Please note that the copy function is not enabled for this field.
If you wish to
modify
existing outcomes, please copy and paste the current outcome text into the Update field.
LOGIN
CREATE ACCOUNT
LOGIN
CREATE ACCOUNT
MY TRIALS
REGISTER TRIAL
FAQs
HINTS AND TIPS
DEFINITIONS
Trial Review
The ANZCTR website will be unavailable from 1pm until 3pm (AEDT) on Wednesday the 30th of October for website maintenance. Please be sure to log out of the system in order to avoid any loss of data.
The safety and scientific validity of this study is the responsibility of the study sponsor and investigators. Listing a study does not mean it has been endorsed by the ANZCTR. Before participating in a study, talk to your health care provider and refer to this
information for consumers
Download to PDF
Trial registered on ANZCTR
Registration number
ACTRN12620000151932
Ethics application status
Approved
Date submitted
13/01/2020
Date registered
13/02/2020
Date last updated
13/02/2020
Date data sharing statement initially provided
13/02/2020
Type of registration
Retrospectively registered
Titles & IDs
Public title
Protocol for choledocholithiasis at emergency surgery
study (ProCESS)
Query!
Scientific title
A cohort study to evaluate the protocolised
management of bile duct stones in emergency general
surgery
Query!
Secondary ID [1]
300248
0
Nil Known
Query!
Universal Trial Number (UTN)
U1111-1246-3961
Query!
Trial acronym
ProCESS
Query!
Linked study record
Query!
Health condition
Health condition(s) or problem(s) studied:
choledocholithiasis
315809
0
Query!
bile duct stones
316073
0
Query!
Condition category
Condition code
Surgery
314100
314100
0
0
Query!
Surgical techniques
Query!
Oral and Gastrointestinal
314344
314344
0
0
Query!
Other diseases of the mouth, teeth, oesophagus, digestive system including liver and colon
Query!
Public Health
314345
314345
0
0
Query!
Health service research
Query!
Intervention/exposure
Study type
Observational
Query!
Patient registry
False
Query!
Target follow-up duration
Query!
Target follow-up type
Query!
Description of intervention(s) / exposure
A cohort study to evaluate a management protocol for CBD stones within the Acute General
Surgery Unit (AGSU).
Outcome data will be recorded from patients with bile duct stones undergoing emergency
laparoscopic cholecystectomy.
Management of CBD stones:
Laparoscopic bile duct exploration can be considered for all patients irrespective of stone
size and number.
If the surgeon is unwilling or unable to clear the bile duct at the time of cholecystectomy
then further management is determined by stone size and number as well as the presence
of absence of biliary obstruction as evidenced by jaundice (bilirubin >40mmol/litre)
CBD stone size is estimated with reference to an Olsen-Reddick laparoscopic grasper (width
4.5mm).
Group A: Solitary stones < 4.5mm with no biochemical evidence of biliary obstruction
Laparoscopic bile duct exploration or conservative management of CBD stones, at the
discretion of the operating surgeon.
Group B: Stones > 4.5mm, multiple stones or biochemical evidence of biliary obstruction
CBD exploration or transcystic stenting at the discretion of the operating surgeon.
Exploration may be performed via the transcystic (through the cystic duct) or transductal
(via incision into the CBD) route, with or without choledochoscopy. Positioning is checked by
intraoperative x-ray.
With good stent positioning and biliary drainage, patients may be discharged
postoperatively without further investigation or treatment and booked for an elective ERCP.
We expect the elective ERCP to be booked within 4-6 weeks of discharge, and our time of follow up ends after successful bile duct clearance via ERCP.
This protocol will be undertaken in the unit regardless of the study occurring, as this is already in line with standard practice for many of the surgeons.
Query!
Intervention code [1]
316520
0
Not applicable
Query!
Comparator / control treatment
No control group
Query!
Control group
Uncontrolled
Query!
Outcomes
Primary outcome [1]
322487
0
Cholangitis as defined by the Tokyo Guidelines for Cholangitis.
Diagnosis is made on presence of systemic inflammation, evidence of cholestasis on laboratory tests and evidence of biliary pathology on imaging (either computed topography (CT), magnetic resonance cholangiopancreatography or ultrasound).
Link to Tokyo Guidelines can be found here: https://onlinelibrary.wiley.com/doi/full/10.1002/jhbp.512
Query!
Assessment method [1]
322487
0
Query!
Timepoint [1]
322487
0
By time of outpatient ERCP (within 6-8 weeks)
Query!
Primary outcome [2]
322488
0
Pancreatitis, as diagnosed by epigastric pain radiating to back with nausea and one of either a.) elevated serum lipase levels or b.) imaging (CT scan) consistent with pancreatic inflammation
Query!
Assessment method [2]
322488
0
Query!
Timepoint [2]
322488
0
By time of outpatient ERCP (within 6-8 weeks)
Query!
Secondary outcome [1]
378673
0
Length of inpatient hospital stay in days, inclusive of admission and discharge day. Assessed via medical records.
Query!
Assessment method [1]
378673
0
Query!
Timepoint [1]
378673
0
This will be assessed retrospectively when all cases are reviewed, after the last patient has completed their ERCP. We anticipate this to be 6-8 weeks after the enrolment of the final patient.
Query!
Secondary outcome [2]
378674
0
Total operating time (in hours) of laparoscopic cholecystectomy, including any biliary tract instrumentation. This will be assessed by time in/out of theatre as recorded in our medical records.
Query!
Assessment method [2]
378674
0
Query!
Timepoint [2]
378674
0
This will be assessed retrospectively when all cases are reviewed, after the last patient has completed their ERCP. We anticipate this to be 6-8 weeks after the enrolment of the final patient.
Query!
Secondary outcome [3]
378675
0
Postoperative complications of laparoscopic cholecystectomy and biliary instrumentation, including bleeding, infection, bile leak and bile duct injury.
This will be assessed by clinician review of all medical records during inpatient stay. Patients will also be clinically assessed via history and exam at their follow up appointment.
Query!
Assessment method [3]
378675
0
Query!
Timepoint [3]
378675
0
By time of outpatient ERCP (within 6-8 weeks)
Query!
Secondary outcome [4]
378676
0
Rate of bile duct exploration, assessed from operation notes.
Query!
Assessment method [4]
378676
0
Query!
Timepoint [4]
378676
0
This outcome is only assessed once, as it is an intra-operative decision. Timepoint is for the time of the study only, so will end at 6-8 review.
Query!
Secondary outcome [5]
378677
0
Rate of small solitary stones retained on follow up magnetic resonance cholangiopancreatography (MRCP)
Query!
Assessment method [5]
378677
0
Query!
Timepoint [5]
378677
0
2 weeks from original surgery date
Query!
Eligibility
Key inclusion criteria
All consecutive patients within unit undergoing emergency laparoscopic cholecystectomy with bile duct stones identified pre or intra-operatively
Query!
Minimum age
18
Years
Query!
Query!
Maximum age
85
Years
Query!
Query!
Sex
Both males and females
Query!
Can healthy volunteers participate?
No
Query!
Key exclusion criteria
Pregnancy
Age >85 years
Query!
Study design
Purpose
Screening
Query!
Duration
Longitudinal
Query!
Selection
Defined population
Query!
Timing
Both
Query!
Statistical methods / analysis
We performed a power calculation with respect to the primary endpoint of cholangitis in
patients discharged from hospital following cholecystectomy with a biliary stent in place.
We performed a one-way model for one proportion using Minitab 17. To demonstrate that
the rate of cholangitis is less than 10% (hypothesised proportion = 0.9; comparison
proportion = 0.999) with a power of 0.9 at an a-level of 0.05, 30 participants will be required.
Query!
Recruitment
Recruitment status
Recruiting
Query!
Date of first participant enrolment
Anticipated
Query!
Actual
19/11/2019
Query!
Date of last participant enrolment
Anticipated
31/03/2020
Query!
Actual
Query!
Date of last data collection
Anticipated
29/05/2020
Query!
Actual
Query!
Sample size
Target
30
Query!
Accrual to date
8
Query!
Final
Query!
Recruitment in Australia
Recruitment state(s)
VIC
Query!
Recruitment hospital [1]
15606
0
Monash Medical Centre - Clayton campus - Clayton
Query!
Recruitment postcode(s) [1]
29006
0
3168 - Clayton
Query!
Funding & Sponsors
Funding source category [1]
304673
0
Self funded/Unfunded
Query!
Name [1]
304673
0
N/A
Query!
Address [1]
304673
0
N/A
Query!
Country [1]
304673
0
Query!
Primary sponsor type
Individual
Query!
Name
Rhys Jones FRCS
Query!
Address
Monash Medical Centre
246 Clayton Rd, Clayton 3168
Victoria, Australia
Query!
Country
Australia
Query!
Secondary sponsor category [1]
304981
0
Individual
Query!
Name [1]
304981
0
Stacey Chamberlain MBBS
Query!
Address [1]
304981
0
Monash Medical Centre
246 Clayton Rd, Clayton VIC 3168
Query!
Country [1]
304981
0
Australia
Query!
Ethics approval
Ethics application status
Approved
Query!
Ethics committee name [1]
305094
0
Monash Health Human Research Ethics Committee
Query!
Ethics committee address [1]
305094
0
Monash Medical Centre 246 Clayton Rd, Clayton VIC 3168
Query!
Ethics committee country [1]
305094
0
Australia
Query!
Date submitted for ethics approval [1]
305094
0
Query!
Approval date [1]
305094
0
15/11/2019
Query!
Ethics approval number [1]
305094
0
58519
Query!
Summary
Brief summary
Gallstone disease is very common, and results in a large number of hospital admissions per year. Some patients with gallstones can develop a blockage in their main bile duct due to stones, which can put them at risk of severe infection, jaundice or other problems like pancreatitis. There are several ways in which surgeons can go about removing the stones from the bile duct, including during surgery or via endoscopy (camera test down the mouth). There is also an option of placing a stent in the bile duct. There is currently no agreement between surgeons on which of these options is the best. We have developed a new protocol to determine if patients can be safely sent home after surgery with a bile duct stent, and then return for an endoscopy electively. We aim to prove that this option is safe, and also improves and steamlines the patient experience.
Query!
Trial website
Query!
Trial related presentations / publications
Query!
Public notes
Query!
Contacts
Principal investigator
Name
99250
0
Dr Stacey Chamberlain
Query!
Address
99250
0
Monash Health
Monash Medical Centre
246 Clayton Rd, Clayton VIC Australia 3168
Query!
Country
99250
0
Australia
Query!
Phone
99250
0
+61 0467904858
Query!
Fax
99250
0
Query!
Email
99250
0
[email protected]
Query!
Contact person for public queries
Name
99251
0
Stacey Chamberlain
Query!
Address
99251
0
Monash Health
Monash Medical Centre
246 Clayton Rd, Clayton VIC Australia 3168
Query!
Country
99251
0
Australia
Query!
Phone
99251
0
+61 0467904858
Query!
Fax
99251
0
Query!
Email
99251
0
[email protected]
Query!
Contact person for scientific queries
Name
99252
0
Stacey Chamberlain
Query!
Address
99252
0
Monash Health
Monash Medical Centre
246 Clayton Rd, Clayton VIC Australia 3168
Query!
Country
99252
0
Australia
Query!
Phone
99252
0
+61 0467904858
Query!
Fax
99252
0
Query!
Email
99252
0
[email protected]
Query!
Data sharing statement
Will individual participant data (IPD) for this trial be available (including data dictionaries)?
Yes
Query!
What data in particular will be shared?
Individual participant data underlying published results only, all de-identified
Query!
When will data be available (start and end dates)?
Immediately following publication, available for 7 years
Query!
Available to whom?
Researchers can provide on reasonable request
Query!
Available for what types of analyses?
To achieve the aims set out in the proposal
Query!
How or where can data be obtained?
Access subject to approval from principal investigator or secondary investigator.
Principal investigator email:
[email protected]
Secondary investigator email:
[email protected]
Query!
What supporting documents are/will be available?
No Supporting Document Provided
Doc. No.
Type
Citation
Link
Email
Other Details
Attachment
6405
Ethical approval
379048-(Uploaded-13-01-2020-20-54-05)-Study-related document.pdf
Results publications and other study-related documents
Documents added manually
No documents have been uploaded by study researchers.
Documents added automatically
No additional documents have been identified.
Download to PDF