Please note that the copy function is not enabled for this field.
If you wish to
modify
existing outcomes, please copy and paste the current outcome text into the Update field.
LOGIN
CREATE ACCOUNT
LOGIN
CREATE ACCOUNT
MY TRIALS
REGISTER TRIAL
FAQs
HINTS AND TIPS
DEFINITIONS
Trial Review
The safety and scientific validity of this study is the responsibility of the study sponsor and investigators. Listing a study does not mean it has been endorsed by the ANZCTR. Before participating in a study, talk to your health care provider and refer to this
information for consumers
Download to PDF
Trial registered on ANZCTR
Registration number
ACTRN12619000767101
Ethics application status
Approved
Date submitted
7/05/2019
Date registered
22/05/2019
Date last updated
3/06/2021
Date data sharing statement initially provided
22/05/2019
Date results information initially provided
22/05/2019
Type of registration
Retrospectively registered
Titles & IDs
Public title
Utility of fundus photography versus ophthalmoscopy in Australian emergency department settings
Query!
Scientific title
Utility of non-mydriatic digital fundus photography in Australian emergency department settings: the FOTO-ED (Fundus photography vs. Ophthalmoscopy Trial Outcomes in the Emergency Department) extension trial
Query!
Secondary ID [1]
298220
0
Nil known
Query!
Universal Trial Number (UTN)
U1111-1232-1578
Query!
Trial acronym
Australian FOTO-ED Extension Trial
Query!
Linked study record
Query!
Health condition
Health condition(s) or problem(s) studied:
Headache
312500
0
Query!
Visual disturbance
312501
0
Query!
Neurological disturbance
312502
0
Query!
Severe hypertension
312503
0
Query!
Condition category
Condition code
Emergency medicine
311045
311045
0
0
Query!
Other emergency care
Query!
Neurological
311046
311046
0
0
Query!
Other neurological disorders
Query!
Eye
311047
311047
0
0
Query!
Diseases / disorders of the eye
Query!
Intervention/exposure
Study type
Interventional
Query!
Description of intervention(s) / exposure
Intervention Name: Non-mydriatic fundus photography (NMFP)
*VisuCam registered trade mark (Zeiss, Oberkochen, Germany): table-mounted camera provided to enrolled patients in the eye examination room in RPA Hospital Emergency Department (ED)
*RetinaVUE registered trade mark (Welch Allyn, Macquarie Park, Australia): portable camera provided to enrolled patients at the bedside in Westmead Hospital ED
*performed in the ED by a nurse, physician or medical student researcher with prior computer-based and face-to-face NMFP training
*administered once during the ED admission, taking approximately 2-10 minutes for complete examination of both eyes
*digital fundus images are loaded to the patient electronic medical record
*fundus images are then interpreted by the treating emergency physician
*fundus images are then reviewed by the local ophthalmology team (and a study investigator)
*any urgent clinical considerations discovered on routine image review are discussed with the treating ED team
*screening protocol adherence monitored by comparing enrolment data with hospital records of ED admissions
Query!
Intervention code [1]
314268
0
Early detection / Screening
Query!
Intervention code [2]
314269
0
Diagnosis / Prognosis
Query!
Intervention code [3]
314456
0
Treatment: Devices
Query!
Comparator / control treatment
Retrospective data review to identify comparative practice patterns. Medical records of patients admitted to EDs during the same date range one year prior to the study, during study hours, and meeting study inclusion and exclusion criteria on the basis of triage and hospital coding.
Outcomes recorded included documentation of funduscopy performed by ED using direct ophthalmoscopy, and any neurology or ophthalmology consultation for a reference standard.
Query!
Control group
Historical
Query!
Outcomes
Primary outcome [1]
319837
0
Period prevalence of fundus pathology amongst patients presenting to ED with any of the four entry criteria
Query!
Assessment method [1]
319837
0
Query!
Timepoint [1]
319837
0
Eight weeks
Query!
Secondary outcome [1]
369642
0
Proportions of eligible patients examined at each ED using a fixed fundus camera (ED site 1) compared with a portable fundus camera (ED site 2).
*Measured by study log compared with hospital ED admissions records.
Query!
Assessment method [1]
369642
0
Query!
Timepoint [1]
369642
0
Eight weeks
Query!
Secondary outcome [2]
369643
0
Proportions of pathological and normal fundi correctly identified by emergency physicians, compared with the reference standard of review by ophthalmology (+/- a neuro-ophthalmologist masked to clinical details and prior interpretations)
*Measured by study-specific questionnaire
Query!
Assessment method [2]
369643
0
Query!
Timepoint [2]
369643
0
Within 48 hours of fundus image aquisition
Query!
Secondary outcome [3]
369644
0
Perceived clinical utility of fundus photographs to emergency physicians
*Measured by 5-point Likert scale
Query!
Assessment method [3]
369644
0
Query!
Timepoint [3]
369644
0
At the time of fundus image review
Query!
Secondary outcome [4]
369645
0
Time to acquire photographs
*Measured by digital timer and recorded in the study specific questionnaire.
Query!
Assessment method [4]
369645
0
Query!
Timepoint [4]
369645
0
At the time of fundus image acquisition
Query!
Secondary outcome [5]
369646
0
Fundus photograph quality as assessed by the local ophthalmology team (independent of the trial investigators) and a masked neuro-ophthalmogist.
*Measured by study-specific 5-point scale (Lamirel et al. Quality of Nonmydriatic Digital Fundus Photography Obtained by Nurse Practitioners in the Emergency Department: The FOTO-ED Study, Ophthalmology, Vol 119:3, ,2012,p617-624, ISSN 0161-6420, https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ophtha.2011.09.013.)
Query!
Assessment method [5]
369646
0
Query!
Timepoint [5]
369646
0
At the time of fundus image review.
Query!
Secondary outcome [6]
370114
0
Determine the percentage of cases in which the findings of nonmydriatic fundus photography
impact on diagnosis or management in the emergency setting
*Measured by study specific questionnaire
Query!
Assessment method [6]
370114
0
Query!
Timepoint [6]
370114
0
At the time of discharge from ED
Query!
Secondary outcome [7]
370367
0
Compare clinical practice patterns amongst enrolled patients in the retrospective and prospective cohorts regarding subspecialty consultation.
*Measured by study specific questionnaire and hospital medical records.
Query!
Assessment method [7]
370367
0
Query!
Timepoint [7]
370367
0
Time of discharge from hospital
Query!
Secondary outcome [8]
370368
0
Compare clinical practice patterns amongst enrolled patients in the retrospective and prospective cohorts regarding duration of ED stay.
*Measured by study specific questionnaire and hospital medical records.
Query!
Assessment method [8]
370368
0
Query!
Timepoint [8]
370368
0
Time of discharge from hospital
Query!
Secondary outcome [9]
370369
0
Compare clinical practice patterns amongst enrolled patients in the retrospective and prospective cohorts regarding neuroimaging investigations ordered.
*Measured by study specific questionnaire and hospital medical records.
Query!
Assessment method [9]
370369
0
Query!
Timepoint [9]
370369
0
Time of discharge from hospital
Query!
Secondary outcome [10]
370370
0
Compare clinical practice patterns amongst enrolled patients in the retrospective and prospective cohorts regarding lumbar puncture performance.
*Measured by study specific questionnaire and hospital medical records.
Query!
Assessment method [10]
370370
0
Query!
Timepoint [10]
370370
0
Time of discharge from hospital
Query!
Eligibility
Key inclusion criteria
Patients presenting to ED Monday-Friday between the hours of 8am - 5pm with:
*Headache
*New neurological disturbance (defined as motor and/or sensory deficits, speech impairment or dizziness)
*Visual disturbance
*Severe hypertension (defined as diastolic blood pressure greater than 120mmHg)
Query!
Minimum age
18
Years
Query!
Query!
Maximum age
No limit
Query!
Query!
Sex
Both males and females
Query!
Can healthy volunteers participate?
No
Query!
Key exclusion criteria
* Unable to give informed consent: normal guardianship consent hospital regulations will be followed
* Medically unstable: once immediate care is provided and the patient is deemed medically stable, inclusion may be considered
* Self-discharge from ED prior to medical review
Query!
Study design
Purpose of the study
Diagnosis
Query!
Allocation to intervention
Non-randomised trial
Query!
Procedure for enrolling a subject and allocating the treatment (allocation concealment procedures)
NA
Query!
Methods used to generate the sequence in which subjects will be randomised (sequence generation)
NA
Query!
Masking / blinding
Blinded (masking used)
Query!
Who is / are masked / blinded?
The people assessing the outcomes
Query!
Query!
Query!
Query!
Intervention assignment
Other
Query!
Other design features
Prospective, cross-sectional, single group study of NMFP
Historical, non-interventional, medical record control group
Query!
Phase
Not Applicable
Query!
Type of endpoint/s
Efficacy
Query!
Statistical methods / analysis
*Potential prospective eligible participants were estimated based on analysis of past admission coding data: (ED1: 2-10 patients per day, ED2: 8-15 patients per day). An eight-week trial period was determined based on availability of research staff to ensure data integrity for period prevalence outcome.
*For the primary outcome of period prevalence of fundus pathology in the prospective cohort, the minimum sample size was calculated at 174 patients for the prospective dataset, such that the prevalence of fundus pathology could be estimated, using an estimated prevalence of 13% (from previous the US FOTO-ED Phase 1 trial), and desired precision of 5% (ie 95% CI 8-18%).
* For the secondary outcome of comparative pathology detection rate at a significance level of 5%, a power of 80% and the estimated difference in the pathology pick up rate between the direct ophthalmoscopy and fundus cameras of 13% (based on FOTO-ED Phase 1 trial), the minimum sample size required is 53 patients in each study arm. However, this sample size was set at 174 for each study arm due to the number of participants needed for the primary outcome.
*Statistical analysis performed using SPSS (version 15.0; SPSS Inc., Chicago, IL).
*Period prevalence of fundus pathology and site outcomes compared using the Chi-squared test.
*Continuous data reported as medians and interquartile ranges (IQR), and categorical data as percentages.
*Statistical significance set at 0.05%.
*Inter-rater agreement calculated using observed agreement and Cohen's kappa.
*Diagnostic accuracy of NMFP determined using consensus fundus imaging grading by local and masked ophthalmologists as the reference standard.
Query!
Recruitment
Recruitment status
Completed
Query!
Date of first participant enrolment
Anticipated
Query!
Actual
30/11/2017
Query!
Date of last participant enrolment
Anticipated
Query!
Actual
17/01/2018
Query!
Date of last data collection
Anticipated
Query!
Actual
18/01/2018
Query!
Sample size
Target
348
Query!
Accrual to date
Query!
Final
942
Query!
Recruitment in Australia
Recruitment state(s)
NSW
Query!
Recruitment hospital [1]
13696
0
Royal Prince Alfred Hospital - Camperdown
Query!
Recruitment hospital [2]
13697
0
Westmead Hospital - Westmead
Query!
Recruitment postcode(s) [1]
26388
0
2050 - Camperdown
Query!
Recruitment postcode(s) [2]
26389
0
2145 - Westmead
Query!
Funding & Sponsors
Funding source category [1]
302566
0
University
Query!
Name [1]
302566
0
Summer Research Scholarship, University of Sydney School of Medicine
Query!
Address [1]
302566
0
Edward Ford Building (A27) Fisher Road
University of Sydney, NSW 2006
Query!
Country [1]
302566
0
Australia
Query!
Funding source category [2]
302568
0
Commercial sector/Industry
Query!
Name [2]
302568
0
Hill-Rom Australia
Query!
Address [2]
302568
0
Suite 4.01, 2-4 Lyonpark Rd
Macquarie Park, NSW 2113
Query!
Country [2]
302568
0
Australia
Query!
Primary sponsor type
University
Query!
Name
Discipline of Clinical Ophthalmology & Eye Health, Faculty of Medicine & Health, University of Sydney
Query!
Address
Save Sight Institute
South Block, Sydney Eye Hospital
8 Macquarie Street
Sydney NSW 2000
Query!
Country
Australia
Query!
Secondary sponsor category [1]
302477
0
None
Query!
Name [1]
302477
0
Query!
Address [1]
302477
0
Query!
Country [1]
302477
0
Query!
Ethics approval
Ethics application status
Approved
Query!
Ethics committee name [1]
303211
0
Sydney Local Health District Ethics Review Committee (RPAH Zone)
Query!
Ethics committee address [1]
303211
0
Research Ethics & Governance Office
210A, Level 2, RPAH Medical Centre 100 Carillon Ave Newtown NSW 2042
Query!
Ethics committee country [1]
303211
0
Australia
Query!
Date submitted for ethics approval [1]
303211
0
19/05/2017
Query!
Approval date [1]
303211
0
07/09/2017
Query!
Ethics approval number [1]
303211
0
HREC/15/RPAH/355
Query!
Summary
Brief summary
Funduscopy is not widely performed, to the detriment of patients whose vision-threatening and life-threatening disorders may not be detected. The decline of fundoscopy has been ascribed to technical challenges of the examination, and difficulties interpreting the findings. Non-mydriatic fundus photography (NMFP) has been demonstrated to improve detection of fundus abnormalities in patients presenting to the emergency department (ED). We aim to determine the prevalence of fundus abnormalities amongst selected patients presenting to Australian EDs, and the clinical impact of NMFP for these patients.
Query!
Trial website
Query!
Trial related presentations / publications
Query!
Public notes
Query!
Contacts
Principal investigator
Name
92866
0
Prof Peter McCluskey
Query!
Address
92866
0
Discipline of Clinical Ophthalmology & Eye Health, Faculty of Medicine & Health, University of Sydney
Save Sight Institute
South Block, Sydney / Sydney Eye Hospital
8 Macquarie Street
Sydney NSW 2000
Query!
Country
92866
0
Australia
Query!
Phone
92866
0
+61 2 9382 7300
Query!
Fax
92866
0
Query!
Email
92866
0
[email protected]
Query!
Contact person for public queries
Name
92867
0
Mrs Alison Pryke
Query!
Address
92867
0
Dept of Ophthalmology
B4a Westmead Hospital
PO Box 533 Wentworthville NSW 2145
Query!
Country
92867
0
Australia
Query!
Phone
92867
0
+61 2 8890 3644
Query!
Fax
92867
0
+61 2 9845 3170
Query!
Email
92867
0
[email protected]
Query!
Contact person for scientific queries
Name
92868
0
Dr Hamish Dunn
Query!
Address
92868
0
Dept of Ophthalmology
B4a Westmead Hospital
PO Box 533 Wentworthville NSW 2145
Query!
Country
92868
0
Australia
Query!
Phone
92868
0
+61 2 8890 3644
Query!
Fax
92868
0
Query!
Email
92868
0
[email protected]
Query!
Data sharing statement
Will individual participant data (IPD) for this trial be available (including data dictionaries)?
Yes
Query!
What data in particular will be shared?
Individual, de-identified data underlying published results.
Query!
When will data be available (start and end dates)?
Beginning 6 months after and ending 3 years after publication of main results.
Query!
Available to whom?
Researchers who provide a methodologically sound proposal, on a case-by-case basis at the discretion of Primary Sponsor.
Query!
Available for what types of analyses?
Meta-analyses
Query!
How or where can data be obtained?
Access subject to approvals by Principal Investigator, requirement to sign data access agreement and approval by the Sydney Local Health District HREC.
Query!
What supporting documents are/will be available?
No Supporting Document Provided
Results publications and other study-related documents
Documents added manually
Type
Is Peer Reviewed?
DOI
Citations or Other Details
Attachment
Study results article
Yes
Dunn HP, Teo KZ, Smyth JW, Weerasinghe LS, Costell...
[
More Details
]
Documents added automatically
Source
Title
Year of Publication
DOI
Embase
Using non-mydriatic fundus photography to detect fundus pathology in Australian metropolitan emergency departments: A prospective prevalence and diagnostic accuracy study.
2021
https://dx.doi.org/10.1111/1742-6723.13619
N.B. These documents automatically identified may not have been verified by the study sponsor.
Download to PDF