Please note that the copy function is not enabled for this field.
If you wish to
modify
existing outcomes, please copy and paste the current outcome text into the Update field.
LOGIN
CREATE ACCOUNT
LOGIN
CREATE ACCOUNT
MY TRIALS
REGISTER TRIAL
FAQs
HINTS AND TIPS
DEFINITIONS
Trial Review
The ANZCTR website will be unavailable from 1pm until 3pm (AEDT) on Wednesday the 30th of October for website maintenance. Please be sure to log out of the system in order to avoid any loss of data.
The safety and scientific validity of this study is the responsibility of the study sponsor and investigators. Listing a study does not mean it has been endorsed by the ANZCTR. Before participating in a study, talk to your health care provider and refer to this
information for consumers
Download to PDF
Trial registered on ANZCTR
Registration number
ACTRN12618000605291
Ethics application status
Approved
Date submitted
31/01/2018
Date registered
18/04/2018
Date last updated
18/04/2018
Type of registration
Retrospectively registered
Titles & IDs
Public title
Properties of measures of balance in people with cerebellar ataxia
Query!
Scientific title
Responsiveness, validity and reliability of measures of balance in people with cerebellar ataxia: 1 year follow up study
Query!
Secondary ID [1]
293924
0
None
Query!
Universal Trial Number (UTN)
Query!
Trial acronym
Nil
Query!
Linked study record
Query!
Health condition
Health condition(s) or problem(s) studied:
Cerebellar ataxia
306414
0
Query!
Condition category
Condition code
Neurological
305502
305502
0
0
Query!
Other neurological disorders
Query!
Intervention/exposure
Study type
Observational
Query!
Patient registry
False
Query!
Target follow-up duration
Query!
Target follow-up type
Query!
Description of intervention(s) / exposure
This prospective observational study will assess participants with cerebellar ataxia (any type). All included participants will be followed up for 12 months period.
Query!
Intervention code [1]
300193
0
Not applicable
Query!
Comparator / control treatment
NA
Query!
Control group
Uncontrolled
Query!
Outcomes
Primary outcome [1]
304630
0
Berg Balance Scale (BBS). The BBS is a measure of dynamic balance. The measure has 14 items testing balance in sitting and standing positions, with each item scored between 0 and 4. This measure is scored out of 56, higher scores indicating better balance.
Query!
Assessment method [1]
304630
0
Query!
Timepoint [1]
304630
0
0 months, 6 months and 12 months (primary time point)
Query!
Primary outcome [2]
304631
0
Gait, stance and sit sub-components of the Scale for the Assessment and Rating of Ataxia (SARAbal): These three sub-components of the Scale for the Assessment and Rating of Ataxia (SARA) are relevant to the assessment of balance and are called the SARAbal. Scoring of each sub-component is performance based with higher the score obtained worse the balance due to CA. This measure has a maximum score of 18, of which gait is scored out of 8, 6 for stance and 4 for sitting balance.
Query!
Assessment method [2]
304631
0
Query!
Timepoint [2]
304631
0
0 months, 6 months and 12 months (primary time point)
Query!
Primary outcome [3]
304632
0
Sensory Organization Test (SOT): Is a laboratory based assessment for testing sensory interaction in maintaining balance. The SOT will be assessed using the Bertec ® system. Balance will be tested across six sensory conditions having a combination of occluded vision, visual reference and sway surface. The participant will be instructed to stand still in each condition lasting for 20 seconds. Among the variables available we will consider (1) equilibrium score using the centre of gravity (COG) sway of each condition, (2) composite equilibrium score and (3) sensory analysis ratio to identify deficits of individual sensory systems.
Query!
Assessment method [3]
304632
0
Query!
Timepoint [3]
304632
0
0 months, 6 months and 12 months (primary time point)
Query!
Secondary outcome [1]
342632
0
Scale for the Assessment and Rating of Ataxia: Is a measure for rating severity of ataxia. The measure has eight sub-components. The scoring is not equal across the sub-components. The measure has a total score of 40, with higher the score obtained, severe the symptoms due to ataxia.
Query!
Assessment method [1]
342632
0
Query!
Timepoint [1]
342632
0
0 months, 6 months and 12 months
Query!
Secondary outcome [2]
342952
0
Barthel Index: Is a self-reported ordinal scale that measures the level of independence in activities of daily living (ADL). Ten common items of ADL are rated between 0 and 15. The scoring across the testing items are not even. The scale has a maximum score of 100 and a minimum of 0. Higher the score obtained indicating better independence in ADL.
Query!
Assessment method [2]
342952
0
Query!
Timepoint [2]
342952
0
0 months, 6 months and 12 months
Query!
Secondary outcome [3]
342953
0
EuroQol 5 dimension 5 level (EQ5D 5L): Is a standardized measure of health status that can be used for economic appraisal. This self-rated questionnaire includes 5 questions addressing 5 domains (mobility, self-care, usual activities, pain and anxiety), each domain scored based on a five level index. Level 1 implies “no problem” and 5 indicates “extreme problem”. This measure also has a visual analogue scale to rate the overall health status ranging between 0 and 100, where 0 implies to the worst health one can imagine and 100 being the best health status.
Query!
Assessment method [3]
342953
0
Query!
Timepoint [3]
342953
0
0 months, 6 months and 12 months
Query!
Secondary outcome [4]
343458
0
Limits of Stability (LOS): This laboratory-based assessment measures dynamic and functional stability. The LOS will be assessed using the Bertec Balance Advantage® system. Participants stand on a computerized dual platform and view their centre of pressure (COP) on the display screen. The test requires the participant to shift their COP by moving their trunk in eight different directions without altering their foot position as well as maintaining their balance. The screen indicates the direction of the target and the COP path as they move. Reaction time (RT) and maximum excursion (MxE) for four directions (front, back, right and left) were considered for analysis. RT represents the time interval between the onset of movement and the prompt to initiate movement provided by the Bertec system. RT is measured in seconds, lesser the score better the movement initiation. MxE is an indicator of maximum displacement of the COP in a given direction without altering the foot position or loosing balance. The MxE is reported in percentage where 100% indicates perfect COP displacement in comparison to age matched healthy peers.
Query!
Assessment method [4]
343458
0
Query!
Timepoint [4]
343458
0
0 months, 6 months and 12 months
Query!
Eligibility
Key inclusion criteria
People with Spinocerebellar ataxia (all sub-types) and other types of cerebellar ataxia in the age group of 18-65 years - Presence of one or more of the following symptoms of ataxia: Gait ataxia: identified by an inability or instability to perform tandem walking; Limb ataxia: identified by dysdiadochokinesia (inability to perform rapid alternating hand movement), and dysmetria (inability to perform accurately the finger to nose test and the heel on shin test); Dysarthria: scanning speech; Nystagmus
Query!
Minimum age
18
Years
Query!
Query!
Maximum age
65
Years
Query!
Query!
Sex
Both males and females
Query!
Can healthy volunteers participate?
No
Query!
Key exclusion criteria
People with cognitive and severe visual impairments - People who do not have access to the data collection centre
Query!
Study design
Purpose
Natural history
Query!
Duration
Longitudinal
Query!
Selection
Defined population
Query!
Timing
Prospective
Query!
Statistical methods / analysis
Descriptive data of the participants including the mean, standard deviation (SD) and range of age, disease duration and age at disease onset will be calculated. In addition, the proportion of ethnicity distribution, employment status, and assistive walking device use among participants will be established. Non-parametric tests will be used for the ordinal scales (BBS, and SARABal). Parametric tests will be used for objective balance measures including variables of SOT and LOS. To estimate the responsiveness of the measures, area under the curve (AUC) will be plotted using the receiver operating characteristics (ROC) curve. Change of score will be correlated with the functional status (Barthel Index) and disease severity scales (SARA).
Query!
Recruitment
Recruitment status
Recruiting
Query!
Date of first participant enrolment
Anticipated
Query!
Actual
1/03/2018
Query!
Date of last participant enrolment
Anticipated
30/04/2018
Query!
Actual
Query!
Date of last data collection
Anticipated
30/04/2019
Query!
Actual
Query!
Sample size
Target
25
Query!
Accrual to date
15
Query!
Final
Query!
Recruitment outside Australia
Country [1]
9541
0
Hong Kong
Query!
State/province [1]
9541
0
Kowloon
Query!
Funding & Sponsors
Funding source category [1]
298552
0
University
Query!
Name [1]
298552
0
Hong Kong Polytechnic University
Query!
Address [1]
298552
0
Room ST514
1 Yuk Choi Road,
Department of Rehabilitation Sciences,
Hong Kong Polytechnic University,
Hung Hom
Kowloon
Hong Kong
Query!
Country [1]
298552
0
Hong Kong
Query!
Primary sponsor type
University
Query!
Name
Hong Kong Polytechnic University
Query!
Address
Room ST514
1 Yuk Choi Road,
Department of Rehabilitation Sciences,
Hong Kong Polytechnic University,
Hung Hom
Kowloon
Hong Kong
Query!
Country
Hong Kong
Query!
Secondary sponsor category [1]
297700
0
None
Query!
Name [1]
297700
0
Query!
Address [1]
297700
0
Query!
Country [1]
297700
0
Query!
Ethics approval
Ethics application status
Approved
Query!
Ethics committee name [1]
299521
0
Human Subjects Ethics application review System’
Query!
Ethics committee address [1]
299521
0
Human Subjects Ethics application review System’, 1 Yuk Choi Road, Department of Rehabilitation Sciences, Hong Kong Polytechnic University, Hung Hom Kowloon Hong Kong
Query!
Ethics committee country [1]
299521
0
Hong Kong
Query!
Date submitted for ethics approval [1]
299521
0
08/01/2018
Query!
Approval date [1]
299521
0
01/02/2018
Query!
Ethics approval number [1]
299521
0
HSERS0245
Query!
Summary
Brief summary
This study will estimate the usefulness of four balance assessment tools (BBS, SARAbal, SOT and LOS) in people with cerebellar ataxia. We will follow-up our participants for 12 months to see if the four balance assessment tools reflect the changes in the health status of patients due to the disease.
Query!
Trial website
Nil
Query!
Trial related presentations / publications
Query!
Public notes
Query!
Contacts
Principal investigator
Name
80706
0
Dr Stanley Winser
Query!
Address
80706
0
ST514,
1, Yuk Choi street,
Department of Rehabilitation Sciences
Hong Kong Polytechnic University,
Kowloon
Hung Hom,
Hong Kong
Query!
Country
80706
0
Hong Kong
Query!
Phone
80706
0
+85227666746
Query!
Fax
80706
0
Query!
Email
80706
0
[email protected]
Query!
Contact person for public queries
Name
80707
0
Stanley Winser
Query!
Address
80707
0
ST514,
1, Yuk Choi street,
Department of Rehabilitation Sciences
Hong Kong Polytechnic University,
Hung Hom
Kowloon
Hong Kong
Query!
Country
80707
0
Hong Kong
Query!
Phone
80707
0
+85227666746
Query!
Fax
80707
0
Query!
Email
80707
0
[email protected]
Query!
Contact person for scientific queries
Name
80708
0
Stanley Winser
Query!
Address
80708
0
ST514,
1, Yuk Choi street,
Department of Rehabilitation Sciences
Hong Kong Polytechnic University,
Hung Hom
Kowloon
Hong Kong
Query!
Country
80708
0
Hong Kong
Query!
Phone
80708
0
+85227666746
Query!
Fax
80708
0
Query!
Email
80708
0
[email protected]
Query!
No information has been provided regarding IPD availability
What supporting documents are/will be available?
No Supporting Document Provided
Results publications and other study-related documents
Documents added manually
No documents have been uploaded by study researchers.
Documents added automatically
Source
Title
Year of Publication
DOI
Embase
Validity of balance measures in cerebellar ataxia: A prospective study with 12-month follow-up.
2023
https://dx.doi.org/10.1002/pmrj.12826
N.B. These documents automatically identified may not have been verified by the study sponsor.
Download to PDF