Please note that the copy function is not enabled for this field.
If you wish to
modify
existing outcomes, please copy and paste the current outcome text into the Update field.
LOGIN
CREATE ACCOUNT
LOGIN
CREATE ACCOUNT
MY TRIALS
REGISTER TRIAL
FAQs
HINTS AND TIPS
DEFINITIONS
Trial Review
The safety and scientific validity of this study is the responsibility of the study sponsor and investigators. Listing a study does not mean it has been endorsed by the ANZCTR. Before participating in a study, talk to your health care provider and refer to this
information for consumers
Download to PDF
Trial registered on ANZCTR
Registration number
ACTRN12619000578101
Ethics application status
Approved
Date submitted
5/04/2019
Date registered
12/04/2019
Date last updated
19/08/2022
Date data sharing statement initially provided
12/04/2019
Type of registration
Prospectively registered
Titles & IDs
Public title
A Prospective Evaluation of Meniscal Repair in Paediatric Patients
Query!
Scientific title
A Prospective Evaluation of Arthroscopic All-Inside Meniscal Repair in Paediatric Patients
Query!
Secondary ID [1]
297902
0
None
Query!
Universal Trial Number (UTN)
U1111-1231-2363
Query!
Trial acronym
Query!
Linked study record
Query!
Health condition
Health condition(s) or problem(s) studied:
Knee meniscal tears
312286
0
Query!
Condition category
Condition code
Surgery
310831
310831
0
0
Query!
Surgical techniques
Query!
Musculoskeletal
310899
310899
0
0
Query!
Other muscular and skeletal disorders
Query!
Injuries and Accidents
310900
310900
0
0
Query!
Other injuries and accidents
Query!
Intervention/exposure
Study type
Observational
Query!
Patient registry
False
Query!
Target follow-up duration
Query!
Target follow-up type
Query!
Description of intervention(s) / exposure
Patients who fulfill the inclusion criteria and are undergoing orthopaedic surgery at the Perth Children's Hospital for their symptomatic knee meniscal tears (with or without concomitant pathology which will be addressed at the time of surgery if required), will be invited to participate in this study. Patients as part of this prospective review are already undergoing knee surgery to address their symptomatic meniscal tear, as per the routine clinical pathway. This study has been designed as a robust pre- and post-operative clinical review of this patient cohort undergoing surgery. Patients will be reviewed over a 24-month post-operative period, and will attend for these clinical reviews specifically pre-surgery, as well as 6 weeks and 3, 6, 12 and 24 months post-surgery.
Query!
Intervention code [1]
314123
0
Not applicable
Query!
Comparator / control treatment
No control group
Query!
Control group
Uncontrolled
Query!
Outcomes
Primary outcome [1]
319667
0
Limb Symmetry Index (LSI) of the single hop for distance (cm) - this test requires a measurement tape. The patient begins on one limb in an upright position. The objective is to hop off one limb as far as possible (forwards), landing on the same limb in a controlled manner.
Query!
Assessment method [1]
319667
0
Query!
Timepoint [1]
319667
0
24 months post-surgery
Query!
Secondary outcome [1]
369084
0
Limb Symmetry Index (LSI) of the triple hop for distance (cm) - this test requires a measurement tape. The patient begins on one limb in an upright position. The objective is to hop off one limb for three consecutive hops (all on the same limb, and without pausing in between each hop) as far as possible (forwards), landing on the same limb in a controlled manner.
Query!
Assessment method [1]
369084
0
Query!
Timepoint [1]
369084
0
24 months post-surgery
Query!
Secondary outcome [2]
369085
0
Limb Symmetry Index (LSI) of the triple crossover hop for distance (cm) - this test requires a measurement tape and 15cm width mat. The patient begins on one limb in an upright position. The objective is to hop off one limb for three consecutive hops (all on the same limb, and without pausing in between each hop) as far as possible (forwards), landing on the same limb in a controlled manner. However, in this test patients must hop back and forth over a 15cm width mat for each of the three hops. The test is considered successful if the patient lands in a controlled manner on the third hop, though does not touch the mat on each of the three hops back and forth.
Query!
Assessment method [2]
369085
0
Query!
Timepoint [2]
369085
0
24 months post-surgery
Query!
Secondary outcome [3]
369086
0
Active knee range of motion - this will be measured with the patient lying supine using a hand held goniometer, creating an angle made by three anatomical landmarks; the greater trochanter of the femur at the hip, the lateral femoral condyle at the knee and the lateral malleolus at the ankle.
Query!
Assessment method [3]
369086
0
Query!
Timepoint [3]
369086
0
24 months post-surgery
Query!
Secondary outcome [4]
369087
0
Visual Analogue Pain Scale (VAS)
Query!
Assessment method [4]
369087
0
Query!
Timepoint [4]
369087
0
24 months post-surgery
Query!
Secondary outcome [5]
369088
0
International Knee Documentation Committee (IKDC) Subjective Knee Form
Query!
Assessment method [5]
369088
0
Query!
Timepoint [5]
369088
0
24 months post-surgery
Query!
Secondary outcome [6]
369089
0
Knee Injury and Osteoarthritis Outcome Score (KOOS)
Query!
Assessment method [6]
369089
0
Query!
Timepoint [6]
369089
0
24 months post-surgery
Query!
Secondary outcome [7]
369090
0
Lysholm Knee Score
Query!
Assessment method [7]
369090
0
Query!
Timepoint [7]
369090
0
24 months post-surgery
Query!
Secondary outcome [8]
369091
0
Tegner Activity Scale (TAS)
Query!
Assessment method [8]
369091
0
Query!
Timepoint [8]
369091
0
24 months post-surgery
Query!
Secondary outcome [9]
369092
0
Patient Satisfaction (Overall Outcome) - this will evaluate satisfaction with the surgery overall. A Likert response scale will be employed with descriptors Very Satisfied, Somewhat Satisfied, Somewhat Dissatisfied and Very Dissatisfied.
Query!
Assessment method [9]
369092
0
Query!
Timepoint [9]
369092
0
24 months post-surgery
Query!
Secondary outcome [10]
369378
0
Patient Satisfaction (Pain) - this will evaluate satisfaction with the surgery to relieve knee pain. A Likert response scale will be employed with descriptors Very Satisfied, Somewhat Satisfied, Somewhat Dissatisfied and Very Dissatisfied.
Query!
Assessment method [10]
369378
0
Query!
Timepoint [10]
369378
0
24 months post-surgery
Query!
Secondary outcome [11]
369379
0
Patient Satisfaction (ADLs) - this will evaluate satisfaction with the surgery to improve the ability to undertake daily and/or work activities. A Likert response scale will be employed with descriptors Very Satisfied, Somewhat Satisfied, Somewhat Dissatisfied and Very Dissatisfied.
Query!
Assessment method [11]
369379
0
Query!
Timepoint [11]
369379
0
24 months post-surgery
Query!
Secondary outcome [12]
369380
0
Patient Satisfaction (Recreation) - this will evaluate satisfaction with the surgery to improve the ability to return to recreational activities (including walking, swimming, cycling, golf, dancing). A Likert response scale will be employed with descriptors Very Satisfied, Somewhat Satisfied, Somewhat Dissatisfied and Very Dissatisfied.
Query!
Assessment method [12]
369380
0
Query!
Timepoint [12]
369380
0
24 months post-surgery
Query!
Secondary outcome [13]
369381
0
Patient Satisfaction (Sport) - this will evaluate satisfaction with the surgery to improve the ability to participate in sport (including sports such as tennis, netball, soccer and football). A Likert response scale will be employed with descriptors Very Satisfied, Somewhat Satisfied, Somewhat Dissatisfied and Very Dissatisfied.
Query!
Assessment method [13]
369381
0
Query!
Timepoint [13]
369381
0
24 months post-surgery
Query!
Eligibility
Key inclusion criteria
Patients will already be undergoing surgery for their symptomatic knee meniscal tear.
Therefore, outside of the routine criteria for surgery, study inclusion criteria are:
1. The individual is between the ages of 8 and 16 years.
2. The individual clinically qualifies for meniscal repair surgery based on clinical examination and MRI.
3. Multiple meniscal injuries are present.
4. The meniscal repair is combined with another knee surgery (or surgeries), such as ligament reconstruction
Query!
Minimum age
8
Years
Query!
Query!
Maximum age
16
Years
Query!
Query!
Sex
Both males and females
Query!
Can healthy volunteers participate?
No
Query!
Key exclusion criteria
Patients will already be undergoing surgery for their symptomatic knee meniscal tear.
Therefore, outside of the routine criteria for surgery, study exclusion criteria are:
1. The individual (and parent) is unable or unwilling to sign the Patient Informed Consent, specific to this study, and approved by the Institutional Ethics Review Board.
2, The individual is classified as morbidly obese (>40 BMI).
Query!
Study design
Purpose
Natural history
Query!
Duration
Longitudinal
Query!
Selection
Defined population
Query!
Timing
Prospective
Query!
Statistical methods / analysis
Study Sample Size
For this study, a priori sample size power calculation has been determined employing G-Power (Dusseldorf, Germany). The primary outcome variable is the Limb Symmetry Index (LSI) of the single hop for distance (cm) at 24 months post-surgery. The LSI is a measure of the operated limb as a percentage of the non-operated limb. An LSI <90% has been regarded as clinically unsatisfactory for a variety of strength and functional tests, including single limb hop capacity. We would expect that the LSI in the single limb hop test for distance to be 100% (irrespective of limb dominance), and for the current study accept side-to-side equivalence if the LSI in single limb hop capacity (as per the single hop for distance test – cm) of >90%, as per current clinical recommendations of functional limb restoration after lower limb surgery. Therefore, using these values (i.e. a non-inferiority margin of 10%) and a SD of 15%, 26 patients will be required at alpha 0.05 with 95% power, to test the primary hypothesis that non-inferiority will be observed (in the single hop test for distance) in paediatric patients undergoing ‘all-inside’ meniscal repair surgery for symptomatic meniscal tears at 24 months post-surgery. Therefore, we seek to recruit and assess 30 patients (i.e. an additional 15% to allow for attrition over the 24 month assessment period).
Planned Data and Statistical Analysis
Firstly, the mean (SD, range) of all subjective and objective measures collected will be presented for the designated pre- and post-operative time-points. Repeated measures Analysis of Variance (ANOVA) will be employed to evaluate change over the pre- and post-operative timeline in all PROMs, as well as active knee ROM and functional hop capacity (both absolute scores for the operated and non-operated limbs, as well as LSIs). ANOVA will also be employed to evaluate differences between the operated and non-operated limbs in these tests. LSIs will be calculated for the single limb hop tests by dividing the peak values on the operated limb by that recorded on the unaffected limb. The mean LSIs for each of the aforementioned hop tests will be presented, and further categorized by the number and percentage of patients with LSIs <90% and =90% (as per clinical recommendations of unsatisfactory and satisfactory performance, respectively). The number respondents reporting each satisfaction score (Very Satisfied, Somewhat Satisfied, Somewhat Dissatisfied and Very Dissatisfied) across each of the Satisfaction items will be reported. The number (and type) of surgical complications, post-operative adverse events and re-injuries will be presented. The status of meniscal healing as demonstrated on MRI (6 and 12 months) will be reported, though a definitive scoring tool may be employed depending on availability at the time. Where appropriate, statistical analysis will be performed using SPSS software (SPSS, Version 23.0, SPSS Inc., USA), while statistical significance was determined at p<0.05.
Query!
Recruitment
Recruitment status
Recruiting
Query!
Date of first participant enrolment
Anticipated
1/06/2019
Query!
Actual
1/09/2020
Query!
Date of last participant enrolment
Anticipated
31/08/2023
Query!
Actual
Query!
Date of last data collection
Anticipated
31/08/2025
Query!
Actual
Query!
Sample size
Target
30
Query!
Accrual to date
22
Query!
Final
Query!
Recruitment in Australia
Recruitment state(s)
WA
Query!
Recruitment hospital [1]
13565
0
Perth Children's Hospital - Nedlands
Query!
Recruitment postcode(s) [1]
26210
0
6009 - Nedlands
Query!
Funding & Sponsors
Funding source category [1]
302420
0
University
Query!
Name [1]
302420
0
University of Western Australia
Query!
Address [1]
302420
0
35 Stirling Highway, Crawley, Western Australia, 6009
Query!
Country [1]
302420
0
Australia
Query!
Primary sponsor type
University
Query!
Name
University of Western Australia
Query!
Address
35 Stirling Highway, Crawley, Western Australia, 6009
Query!
Country
Australia
Query!
Secondary sponsor category [1]
302318
0
None
Query!
Name [1]
302318
0
Query!
Address [1]
302318
0
Query!
Country [1]
302318
0
Query!
Other collaborator category [1]
280630
0
University
Query!
Name [1]
280630
0
University of Western Australia
Query!
Address [1]
280630
0
35 Stirling Highway, Crawley, Western Australia, 6009
Query!
Country [1]
280630
0
Australia
Query!
Ethics approval
Ethics application status
Approved
Query!
Ethics committee name [1]
303089
0
Child and Adolescent Health Service Human Research Ethics Committee
Query!
Ethics committee address [1]
303089
0
Perth Children Hospital
Level 5, Office 5E
15 Hospital Avenue, Nedlands
Locked Bag 2010, Nedlands WA 6909
Query!
Ethics committee country [1]
303089
0
Australia
Query!
Date submitted for ethics approval [1]
303089
0
15/04/2019
Query!
Approval date [1]
303089
0
09/09/2019
Query!
Ethics approval number [1]
303089
0
Query!
Summary
Brief summary
This is a prospective study seeking to investigate the post-operative clinical and radiographic outcomes of meniscal repair surgery in the knee in paediatric patients, with or without concomitant knee surgery if indicated. Patient outcomes will be collected over a 24 month post-operative period, and will include a range of subjective and functional outcomes, radiographic measures and patient satisfaction.
Query!
Trial website
Query!
Trial related presentations / publications
Query!
Public notes
Query!
Contacts
Principal investigator
Name
92434
0
Dr Jay Ebert
Query!
Address
92434
0
School of Human Sciences (Exercise and Sport Science)
University of Western Australia
35 Stirling Highway
Crawley, Western Australia, 6009
Query!
Country
92434
0
Australia
Query!
Phone
92434
0
+61 8 9386 9961
Query!
Fax
92434
0
Query!
Email
92434
0
[email protected]
Query!
Contact person for public queries
Name
92435
0
Dr Jay Ebert
Query!
Address
92435
0
School of Human Sciences (Exercise and Sport Science)
University of Western Australia
35 Stirling Highway
Crawley, Western Australia, 6009
Query!
Country
92435
0
Australia
Query!
Phone
92435
0
+61 8 9386 9961
Query!
Fax
92435
0
Query!
Email
92435
0
[email protected]
Query!
Contact person for scientific queries
Name
92436
0
Dr Jay Ebert
Query!
Address
92436
0
School of Human Sciences (Exercise and Sport Science)
University of Western Australia
35 Stirling Highway
Crawley, Western Australia, 6009
Query!
Country
92436
0
Australia
Query!
Phone
92436
0
+61 8 9386 9961
Query!
Fax
92436
0
Query!
Email
92436
0
[email protected]
Query!
Data sharing statement
Will individual participant data (IPD) for this trial be available (including data dictionaries)?
No
Query!
No/undecided IPD sharing reason/comment
There is no requirement for this.
Query!
What supporting documents are/will be available?
No Supporting Document Provided
Doc. No.
Type
Citation
Link
Email
Other Details
Attachment
1801
Study protocol
377344-(Uploaded-05-04-2019-13-22-22)-Study-related document.docx
Results publications and other study-related documents
Documents added manually
No documents have been uploaded by study researchers.
Documents added automatically
No additional documents have been identified.
Download to PDF