Please note that the copy function is not enabled for this field.
If you wish to
modify
existing outcomes, please copy and paste the current outcome text into the Update field.
LOGIN
CREATE ACCOUNT
LOGIN
CREATE ACCOUNT
MY TRIALS
REGISTER TRIAL
FAQs
HINTS AND TIPS
DEFINITIONS
Trial Review
The ANZCTR website will be unavailable from 1pm until 3pm (AEDT) on Wednesday the 30th of October for website maintenance. Please be sure to log out of the system in order to avoid any loss of data.
The safety and scientific validity of this study is the responsibility of the study sponsor and investigators. Listing a study does not mean it has been endorsed by the ANZCTR. Before participating in a study, talk to your health care provider and refer to this
information for consumers
Download to PDF
Trial registered on ANZCTR
Registration number
ACTRN12618000925246p
Ethics application status
Submitted, not yet approved
Date submitted
22/05/2018
Date registered
31/05/2018
Date last updated
31/05/2018
Type of registration
Prospectively registered
Titles & IDs
Public title
Outcomes following full versus selective functional endoscopic sinus surgery
Query!
Scientific title
Efficacy of full endoscopic sinus surgery compared to mini endoscopic sinus surgery
Query!
Secondary ID [1]
294963
0
None
Query!
Universal Trial Number (UTN)
U1111-1214-4588
Query!
Trial acronym
N/A
Query!
Linked study record
N/A
Query!
Health condition
Health condition(s) or problem(s) studied:
Chronic Rhinosinusitis
307960
0
Query!
Condition category
Condition code
Surgery
306995
306995
0
0
Query!
Surgical techniques
Query!
Respiratory
307067
307067
0
0
Query!
Other respiratory disorders / diseases
Query!
Intervention/exposure
Study type
Interventional
Query!
Description of intervention(s) / exposure
Patients with chronic rhinosinusitis undergo sinus surgery to improve ventilation and drainage of paranasal sinuses (frontal, ethmoid, sphenoid, maxillary sinuses). Limited evidence exists to compare a conservative approach (i.e. operating on select sinuses) or a non-conservative approach (i.e. operating on all paranasal sinuses).
This study compares the two methods - full functional endoscopic sinus surgery (FESS) versus selective (mini) sinus surgery in patients with Chronic rhinosinusitis. Patients will be randomised to receive either full FESS or mini FESS. Outcomes including symptoms scores and revision rates will be studied and compared.
Patients will be recruited from one expert surgeons rooms/clinics who will consent and perform the operation.
Normal sinus surgery takes approximately 60 minutes to 2 hours. Patients will be fasted 6 hours before the operation as it routine. After their operation they are usually discharged from hospital the same day.
They will be followed up in the rooms of the primary surgeon for at least 1 year.
Query!
Intervention code [1]
301289
0
Treatment: Surgery
Query!
Comparator / control treatment
Full functional endoscopic sinus surgery
Query!
Control group
Active
Query!
Outcomes
Primary outcome [1]
305983
0
Number of patients needing revision sinus surgery based on clinical examination on follow up
Query!
Assessment method [1]
305983
0
Query!
Timepoint [1]
305983
0
1 year post operation
Query!
Secondary outcome [1]
347207
0
Symptom improvement based on a standardised symptoms scoring system (SNOT-22) utilised within the specialty. This is a patient questionnaire which has 22 questions patients fill out. This takes into account patient satisfaction. This is a composite outcome.
Query!
Assessment method [1]
347207
0
Query!
Timepoint [1]
347207
0
3 months post operation
Query!
Eligibility
Key inclusion criteria
Patients over 18 undergoing endoscopic sinus surgery for their condition.
Query!
Minimum age
18
Years
Query!
Query!
Maximum age
65
Years
Query!
Query!
Sex
Both males and females
Query!
Can healthy volunteers participate?
No
Query!
Key exclusion criteria
Those who have had previous sinus surgery will be excluded
Those who are unable to consent
Query!
Study design
Purpose of the study
Treatment
Query!
Allocation to intervention
Randomised controlled trial
Query!
Procedure for enrolling a subject and allocating the treatment (allocation concealment procedures)
Allocation is not concealed
Query!
Methods used to generate the sequence in which subjects will be randomised (sequence generation)
Simple randomisation using a randomisation table created by computer software (i.e. computerised sequence generation)
Query!
Masking / blinding
Open (masking not used)
Query!
Who is / are masked / blinded?
Query!
Query!
Query!
Query!
Intervention assignment
Parallel
Query!
Other design features
N/A
Query!
Phase
Not Applicable
Query!
Type of endpoint/s
Efficacy
Query!
Statistical methods / analysis
Based on 20% improvement, sample size is calculated at approximately 50 patients. This is determined using statistical software (G-Power). Data is expected to be non-parametric.
For parametric data Student T test to compare means across two groups and ANOVA across three or more groups. For non parametric dataMann Whitney U test if non parametric or Kruskal-Wallis for comparisons across three or more groups.
Query!
Recruitment
Recruitment status
Not yet recruiting
Query!
Date of first participant enrolment
Anticipated
1/07/2018
Query!
Actual
Query!
Date of last participant enrolment
Anticipated
1/10/2018
Query!
Actual
Query!
Date of last data collection
Anticipated
1/10/2019
Query!
Actual
Query!
Sample size
Target
50
Query!
Accrual to date
Query!
Final
Query!
Recruitment in Australia
Recruitment state(s)
NSW
Query!
Recruitment hospital [1]
10958
0
North Shore Private Hospital - St Leonards
Query!
Recruitment hospital [2]
10959
0
Macquarie University Hospital - Macquarie Park
Query!
Recruitment hospital [3]
10960
0
Sydney Adventist Hospital - Wahroonga
Query!
Recruitment postcode(s) [1]
22744
0
2065 - St Leonards
Query!
Recruitment postcode(s) [2]
22745
0
2109 - Macquarie Park
Query!
Recruitment postcode(s) [3]
22746
0
2076 - Wahroonga
Query!
Funding & Sponsors
Funding source category [1]
299552
0
Hospital
Query!
Name [1]
299552
0
Macquarie University Hospital
Query!
Address [1]
299552
0
3 Technology Pl
Macquarie University
NSW 2109
Query!
Country [1]
299552
0
Australia
Query!
Funding source category [2]
299627
0
Hospital
Query!
Name [2]
299627
0
North Shore Private Hospital
Query!
Address [2]
299627
0
Westbourne St,
St Leonards NSW 2065
Query!
Country [2]
299627
0
Australia
Query!
Funding source category [3]
299628
0
Hospital
Query!
Name [3]
299628
0
Sydney Adventist Hospital
Query!
Address [3]
299628
0
185 Fox Valley Rd,
Wahroonga
NSW 2076
Query!
Country [3]
299628
0
Australia
Query!
Primary sponsor type
Individual
Query!
Name
Yuresh Naidoo
Query!
Address
Dr. Yuresh Naidoo ENT practice
25-29 Hunter Street, Hornsby NSW 2077
Query!
Country
Australia
Query!
Secondary sponsor category [1]
298911
0
None
Query!
Name [1]
298911
0
Query!
Address [1]
298911
0
Query!
Country [1]
298911
0
Query!
Ethics approval
Ethics application status
Submitted, not yet approved
Query!
Ethics committee name [1]
300447
0
North Shore Private Ethics Committee
Query!
Ethics committee address [1]
300447
0
North Shore Private Hospital Westbourne Street St Leonards NSW 2065
Query!
Ethics committee country [1]
300447
0
Australia
Query!
Date submitted for ethics approval [1]
300447
0
23/05/2018
Query!
Approval date [1]
300447
0
Query!
Ethics approval number [1]
300447
0
Query!
Ethics committee name [2]
300448
0
Macquarie University Human Research Ethics Committee (Medical Sciences)
Query!
Ethics committee address [2]
300448
0
Macquarie University Human Research Ethics Committee (Medical Sciences) 3 Technology Pl, Macquarie University NSW 2109
Query!
Ethics committee country [2]
300448
0
Australia
Query!
Date submitted for ethics approval [2]
300448
0
13/06/2018
Query!
Approval date [2]
300448
0
Query!
Ethics approval number [2]
300448
0
Query!
Ethics committee name [3]
300449
0
Adventist Health Care Human Research Ethics Committee
Query!
Ethics committee address [3]
300449
0
Adventist Health Care Limited Adventist Health Care Human Research Ethics Committee 185 Fox Valley Road Wahroonga NSW 2076
Query!
Ethics committee country [3]
300449
0
Query!
Date submitted for ethics approval [3]
300449
0
30/05/2018
Query!
Approval date [3]
300449
0
Query!
Ethics approval number [3]
300449
0
Query!
Summary
Brief summary
Currently functional endoscopic sinus surgery is a treatment offered to patients with chronic sinus disease. This involved opening channels in the sinuses to allow better ventilation and drainage. This can be achieved by either opening channels between all sinuses or only a select few. There is limited evidence to suggest if once is superior to the other and current standard of practice varies between specialists. There is limited evidence to suggest that opening all channels is better than opening a select few. A randomised controlled trial offers the same standard of care to patients with sinus disease but compare outcomes in two techniques - opening all channels versus opening a select few. This study will compare outcomes between the two methods by measuring patient satisfaction, evaluation with imaging and specialised endoscopy and rates of revision surgery.
Query!
Trial website
Nil
Query!
Trial related presentations / publications
Nil
Query!
Public notes
Nil
Query!
Contacts
Principal investigator
Name
83698
0
A/Prof Yuresh Naidoo
Query!
Address
83698
0
Yuresh Naidoo ENT Practice
25-29 Hunter Street,
Hornsby NSW 2077
Query!
Country
83698
0
Australia
Query!
Phone
83698
0
+612 9477 3717
Query!
Fax
83698
0
Query!
Email
83698
0
[email protected]
Query!
Contact person for public queries
Name
83699
0
Sejad Ahmadzada
Query!
Address
83699
0
Yuresh Naidoo ENT Practice
25-29 Hunter Street,
Hornsby NSW 2077
Query!
Country
83699
0
Australia
Query!
Phone
83699
0
+61401046548
Query!
Fax
83699
0
Query!
Email
83699
0
[email protected]
Query!
Contact person for scientific queries
Name
83700
0
Sejad Ahmadzada
Query!
Address
83700
0
Yuresh Naidoo ENT Practice
25-29 Hunter Street,
Hornsby NSW 2077
Query!
Country
83700
0
Australia
Query!
Phone
83700
0
+61401046548
Query!
Fax
83700
0
Query!
Email
83700
0
[email protected]
Query!
No information has been provided regarding IPD availability
What supporting documents are/will be available?
No Supporting Document Provided
Results publications and other study-related documents
Documents added manually
No documents have been uploaded by study researchers.
Documents added automatically
No additional documents have been identified.
Download to PDF