Please note that the copy function is not enabled for this field.
If you wish to
modify
existing outcomes, please copy and paste the current outcome text into the Update field.
LOGIN
CREATE ACCOUNT
LOGIN
CREATE ACCOUNT
MY TRIALS
REGISTER TRIAL
FAQs
HINTS AND TIPS
DEFINITIONS
Trial Review
The ANZCTR website will be unavailable from 1pm until 3pm (AEDT) on Wednesday the 30th of October for website maintenance. Please be sure to log out of the system in order to avoid any loss of data.
The safety and scientific validity of this study is the responsibility of the study sponsor and investigators. Listing a study does not mean it has been endorsed by the ANZCTR. Before participating in a study, talk to your health care provider and refer to this
information for consumers
Download to PDF
Trial registered on ANZCTR
Registration number
ACTRN12618001020279p
Ethics application status
Submitted, not yet approved
Date submitted
6/06/2018
Date registered
18/06/2018
Date last updated
11/06/2019
Date data sharing statement initially provided
11/06/2019
Type of registration
Prospectively registered
Titles & IDs
Public title
Does metronidazole improve symptoms of irritable bowel syndrome in cases of colonic spirochaetosis?
Query!
Scientific title
The effect of colonic spirochaetosis eradication on the symptoms of irritable bowel syndrome: a randomised control trial
Query!
Secondary ID [1]
295120
0
None
Query!
Universal Trial Number (UTN)
Query!
Trial acronym
Query!
Linked study record
Query!
Health condition
Health condition(s) or problem(s) studied:
Colonic spirochaetosis
308209
0
Query!
Irritable bowel syndrome
308210
0
Query!
Condition category
Condition code
Oral and Gastrointestinal
307240
307240
0
0
Query!
Other diseases of the mouth, teeth, oesophagus, digestive system including liver and colon
Query!
Infection
307241
307241
0
0
Query!
Other infectious diseases
Query!
Intervention/exposure
Study type
Interventional
Query!
Description of intervention(s) / exposure
Metronidazole 400mg orally three times daily for ten days.
Adherence will be monitored through tablet return and count at the scheduled end of treatment review.
Query!
Intervention code [1]
301453
0
Treatment: Drugs
Query!
Comparator / control treatment
Identical placebo tablet (cornstarch) taken three times daily for ten days
Query!
Control group
Placebo
Query!
Outcomes
Primary outcome [1]
306189
0
Mean reduction in irritable bowel syndrome symptoms measured with the irritable bowel syndrome symptom severity score (IBS-SSS) at 3 and 12 weeks after treatment in patients with colonic spirochaetosis compared with placebo.
Query!
Assessment method [1]
306189
0
Query!
Timepoint [1]
306189
0
3 and 12 [primary timepoint] weeks after completion of treatment
Query!
Secondary outcome [1]
347802
0
Proportion of colonic spirochaetosis positive participants achieving a 50 point reduction in the IBS-SSS
Query!
Assessment method [1]
347802
0
Query!
Timepoint [1]
347802
0
3 and 12 weeks after treatment compared with placebo.
Query!
Secondary outcome [2]
347803
0
Mean reduction in irritable bowel syndrome symptoms measured with the IBS-SSS at 3 and 12 weeks after treatment in patients without colonic spirochaetosis compared with placebo.
Query!
Assessment method [2]
347803
0
Query!
Timepoint [2]
347803
0
3 and 12 weeks after treatment
Query!
Secondary outcome [3]
347804
0
Proportion of colonic spirochaetosis negative participants achieving a 50 point reduction in the IBS-SSS at 3 and 12 weeks after treatment compared with placebo.
Query!
Assessment method [3]
347804
0
Query!
Timepoint [3]
347804
0
3 and 12 weeks after treatment
Query!
Secondary outcome [4]
347805
0
Difference in mean reduction in IBS-SSS between metronidazole treatment and placebo in participants infected with colonic spirochaetosis compared with participants without colonic spirochaetosis receiving the same interventions.
Query!
Assessment method [4]
347805
0
Query!
Timepoint [4]
347805
0
3 and 12 weeks after treatment
Query!
Secondary outcome [5]
347806
0
Rates of colonic spirochaetosis eradication on metronidazole compared with placebo.
This will be measured with the gold standard of sigmoid biopsy and histologic analysis with warthog starry stain.
Query!
Assessment method [5]
347806
0
Query!
Timepoint [5]
347806
0
12 weeks after treatment
Query!
Eligibility
Key inclusion criteria
• Age > 18 years
• Able to consent
• Clear diagnosis of IBD-d in the medical record with adequate exclusion of other causes. This includes duration of symptoms for more than 3 months, stool culture for exclusion of common causes of chronic diarrhoea including parasitic infection with stool microbiology, malabsorption based on clinical impression with appropriate investigations or bile acid diarrhoea.
• Willingness to submit stool samples and take metronidazole.
• No metronidazole taken in the last 6 months.
• Not have an alcohol dependence disorder due to risk of disulfram like reaction with metronidazole.
• No other long term antibiotic use.
• No immunodeficiency (HIV, Long term steroid use, use of immunosuppressive agents)
• Not be pregnant or have a chance of falling pregnant whilst taking treatment
Query!
Minimum age
18
Years
Query!
Query!
Maximum age
No limit
Query!
Query!
Sex
Both males and females
Query!
Can healthy volunteers participate?
No
Query!
Key exclusion criteria
Unable to consent
Immunodeficiency
Pregnancy
Inflammatory bowel disease
Antibiotic use in last 6 months
Query!
Study design
Purpose of the study
Treatment
Query!
Allocation to intervention
Randomised controlled trial
Query!
Procedure for enrolling a subject and allocating the treatment (allocation concealment procedures)
Centralised random allocation in permuted blocks of four provided through our teaching hospital pharmacy.
Query!
Methods used to generate the sequence in which subjects will be randomised (sequence generation)
Permuted blocks of four using randomisation software
Query!
Masking / blinding
Blinded (masking used)
Query!
Who is / are masked / blinded?
The people receiving the treatment/s
The people administering the treatment/s
The people assessing the outcomes
The people analysing the results/data
Query!
Query!
Query!
Query!
Intervention assignment
Parallel
Query!
Other design features
Interventional randomised double blind trial with parallel double armed groups based on presence of absence of colonic spirochaetosis.
Because of the diversity of the microbiome, non-selective effect of metronidazole, and the difficulty in demonstrating that eradication of CS is causally linked with resolution of symptoms the design will have four arms: Patients with IBS-d and Brachyspira biopsy positive randomised to metronidazole or placebo and patients with IBS-d and Brachyspira biopsy negative randomised to metronidazole or placebo.
Query!
Phase
Phase 3
Query!
Type of endpoint/s
Efficacy
Query!
Statistical methods / analysis
Analysis (Performed using Stata v14, Statacorp, USA)
All analysis will use a two tailed alpha cut-off value of 0.05 as significant.
Hypothesis 1A (Primary)
Eradication of colonic spirochaetosis with metronidazole 400mg TDS will lead to a greater mean reduction in irritable bowel syndrome symptoms severity score (IBS-SSS) when compared to placebo at 3 and 12 weeks.
Hypothesis 1B
Eradication of colonic spirochaetosis with metronidazole 400mg TDS will lead to a greater proportion of participants with a 50 point reduction in the IBS-SSS when compared to placebo at 3 and 12 weeks.
Hypothesis 2A
Treatment of colonic spirochaetosis negative patients with metronidazole 400mg TDS will lead to a greater mean reduction IBS-SSS when compared to placebo at 3 and 12 weeks.
Hypothesis 2B
Treatment of colonic spirochaetosis negative patients with metronidazole 400mg TDS will lead to a greater proportion of participants with a 50 point or greater reduction in the IBS-SSS when compared to placebo at 3 and 12 weeks.
The reduction in scores at 3 weeks and 3 months from baseline will be calculated for individuals in the intervention and placebo groups. The distribution will be tested for normality. If normal, then an independent T-test will be used to compare the means for a significant difference otherwise a Wilcoxon Rank Sum test will be used. Using a definition of clinical improvement as 50 points decrease in IBS-SSS score, a chi2 test (or Fishers exact if any group <5) will be used to test for significant difference in improvement rates between groups.
Hypothesis 3
The difference in mean reduction in IBS-SSS at 3 and 12 weeks between metronidazole and placebo will be greater in patients infected with colonic spirochaetosis than in patients without colonic spirochaetosis receiving the same interventions.
The reduction in scores at 3 weeks and 3 months from baseline will be calculated for all individuals. The mean change will then be calculated for each arm. Tests of normality will be performed. The mean difference between intervention and placebo will then be calculated for the CS positive arms and the same mean difference calculated for the CS negative arms. These two mean differences will be compared using an independent t-test.
Hypothesis 4
Metronidazole at a dose of 400mg TDS for 10 days will lead to a greater rate of eradication of CS at 3 week colonic biopsy compared to the placebo group.
This is an important requirement in the attempt to prove causality because if this outcome is not met then the other outcomes are not biologically plausible by the Bradford-Hill criteria. This can be tested using a Chi2 test comparing independent proportions.
Sample size estimation
All sample size calculations use an alpha value of 5% and a beta value of 20% (Power of 80%). Calculations made using Stata v14 (Statacorp, USA).
For hypothesis 1 and 2 the clinically significant decrease in the IBS-SSS score is 50 out of a possible 500. The validation study found a mean score of 243 for cases with moderate IBS with a standard deviation of 42. A clinically significant change is considered 50. To compare the mean change in score between arms using a t-test of independent means the sample size for each arm is calculated at 13 which would equate to a total study size of 52 patients in an equally distributed four arm group.
To compare the proportion of patients achieving clinically significant response defined as an IBS-SSS score decrease of >=50 points, a calculation was made for a chi2 test comparing independent proportions. An assumption was made that the placebo group are likely to have a 20% response rate while a response rate of 70% in the treatment group would be clinically significant. The sample size per group was calculated at 15 which equates to a total number of 60 participants.
Hypothesis 3 compares two differences in mean score change. There was inadequate literature to make sufficiently accurate estimates about the likely change and standard deviation to allow an accurate power calculation. A moderate treatment effect size was estimated in the CS positive arms of a difference of 40 points in the mean IBS-SSS score change while a more minor effect size was estimated in the CS negative arms of 10 points. Assuming a standard deviation of 10 the power calculation for a t-test of independent means was 4 individuals per group.
For hypothesis 4, a calculation was made for a chi2 test comparing independent proportions. An assumption was made that the placebo group may have up to a 10% eradication rate while an eradication rate of at least 70% should be expected in the intervention arm. The sample size for each group was calculated at 10 which equates to a CS sample size of at least 20 participants.
The conclusion is that the study requires a sample size of 30 CS positive participants with at least equal numbers in the CS negative group (n=60) and 1:1 randomisation. As CS negative participants are more prevalent and likely to be recruited more rapidly but cannot be identified until after recruitment and rectal biopsy there may be a larger proportion of patients in the CS negative trial group. This raises an ethical issue of inflicting investigation and medical trials on participants after the sample size is met. To address this issue, after recruitment of 30 CS negative individuals, further participants found to be CS negative will be offered an opt out option.
A more conservative sample size calculation was also performed with a beta value of 10%, mean IBS-SSS score of 300 and standard deviation of 50. The required numbers for comparison of means in hypothesis 1 and 2 is 23 per group (92 total) and for comparison of proportions reaching clinically significant benefit is 19 per group (76 total). If funding and recruitment allow, an interim analysis will be performed when 30 CS patients have been recruited and if there is insufficient evidence to reject the null hypothesis then recruitment will continue to the larger sample size estimate of 23 per group.
Ref: Francis CY, Morris J, Whorwell PJ. The irritiable bowel severity scoring system: a simple method of monitoring irritable bowel syndrome and its progress. Aliment Pharmacol Ther 1997;11:395-402.
Query!
Recruitment
Recruitment status
Not yet recruiting
Query!
Date of first participant enrolment
Anticipated
30/08/2019
Query!
Actual
Query!
Date of last participant enrolment
Anticipated
31/12/2020
Query!
Actual
Query!
Date of last data collection
Anticipated
31/03/2021
Query!
Actual
Query!
Sample size
Target
60
Query!
Accrual to date
Query!
Final
Query!
Recruitment in Australia
Recruitment state(s)
NSW
Query!
Recruitment hospital [1]
11101
0
John Hunter Hospital - New Lambton
Query!
Recruitment postcode(s) [1]
22913
0
2305 - New Lambton
Query!
Funding & Sponsors
Funding source category [1]
299798
0
Other
Query!
Name [1]
299798
0
PRC Digestive Health and Neurogastroenterology fund through the Hunter Medical Research Institute in conjunction witht he University of Newcastle
Query!
Address [1]
299798
0
Level 3 East Wing, HMRI, Kookaburra Circuit, New Lambton, 2305.
NSW
Query!
Country [1]
299798
0
Australia
Query!
Primary sponsor type
Other
Query!
Name
PRC Digestive Health and Neurogastroenterology fund through the Hunter Medical Research Institute in conjunction witht he University of Newcaslte
Query!
Address
Level 3 East Wing, HMRI, Kookaburra Circuit, New Lambton, 2305.
NSW
Query!
Country
Australia
Query!
Secondary sponsor category [1]
299147
0
None
Query!
Name [1]
299147
0
None
Query!
Address [1]
299147
0
None
Query!
Country [1]
299147
0
Query!
Ethics approval
Ethics application status
Submitted, not yet approved
Query!
Ethics committee name [1]
300601
0
Hunter New England Human Research Ethics Committee
Query!
Ethics committee address [1]
300601
0
Research Ethics and Governance Office Hunter New England Human Research Ethics Committee Hunter New England Local Health District Locked Bag 1 New Lambton NSW 2305
Query!
Ethics committee country [1]
300601
0
Australia
Query!
Date submitted for ethics approval [1]
300601
0
30/05/2019
Query!
Approval date [1]
300601
0
Query!
Ethics approval number [1]
300601
0
Query!
Summary
Brief summary
Colonic spirochaetosis (CS) was first described in humans in 1967. The role of CS in human health and disease has been debated in the literature and historically it was considered to be a commensal organism. Recent studies have shown that CS is associated with abdominal pain and diarrhoea in multiple population samples and that CS is associated with subtle but clinically significant submucosal eosinophilia. This supports the hypothesis that CS is a pathologic finding that should be considered in cases of diarrhoea predominant irritable bowel syndrome (IBS-d). Despite this there is no clear treatment recommendation for CS. CS prevalence in developed countries is estimated to be 2-7%. Furthermore, the risk of IBS-d symptoms in patients with CS is three fold. In western populations the prevalence of the irritable bowel syndrome is 7-16%. If a conservative estimate is taken it is possible that 2% of the general population is infected with CS and experiences potentially treatable symptoms of IBS-d that have a significant personal and economic costs. Our research question follows on from this to ask whether treating CS in patients with IBS-d will lead to an improvement in symptoms. This question has not been adequately answered in a prospective high quality trial. A positive result would demand confirmation and further trials to estimate sustainability of the effect. This has the potential to change the diagnostic and treatment algorithm for IBS and affect a substantial number of people. It is interesting to note that metronidazole is used to empirically treat chronic diarrhoea in the community with anecdotal benefit and this may represent unknowing treatment of CS.
Query!
Trial website
Query!
Trial related presentations / publications
Query!
Public notes
Query!
Contacts
Principal investigator
Name
84178
0
Prof Nicholas Talley
Query!
Address
84178
0
Level 3 East Wing, HMRI
Kookaburra Circuit
New Lambton, 2305
NSW
Australia
Query!
Country
84178
0
Australia
Query!
Phone
84178
0
+61249215855
Query!
Fax
84178
0
Query!
Email
84178
0
[email protected]
Query!
Contact person for public queries
Name
84179
0
Nicholas Talley
Query!
Address
84179
0
Level 3 East Wing, HMRI
Kookaburra Circuit
New Lambton, 2305
NSW
Australia
Query!
Country
84179
0
Australia
Query!
Phone
84179
0
+61249215855
Query!
Fax
84179
0
Query!
Email
84179
0
[email protected]
Query!
Contact person for scientific queries
Name
84180
0
Nicholas Talley
Query!
Address
84180
0
Level 3 East Wing, HMRI
Kookaburra Circuit
New Lambton, 2305
NSW
Australia
Query!
Country
84180
0
Australia
Query!
Phone
84180
0
+61249215855
Query!
Fax
84180
0
Query!
Email
84180
0
[email protected]
Query!
Data sharing statement
Will individual participant data (IPD) for this trial be available (including data dictionaries)?
Yes
Query!
What data in particular will be shared?
Demographic
Response outcomes as outlined in protocol
Query!
When will data be available (start and end dates)?
At the completion of study (start) through to 10 years after study publication.
Query!
Available to whom?
Investigators
Journal editors and reviewers on request
Query!
Available for what types of analyses?
For the aims of the study
To assist with any meta-analysis
Query!
How or where can data be obtained?
Access subject to approval by PI and ethics committee
Query!
What supporting documents are/will be available?
No Supporting Document Provided
Results publications and other study-related documents
Documents added manually
No documents have been uploaded by study researchers.
Documents added automatically
No additional documents have been identified.
Download to PDF