Please note that the copy function is not enabled for this field.
If you wish to
modify
existing outcomes, please copy and paste the current outcome text into the Update field.
LOGIN
CREATE ACCOUNT
LOGIN
CREATE ACCOUNT
MY TRIALS
REGISTER TRIAL
FAQs
HINTS AND TIPS
DEFINITIONS
Trial Review
The ANZCTR website will be unavailable from 1pm until 3pm (AEDT) on Wednesday the 30th of October for website maintenance. Please be sure to log out of the system in order to avoid any loss of data.
The safety and scientific validity of this study is the responsibility of the study sponsor and investigators. Listing a study does not mean it has been endorsed by the ANZCTR. Before participating in a study, talk to your health care provider and refer to this
information for consumers
Download to PDF
Trial registered on ANZCTR
Registration number
ACTRN12620000001998
Ethics application status
Approved
Date submitted
21/11/2019
Date registered
8/01/2020
Date last updated
8/01/2020
Date data sharing statement initially provided
8/01/2020
Type of registration
Retrospectively registered
Titles & IDs
Public title
Intrathecal analgesia in patients undergoing major hepatobiliary surgery
Query!
Scientific title
Intrathecal analgesia in patients undergoing major hepatobiliary surgery: a retrospective study
Query!
Secondary ID [1]
291444
0
Nil known
Query!
Universal Trial Number (UTN)
U1111-1194-2436
Query!
Trial acronym
Not applicable
Query!
Linked study record
Not applicable
Query!
Health condition
Health condition(s) or problem(s) studied:
Liver resection
315281
0
Query!
Analgesia following liver resection
315282
0
Query!
Condition category
Condition code
Surgery
313577
313577
0
0
Query!
Surgical techniques
Query!
Anaesthesiology
313578
313578
0
0
Query!
Pain management
Query!
Oral and Gastrointestinal
313579
313579
0
0
Query!
Other diseases of the mouth, teeth, oesophagus, digestive system including liver and colon
Query!
Cancer
313580
313580
0
0
Query!
Liver
Query!
Intervention/exposure
Study type
Observational
Query!
Patient registry
False
Query!
Target follow-up duration
Query!
Target follow-up type
Query!
Description of intervention(s) / exposure
This is a retrospective analysis of morphine use and pain scores in adult patients who underwent major open liver resection between July 2010 and June 2017 using a standardized enhanced recovery after surgery protocol. All patients underwent surgery at the Austin Hospital, a university hospital in Melbourne, Australia with a dedicated high volume hepato-pancreatic-biliary and liver transplant centre. Eligible patients were identified by International Statistical Classification of Diseases (ICD) codes that included the following surgical categories:
i.) excision of lesion of liver,
ii.) segmental resection of liver,
iii.) lobectomy of liver,
iv.) trisegmental resection of liver, and
v.) segmental resection of liver for trauma.
Patients were followed-up until hospital discharge for from the index admission.As this is a retrospective study, there is no patient involvement.
Query!
Intervention code [1]
316136
0
Not applicable
Query!
Comparator / control treatment
No control group
Query!
Control group
Uncontrolled
Query!
Outcomes
Primary outcome [1]
322034
0
The primary outcome was cumulative oral morphine equivalent daily dose in milligrams (oMEDD) on post operative Day 1.
Query!
Assessment method [1]
322034
0
Query!
Timepoint [1]
322034
0
Oral morphine equivalent daily dose in milligrams amounts will be collected from the patient's hospital electronic medical record. Oral morphine equivalent will be calculated using the Opioid Dose Equivalence document endorsed by the Faculty of Pain Medicine, Australian and New Zealand College of Anaesthetists
Query!
Secondary outcome [1]
377101
0
Postoperative pain scores measured immediately postoperative in the post anaesthesia recovery unit
Query!
Assessment method [1]
377101
0
Query!
Timepoint [1]
377101
0
Daily postoperative pain scores will be measured using the Numerical Rating Scale (NRS). The NRS is a single 11-point numeric scale in which a respondent selects a whole number (integers from 0 to 10) that best reflects the intensity of their pain. A score of 0 indicates no pain, whereas a score of 10 indicates extreme or the worst pain imaginable
Query!
Secondary outcome [2]
377102
0
Postoperative pain scores on postoperative Day 1
Query!
Assessment method [2]
377102
0
Query!
Timepoint [2]
377102
0
Postoperative pain scores will be measured using the Numerical Rating Scale (NRS). The NRS is a single 11-point numeric scale in which a respondent selects a whole number (integers from 0 to 10) that best reflects the intensity of their pain. A score of 0 indicates no pain, whereas a score of 10 indicates extreme or the worst pain imaginable
Query!
Secondary outcome [3]
377103
0
Postoperative pain scores on postoperative Day 2
Query!
Assessment method [3]
377103
0
Query!
Timepoint [3]
377103
0
Postoperative pain scores will be measured using the Numerical Rating Scale (NRS). The NRS is a single 11-point numeric scale in which a respondent selects a whole number (integers from 0 to 10) that best reflects the intensity of their pain. A score of 0 indicates no pain, whereas a score of 10 indicates extreme or the worst pain imaginable
Query!
Secondary outcome [4]
377104
0
Length of hospital stay (LOS) will be collected from the patient's hospital electronic medical record.
Query!
Assessment method [4]
377104
0
Query!
Timepoint [4]
377104
0
LOS will be determined by the period from completion of surgery to discharge
Query!
Secondary outcome [5]
377105
0
Time to full ward diet
Query!
Assessment method [5]
377105
0
Query!
Timepoint [5]
377105
0
Time to full ward diet will be defined as the period from completion of surgery to the first mention of tolerating full ward diet in the patient medical records.
Query!
Secondary outcome [6]
377106
0
Time to first oral opioid use
Query!
Assessment method [6]
377106
0
Query!
Timepoint [6]
377106
0
Time to first oral opioid use will be collected from the patient's hospital electronic medical record.. This will be defined as the period from completion of surgery to the first administration of oral opioid after surgery.
Query!
Secondary outcome [7]
377107
0
Any postoperative complication as a composite outcome
Query!
Assessment method [7]
377107
0
Query!
Timepoint [7]
377107
0
Complications will be defined as any deviation from the normal postoperative course, guided by the European Perioperative Clinical Outcome definitions. Complications were recorded by two independent clinicians, and then graded using Clavien-Dindo Classification - a widely used and validated approach to surgical outcome assessment that assigns severity grades to surgical complications.
Query!
Secondary outcome [8]
377121
0
Costs related to the index hospital admission and any consequent readmission within 30 postoperative days.
Query!
Assessment method [8]
377121
0
Query!
Timepoint [8]
377121
0
Raw costing data will be obtained from the hospital’s business intelligent unit, and then allocated into categories based on individual itemisation codes for costs incurred during admission. These categories will include:
1. intensive care unit costs
2. allied health costs
3. pathology costs
4. blood products costs
5. radiology costs
6. pharmacy costs
7. ward cost
8. theatre costs
Only in-hospital costs will be considered.
Query!
Eligibility
Key inclusion criteria
All adult patients who underwent surgery at Austin hospital in Melbourne, Eligible patients were identified by International Statistical Classification of Diseases (ICD) codes that included the following surgical categories: i.) excision of lesion of liver, ii.) segmental resection of liver, iii.) lobectomy of liver, iv.) trisegmental resection of liver, and v.) segmental resection of liver for trauma.
Query!
Minimum age
18
Years
Query!
Query!
Maximum age
No limit
Query!
Query!
Sex
Both males and females
Query!
Can healthy volunteers participate?
No
Query!
Key exclusion criteria
We will excluded patients with a history of chronic opioid use (defined as near-daily use of >60 mg oral morphine equivalent) for 8 weeks or longer and patients receiving epidural analgesia.
Query!
Study design
Purpose
Natural history
Query!
Duration
Longitudinal
Query!
Selection
Defined population
Query!
Timing
Retrospective
Query!
Statistical methods / analysis
For the primary and the key secondary outcomes we will use quantile regression model-ling adjusted for the following priori defined covariates: major resection, patient age, Charlston Comorbidity Index, duration of surgery, and intraoperative oMEDD use. Standard assessment of collinearity will be conducted using variance inflation factors and condition number. For all other outcomes, continuous data will be summarized as medians and interquartile range ) and compared using the Mann-Whitney U test. Categorical variables will be summarized as counts (proportions) and compared using the chi-squared test or Fisher’s Exact test, as appropriate. Statistical analysis was performed using commercial statistical software.
Query!
Recruitment
Recruitment status
Completed
Query!
Date of first participant enrolment
Anticipated
Query!
Actual
26/01/2018
Query!
Date of last participant enrolment
Anticipated
Query!
Actual
26/10/2018
Query!
Date of last data collection
Anticipated
Query!
Actual
8/12/2018
Query!
Sample size
Target
335
Query!
Accrual to date
Query!
Final
335
Query!
Recruitment in Australia
Recruitment state(s)
VIC
Query!
Recruitment hospital [1]
15277
0
Austin Health - Austin Hospital - Heidelberg
Query!
Recruitment postcode(s) [1]
28587
0
3084 - Heidelberg
Query!
Funding & Sponsors
Funding source category [1]
295911
0
Hospital
Query!
Name [1]
295911
0
Austin Health
Query!
Address [1]
295911
0
Department of Anaesthesia, Austin Health, 145 Studley Road, Heidelberg VIC, 3084
Query!
Country [1]
295911
0
Australia
Query!
Primary sponsor type
Hospital
Query!
Name
Austin Health
Query!
Address
Department of Anaesthesia, Austin Health, 145 Studley Road, Heidelberg VIC, 3084
Query!
Country
Australia
Query!
Secondary sponsor category [1]
294785
0
None
Query!
Name [1]
294785
0
Query!
Address [1]
294785
0
Query!
Country [1]
294785
0
Query!
Ethics approval
Ethics application status
Approved
Query!
Ethics committee name [1]
297192
0
Austin Health Research Ethics Commitee
Query!
Ethics committee address [1]
297192
0
Level 8 Harold Stokes Building 145 Studley Road Heidelberg Victoria Australia 3084
Query!
Ethics committee country [1]
297192
0
Australia
Query!
Date submitted for ethics approval [1]
297192
0
18/01/2018
Query!
Approval date [1]
297192
0
25/01/2018
Query!
Ethics approval number [1]
297192
0
HREC no: LNR/18/Austin/79
Query!
Summary
Brief summary
The purpose of this study is to identify the time point of peak serum potassium levels during the reperfusion phase of adult liver transplantation. We aim to assess the the changes in blood potassium levels from baseline values during reperfusion, and evaluate clinical factors that may be associated with the development of hyperkalaemia. Who is it for? The study will include adult patients undergoing liver resection surgery. This is a retrospective study to test the hypothesis that the addition of intrathecal morphine (ITM) results in reduced postoperative opioid use and enhanced postoperative analgesia in patients undergoing open liver resection using a standardized enhanced recovery after surgery (ERAS) protocol with multimodal analgesia. Study details The aim of this study is to quantify the cumulative oral morphine equivalent daily dose in milligrams (oMEDD) in the postoperative period and evaluate maximum pain scores at rest and on movement after surgery. In addition, we will highlight the importance of using intrathecal morphine in patients undergoing liver resection. It is hoped that this study will be hypothesis generating and provide valuable data for power calculations for future studies on evaluating the use of intrathecal morphine in patients undergoing liver resection surgery.
Query!
Trial website
Query!
Trial related presentations / publications
Query!
Public notes
Query!
Contacts
Principal investigator
Name
73290
0
A/Prof Laurence Weinberg
Query!
Address
73290
0
Department of Anaesthesia, Austin Health, 145 Studley Road Heidelberg VIC 3084
Query!
Country
73290
0
Australia
Query!
Phone
73290
0
+61 394965000
Query!
Fax
73290
0
+61 394966421
Query!
Email
73290
0
[email protected]
Query!
Contact person for public queries
Name
73291
0
Laurence Weinberg
Query!
Address
73291
0
Department of Anaesthesia, Austin Health, 145 Studley Road Heidelberg VIC 3084
Query!
Country
73291
0
Australia
Query!
Phone
73291
0
+61 394965000
Query!
Fax
73291
0
+61 394966421
Query!
Email
73291
0
[email protected]
Query!
Contact person for scientific queries
Name
73292
0
Laurence Weinberg
Query!
Address
73292
0
Department of Anaesthesia, Austin Health, 145 Studley Road Heidelberg VIC 3084
Query!
Country
73292
0
Australia
Query!
Phone
73292
0
+61 394965000
Query!
Fax
73292
0
+61 394966421
Query!
Email
73292
0
[email protected]
Query!
Data sharing statement
Will individual participant data (IPD) for this trial be available (including data dictionaries)?
No
Query!
No/undecided IPD sharing reason/comment
Patients have not consented to sharing of their data
Query!
What supporting documents are/will be available?
No Supporting Document Provided
Doc. No.
Type
Citation
Link
Email
Other Details
Attachment
5791
Ethical approval
[email protected]
Results publications and other study-related documents
Documents added manually
No documents have been uploaded by study researchers.
Documents added automatically
Source
Title
Year of Publication
DOI
Embase
Intrathecal morphine is associated with reduction in postoperative opioid requirements and improvement in postoperative analgesia in patients undergoing open liver resection.
2020
https://dx.doi.org/10.1186/s12871-020-01113-8
N.B. These documents automatically identified may not have been verified by the study sponsor.
Download to PDF