Please note that the copy function is not enabled for this field.
If you wish to
modify
existing outcomes, please copy and paste the current outcome text into the Update field.
LOGIN
CREATE ACCOUNT
LOGIN
CREATE ACCOUNT
MY TRIALS
REGISTER TRIAL
FAQs
HINTS AND TIPS
DEFINITIONS
Trial Review
The ANZCTR website will be unavailable from 1pm until 3pm (AEDT) on Wednesday the 30th of October for website maintenance. Please be sure to log out of the system in order to avoid any loss of data.
The safety and scientific validity of this study is the responsibility of the study sponsor and investigators. Listing a study does not mean it has been endorsed by the ANZCTR. Before participating in a study, talk to your health care provider and refer to this
information for consumers
Download to PDF
Trial registered on ANZCTR
Registration number
ACTRN12617001469303
Ethics application status
Approved
Date submitted
11/09/2017
Date registered
17/10/2017
Date last updated
17/10/2017
Type of registration
Prospectively registered
Titles & IDs
Public title
Acute Mental Health Facility Design Study: the NZ experience (2017-2020)
Query!
Scientific title
Acute Mental Health Facility Design: perspectives and experiences of NZ stakeholders
Query!
Secondary ID [1]
292848
0
NIL
Query!
Universal Trial Number (UTN)
None
Query!
Trial acronym
AMHFDS
Query!
Linked study record
Query!
Health condition
Health condition(s) or problem(s) studied:
Design of psychiatric facility. Perspectives and experiences
304689
0
Query!
mental health
304690
0
Query!
well being
304691
0
Query!
public health
304785
0
Query!
Health service research
304786
0
Query!
mental health
304787
0
Query!
Condition category
Condition code
Public Health
304000
304000
0
0
Query!
Health service research
Query!
Mental Health
304093
304093
0
0
Query!
Other mental health disorders
Query!
Intervention/exposure
Study type
Observational
Query!
Patient registry
False
Query!
Target follow-up duration
Query!
Target follow-up type
Query!
Description of intervention(s) / exposure
The conditions being observed are the acute mental health ward users' perspectives and experiences of the ward environment (not any specific health outcome).
The exposure is the physical building and interior of the acute mental health ward.
The planned period of observation will be the 8 weeks in which the data are collected by the researchers (interview data and focus groups).
There are three main components to this observational study:
1. Face-to-face interviews with 3 groups will be conducted to find out ward users perspectives and expereinces of the design of the ward environment, asking about specific architectural features and related issues. The three groups to be interviewed are: Service users residing in the acute mental health ward, staff working in the ward, and a family member who visits the ward (and who is nominated by the service user interviewed).
2. Stakeholder specific walking focus groups: Stakeholder focus groups led by the architect on this project and the PI will include consenting individuals from five key stakeholder groups. Each stakeholder group will be led around the ward with the architect and the PI and will be asked what the spaces are used for and how they function for these purposes. The building is used as a prompt for discussion. The five stakeholder groups will be:
-Mental health service users resident in the ward
-Nursing and other staff
-Visiting health and allied professionals (social workers, Chaplains, consumer advocates, psychologists and psychiatrists)
-Policy makers/planners, district inspectors, and DHB managers and designers
-Maori stakeholders
3. Architectural analysis of plans and consultation documents.
Data sources: Architects’ plans, building specifications and photographs. Method: Plans will be requested by PI from the appropriate personnel in participating DHBs. Photographs will be taken by the PI and architect of the inside and outside of the facility. Inside will include photographs of rooms and corridors (to show room color, layout and furnishings) and key physical features (fixtures and fittings). Photographs will be taken at a time convenient to ward users and care will be taken to ensure no-one is captured in the photographs.
Photographs of private sleeping quarters will only be taken either a) when the rooms are unoccupied - vacant of people and possessions or b) with written prior consent of the mental health service user. Photographs of bedrooms with personal belongings are important for showing the degree of personalisation and choice enjoyed by the occupants.
Analysis: Plans and photographs will be analysed using a 215 item validated check-list designed in accordance with normalisation theory. Data gleaned will include ward location, size, internal layout and allocation of space (public, private, intimate), room function and purpose, interior decoration, security and other architectural qualities.
Query!
Intervention code [1]
299093
0
Not applicable
Query!
Comparator / control treatment
No control group
Query!
Control group
Uncontrolled
Query!
Outcomes
Primary outcome [1]
303331
0
Acute mental health ward users experiences and perspectives of the the acute mental health ward environment as measured by a structured face to face interview.
Query!
Assessment method [1]
303331
0
Query!
Timepoint [1]
303331
0
Ward users will be interviewed and focus groups conducted in a 6-8 week window of the data collection at each of the three casse study sites. Exact timing will be negotiated with each DHB so as to minimise disruption to patient care.
Query!
Primary outcome [2]
303410
0
Acute mental health ward users experiences and perspectives of the the acute mental health ward environment as measured by a walking focus group interview arounde the ward.
Query!
Assessment method [2]
303410
0
Query!
Timepoint [2]
303410
0
Ward users will be interviewed and focus groups conducted in a 6-8 week window of the data collection at each of the three casse study sites. Exact timing will be negotiated with each DHB so as to minimise disruption to patient care.
Query!
Secondary outcome [1]
338661
0
nil
Query!
Assessment method [1]
338661
0
Query!
Timepoint [1]
338661
0
nil
Query!
Eligibility
Key inclusion criteria
Interviews
Mental health service users resident in the ward - all adult acute mental health service users who are competent to consent (competence will be assessed by the lead clinician) to participate. are eligible. As there is no restriction on the length of time they have been in the ward, those who have only just arrived will be eligible.
Nominated family member - any familiy member nominated by a consenting mental health service user, who agrees to participate is eligible for inclusion in the study.
Staff - all staff members who work in the ward will be eligible to participate in the study.
Stakeholder focus groups:
Stakeholder focus groups led by the architect on this project and the PI will include consenting individuals from these five key stakeholder groups:
-Mental health service users resident in the ward (same eligibility criteria as for interviews above)
-Nursing and other staff (same criteria as for interviews)
-Visiting health and allied professionals (social workers, Chaplains, consumer advocates, psychologists and psychiatrists). - identified by staff members will be eligible to participate in the focus groups.
-Policy makers/planners, district inspectors, and DHB managers and designers identified by staff will be eligible to participate.
-Maori stakeholders - identiifed by staff members and through any additional Maori consultation process for each DHB will be eligible to participate.
Query!
Minimum age
20
Years
Query!
Query!
Maximum age
No limit
Query!
Query!
Sex
Both males and females
Query!
Can healthy volunteers participate?
Yes
Query!
Key exclusion criteria
Mental health service users: any service user deemed not competent to consent at the time of the interview or focus group will be excluded (this includes any patient in seclusion at the time).
Family member/family friend - only family members nominated by a service user who has consented to be interviewed will be eligible to participate.
Any stakeholder unavailable at the time of the interview or focus group will be excluded.
Query!
Study design
Purpose
Natural history
Query!
Duration
Cross-sectional
Query!
Selection
Defined population
Query!
Timing
Both
Query!
Statistical methods / analysis
Data from interviews and focus groups will be analysed by thematic analysis.
Data from architectural plans will be analysed using space syntax analysis and healthcare architecture analysis. All data will be triangulated.
Query!
Recruitment
Recruitment status
Not yet recruiting
Query!
Date of first participant enrolment
Anticipated
1/02/2018
Query!
Actual
Query!
Date of last participant enrolment
Anticipated
1/06/2019
Query!
Actual
Query!
Date of last data collection
Anticipated
1/06/2019
Query!
Actual
Query!
Sample size
Target
150
Query!
Accrual to date
Query!
Final
Query!
Recruitment outside Australia
Country [1]
9187
0
New Zealand
Query!
State/province [1]
9187
0
We are still arranging locality consent with the DHB participants. There will be three DHB regions selected as case studies. We will not be sure which three until we have completed negotiations and locality approval processes.
Query!
Funding & Sponsors
Funding source category [1]
297481
0
Charities/Societies/Foundations
Query!
Name [1]
297481
0
Royal Society of NZ
Query!
Address [1]
297481
0
11 Turnbull St, Thorndon, Wellington 6011
Query!
Country [1]
297481
0
New Zealand
Query!
Primary sponsor type
University
Query!
Name
University of Otago, Wellington
Query!
Address
23a Mein St
Newtown
PO Box 7343
Wellington South 6242
Query!
Country
New Zealand
Query!
Secondary sponsor category [1]
296555
0
University
Query!
Name [1]
296555
0
Otago
Query!
Address [1]
296555
0
University of Otago, Wellington
23a Mein St, Newtown
PO Box 7343
Wellington South 6242
Query!
Country [1]
296555
0
New Zealand
Query!
Ethics approval
Ethics application status
Approved
Query!
Ethics committee name [1]
298583
0
Health and Disability Ethics Committee
Query!
Ethics committee address [1]
298583
0
Postal address: Ministry of Health Health and Disability Ethics Committees PO Box 5013 Wellington 6140
Query!
Ethics committee country [1]
298583
0
New Zealand
Query!
Date submitted for ethics approval [1]
298583
0
03/04/2017
Query!
Approval date [1]
298583
0
25/07/2017
Query!
Ethics approval number [1]
298583
0
17/CEN/94
Query!
Summary
Brief summary
The acute mental health ward is the modern equivalent of the old mental asylum but little is known about factors informing its design and use or the underpinning philosophy of care upon which these facilities are based and if they could benefit from improvements. This multidisciplinary three year study will draw on perspectives from social science, psychiatry, nursing and architecture to understand the architectural design, therapeutic philosophy and social regime of the modern acute mental health unit in New Zealand. It will examine as case studies, three acute adult psychiatric wards in New Zealand. Using multiple existing sources of data, including architects plans, briefs and grey literature and collecting new data via in-depth interviews and small focus groups with mental health consumers resident in the wards, staff and other ward users and stakeholders, the findings from this research will inform a much needed evidence base for optimal acute psychiatric facility design in NZ. This research is funded by a Marsden Fast Start.
Query!
Trial website
No website
Query!
Trial related presentations / publications
Conference poster, Jenkin G, Chrysikou E, Peterson D, Collings S, Every-Palmer S. (2017) Acute Psychiatric Facilities: Therapeutic Spaces or Stigmatising Places? Poster. European Healthcare Design. Visioning the future: Designing for change in people-centred health systems. 10-14 June. Royal College of Physicians, London, UK. Poster - Acute Mental Health Wards [PNG - 2MB]
Query!
Public notes
Query!
Contacts
Principal investigator
Name
77554
0
Dr Gabrielle Jenkin
Query!
Address
77554
0
Deputy Director
Suicide and mental health research group
University of Otago, Wellington
23a Mein St
Newtown
Wellington 6021
Query!
Country
77554
0
New Zealand
Query!
Phone
77554
0
+64 212578040
Query!
Fax
77554
0
Query!
Email
77554
0
[email protected]
Query!
Contact person for public queries
Name
77555
0
Gabrielle Jenkin
Query!
Address
77555
0
Deputy Director
Suicide and mental health research group
University of Otago, Wellington
23a Mein St
Newtown
Wellington 6021
Query!
Country
77555
0
New Zealand
Query!
Phone
77555
0
+64 212578040
Query!
Fax
77555
0
Query!
Email
77555
0
[email protected]
Query!
Contact person for scientific queries
Name
77556
0
Gabrielle Jenkin
Query!
Address
77556
0
Deputy Director
Suicide and mental health research group
University of Otago, Wellington
23a Mein St
Newtown
Wellington 6021
Query!
Country
77556
0
New Zealand
Query!
Phone
77556
0
+64 212578040
Query!
Fax
77556
0
Query!
Email
77556
0
[email protected]
Query!
No information has been provided regarding IPD availability
What supporting documents are/will be available?
No Supporting Document Provided
Results publications and other study-related documents
Documents added manually
No documents have been uploaded by study researchers.
Documents added automatically
Source
Title
Year of Publication
DOI
Embase
Gender and intersecting vulnerabilities on the mental health unit: Rethinking the dilemma.
2022
https://dx.doi.org/10.3389/fpsyt.2022.940130
Embase
Places of safety? Fear and violence in acute mental health facilities: A large qualitative study of staff and service user perspectives.
2022
https://dx.doi.org/10.1371/journal.pone.0266935
Dimensions AI
‘My Work Matters’: A Qualitative Exploration of Why Staff Love Working in Acute Mental Health
2022
https://doi.org/10.3390/ijerph192013619
Dimensions AI
‘We have to band together’: service user experiences of naturally occurring peer support on the acute mental health unit
2022
https://doi.org/10.1080/1177083x.2022.2093230
N.B. These documents automatically identified may not have been verified by the study sponsor.
Download to PDF