Please note that the copy function is not enabled for this field.
If you wish to
modify
existing outcomes, please copy and paste the current outcome text into the Update field.
LOGIN
CREATE ACCOUNT
LOGIN
CREATE ACCOUNT
MY TRIALS
REGISTER TRIAL
FAQs
HINTS AND TIPS
DEFINITIONS
Trial Review
The ANZCTR website will be unavailable from 1pm until 3pm (AEDT) on Wednesday the 30th of October for website maintenance. Please be sure to log out of the system in order to avoid any loss of data.
The safety and scientific validity of this study is the responsibility of the study sponsor and investigators. Listing a study does not mean it has been endorsed by the ANZCTR. Before participating in a study, talk to your health care provider and refer to this
information for consumers
Download to PDF
Trial registered on ANZCTR
Registration number
ACTRN12617000743369
Ethics application status
Approved
Date submitted
15/05/2017
Date registered
22/05/2017
Date last updated
22/05/2017
Type of registration
Prospectively registered
Titles & IDs
Public title
A national prevalence study of advance care planning documentation and self-reported uptake in Australia
Query!
Scientific title
A national prevalence study of advance care planning documentation and self-reported uptake in elderly people in Australia
Query!
Secondary ID [1]
291941
0
None
Query!
Universal Trial Number (UTN)
Query!
Trial acronym
Query!
Linked study record
Query!
Health condition
Health condition(s) or problem(s) studied:
advance care planning
303281
0
Query!
Condition category
Condition code
Public Health
302709
302709
0
0
Query!
Health service research
Query!
Intervention/exposure
Study type
Observational
Query!
Patient registry
False
Query!
Target follow-up duration
Query!
Target follow-up type
Query!
Description of intervention(s) / exposure
This national multicentre cross-sectional prevalence pilot study consists of two parts: 1) an audit of a person’s records and 2) a survey of those people whose files were audited. It will be conducted in people admitted to hospital, attending general practices, or residing at residential aged care facilities in Australia.
Condition or exposure observed: presence of the advance care planning documentation in health records
Duration of the observation: The study will be conducted on a specific day determined by investigators in advance. Each observation will take up to 40 minutes to complete
Query!
Intervention code [1]
298062
0
Not applicable
Query!
Comparator / control treatment
No control group
Query!
Control group
Uncontrolled
Query!
Outcomes
Primary outcome [1]
302108
0
Advance care planning (ACP) prevalence, measured by the number of people who have ACP documentation that can be located in records within 15 minutes
Query!
Assessment method [1]
302108
0
Query!
Timepoint [1]
302108
0
The outcomes will be assessed upon 48hous after admission to hospital or residential care facilities, and at GP visit in general practices,
Query!
Secondary outcome [1]
334804
0
Type of ACP documentation
Query!
Assessment method [1]
334804
0
Query!
Timepoint [1]
334804
0
The outcome will be assessed upon 48hous after admission to hospital or residential care facilities, and at GP visit in general practices,
Query!
Secondary outcome [2]
334956
0
Validity of ACP documentation. This outcome will be assessed based on the data collected during Part 1 (audit of health records). ACP documents will be considered valid if necessary signatures on the document are present.
Query!
Assessment method [2]
334956
0
Query!
Timepoint [2]
334956
0
The outcome will be assessed upon 48hous after admission to hospital or residential care facilities, and at GP visit in general practices,
Query!
Secondary outcome [3]
334958
0
Peoples’ self-reported views on ACP and ACP uptake, This is a composite secondary outcome and it will be assessed during Part 2 (survey) of the study.
Query!
Assessment method [3]
334958
0
Query!
Timepoint [3]
334958
0
The outcome will be assessed upon 48hous after admission to hospital or residential care facilities, and at GP visit in general practices,
Query!
Secondary outcome [4]
334959
0
Consistency between ACP documentation and clinical care plans and medical orders. This outcome and it will be assessed during Part 2 (survey) of the study and the results will be compared with the data collected in Part 1.
Query!
Assessment method [4]
334959
0
Query!
Timepoint [4]
334959
0
The outcome will be assessed upon 48hous after admission to hospital or residential care facilities, and at GP visit in general practices,
Query!
Eligibility
Key inclusion criteria
Part 1. Records audit
Hospitals, residential aged care facilities, general practices
Males and females
>=65 years of age (>=55 years for ATSI people)
People admitted to hospitals and residential aged car facilities admitted for >48 hours
For general practices: persons visiting general practice on the nominated day/(s) of the study
Part 2. Survey
Everybody included in Part 1
English-speaking
Able to consent
Query!
Minimum age
55
Years
Query!
Query!
Maximum age
No limit
Query!
Query!
Sex
Both males and females
Query!
Can healthy volunteers participate?
Yes
Query!
Key exclusion criteria
Part 1. Records audit
<65 years of age (<55 years for ATSI people)
Persons admitted to the ICU
Persons in maternal/obstetric wards
For hospitals and RACFs: People admitted for >48 hours
Part 2. Survey
Non-English speaking persons
Persons who do not have decision making capacity
Persons unable to or elcting not to provide consent
People expected to die within 24 hours
Query!
Study design
Purpose
Natural history
Query!
Duration
Cross-sectional
Query!
Selection
Random sample
Query!
Timing
Both
Query!
Statistical methods / analysis
Descriptive statistics will be calculated for the total sample of the study and will be stratified by major grouping variables: organisation type, state, location, age, sex, ethnicity, diagnosis, functional status and outcomes.
Data collectors will judge ACP documentation to be present if they find any documentation of advance care planning (either statutory or non-statutory), or legal appointment of a substitute decision-maker. Presence of ACP documentation, such as ACDs and advance care plans will be described using the mode, frequency, and distribution of the respective categories. Comparisons will be made using t-tests for the continuous type variables and chi-square contingency table analysis for the categorical type variables.
Multivariate logistic regression will be performed, predicting the presence of ACP documentation while controlling for the type of organisation, jurisdictions, location, age, sex and ethnicity. In instances where data is missing, analysis will be performed using list-wise deletion. The level of significance will be set at 0.05.
Query!
Recruitment
Recruitment status
Not yet recruiting
Query!
Date of first participant enrolment
Anticipated
3/07/2017
Query!
Actual
Query!
Date of last participant enrolment
Anticipated
Query!
Actual
Query!
Date of last data collection
Anticipated
Query!
Actual
Query!
Sample size
Target
2400
Query!
Accrual to date
Query!
Final
Query!
Recruitment in Australia
Recruitment state(s)
ACT,NSW,NT,QLD,SA,TAS,WA,VIC
Query!
Funding & Sponsors
Funding source category [1]
296453
0
Government body
Query!
Name [1]
296453
0
Australian Government
Query!
Address [1]
296453
0
Commonwealth of Australia
GPO Box 9848,
Canberra, ACT 2601
Query!
Country [1]
296453
0
Australia
Query!
Primary sponsor type
Other
Query!
Name
Decission Assist/ Advance Care Planning Australia
Query!
Address
Advance Care Planning Australia
Austin Hospital
145 Studley Road
Heidelberg VIC: 3084
Query!
Country
Australia
Query!
Secondary sponsor category [1]
295409
0
None
Query!
Name [1]
295409
0
Query!
Address [1]
295409
0
Query!
Country [1]
295409
0
Query!
Ethics approval
Ethics application status
Approved
Query!
Ethics committee name [1]
297678
0
Austin Health
Query!
Ethics committee address [1]
297678
0
Research Ethics Office for Research Level 8, Harold Stokes Building Austin Health PO Box 5555 Heidelberg Victoria Australia 3084
Query!
Ethics committee country [1]
297678
0
Australia
Query!
Date submitted for ethics approval [1]
297678
0
01/03/2017
Query!
Approval date [1]
297678
0
02/05/2017
Query!
Ethics approval number [1]
297678
0
HREC/17/Austin/83
Query!
Summary
Brief summary
Advance care planning (ACP) is a process between a person, their family/carer(s) and healthcare providers that supports adults at any age or stage of health in understanding and sharing their personal values, life goals, and preferences regarding future medical care. The Australian government funds a number of national initiatives aimed at increasing ACP uptake, however there is currently no standardised Australian data regarding formal ACP documentation or self-reported uptake. This makes it difficult to evaluate the impact of ACP initiatives. This study aims to determine the prevalence of ACP and completion of Advance Care Directives (ACDs) in hospitals, aged care facilities and general practices. It will also explore people’s self-reported use of ACP, and views about the process. Researchers will conduct a national multicentre cross-sectional prevalence study, consisting of a record audit and surveys of people over 65 years in three sectors, hospitals, general practices and aged care facilities. Up to 50 records from 48 participating Australian organisations will be audited (total of 2400 records). People whose records were audited, who speak English and have a decision-making capacity will be invited to complete a survey. Up to 50 people associated with each organisation (whose records have been audited) will be surveyed. The primary outcome measure will be the number of people who have formal or informal ACP documentation that can be located in records within 15 minutes. Other outcomes will include specific details of ACP documentation (including type and validity of document), and whether current clinical care plans are consistent with ACP documentation. People will be surveyed to measure self-reported interest, uptake and use of ACP/ACDs.
Query!
Trial website
Query!
Trial related presentations / publications
Query!
Public notes
Query!
Contacts
Principal investigator
Name
74790
0
Dr Rasa Ruseckaite
Query!
Address
74790
0
Department of Epidemiology and Preventive Medicine
School of Public Health and Preventive Medicine
Monash University
Level 2, 553 St Kilda Rd
Melbourne VIC 3004
Query!
Country
74790
0
Australia
Query!
Phone
74790
0
+61399030437
Query!
Fax
74790
0
Query!
Email
74790
0
[email protected]
Query!
Contact person for public queries
Name
74791
0
Rasa Ruseckaite
Query!
Address
74791
0
Department of Epidemiology and Preventive Medicine
School of Public Health and Preventive Medicine
Monash University
Level 2, 553 St Kilda Rd
Melbourne VIC 3004
Query!
Country
74791
0
Australia
Query!
Phone
74791
0
+61399030437
Query!
Fax
74791
0
Query!
Email
74791
0
[email protected]
Query!
Contact person for scientific queries
Name
74792
0
Rasa Ruseckaite
Query!
Address
74792
0
Department of Epidemiology and Preventive Medicine
School of Public Health and Preventive Medicine
Monash University
Level 2, 553 St Kilda Rd
Melbourne VIC 3004
Query!
Country
74792
0
Australia
Query!
Phone
74792
0
+61399030437
Query!
Fax
74792
0
Query!
Email
74792
0
[email protected]
Query!
No information has been provided regarding IPD availability
What supporting documents are/will be available?
No Supporting Document Provided
Results publications and other study-related documents
Documents added manually
No documents have been uploaded by study researchers.
Documents added automatically
Source
Title
Year of Publication
DOI
Dimensions AI
Protocol for a national prevalence study of advance care planning documentation and self-reported uptake in Australia
2017
https://doi.org/10.1136/bmjopen-2017-018024
Embase
Prevalence and correlates of advance care directives among older Australians accessing health and residential aged care services: Multicentre audit study.
2019
https://dx.doi.org/10.1136/bmjopen-2018-025255
N.B. These documents automatically identified may not have been verified by the study sponsor.
Download to PDF