Please note that the copy function is not enabled for this field.
If you wish to
modify
existing outcomes, please copy and paste the current outcome text into the Update field.
LOGIN
CREATE ACCOUNT
LOGIN
CREATE ACCOUNT
MY TRIALS
REGISTER TRIAL
FAQs
HINTS AND TIPS
DEFINITIONS
Trial Review
The safety and scientific validity of this study is the responsibility of the study sponsor and investigators. Listing a study does not mean it has been endorsed by the ANZCTR. Before participating in a study, talk to your health care provider and refer to this
information for consumers
Download to PDF
Trial registered on ANZCTR
Registration number
ACTRN12619000999134
Ethics application status
Approved
Date submitted
9/10/2018
Date registered
15/07/2019
Date last updated
23/09/2022
Date data sharing statement initially provided
15/07/2019
Type of registration
Retrospectively registered
Titles & IDs
Public title
"What Lies Beneath": Keyhole surgery after previous abdomino-pelvic surgery, and the risk of developing important scar tissue.
Query!
Scientific title
What Lies Beneath: Laparoscopy after previous laparotomy and laparoscopy, and the incidence of intra-abdominal adhesions
Query!
Secondary ID [1]
296290
0
Nil Known
Query!
Universal Trial Number (UTN)
Query!
Trial acronym
Query!
Linked study record
Query!
Health condition
Health condition(s) or problem(s) studied:
Adhesions
309962
0
Query!
Gynaecological Surgery
310133
0
Query!
Condition category
Condition code
Surgery
308738
308738
0
0
Query!
Other surgery
Query!
Renal and Urogenital
308879
308879
0
0
Query!
Other renal and urogenital disorders
Query!
Intervention/exposure
Study type
Observational
Query!
Patient registry
False
Query!
Target follow-up duration
Query!
Target follow-up type
Query!
Description of intervention(s) / exposure
Many women undergoing laparoscopy have had previous abdomino-pelvic surgery, placing them at greater risk of developing intraperitoneal adhesions. Adhesions, especially to the anterior abdominal wall, increase the risk of visceral injury, particularly at time of laparoscopic entry and establishment of pneumoperitoneum. We aim to complete a prospective observational cohort study to examine the rates of intra-abdominal adhesions in women with a past history of abdomino-pelvic surgery undergoing laparoscopy for any indication at our institution. We suspect recruitment of cases undergoing surgery to take approximately 18 months. The time period for which prior surgical history is relevant is anytime in the patient's lifetime (that is, we will request details of any abdomino-pelvic surgeries, regardless of time proceeding repeat surgery).
Query!
Intervention code [1]
312620
0
Diagnosis / Prognosis
Query!
Comparator / control treatment
As our study subjects, we aim to enroll 900 women with a past history of one or more abdominopelvic surgeries, who are undergoing laparoscopic gynaecological surgery for any indication. We will also include 300 women who have no previous abdominal or pelvic surgeries as ‘control’ subjects. 'Control' patients will not have a abdomino-pelvic surgical history, and thus we will not ned to source data from prior hospitals. Surgical histories for women in the 'comparator' group will be sourced from Australian institutions. It is likely that most women in our cohort will be <60years of age, and thus most surgical records will be from 1970 onwards. It is possible that it is more difficult to access older records. Overseas operation reports will not be sought.
Query!
Control group
Active
Query!
Outcomes
Primary outcome [1]
307727
0
Percentage of women with adhesions involving the anterior abdominal wall, with particular reference to adhesions at the umbilicus, according to number and type of previous incision? This will be assessed by laparoscopic examination.
Query!
Assessment method [1]
307727
0
Query!
Timepoint [1]
307727
0
Analysis will occur at the conclusion of recruitment, which is expected to be at the conclusion of 2019. For each participant, we will assess their prior surgical history preoperatively, and then assess intraoperatively for the presence of anterior abdominal adhesions, and potential risk to organs depending on route of entry utilised.
Query!
Secondary outcome [1]
352655
0
Percentage of women at risk of bowel injury upon laparoscopic entry at the umbilicus following previous abdominopelvic surgery. This will be assessed by laparoscopic examination.
Query!
Assessment method [1]
352655
0
Query!
Timepoint [1]
352655
0
Analysis will occur at the conclusion of recruitment, which is expected to be at the conclusion of 2019. For each participant, we will assess their prior surgical history preoperatively, and then assess intraoperatively for the presence of anterior abdominal adhesions, and potential risk to organs depending on route of entry utilised.
Query!
Secondary outcome [2]
372273
0
Percentage of women undergoing laparoscopic entry at an alternative entry site (not the umbilicus) who suffer a complication as a result of the alternative entry. This will be assessed via a study-specific questionnaire to be completed by the primary surgeon (immediate complications), and collection of clinical data at post-operative appointment(s). Complications include: operative haemorrhage, visceral damage, wound infection etc.
Query!
Assessment method [2]
372273
0
Query!
Timepoint [2]
372273
0
Analysis will occur at the conclusion of recruitment, which is expected to be at the conclusion of 2019.
Query!
Secondary outcome [3]
372274
0
Percentage of women undergoing a laparoscopic procedure who suffer a surgical complication (either immediate or delayed). This will be assessed via a study-specific questionnaire to be completed by the primary surgeon (immediate complications), and collection of clinical data at post-operative appointment(s). Complications include: operative haemorrhage, visceral damage, wound infection etc.
Query!
Assessment method [3]
372274
0
Query!
Timepoint [3]
372274
0
Analysis will occur at the conclusion of recruitment, which is expected to be at the conclusion of 2019. Complications will be noted either on the operative questionnaire (for immediate complications), or at the initial 1-2 month post-operative visit (for delayed complications).
Query!
Eligibility
Key inclusion criteria
The participants will meet the following inclusion criteria:
- Female, 18 years of age or older at time of consent to participation
- Requiring and consenting to laparoscopy for any indication as determined and agreed to by both the surgeon and the participant
- Prior history of laparotomy OR laparoscopy with surgical details such as type of entry/incision, indication, number of prior surgeries known
o Laparotomy incisions include: suprapubic transverse incision (such as Pfannenstiel, Joel-Cohen, or Maylard incision), midline incision (sub- or supra- umbilical), Hasson entry at umbilicus and prior umbilical hernia repair procedures
o Laparoscopy includes any prior 5mm or 10mm trochar insertion at the umbilicus
- Capable of, and have given, informed consent to their inclusion in study after explanation of research and reading of Patient Information and Consent (PCIS) form.
Authorised interpreters will be utilized when necessary to assist with the consent process for women of non-English speaking backgrounds.
Query!
Minimum age
18
Years
Query!
Query!
Maximum age
No limit
Query!
Query!
Sex
Females
Query!
Can healthy volunteers participate?
No
Query!
Key exclusion criteria
- Not consenting to participation in proposed study
- Unrecoverable details of prior surgeries
- Prior abdomino-pelvic radiation therapy
Query!
Study design
Purpose
Natural history
Query!
Duration
Longitudinal
Query!
Selection
Defined population
Query!
Timing
Prospective
Query!
Statistical methods / analysis
An electronic database [Microsoft® Excel, 2017] will be created and utilised for storage of information obtained in the study. Information stored will be able to be transferred across to GraphPad Prism 6 software (GraphPad Software, La Jolla, CA) for statistical analysis.
Statistical analysis will include simple descriptive data for such details as baseline details and operative history. Comparative data will be tested for normal distribution and statistically analysed as appropriate. When two groups are analysed, either an unpaired t-test (parametric) or a Mann-Whitney test (non-parametric) will be used. Categorical variables will be assessed using chi-squared test. When three or more groups are compared a 1-way ANOVA (for parametric data) or Kruskal-Wallis test (for non-parametric data) will be employed. If possible, logistical regression will be used to explain the relationship between the presence/absence of umbilical adhesions (binary variable) and one or more or prior history variables: number, type, and indication for incision.
Query!
Recruitment
Recruitment status
Recruiting
Query!
Date of first participant enrolment
Anticipated
Query!
Actual
6/08/2018
Query!
Date of last participant enrolment
Anticipated
31/12/2022
Query!
Actual
Query!
Date of last data collection
Anticipated
31/12/2022
Query!
Actual
Query!
Sample size
Target
1200
Query!
Accrual to date
790
Query!
Final
Query!
Recruitment in Australia
Recruitment state(s)
VIC
Query!
Recruitment hospital [1]
12123
0
Mercy Hospital for Women - Heidelberg
Query!
Recruitment hospital [2]
12124
0
Werribee Mercy Hospital - Werribee
Query!
Recruitment hospital [3]
12125
0
Warringal Private Hospital - Heidelberg
Query!
Recruitment hospital [4]
12127
0
Epworth Freemasons - Melbourne
Query!
Recruitment hospital [5]
12228
0
Albury Wodonga Health - Wodonga campus - Wodonga
Query!
Recruitment postcode(s) [1]
24292
0
3084 - Heidelberg
Query!
Recruitment postcode(s) [2]
24293
0
3030 - Werribee
Query!
Recruitment postcode(s) [3]
24295
0
3002 - Melbourne
Query!
Recruitment postcode(s) [4]
24408
0
3690 - Wodonga
Query!
Funding & Sponsors
Funding source category [1]
300880
0
Other Collaborative groups
Query!
Name [1]
300880
0
Australian Gynaecological and Endoscopy Surgery Society Ltd
Query!
Address [1]
300880
0
YRD Event Management
PO Box 717 Indooroopilly
QLD 4068 AUSTRALIA
Query!
Country [1]
300880
0
Australia
Query!
Primary sponsor type
Individual
Query!
Name
Dr Samantha Mooney
Query!
Address
Mercy Hospital for Women
Endosurgery Department
163 Studley Road
Heidelberg VIC 3084
Query!
Country
Australia
Query!
Secondary sponsor category [1]
300444
0
None
Query!
Name [1]
300444
0
Query!
Address [1]
300444
0
Query!
Country [1]
300444
0
Query!
Ethics approval
Ethics application status
Approved
Query!
Ethics committee name [1]
301655
0
Mercy Health Human Research Ethics Committee
Query!
Ethics committee address [1]
301655
0
Natasha Rooney
Administrative Officer,
Human Research Ethics Committee
Mercy Hospital for Women
Level 6, 163 Studley Road
Heidelberg Vic 3084
Query!
Ethics committee country [1]
301655
0
Australia
Query!
Date submitted for ethics approval [1]
301655
0
15/12/2017
Query!
Approval date [1]
301655
0
18/07/2018
Query!
Ethics approval number [1]
301655
0
HREC 2018-002
Query!
Summary
Brief summary
We aim to complete a prospective observational cohort study to examine the rates of intra-abdominal adhesions in women with a past history of abdomino-pelvic surgery undergoing laparoscopy for any indication at our institution. At time of consent for laparoscopy for any indication, patients will be invited to participate in this study. Our study has a pragmatic design, and patient involvement in the research will not alter their treatment course. Upon consent and enrolment, the research team will then endeavour to obtain operative notes from prior surgeries for each study subject. Data will then be entered into a secure database, noting baseline patient characteristics, year of prior surgery(ies), type and number of prior incision(s), and any known history of complications during/after the prior abdominal surgeries. Patient confidentiality will be respected as per HREC guidelines. Collection of baseline data (including prior operative history) will occur pre-operatively at time of consent to participation and upon wait-listing of the case. Intra-operative findings will be documented during the planned procedure (by way of intraoperative clinical pictures), as well as at the by completion of a brief questionnaire at the conclusion of the procedure. This questionnaire will concern the presence/absence of anterior abdominal wall adhesions, their proximity to the umbilicus, and whether omentum, bowel, or both were involved. The questionnaire will take 5 minutes. Results will be analysed following the completion of data collection (once the final enrolled participant has undergone their planned surgery). Any surgical complications will be noted either on the operative questionnaire (for immediate complications), or at the initial 1-2 month post-operative visit (for delayed complications).
Query!
Trial website
N/A
Query!
Trial related presentations / publications
Nil as yet
Query!
Public notes
The rates of vascular and visceral injury sustained at time of laparoscopy are well recognised, and complicate approximately 0.1-1% of laparoscopic surgeries (MacCordick et al, 1999; Molloy et al, 2002; Liu et al, 2009; Lawson, 2015). A particularly at-risk time of procedure occurs upon entry and establishment of pneumoperitoneum, when approximately a third to a half of these injuries occur (Chapron et al, 1999; Harkki-Siren and Kurki 1997; Jansen et al, 1997), regardless of entry technique. For both closed and open entry techniques, protection to the bowel is usually afforded by the elevation of the abdominal wall and mobility of the bowel. If bowel or omentum are adherent to this point of entry, this protection is lost.
Prior studies from 15 – 40 years ago (Weibel and Manjo, 1973; Childers et al, 1993; Marret et al, 1998; Audebert and Gomel, 2000; Lam and Pun, 2002;) indicate rates of adhesions following abdominal incisions of 15-90% (predominantly based on prior laparotomy), but these studies are negatively impacted by retrospective design (some), small sample sizes (precluding multivariate analysis and adequate relative risk assessment), and lack of clear comment regarding bowel involvement within adhesions and cumulative risk following multiple laparoscopies or laparotomy. Varma and Gupta (2008) report that while almost 50% of surgeons surveyed would chose an alternative laparoscopic entry point to the umbilicus for women with a past history of midline laparotomy, the great majority would make no such alteration for women with single or multiple prior suprapubic laparotomy or umbilical laparoscopy. We plan to prospectively assess adhesions after previous abdominopelvic surgery, in an effort to better stratify risk for these patients undergoing laparoscopy after prior surgery. We are interested to primarily assess whether there is a threshold for which entry at an alternative site (for example, the left upper quadrant) should be recommended (McDonald et al, 2005). Unfortunately, there is a dearth of quality contemporary data assessing this issue. Significant findings may therefore direct future surgical practice, guiding clinicians with regards to planning a safer entry point for patients with prior abdominal incisions.
Query!
Contacts
Principal investigator
Name
87678
0
Dr Lenore Ellett
Query!
Address
87678
0
Mercy Hospital for Women
Endosurgery Department
163 Studley Road
Heidelberg VIC 3084
Query!
Country
87678
0
Australia
Query!
Phone
87678
0
+61 3 84584444
Query!
Fax
87678
0
Query!
Email
87678
0
[email protected]
Query!
Contact person for public queries
Name
87679
0
Dr Samantha Mooney
Query!
Address
87679
0
Mercy Hospital for Women
Endosurgery Department
163 Studley Road
Heidelberg VIC 3084
Query!
Country
87679
0
Australia
Query!
Phone
87679
0
+61 3 8458 4444
Query!
Fax
87679
0
Query!
Email
87679
0
[email protected]
Query!
Contact person for scientific queries
Name
87680
0
Dr Samantha Mooney
Query!
Address
87680
0
Mercy Hospital for Women
Endosurgery Department
163 Studley Road
Heidelberg VIC 3084
Query!
Country
87680
0
Australia
Query!
Phone
87680
0
+61 3 8458 4444
Query!
Fax
87680
0
Query!
Email
87680
0
[email protected]
Query!
Data sharing statement
Will individual participant data (IPD) for this trial be available (including data dictionaries)?
No
Query!
No/undecided IPD sharing reason/comment
Query!
What supporting documents are/will be available?
No Supporting Document Provided
Results publications and other study-related documents
Documents added manually
No documents have been uploaded by study researchers.
Documents added automatically
No additional documents have been identified.
Download to PDF