intervention/exposure
Study type
Interventional
Query!
Description of intervention(s) / exposure
Provision of individualised feedback on assignment tasks in addition to generic feedback to fitness professionals participating in an online short course titled 'Exercise Prescription for Falls Prevention'.
The generic feedback is a collation of the main strengths and weaknesses of the group as a whole for each assignment task. This feedback is standardardized for all participants and will be developed by the course facilitators after examining the assignment tasks. The course facilitators are physiotherapists with a minimum of 5 years experience in the area of falls prevention.
The individualised feedback will be feedback specifically developed for each participant based on their own assignment task. Both positive aspects of the task along with some constructive criticism relating to the task goals and possible areas of improvement will be given. This feedback will be provided by the same course facilitators who provide the generic feedback.
The mode of delivery of both the individualised and generic feedback will be the online learning platform (Moodle) used for the online course which can be set up to send email notifications. Both interventions will be provided for each of the four assessment tasks. All participants will be able to direct questions to their course facilitator based on the feedback given. Participants receiving individualised feedback will be encouraged to engage in the feedback given.
The overall duration of the course is 6 weeks. This contains four weeks of active facilitation with an additional 2 weeks when educational materials will remain available for participants and it is expected the final knowledge test and course evaluation should be completed.
Query!
Intervention code [1]
297152
0
Prevention
Query!
Intervention code [2]
297179
0
Behaviour
Query!
Comparator / control treatment
Provision of generic feedback to fitness professionals participating in an online short course titled 'Exercise prescription for Falls Prevention'.
The control group will receive generic feedback only.
The generic feedback is a collation of the main strengths and weaknesses of the group as a whole for each assignment task. This feedback is standardized for all participants and will be developed by the course facilitators after examining the assignment tasks. The course facilitators are physiotherapists with a minimum of 5 years experience in the area of falls prevention.
The mode of delivery will be the online learning platform (Moodle) used for the online course which can be set up to send email notifications. Generic feedback will be provided for each of the four assessment tasks. All participants will be able to direct questions to their course facilitator based on the feedback given.
The overall duration of the course is 6 weeks. This contains four weeks of active facilitation with an additional 2 weeks when educational materials will remain available for participants and it is expected the final knowledge test and course evaluation should be completed.
Query!
Control group
Active
Query!
Outcomes
Primary outcome [1]
301066
0
Participant satisfaction with content and its relevance and with the support and facilitation measured with a post course evaluation questionnaire designed specifically for a previous study involving this web-based course (Maloney S, Haas R, Keating JL, Molloy E, Jolly B, Sims J, Morgan P, Haines T. Effectiveness of web-based versus face-to-face delivery of education in prescription of falls-prevention exercise to health professionals: Randomised Trial. J Med Internet Res 2011:13(4):e116).
Participants will be asked to respond to the following statements with response options of strongly disagree, disagree, neutral, agree or strongly agree:
1. The course was pitched at an appropriate knowledge level.
2. I found the tasks and quizzes relevant to my learning.
3. I found the resources relevant to my learning
4. I feel better prepared to prescribe exercise for falls and balance clients
5. Overall, completing the course has improved my confidence in exercise prescription for falls and balance clients.
6. The course content (i.e. topics and skills) was relevant to my current work role.
7. The course content (i.e. topics and skills) was relevant to my career aspirations.
8. I felt supported throughout the course.
9. I was satisfied with the quantity of feedback available on my progress and performance in the course (i.e. provided through answers to self-directed quizzes, feedback on task submissions, answer/feedback sought form the facilitator).
10. Overall I was satisfied with the facilitation of this short-course.
Query!
Assessment method [1]
301066
0
Query!
Timepoint [1]
301066
0
within 2 weeks of course completion
Query!
Primary outcome [2]
301067
0
Willingness to pay for course measured using open ended contingent evaluation question.
At the beginning of the course, we asked you how much was the maximum amount that you would have been willing to pay out of your own pocket to undertake this course.
Now that you have completed this course and know what was contained within the course and what you have learnt, please tell us what the maximum amount you would now be willing to pay of your own money to complete this course?
Query!
Assessment method [2]
301067
0
Query!
Timepoint [2]
301067
0
Within 2 weeks of course completion.
Query!
Secondary outcome [1]
331598
0
Participant engagement in course materials measured via computer-generated usage reports. Engagement will be measured by number of minutes of online usage with the learning platform, Moodle. This is automatically collected for each participant as they interact with the online course materials.
Query!
Assessment method [1]
331598
0
Query!
Timepoint [1]
331598
0
From course commencement till course completion (6 week time period)
Query!
Secondary outcome [2]
331599
0
Participant change in clinical behaviour measured by self-reported change in practice since completing the program. Participants will be asked to respond to the following statements with response options of strongly disagree, disagree, neutral, agree or strongly agree:
1. Since completing the course, I offer greater assistance/advise to other clinicians within falls prevention..
2. Since completing the course, I feel I communicate more effectively with falls prevention clients.
3. Since completing the course, I attempt to use more motivational interviewing techniques..
4. Since completing the course, I manage falls prevention clients more safely.
5. Since completing the course, I have increased my effort to help clients adhere to their falls and balance programs.
6. Since completing the course, I feel I incorporate more evidence-based practice into the management of falls and balance clients.
Query!
Assessment method [2]
331599
0
Query!
Timepoint [2]
331599
0
Within 2 weeks of course completion and again 3 months following course completion
Query!
Secondary outcome [3]
331632
0
Participant knowledge of exercise prescription for falls prevention measured using 1 hour multiple choice knowledge test.
Query!
Assessment method [3]
331632
0
Query!
Timepoint [3]
331632
0
Within 2 weeks of course completion
Query!
Eligibility
Key inclusion criteria
All fitness professionals enrolled in an online short course titled 'Exercise Prescription for Falls Prevention'
Query!
Minimum age
18
Years
Query!
Query!
Maximum age
No limit
Query!
Query!
Sex
Both males and females
Query!
Can healthy volunteers participate?
Yes
Query!
Key exclusion criteria
All enrolled course participants are eligible to participate.
Query!
Study design
Purpose of the study
Educational / counselling / training
Query!
Allocation to intervention
Randomised controlled trial
Query!
Procedure for enrolling a subject and allocating the treatment (allocation concealment procedures)
Central randomisation by computer
Query!
Methods used to generate the sequence in which subjects will be randomised (sequence generation)
Generation of a computerised random number sequence using permuted blocks.
Participants will be stratified according to gender and level of experience.
Query!
Masking / blinding
Blinded (masking used)
Query!
Who is / are masked / blinded?
The people analysing the results/data
Query!
Query!
Query!
Query!
Intervention assignment
Parallel
Query!
Other design features
Query!
Phase
Not Applicable
Query!
Type of endpoint/s
Efficacy
Query!
Statistical methods / analysis
This will be a pilot study using all possible participants of online short course.
Differences between the intervention and control group in knowledge test and assignment scores will be analysed using the Mann-Whitney U test (assuming data is not normally distributed).
Previously used survey questions measuring participant satisfaction and change in behaviour will undergo factor analysis. Differences between intervention and control group in participant satisfaction and change in clinical behaviour will be examined by linear regression using the factor score as the dependent variable and intervention group as the independent variable.
Responses to open-ended qualitative questions will be analysed thematically.
Query!
Recruitment
Recruitment status
Active, not recruiting
Query!
Date of first participant enrolment
Anticipated
24/02/2017
Query!
Actual
27/02/2017
Query!
Date of last participant enrolment
Anticipated
3/03/2017
Query!
Actual
6/03/2017
Query!
Date of last data collection
Anticipated
9/04/2017
Query!
Actual
Query!
Sample size
Target
98
Query!
Accrual to date
Query!
Final
96
Query!
Recruitment in Australia
Recruitment state(s)
ACT,NSW,NT,QLD,SA,TAS,WA,VIC
Query!
Funding & Sponsors
Funding source category [1]
295601
0
Self funded/Unfunded
Query!
Name [1]
295601
0
Query!
Address [1]
295601
0
Query!
Country [1]
295601
0
Query!
Primary sponsor type
University
Query!
Name
Monash University Peninsula Campus
Query!
Address
McMahons Rd, Frankston,
Victoria, 3199
Query!
Country
Australia
Query!
Secondary sponsor category [1]
294434
0
None
Query!
Name [1]
294434
0
Query!
Address [1]
294434
0
Query!
Country [1]
294434
0
Query!
Ethics approval
Ethics application status
Approved
Query!
Ethics committee name [1]
296920
0
Monash University Human Ethics Committee
Query!
Ethics committee address [1]
296920
0
Monash Research Office 26 Sports Walk Monash University Victoria, 3800
Query!
Ethics committee country [1]
296920
0
Australia
Query!
Date submitted for ethics approval [1]
296920
0
13/02/2017
Query!
Approval date [1]
296920
0
27/02/2017
Query!
Ethics approval number [1]
296920
0
8070
Query!
Summary
Brief summary
This study aims to assess the effect of providing individualised feedback in addition to generic feedback compared to generic feedback alone on learning outcomes of a web-based educational course related to falls prevention.
Query!
Trial website
Query!
Trial related presentations / publications
Query!
Public notes
Query!
Contacts
Principal investigator
Name
70934
0
Ms Romi Haas
Query!
Address
70934
0
Department of Physiotherapy
Department of Physiotherapy
School of Primary Health Care
Monash University
McMahons Rd,
Frankston,
VIC, 3199
Query!
Country
70934
0
Australia
Query!
Phone
70934
0
61 409010626
Query!
Fax
70934
0
Query!
Email
70934
0
[email protected]
Query!
Contact person for public queries
Name
70935
0
Romi Haas
Query!
Address
70935
0
Department of Physiotherapy
School of Primary Health Care
Monash University
McMahons Rd,
Frankston,
VIC, 3199
Query!
Country
70935
0
Australia
Query!
Phone
70935
0
61 409010626
Query!
Fax
70935
0
Query!
Email
70935
0
[email protected]
Query!
Contact person for scientific queries
Name
70936
0
Romi Haas
Query!
Address
70936
0
Department of Physiotherapy
School of Primary Health Care
Monash University
McMahons Rd,
Frankston,
VIC, 3199
Query!
Country
70936
0
Australia
Query!
Phone
70936
0
61 409010626
Query!
Fax
70936
0
Query!
Email
70936
0
[email protected]
Query!
No information has been provided regarding IPD availability
What supporting documents are/will be available?
No Supporting Document Provided
Results publications and other study-related documents
Documents added manually
No documents have been uploaded by study researchers.
Documents added automatically
No additional documents have been identified.
Download to PDF