Please note that the copy function is not enabled for this field.
If you wish to
modify
existing outcomes, please copy and paste the current outcome text into the Update field.
LOGIN
CREATE ACCOUNT
LOGIN
CREATE ACCOUNT
MY TRIALS
REGISTER TRIAL
FAQs
HINTS AND TIPS
DEFINITIONS
Trial Review
The ANZCTR website will be unavailable from 1pm until 3pm (AEDT) on Wednesday the 30th of October for website maintenance. Please be sure to log out of the system in order to avoid any loss of data.
The safety and scientific validity of this study is the responsibility of the study sponsor and investigators. Listing a study does not mean it has been endorsed by the ANZCTR. Before participating in a study, talk to your health care provider and refer to this
information for consumers
Download to PDF
Trial registered on ANZCTR
Registration number
ACTRN12618000116224
Ethics application status
Approved
Date submitted
15/01/2018
Date registered
29/01/2018
Date last updated
29/01/2018
Type of registration
Prospectively registered
Titles & IDs
Public title
The impact of an antimicrobial stewardship team on the appropriateness of antimicrobial
therapy in sepsis
Query!
Scientific title
The impact of an antimicrobial stewardship team on the appropriateness of antimicrobial
therapy in sepsis
Query!
Secondary ID [1]
293766
0
None
Query!
Universal Trial Number (UTN)
U1111-1207-6392
Query!
Trial acronym
Query!
Linked study record
Query!
Health condition
Health condition(s) or problem(s) studied:
Sepsis
306160
0
Query!
Condition category
Condition code
Infection
305272
305272
0
0
Query!
Studies of infection and infectious agents
Query!
Intervention/exposure
Study type
Interventional
Query!
Description of intervention(s) / exposure
In hospital patients with medical emergency team (MET) calls for suspected sepsis, antimicrobial therapy is currently managed by the admitting, or home, team. Complex cases may be referred to specialist Infectious Diseases (ID) clinicians on request by the treating team. The antimicrobial stewardship (AMS) team (ID physician and pharmacist) currently conduct a post prescription review of a limited patient group, after the prescription of restricted antimicrobial agents or a positive blood culture result. The former group is primarily identified by clinical pharmacists who request review of their patients, but the AMS team also reviews patients on broad spectrum antimicrobial agents identified by other means. This AMS review is a focused review of medical records, pathology results and clinical notes, but does not include a clinical or physical review of the patient. The AMS team then make recommendations about antimicrobial therapy to the treating team.
Currently, patients with MET calls for suspected sepsis are not routinely seen by the AMS team, despite the use of broad-spectrum antimicrobial agents. Many of these patients are not flagged to the AMS team via the current practice, or referral via current notification mechanisms is often delayed.
The intervention will be ongoing standard care as above, as well as an expert ID AMS review at 48 hours after a MET call for suspected sepsis.
Query!
Intervention code [1]
300021
0
Treatment: Drugs
Query!
Comparator / control treatment
This study will enroll patients with MET calls for suspected sepsis who would otherwise not be seen by an AMS team. Control patients will continue to receive standard care and management by the treating team as above, which does not currently involve an AMS review for this patient group.
Control patients who are later referred for an AMS review by the treating team will be reviewed as standard care, but will be excluded for the purpose of this study.
Query!
Control group
Active
Query!
Outcomes
Primary outcome [1]
304425
0
Appropriateness of antimicrobial therapy, as determined by a panel of blinded ID physicians. This will be assessed by review of medical records, pathology results and clinical notes.
Query!
Assessment method [1]
304425
0
Query!
Timepoint [1]
304425
0
72 hours post MET call
Query!
Secondary outcome [1]
341912
0
Duration of antimicrobial therapy, assessed by review of medical records
Query!
Assessment method [1]
341912
0
Query!
Timepoint [1]
341912
0
Hospital discharge or in-hospital death
Query!
Secondary outcome [2]
341913
0
Admission to ICU, assessed by review of medical records
Query!
Assessment method [2]
341913
0
Query!
Timepoint [2]
341913
0
Hospital discharge or in-hospital death
Query!
Secondary outcome [3]
341914
0
Sepsis-related mortality, assessed by review of medical records
Query!
Assessment method [3]
341914
0
Query!
Timepoint [3]
341914
0
Hospital discharge or in-hospital death
Query!
Secondary outcome [4]
341915
0
All-cause mortality
Query!
Assessment method [4]
341915
0
Query!
Timepoint [4]
341915
0
Hospital discharge or in-hospital death
Query!
Eligibility
Key inclusion criteria
-Patients with MET calls for suspected sepsis, as identified by Riskman® reports (hospital risk management system)
-First MET call only during the study period
Query!
Minimum age
18
Years
Query!
Query!
Maximum age
No limit
Query!
Query!
Sex
Both males and females
Query!
Can healthy volunteers participate?
No
Query!
Key exclusion criteria
-Patients under the care of an ID physician
-Patients who have already been seen by AMS post MET call, or will be seen on the day of randomisation as standard care (i.e. patients with electronic alerts for restricted antimicrobials or positive blood cultures)
-Patients admitted to the Intensive Care Unit (ICU) within 48 hours post MET call
-Patients with a limitation of care order prohibiting active treatment of sepsis
Query!
Study design
Purpose of the study
Treatment
Query!
Allocation to intervention
Randomised controlled trial
Query!
Procedure for enrolling a subject and allocating the treatment (allocation concealment procedures)
Patient allocation will be concealed by sequentially numbered, opaque envelopes sealed by an independent research assistant.
Query!
Methods used to generate the sequence in which subjects will be randomised (sequence generation)
Patient allocation will be determined by computer-generated randomisation.
Query!
Masking / blinding
Blinded (masking used)
Query!
Who is / are masked / blinded?
The people receiving the treatment/s
The people assessing the outcomes
Query!
Query!
Query!
Query!
Intervention assignment
Parallel
Query!
Other design features
Query!
Phase
Not Applicable
Query!
Type of endpoint/s
Efficacy
Query!
Statistical methods / analysis
Sample size calculation:
To detect a difference in antimicrobial appropriateness at 72 hours between 50% in the control group and 80% in the intervention group with an a of 0.05 and 80% power, 45 patients are required in each arm of the study. Due to the limited size of the pilot study used to guide sample size calculations, as well as to allow for patient loss, this number will be inflated to enrol approximately 60 patients in each arm.
Statistical analysis:
Descriptive statistics will be derived. Demographic characteristics and primary and secondary outcomes will be compared between the control group and intervention group participants. Dichotomous outcome measurements will be compared using a chi2 or Fisher exact test. Continuous variables will require a t test or a Mann-Whitney test as appropriate. A p value < 0.05 will be considered to be statistically significant.
Query!
Recruitment
Recruitment status
Not yet recruiting
Query!
Date of first participant enrolment
Anticipated
29/01/2018
Query!
Actual
Query!
Date of last participant enrolment
Anticipated
15/08/2018
Query!
Actual
Query!
Date of last data collection
Anticipated
31/08/2018
Query!
Actual
Query!
Sample size
Target
120
Query!
Accrual to date
Query!
Final
Query!
Recruitment in Australia
Recruitment state(s)
VIC
Query!
Recruitment hospital [1]
9736
0
The Alfred - Prahran
Query!
Recruitment postcode(s) [1]
18515
0
3004 - Prahran
Query!
Funding & Sponsors
Funding source category [1]
298382
0
Hospital
Query!
Name [1]
298382
0
Alfred Hospital Pharmacy Department
Query!
Address [1]
298382
0
55 Commercial Road, Melbourne, VIC, 3004
Query!
Country [1]
298382
0
Australia
Query!
Primary sponsor type
Hospital
Query!
Name
Alfred Hospital Pharmacy Department
Query!
Address
55 Commercial Road, Melbourne, VIC, 3004
Query!
Country
Australia
Query!
Secondary sponsor category [1]
297517
0
None
Query!
Name [1]
297517
0
Query!
Address [1]
297517
0
Query!
Country [1]
297517
0
Query!
Ethics approval
Ethics application status
Approved
Query!
Ethics committee name [1]
299376
0
Alfred Hospital Ethics Committee
Query!
Ethics committee address [1]
299376
0
55 Commercial Road, Melbourne, VIC, 3004
Query!
Ethics committee country [1]
299376
0
Australia
Query!
Date submitted for ethics approval [1]
299376
0
08/11/2017
Query!
Approval date [1]
299376
0
18/12/2017
Query!
Ethics approval number [1]
299376
0
Query!
Summary
Brief summary
Background: Sepsis is one of the leading causes of death in hospital patients. The early administration of broad spectrum antimicrobials improves survival in sepsis. However, the use of these antimicrobials must be balanced with their unintended consequences, such as the development of antimicrobial resistance and adverse effects. Many patients receive prolonged courses of inappropriate antimicrobials in suspected sepsis. The established antimicrobial stewardship (AMS) team currently do a post-prescription review of restricted antimicrobials and positive blood cultures. They do not routinely review treatment in sepsis, however they may have a role to promote the optimal use of antimicrobials in this setting. Aim: To determine the impact of AMS intervention in patients with medical emergency team (MET) calls for suspected sepsis Hypothesis: AMS intervention will improve appropriateness of antimicrobial therapy in suspected sepsis Participants: Patients with MET calls for suspected sepsis Method: Randomised controlled trial Control: Standard care (antimicrobials managed by the home team) Intervention: Standard care PLUS AMS review 48 hours post MET call Outcomes: Appropriateness of antimicrobial therapy at 72 hours post MET call
Query!
Trial website
Query!
Trial related presentations / publications
Query!
Public notes
Query!
Contacts
Principal investigator
Name
80218
0
Prof Michael Dooley
Query!
Address
80218
0
The Alfred, 55 Commercial Rd, Melbourne, VIC, 3004
Query!
Country
80218
0
Australia
Query!
Phone
80218
0
+61 3 9076 2061
Query!
Fax
80218
0
Query!
Email
80218
0
[email protected]
Query!
Contact person for public queries
Name
80219
0
Zohal Rashidzada
Query!
Address
80219
0
The Alfred, 55 Commercial Rd, Melbourne, VIC, 3004
Query!
Country
80219
0
Australia
Query!
Phone
80219
0
+61 3 9076 2061
Query!
Fax
80219
0
Query!
Email
80219
0
[email protected]
Query!
Contact person for scientific queries
Name
80220
0
Zohal Rashidzada
Query!
Address
80220
0
The Alfred, 55 Commercial Rd, Melbourne, VIC, 3004
Query!
Country
80220
0
Australia
Query!
Phone
80220
0
+61 3 9076 2061
Query!
Fax
80220
0
Query!
Email
80220
0
[email protected]
Query!
No information has been provided regarding IPD availability
What supporting documents are/will be available?
No Supporting Document Provided
Results publications and other study-related documents
Documents added manually
No documents have been uploaded by study researchers.
Documents added automatically
Source
Title
Year of Publication
DOI
Embase
Early antimicrobial stewardship team intervention on appropriateness of antimicrobial therapy in suspected sepsis: A randomized controlled trial.
2021
https://dx.doi.org/10.1093/jacamr/dlab097
N.B. These documents automatically identified may not have been verified by the study sponsor.
Download to PDF