Please note that the copy function is not enabled for this field.
If you wish to
modify
existing outcomes, please copy and paste the current outcome text into the Update field.
LOGIN
CREATE ACCOUNT
LOGIN
CREATE ACCOUNT
MY TRIALS
REGISTER TRIAL
FAQs
HINTS AND TIPS
DEFINITIONS
Trial Review
The ANZCTR website will be unavailable from 1pm until 3pm (AEDT) on Wednesday the 30th of October for website maintenance. Please be sure to log out of the system in order to avoid any loss of data.
The safety and scientific validity of this study is the responsibility of the study sponsor and investigators. Listing a study does not mean it has been endorsed by the ANZCTR. Before participating in a study, talk to your health care provider and refer to this
information for consumers
Download to PDF
Trial registered on ANZCTR
Registration number
ACTRN12617001310358
Ethics application status
Approved
Date submitted
7/09/2017
Date registered
12/09/2017
Date last updated
12/09/2017
Type of registration
Retrospectively registered
Titles & IDs
Public title
Trialling a modified consent card and school package for improving outcomes in the secondary school vaccine program
Query!
Scientific title
Trialling a modified consent card and school package to increase consent card return rates, vaccination rates, and improve data quality within the secondary school vaccine program
Query!
Secondary ID [1]
292824
0
None
Query!
Universal Trial Number (UTN)
U1111-1201-7581
Query!
Trial acronym
Query!
Linked study record
Query!
Health condition
Health condition(s) or problem(s) studied:
Genital warts
304659
0
Query!
Cervical cancer
304660
0
Query!
Human papillomavirus
304694
0
Query!
Condition category
Condition code
Infection
303979
303979
0
0
Query!
Sexually transmitted infections
Query!
Public Health
304004
304004
0
0
Query!
Health promotion/education
Query!
Intervention/exposure
Study type
Interventional
Query!
Description of intervention(s) / exposure
Background: In order for a student to be immunised within the secondary school vaccine program, their parent or guardian must complete and return a vaccine consent card. Unfortunately, approximately 9% of students do not return a consent card, and without further contact from council are prevented from receiving vaccines within the school program. This also occurs when parents/guardians return the consent card with missing or incorrect information leaving follow-up actions necessary for a valid consent. With this backdrop, efforts to improve consent card return rates and data quality have the potential to increase vaccination rates.
Within the school vaccine program, state government (i.e., Department of Health and Human Services (DHHS)) distribute the consent card to local government (i.e., councils). Each council then distributes the consent cards to the schools in their area. The school immunisation coordinator (i.e., person at the school responsible for managing the vaccine program at the school) distributes and collects the consent cards from parents/students and then council come back to the school to collect the returned cards.
Intervention (arm A): A new consent card was trialled (card incorporated plain language and social norming principles) alongside a new mode of card delivery. Specifically, DHHS distributed the consent cards directly to schools along with a letter to the school Principal and the school immunisation coordinator (the letters also incorporated social norming principles). They did this during December 2016. They also distributed a smaller batch of cards early in the school year (February 2017) so schools could re-distribute the consent card to any students who had not returned a consent card. The letters were personalized (i.e., the name of the school Principal / school immunization coordinator).
Please find the new consent card and letters attached to the original ANZCTR registration record.
Query!
Intervention code [1]
299077
0
Prevention
Query!
Comparator / control treatment
Control (arm B). The control group did not receive the intervention. They continued to receive the older card from council as per normal.
Query!
Control group
Active
Query!
Outcomes
Primary outcome [1]
303317
0
Proportion of year 7 students who returned a consent card.
Councils keep track of this information as part of their usual delivery/management of the school vaccine program (i.e., number of students enrolled in year 7 and number of cards returned).
Query!
Assessment method [1]
303317
0
Query!
Timepoint [1]
303317
0
Within one week of the first school visit of the 2017 secondary school vaccine program
Query!
Secondary outcome [1]
338618
0
Proportion of returned cards that had missing or incorrect information.
Council do not routinely collect this information, however, they do routinely check each card for this information. Hence, the researchers simply asked them to keep a tally of how many of the returned cards at each school had missing or incorrect information.
Query!
Assessment method [1]
338618
0
Query!
Timepoint [1]
338618
0
Councils were asked to provide this information within one week of each school having their first school visit.
Query!
Secondary outcome [2]
338619
0
Proportion of all year 7 students who had a dose of the HPV vaccine at the first school visit.
Councils routinely collect this information (number of students enrolled in year 7 and number of students who received a dose of the vaccine at the first school session).
Query!
Assessment method [2]
338619
0
Query!
Timepoint [2]
338619
0
Councils were asked to provide this information within one week of each school having their first school visit.
Query!
Eligibility
Key inclusion criteria
From the 79 councils across Victoria, only councils that have at least two schools who:
1) had not received their 2017 consent cards
2) were expected to have more than 20 students enrolled in year 7 in 2017.
Schools that fit within this description (within participating councils) were included in the study.
Query!
Minimum age
10
Years
Query!
Query!
Maximum age
14
Years
Query!
Query!
Sex
Both males and females
Query!
Can healthy volunteers participate?
Yes
Query!
Key exclusion criteria
There were no unique exclusion criteria for any participant group (i.e., school Principals, school immunization coordinators, students) beyond that outline above in the key inclusion criteria section.
Query!
Study design
Purpose of the study
Prevention
Query!
Allocation to intervention
Randomised controlled trial
Query!
Procedure for enrolling a subject and allocating the treatment (allocation concealment procedures)
Allocation is not concealed.
Query!
Methods used to generate the sequence in which subjects will be randomised (sequence generation)
Excel's RANDBETWEEN function (with condition that each council has similar number of schools allocated to the intervention condition and the control condition).
Query!
Masking / blinding
Blinded (masking used)
Query!
Who is / are masked / blinded?
The people receiving the treatment/s
Query!
Query!
Query!
Query!
Intervention assignment
Parallel
Query!
Other design features
Query!
Phase
Not Applicable
Query!
Type of endpoint/s
Query!
Statistical methods / analysis
Councils provide the data in aggregate format (i.e., for each school in their area they list 1) number of year 7 students enrolled, number of cards returned, number of cards with missing or incorrect information, number of HPV encounters at first school visit). The research team then turned this into individual level data to use for analysis.
Analysis: Multilevel Modeling where the outcome is regressed onto study condition whilst accounting for the nested structure of the data (i.e, students nested within schools which are nested within councils).
Prior to this a series of randomization checks will be performed (to ensure randomization lead to equivalent groups). The factors assessed include: School type (e.g., secondary vs. P-12 vs. special/language), school sector (e.g., state vs. independent vs. catholic), region (e.g., metro vs. regional).
Query!
Recruitment
Recruitment status
Completed
Query!
Date of first participant enrolment
Anticipated
Query!
Actual
5/12/2016
Query!
Date of last participant enrolment
Anticipated
Query!
Actual
28/02/2017
Query!
Date of last data collection
Anticipated
Query!
Actual
30/06/2017
Query!
Sample size
Target
10000
Query!
Accrual to date
Query!
Final
14898
Query!
Recruitment in Australia
Recruitment state(s)
VIC
Query!
Funding & Sponsors
Funding source category [1]
297454
0
Government body
Query!
Name [1]
297454
0
Public Sector Innovation, Department of Premier and Cabinet, Victorian State Government
Query!
Address [1]
297454
0
Public Sector Innovation
Department of Premier and Cabinet
Level 29, 35 Collins Street
Melbourne VIC 3000
Australia
Query!
Country [1]
297454
0
Australia
Query!
Primary sponsor type
University
Query!
Name
Monash University
Query!
Address
BehaviourWorks Australia
Monash Sustainable Development Institute
Monash University
8 Scenic Boulevard, Clayton Campus
Clayton, VIC, 3800
Australia
Query!
Country
Australia
Query!
Secondary sponsor category [1]
296450
0
Government body
Query!
Name [1]
296450
0
Department of Health and Human Services
Query!
Address [1]
296450
0
Immunisation Section
Health Protection Branch
Regulation, Health Protection & Emergency Management Division
50 Lonsdale Street
Melbourne, VIC, 3000
Australia
Query!
Country [1]
296450
0
Australia
Query!
Ethics approval
Ethics application status
Approved
Query!
Ethics committee name [1]
298560
0
Monash University Human Research Ethics Commettee
Query!
Ethics committee address [1]
298560
0
Monash University Room 111, Chancellery Building E 24 Sports Walk Clayton Campus Wellington Rd Clayton VIC 3800 Australia
Query!
Ethics committee country [1]
298560
0
Australia
Query!
Date submitted for ethics approval [1]
298560
0
19/10/2016
Query!
Approval date [1]
298560
0
07/11/2016
Query!
Ethics approval number [1]
298560
0
2016-1081-1027
Query!
Summary
Brief summary
The Gardasil quadrivalent 3-dose human papillomavirus (HPV) vaccine, which protects against genital warts and most cervical cancers, is provided in Victoria through a secondary school program, administered by local government (i.e., councils). In order for a student to be immunised within this program, their parent or guardian must complete and return a vaccine consent card. Unfortunately, approximately 9% of students do not return a consent card, and without further contact from council are prevented from receiving vaccines within the school program. This also occurs when parents/guardians return the consent card with missing or incorrect information leaving follow-up actions necessary for a valid consent. With this backdrop, efforts to improve consent card return rates and data quality have the potential to increase vaccination rates. The aim of this trial was to assess whether these outcomes could be improved by modifying using a new consent card (card incorporated plain language and social norming principles) alongside a new mode of card delivery. Specifically, DHHS distributed the consent cards directly to schools along with a letter to the school Principal and the school immunisation coordinator (the letters also incorporated social norming principles). They did this during December 2016. They also distributed a smaller batch of cards early in the school year (February 2017) so schools could re-distribute the consent card to any students who had not returned a consent card. It was hypothesized that this intervention (i.e., new and card and mode of delivery) would 1) increase the likelihood that a parent would complete and return the consent card, 2) the parent would be more likely to complete the card with no missing or incorrect information, and 3) more students would receive the HPV vaccine at the first school visit.
Query!
Trial website
Query!
Trial related presentations / publications
Query!
Public notes
Query!
Attachments [1]
2021
2021
0
0
/AnzctrAttachments/373603-Monash University HREC Approval.pdf
(Ethics approval)
Query!
Query!
Attachments [2]
2022
2022
0
0
/AnzctrAttachments/373603-New Card_OUTSIDE PRINT.pdf
(Other)
Query!
Query!
Attachments [3]
2023
2023
0
0
/AnzctrAttachments/373603-Letter to good performing school_FINAL.pdf
(Other)
Query!
Query!
Attachments [4]
2024
2024
0
0
/AnzctrAttachments/373603-Letter to poor performing school_FINAL.pdf
(Other)
Query!
Query!
Contacts
Principal investigator
Name
77470
0
A/Prof Peter Bragge
Query!
Address
77470
0
BehaviourWorks Australia
Monash Sustainable Development Institute
Monash University
8 Scenic Boulevard, Clayton Campus
Clayton, VIC, 3800
Australia
Query!
Country
77470
0
Australia
Query!
Phone
77470
0
+61 3 9905 9664
Query!
Fax
77470
0
Query!
Email
77470
0
[email protected]
Query!
Contact person for public queries
Name
77471
0
Fraser Tull
Query!
Address
77471
0
BehaviourWorks Australia
Monash Sustainable Development Institute
Monash University
8 Scenic Boulevard, Clayton Campus
Clayton, VIC, 3800
Australia
Query!
Country
77471
0
Australia
Query!
Phone
77471
0
+61 (0)407 965 196
Query!
Fax
77471
0
Query!
Email
77471
0
[email protected]
Query!
Contact person for scientific queries
Name
77472
0
Fraser Tull
Query!
Address
77472
0
BehaviourWorks Australia
Monash Sustainable Development Institute
Monash University
8 Scenic Boulevard, Clayton Campus
Clayton, VIC, 3800
Australia
Query!
Country
77472
0
Australia
Query!
Phone
77472
0
+61 (0)407 965 196
Query!
Fax
77472
0
Query!
Email
77472
0
[email protected]
Query!
No information has been provided regarding IPD availability
What supporting documents are/will be available?
No Supporting Document Provided
Results publications and other study-related documents
Documents added manually
No documents have been uploaded by study researchers.
Documents added automatically
No additional documents have been identified.
Download to PDF