Please note that the copy function is not enabled for this field.
If you wish to
modify
existing outcomes, please copy and paste the current outcome text into the Update field.
LOGIN
CREATE ACCOUNT
LOGIN
CREATE ACCOUNT
MY TRIALS
REGISTER TRIAL
FAQs
HINTS AND TIPS
DEFINITIONS
Trial Review
The ANZCTR website will be unavailable from 1pm until 3pm (AEDT) on Wednesday the 30th of October for website maintenance. Please be sure to log out of the system in order to avoid any loss of data.
The safety and scientific validity of this study is the responsibility of the study sponsor and investigators. Listing a study does not mean it has been endorsed by the ANZCTR. Before participating in a study, talk to your health care provider and refer to this
information for consumers
Download to PDF
Trial registered on ANZCTR
Registration number
ACTRN12617000407392
Ethics application status
Approved
Date submitted
27/02/2017
Date registered
20/03/2017
Date last updated
12/10/2018
Type of registration
Retrospectively registered
Titles & IDs
Public title
The psychosocial impact of haematopoietic stem cell donation on adult related donors
Query!
Scientific title
A multi-center, prospective, exploratory study of the psychosocial impact of donating haematopoietic stem cells on adult related donors
Query!
Secondary ID [1]
290716
0
None
Query!
Universal Trial Number (UTN)
U1111-1193-4236
Query!
Trial acronym
IMPECT
Query!
Linked study record
Query!
Health condition
Health condition(s) or problem(s) studied:
Haematopoietic stem cell donation
301284
0
Query!
Psychosocial distress
301286
0
Query!
Unmet needs
301287
0
Query!
Quality of life
301288
0
Query!
Condition category
Condition code
Public Health
301040
301040
0
0
Query!
Health service research
Query!
Blood
301041
301041
0
0
Query!
Haematological diseases
Query!
Mental Health
301042
301042
0
0
Query!
Studies of normal psychology, cognitive function and behaviour
Query!
Intervention/exposure
Study type
Observational
Query!
Patient registry
False
Query!
Target follow-up duration
Query!
Target follow-up type
Query!
Description of intervention(s) / exposure
PHASE 1
Group 1 - adult related stem cell transplant donors
Adult related stem cell transplant donors of planned allogeneic transplant recipients will complete three semi-structured interviews and provide three samples of saliva (as a measure of stress) at the following time points:
(T1) Within 2 weeks before the stem cell mobilisation commences;
(T2) Within 24 hours (pre- or post-donation) of the donors’ stem cell collection and;
(T3) Within 2 weeks of the 30-day anniversary of the stem cell collection.
Group 2 - Adult related lymphocyte infusion donors
Adult related lymphocyte donors of planned lymphocyte infusions recipients are included in this study to consider any potential effect granulocyte colony-stimulating factor (GCSF) may have on salivary alpha-amylase levels. Related lymphocyte donors will provide three samples of saliva at the following time points:
(T1) Within 2 weeks before the lymphocyte collection;
(T2) Within 24 hours (pre- or post-donation) of the donors’ lymphocyte collection and;
(T3) Within 2 weeks of the 30-day anniversary of the lymphocyte collection
Group 3 - Bone Marrow Transplant Nurses
Bone Marrow Transplant Nurses will complete one interview towards the end of the study. The interview will explore the nature of their role, their perceptions of the psychosocial needs of donors and their role (if any) in responding to donor distress.
PHASE II
In response to the needs identified through interviews with adult related stem cell donors and nurses, a psycho-educational resource will be developed to improve donor efficacy and promote self-care. Adult related stem cell donors and Nurses from Phase I will be re-contacted and asked to evaluate the psychoeducational resource. A study pack including an information sheet, resource, questionnaire and reply paid envelope for returning the questionnaire will be mailed to potential participants. Consent is presumed by completion and return of the postal questionnaire in a reply paid envelope. Questionnaires will take approximately 20 minutes to complete.
Query!
Intervention code [1]
297352
0
Not applicable
Query!
Comparator / control treatment
Adult related lymphocyte infusion donors are included in this study to consider any potential effect of granulocyte-colony stimulating factor (GCSF) on salivary alpha-amylase levels. These patients are an appropriate control group since white cells are collected from these donors by apheresis in the absence of GCSF.
Query!
Control group
Active
Query!
Outcomes
Primary outcome [1]
300462
0
Phase I
Psychological distress will be measured using the Kessler Psychological Distress Scale (K10)
Query!
Assessment method [1]
300462
0
Query!
Timepoint [1]
300462
0
(1) 2 weeks pre-stem cell collection;
(2) on the day of stem cell collection;
(3) 30 days post-stem cell collection
Query!
Primary outcome [2]
301209
0
Phase I
Health-related quality of life will be measured using the World Health Organisation Quality of Life (WHOQOL-BREF); an abbreviated version of the WHOQOL-100.
Query!
Assessment method [2]
301209
0
Query!
Timepoint [2]
301209
0
(1) 2 weeks pre-stem cell collection;
(2) 30 days post-stem cell collection
Query!
Primary outcome [3]
301214
0
Phase I
Saliva will be collected using Salivettes and analysed for salivary alpha-amylase activity (biomarker for activity of the sympathetic nervous system) by a liquid handling platform (the Beckman Coulter AU-480).
Query!
Assessment method [3]
301214
0
Query!
Timepoint [3]
301214
0
(1) 2 weeks pre-stem cell collection;
(2) on the day of stem cell collection;
(3) 30 days post-stem cell collection
Query!
Secondary outcome [1]
330024
0
Phase I
Ambivalence about donation will be measured using the Ambivalence about Donation scale developed by Simmons et al., 1977.
Query!
Assessment method [1]
330024
0
Query!
Timepoint [1]
330024
0
2 weeks pre-stem cell collection
Query!
Secondary outcome [2]
332052
0
Phase I
Donation experience will be assessed using the Donation Experience scale developed by Butterworth et al., 1993. An overall score is not derived, but individual items are reviewed to understand the donation experience.
Query!
Assessment method [2]
332052
0
Query!
Timepoint [2]
332052
0
(1) on the day of stem cell collection;
(2) 30 days post-stem cell collection
Query!
Secondary outcome [3]
332053
0
Phase I
Guilt and responsibility will be assessed using the Guilt and Responsibility scale developed by Butterworth et al., 1993. The individual items are examined separately in the analyses.
Query!
Assessment method [3]
332053
0
Query!
Timepoint [3]
332053
0
(1) 2 weeks pre-stem cell collection;
(2) on the day of stem cell collection;
(3) 30 days post-stem cell collection
Query!
Secondary outcome [4]
332054
0
Phase I
Self esteem will be measured using the Better Person scale developed by Simmons et al., 1977
Query!
Assessment method [4]
332054
0
Query!
Timepoint [4]
332054
0
(1) 2 weeks pre-stem cell collection;
(2) on the day of stem cell collection;
(3) 30 days post-stem cell collection
Query!
Secondary outcome [5]
332285
0
Phase I
Donor-recipient contact will be assessed using a scale designed specifically for the study of (a) daily, (b) weekly, (c) monthly or (d) yearly/less frequent contact
Query!
Assessment method [5]
332285
0
Query!
Timepoint [5]
332285
0
(1) 2 weeks pre-stem cell collection;
(2) 30 days post-stem cell collection
Query!
Secondary outcome [6]
332286
0
Phase I
Relationship closeness with the recipient will be assessed using the Autonomy and Relatedness Inventory (ARI) scale
Query!
Assessment method [6]
332286
0
Query!
Timepoint [6]
332286
0
(1) 2 weeks pre-stem cell collection;
(2) 30 days post-stem cell collection
Query!
Secondary outcome [7]
332287
0
Phase I
Donors will rate their opinion of the recipient's health using the Karnofsky Performance Status (KPS) scale.
Query!
Assessment method [7]
332287
0
Query!
Timepoint [7]
332287
0
(1) 2 weeks pre-stem cell collection;
(2) on the day of stem cell collection;
(3) 30 days post-stem cell collection
Query!
Secondary outcome [8]
332289
0
Phase I
Qualitative questionnaire 1 - Adult related stem cell transplant donors of planned allogeneic transplant recipients. In addition to validated measures, a number of qualitative questions were designed specifically for the study to provide a full assessment of the deeper aspects of related donation and suggestions for improvement pre-donation: 1. Decision to donate/ Did you at all hesitate in deciding to donate? 2. What was your motivation to donate? I.e. why are you donating? 3. Did you at all feel pressured to donate? 4. What are your thoughts and feelings about being a donor? 5. How prepared do you feel for the donation experience? 6. What were some of the sources of information that you accessed prior to donation? Use a checklist of available sources: *Haematologist *Internet, incl. videos *BMT coordinator *Books *Friends/family *General practitioner 7. What was the most helpful source of information about donation? 8. How do you think the hospital can improve donor preparation?
Query!
Assessment method [8]
332289
0
Query!
Timepoint [8]
332289
0
2 weeks pre-stem cell collection
Query!
Secondary outcome [9]
332290
0
Phase 1
Qualitative questionnaire 2 - Adult related stem cell transplant donors of planned allogeneic transplant recipients. These qualitative questions explore the deeper aspects of related donation and any suggestions for improvement pre-donation and on the day of donation. 1. Sources of emotional support and use of emotional support services of the hospital? 2. Adequacy of emotional support from the hospital: *Not at all adequate *Moderately adequate *Adequate *Very adequate 3. How do you think the hospital can improve donor emotional support?
Query!
Assessment method [9]
332290
0
Query!
Timepoint [9]
332290
0
On the day of stem cell collection
Query!
Secondary outcome [10]
332291
0
Phase 1
Qualitative questionnaire 3 - Adult related stem cell transplant donors of planned allogeneic transplant recipients. These qualitative questions explore the deeper aspects of related donation and any suggestions for improvement post-donation. 1. Looking back, what are your thoughts and feelings about being a donor after donation? 2. Has donating changed your relationship with your recipient or other family members? 3. What was the most challenging aspect of donation?
Query!
Assessment method [10]
332291
0
Query!
Timepoint [10]
332291
0
30 days post-stem cell collection
Query!
Secondary outcome [11]
332796
0
Phase 1
Adult related stem cell transplant donor demographics assessed by a questionnaire designed specifically for this study. Participants are asked for their age, gender, country of birth, marital status, relationship to the recipient, and education.
Query!
Assessment method [11]
332796
0
Query!
Timepoint [11]
332796
0
2 weeks pre-stem cell collection
Query!
Secondary outcome [12]
332798
0
Phase I
BMT Nurse demographics (age, length of professional experience as nurses in Haematology/BMT Units and as BMT Coordinators) will be assessed by a questionnaire designed specifically for this study.
Query!
Assessment method [12]
332798
0
Query!
Timepoint [12]
332798
0
BMT Coordinator demographics will be assessed through one interview at a single timepoint.
Query!
Secondary outcome [13]
332879
0
Phase I
Organisation of related donor care in BMT Units will assessed by a questionnaire designed specifically for this study. Questions on donation procedures requested a description of each BMT unit’s organisation, including (1) information provided to potential donors (support materials and professionals involved); (2) HLA tests procedures; (3) the consent process; (4) the availability of financial support; and (5) donor follow- up.
Query!
Assessment method [13]
332879
0
Query!
Timepoint [13]
332879
0
Phase I
Organisation of related donor care in BMT Units will be assessed through one interview with BMT Nurse participants at a single timepoint
Query!
Secondary outcome [14]
332880
0
Phase I
BMT Nurse' perceptions of the related donation process will be assessed by a questionnaire designed specifically for this study. Open-ended questions invited BMT Nurses to give their opinion about the related donation process in terms of their own role, the challenges encountered in their professional experience, related donors' concerns and suggestions to improve the organisation of related donation.
Query!
Assessment method [14]
332880
0
Query!
Timepoint [14]
332880
0
Phase I
BMT Nurses' perceptions of the related donation process will be assessed through one interview at a single timepoint.
Query!
Secondary outcome [15]
352831
0
Phase II
Acceptability of the resource will be determined by participant evaluation of the acceptability, perceived usefulness and benefits of the resource. The items included in the questionnaires for completion by donors and Nurses will assess participant perceptions of the content, structure, design, timing and delivery of the resource.
Query!
Assessment method [15]
352831
0
Query!
Timepoint [15]
352831
0
Participant evaluation of the resource will be assess through completion and return of a postal questionnaire. A study pack including an information sheet, resource, questionnaire and reply paid envelope for returning the questionnaire will be mailed to potential participants.
Query!
Eligibility
Key inclusion criteria
Update
Group 1: Adult related stem cell transplant donors of planned allogeneic transplant recipients.
Group 2: Adult related lymphocyte donors of planned lymphocyte infusion recipients.
Group 3: BMT Nurses within the RBWH and Westmead Hospital Haematology and Bone Marrow Transplant Units.
1) Ages eligible for study: 18 to 70 years
2) Able to provide informed consent
Query!
Minimum age
18
Years
Query!
Query!
Maximum age
70
Years
Query!
Query!
Sex
Both males and females
Query!
Can healthy volunteers participate?
No
Query!
Key exclusion criteria
People whose primary language is other than English
Women who are pregnant and the human fetus
Children and/or young people (ie. <18 years)
People with a cognitive impairment, an intellectual disability or a mental illness
Query!
Study design
Purpose
Psychosocial
Query!
Duration
Longitudinal
Query!
Selection
Defined population
Query!
Timing
Prospective
Query!
Statistical methods / analysis
Analysis of historical related stem cell donors at RBWH demonstrates that an estimated 25 related donors are recruited per year. Enrolment is expected to be completed within 23 months, providing a potential sample size of 47 donors. Up to 10 related donors will be recruited from the Westmead Hospital. Based on previous prospective studies of related donors that utilised 3 or more time-points, we expect a participation rate of 50%. Therefore, we expect that 57 related SCT donors will be eligible to participate and assume that 28 related SCT donors will agree to participate.
A total of 7 BMT Nurses will be recruited from the two sites. Up to 6 related lymphocyte infusion donors will be recruited from the two sites to pilot the effect of GCSF on saliva.
Therefore, the target sample size is comprised of 28 related stem cell donors, 6 related lymphocyte donors, and 7 BMT Nurses, providing a total of 41 study participants.
Query!
Recruitment
Recruitment status
Active, not recruiting
Query!
Date of first participant enrolment
Anticipated
Query!
Actual
16/02/2017
Query!
Date of last participant enrolment
Anticipated
1/09/2018
Query!
Actual
20/04/2018
Query!
Date of last data collection
Anticipated
1/11/2018
Query!
Actual
Query!
Sample size
Target
41
Query!
Accrual to date
Query!
Final
47
Query!
Recruitment in Australia
Recruitment state(s)
NSW,QLD
Query!
Recruitment hospital [1]
7554
0
Royal Brisbane & Womens Hospital - Herston
Query!
Recruitment hospital [2]
7555
0
Westmead Hospital - Westmead
Query!
Recruitment postcode(s) [1]
15446
0
4029 - Herston
Query!
Recruitment postcode(s) [2]
15447
0
2145 - Westmead
Query!
Funding & Sponsors
Funding source category [1]
295722
0
Government body
Query!
Name [1]
295722
0
Australian Government Department of Education and Training
Query!
Address [1]
295722
0
Department of Education and Training
GPO Box 9880
Canberra ACT 2601
Query!
Country [1]
295722
0
Australia
Query!
Funding source category [2]
295723
0
Hospital
Query!
Name [2]
295723
0
Royal Brisbane & Women's Hospital Foundation
Query!
Address [2]
295723
0
Royal Brisbane & Women's Hospital Foundation
Butterfield St & Bowen Bridge Rd
Herston QLD 4029
Query!
Country [2]
295723
0
Australia
Query!
Primary sponsor type
University
Query!
Name
University of Queensland
Query!
Address
University of Queensland, School of Medicine
Level 6, UQ Oral Health Centre (Bldg. 883)
288 Herston Road
Herston, QLD 4006
Query!
Country
Australia
Query!
Secondary sponsor category [1]
294742
0
None
Query!
Name [1]
294742
0
Query!
Address [1]
294742
0
Query!
Country [1]
294742
0
Query!
Ethics approval
Ethics application status
Approved
Query!
Ethics committee name [1]
297025
0
Royal Brisbane & Women's Hospital Human Research Ethics Committee
Query!
Ethics committee address [1]
297025
0
Level 7 Block 7 Butterfield St Herston QLD 4029
Query!
Ethics committee country [1]
297025
0
Australia
Query!
Date submitted for ethics approval [1]
297025
0
26/05/2016
Query!
Approval date [1]
297025
0
01/08/2016
Query!
Ethics approval number [1]
297025
0
HREC/16/QRBW/207
Query!
Ethics committee name [2]
297026
0
University of Queensland Human Research Ethics Committee
Query!
Ethics committee address [2]
297026
0
The University of Queensland Cumbrae-Stewart, Building 72 QLD 4072
Query!
Ethics committee country [2]
297026
0
Australia
Query!
Date submitted for ethics approval [2]
297026
0
21/09/2016
Query!
Approval date [2]
297026
0
12/10/2016
Query!
Ethics approval number [2]
297026
0
2016001438
Query!
Summary
Brief summary
Background: While World Marrow Donor Association Standards ensure consistency in the assessment and care of unrelated haematopoietic stem cell (HSC) donors, no such criteria exist for related HSC donors. Unlike unrelated donors, related donors are actively involved in the transplant process and witness first-hand the changes in their relative’s health. Their lived experience is thus likely to be very different from that of unrelated donors and it is important to understand and address their needs. Aim: The aim of this PhD project is to identify potential predictors of psychosocial distress and unmet needs of adult related HSC donors, to develop information resources for health professionals and develop and pilot test a psycho-educational resource for donors. PHASE I Participants are adults undergoing HSC donation for a related recipient at the RBWH and Westmead Hospital, Sydney. Donors complete 3 interviews and provide 3 samples of saliva (as a measure of stress): (1) 2 weeks pre-HSC collection; (2) within 24hrs of HSC collection and; (3) 30 days post-HSC collection. An interview with BMT Nurses will explore the nature of their role, their perceptions of the psychosocial needs of donors and their role (if any) in responding to donor distress. Hypotheses: As research into adult related donors is limited, findings from research with younger related HSC donors and adult bone marrow donors were used to make the following predictions: 1. Donor perceptions of the closeness of the relationship with the recipient will be associated with post-donation reactions such as guilt, responsibility and stress. 2. Perceived adequacy of preparation and emotional support will correlate with post-donation reactions such as concern for own health, physical pain/discomfort, guilt and responsibility. 3. Donors with poorer self-evaluated health-related quality of life will report more negative reactions throughout the process. 4. Donors of recipients who experience adverse clinical events (such as development of graft versus-host-disease) will experience increased distress and anxiety. 5. Donor reactions such as stress/physical pain will correlate with high salivary a-amylase levels throughout the process. PHASE II Key indicators that identify risk of HSC donation-related distress will be used to develop a paper-based psycho-educational resource that seeks to reduce related HSC donor distress and may be appropriate for integration within the health system. We aim to assess acceptability, feasibility and potential efficacy and inform the development of a large post-doctoral study which will be required to validate the tool.
Query!
Trial website
Query!
Trial related presentations / publications
Query!
Public notes
Query!
Attachments [1]
1523
1523
0
0
/AnzctrAttachments/371999-UQ HREC Approval Letter 12Oct2016.pdf
(Ethics approval)
Query!
Query!
Contacts
Principal investigator
Name
71054
0
Ms Nienke Zomerdijk
Query!
Address
71054
0
Cancer Care Services
Building 34, Ground Floor, Clinical Research Unit
Royal Brisbane & Women’s Hospital
Herston, Qld 4029
Query!
Country
71054
0
Australia
Query!
Phone
71054
0
+617 3646 6652
Query!
Fax
71054
0
+617 3646 7371
Query!
Email
71054
0
[email protected]
Query!
Contact person for public queries
Name
71055
0
Nienke Zomerdijk
Query!
Address
71055
0
Cancer Care Services
Building 34, Ground Floor, Clinical Research Unit
Royal Brisbane & Women’s Hospital
Herston, Qld 4029
Query!
Country
71055
0
Australia
Query!
Phone
71055
0
+617 3646 6652
Query!
Fax
71055
0
+617 3646 7371
Query!
Email
71055
0
[email protected]
Query!
Contact person for scientific queries
Name
71056
0
Nienke Zomerdijk
Query!
Address
71056
0
Cancer Care Services
Building 34, Ground Floor, Clinical Research Unit
Royal Brisbane & Women’s Hospital
Herston, Qld 4029
Query!
Country
71056
0
Australia
Query!
Phone
71056
0
+617 3646 6652
Query!
Fax
71056
0
+617 3646 7371
Query!
Email
71056
0
[email protected]
Query!
No information has been provided regarding IPD availability
What supporting documents are/will be available?
No Supporting Document Provided
Results publications and other study-related documents
Documents added manually
No documents have been uploaded by study researchers.
Documents added automatically
No additional documents have been identified.
Download to PDF