Please note that the copy function is not enabled for this field.
If you wish to
modify
existing outcomes, please copy and paste the current outcome text into the Update field.
LOGIN
CREATE ACCOUNT
LOGIN
CREATE ACCOUNT
MY TRIALS
REGISTER TRIAL
FAQs
HINTS AND TIPS
DEFINITIONS
Trial Review
The ANZCTR website will be unavailable from 1pm until 3pm (AEDT) on Wednesday the 30th of October for website maintenance. Please be sure to log out of the system in order to avoid any loss of data.
The safety and scientific validity of this study is the responsibility of the study sponsor and investigators. Listing a study does not mean it has been endorsed by the ANZCTR. Before participating in a study, talk to your health care provider and refer to this
information for consumers
Download to PDF
Trial registered on ANZCTR
Registration number
ACTRN12621000118808
Ethics application status
Approved
Date submitted
21/11/2020
Date registered
5/02/2021
Date last updated
16/01/2024
Date data sharing statement initially provided
5/02/2021
Type of registration
Prospectively registered
Titles & IDs
Public title
Therapeutic ultrasound treatment for women with inflammatory conditions of the lactating breast
Query!
Scientific title
The effectiveness of therapeutic ultrasound treatment on the size of breast hardness area in women with inflammatory conditions of the lactating breast
Query!
Secondary ID [1]
302025
0
Nil known
Query!
Universal Trial Number (UTN)
U1111-1256-8464
Query!
Trial acronym
Query!
Linked study record
Not applicable
Query!
Health condition
Health condition(s) or problem(s) studied:
Breast engorgement
318603
0
Query!
Lactational blocked ducts
320161
0
Query!
Lactational mastitis
320162
0
Query!
Breast abscess
320163
0
Query!
Condition category
Condition code
Reproductive Health and Childbirth
316621
316621
0
0
Query!
Breast feeding
Query!
Inflammatory and Immune System
318104
318104
0
0
Query!
Other inflammatory or immune system disorders
Query!
Intervention/exposure
Study type
Interventional
Query!
Description of intervention(s) / exposure
Therapeutic ultrasound plus a standard treatment.
Arm 1: High intensity therapeutic ultrasound (2 Wcm2).
Arm 2: Low intensity therapeutic ultrasound (1 Wcm2).
Therapeutic ultrasound (TUS) is non-invasive cutaneously delivered high frequency ultrasound energy, that is delivered via a sound head that is moving continuously.
A women’s health physiotherapist, with over 6 years experience of using TUS to treat women with ICLBs, will provide the intervention face-to-face at the recruitment sites: 1) A public tertiary women's hospital; 2) private women's health physiotherapy practices; and 3) the community (at the participant’s home). The physiotherapist is a staff member at recruitment site 1) and at one of recruitment sites 2).
All participants will receive a standard treatment, comprising education and advice addressing ICLB risk factors and the common supportive measures outlined in the literature. In addition, all participants will receive up to 3 consecutive days of TUS treatment to their affected breast, which could be either high intensity TUS (arm 1), low intensity TUS (arm 2) or sham TUS (arm 3: comparator/control). Day 1 of treatment will be prioritised for the same day as recruitment, or as soon as appropriate. A standardised script will be used, asking participants to adhere to the standard treatment and not try different treatments or change what they are doing, and informed consent gained. Participants will be asked to remove clothing covering the breast and will be appropriately positioned lying down and draped with towels, allowing optimal exposure of the affected breast. To mitigate the risk of overheating, intact sensation will be confirmed prior to TUS application and participants will be given a TUS standard warnings and safety summary sheet prior to and for reference throughout the intervention. The physiotherapist will have 1 TUS machine (Astar Physiogo 300) with 3 sound heads clearly labelled A, B or C. These will correspond to pre-set programs (A, B and C) on the TUS machine. One program will be set to deliver high intensity TUS (2 Wcm2), one to deliver low intensity TUS (1 Wcm2) and one to deliver sham TUS. This will be done by a non-trial member and the sham sound head will be altered by the electrophysical company prior to the physiotherapist receiving them, thus, blinding both the physiotherapist and participant to the intervention. The physiotherapist will be able to turn down the intensity for safety. Active TUS will be applied at 1 MHz frequency in continuous mode, reflective of the majority of Australian physiotherapy practice.
Aqueous gel will be placed on the 4 cm2 sound head and the physiotherapist will apply the TUS over the area of breast swelling/hardness/tightness, using consistent light pressure and overlapping linear strokes, extending towards the axilla and nipple. Participants will be instructed not to inform the physiotherapist if they feel heat, to maintain blinding, unless it becomes more than a comfortable warmth. Duration of application will be dependent on the size of the affected area, which will be measured using the sound head, prior to TUS application. Areas of up to and including 8 cm2 (2 ultrasound heads) will receive 10 minutes of treatment; areas of greater than 8 cm2 and less than 16 cm2 (within 3 sound heads) will receive 15 minutes; and areas of 16 cm2 (4 sound heads) or greater, will receive 20 minutes of TUS treatment.
The standard treatment will be delivered via 3 different mediums: 1) video: 3-4 minutes duration, played for participants on a tablet during day 1 TUS intervention (the video will be on the trial's website for participant's later reference); 2) hard paper copy: As an infographic, with a) a laminated copy for participants to view on day 1 during the intervention and b) a pamphlet for them to take home; and 3) electronic copy of the infographic (on the trial's website; the URL will be given to all participants). The educational material/infographic is designed specifically for this study.
Participants will be encouraged to breastfeed or express prior to the intervention, to ensure their breasts are as soft as possible, and then again as soon as possible/comfortable (or within 20 to 30 minutes) post intervention. Intervention fidelity will be assessed via an online secure survey (REDCap) comprising yes/no and slider scale questions checking compliance with the different aspects of the standard treatment, and an open text response question asking about any additional treatments used/trialled. Participants will use a QR code or customised email link to access their survey. Four extra slider scale and accompanying open text questions will be included in the survey at the end of the intervention, asking participants about their satisfaction and experience with aspects of the trial (see secondary outcomes).
Participants may be contacted at 3 and 6 months post their participation in the trial, via email or phone, to ask a few questions about ICLB recurrences.
Query!
Intervention code [1]
318326
0
Treatment: Devices
Query!
Comparator / control treatment
Arm 3: Sham therapeutic ultrasound (0 Wcm2) plus a standard treatment.
As per description of intervention(s) / exposure above:
A women’s health physiotherapist, with over 6 years experience of using TUS to treat women with ICLBs, will provide the comparator/control treatment face-to-face at the recruitment sites: 1) A public tertiary women's hospital; 2) private women's health physiotherapy practices; and 3) the community (at the participant’s home). The physiotherapist is a staff member at recruitment site 1) and at one of recruitment sites 2).
All participants will receive up to 3 consecutive days of TUS treatment to their affected breast, which could be either high intensity TUS (intervention arm 1), low intensity TUS (intervention arm 2) or sham TUS (arm 3: comparator/control). Day 1 of treatment will be prioritised for the same day as recruitment, or as soon as appropriate. A standardised script will be used, asking participants to adhere to the standard treatment and not try different treatments or change what they are doing, and informed consent gained. Participants will be asked to remove clothing covering the breast and will be appropriately positioned lying down and draped with towels, allowing optimal exposure of the affected breast. To mitigate the risk of overheating, intact sensation will be confirmed prior to TUS application and participants will be given a TUS standard warnings and safety summary sheet prior to and for reference throughout the treatment. The physiotherapist will have 1 TUS machine (Astar Physiogo 300) with 3 sound heads clearly labelled A, B or C. These will correspond to pre-set programs (A, B and C) on the TUS machine. One program will be set to deliver high intensity TUS (2 Wcm2), one to deliver low intensity TUS (1 Wcm2) and one to deliver sham TUS. This will be done by a non-trial member and the sham sound head will be altered by the electrophysical company prior to the physiotherapist receiving them, thus, blinding both the physiotherapist and participant to the treatment. The physiotherapist will be able to turn down the intensity for safety.
Aqueous gel will be placed on the 4 cm2 sound head and the physiotherapist will apply the TUS over the area of breast swelling/hardness/tightness, using consistent light pressure and overlapping linear strokes, extending towards the axilla and nipple. Participants will be instructed not to inform the physiotherapist if they feel heat, to maintain blinding, unless it becomes more than a comfortable warmth. Duration of application will be dependent on the size of the affected area, which will be measured using the sound head, prior to TUS application. Areas of up to and including 8 cm2 (2 ultrasound heads) will receive 10 minutes of treatment; areas of greater than 8 cm2 and less than 16 cm2 (within 3 sound heads) will receive 15 minutes; and areas of 16 cm2 (4 sound heads) or greater, will receive 20 minutes of TUS treatment.
The standard treatment will be delivered via 3 different mediums: 1) video: 3-4 minutes duration, played for participants on a tablet during day 1 TUS intervention (the video will be on the trial's website for participant's later reference); 2) hard paper copy: As an infographic, with a) a laminated copy for participants to view on day 1 during the intervention and b) a pamphlet for them to take home; and 3) electronic copy of the infographic (on the trial's website; the URL will be given to all participants). The educational material/infographic is designed specifically for this study.
Participants will be encouraged to breastfeed or express prior to the treatment, to ensure their breasts are as soft as possible, and then again as soon as possible/comfortable (or within 20 to 30 minutes) post treatment. Intervention fidelity will be assessed via an online secure survey (REDCap) comprising yes/no and slider scale questions checking compliance with the different aspects of the standard treatment, and an open text response question asking about any additional treatments used/trialled. Participants will use a QR code or customised email link to access their survey. Four extra slider scale and accompanying open text questions will be included in the survey at the end of the intervention, asking participants about their satisfaction and experience with aspects of the trial (see secondary outcomes).
Participants may be contacted at 3 and 6 months post their participation in the trial, via email or phone, to ask a few questions about ICLB recurrences.
Query!
Control group
Placebo
Query!
Outcomes
Primary outcome [1]
324749
0
Size of breast hardness area (in cm2), measured via tracing the area of hardness on to cling wrap with a permanent marker. Cling wrap tracings will be scanned into Adobe and the area calculated electronically. This measures area of local inflammatory symptoms.
Query!
Assessment method [1]
324749
0
Query!
Timepoint [1]
324749
0
Timepoint 1: baseline (day 1, pre intervention). Timepoint 2: 1 day after intervention commencement (day 2, pre day 2 intervention). Timepoint 3: 2 days after intervention commencement (day 3, pre day 3 intervention) - primary timepoint. Timepoint 4: 10 days after intervention commencement.
Query!
Secondary outcome [1]
385635
0
Breast milk sodium and potassium levels as measured by an ion selective electrode (ISE). This is to measure local and systemic inflammatory symptoms. This is a composite secondary outcome.
Query!
Assessment method [1]
385635
0
Query!
Timepoint [1]
385635
0
Timepoint 1: baseline (day 1, pre intervention). Timepoint 3: 2 days after intervention commencement (day 3, pre day 3 intervention). Timepoint 4: 10 days after intervention commencement.
Query!
Secondary outcome [2]
385676
0
Breast Inflammatory Symptom Severity Index (BISSI) scores - a patient reported outcome measure (copyright: Melinda Cooper, physiotherapist), with face and content validity established. This is to measure local and systemic inflammatory symptoms.
Query!
Assessment method [2]
385676
0
Query!
Timepoint [2]
385676
0
Timepoint 1: baseline (day 1, pre intervention). Timepoint 2: 1 day after intervention commencement (day 2, pre day 2 intervention). Timepoint 3: 2 days after intervention commencement (day 3, pre day 3 intervention). Timepoint 4: 10 days after intervention commencement.
Query!
Secondary outcome [3]
390098
0
Acceptability of participating in this study assessed using an online secure survey (REDCap). The survey is designed specifically for this study.
Query!
Assessment method [3]
390098
0
Query!
Timepoint [3]
390098
0
Timepoint 4: 10 days after intervention commencement.
Query!
Secondary outcome [4]
390099
0
Feasibility of participating in this study assessed using an online secure survey (REDCap). The survey is designed specifically for this study.
Query!
Assessment method [4]
390099
0
Query!
Timepoint [4]
390099
0
Timepoint 4: 10 days after intervention commencement.
Query!
Secondary outcome [5]
390100
0
Acceptability of the primary outcome (size of breast hardness area) assessed using an online secure survey (REDCap). The survey is designed specifically for this study.
Query!
Assessment method [5]
390100
0
Query!
Timepoint [5]
390100
0
Timepoint 4: 10 days after intervention commencement.
Query!
Secondary outcome [6]
390101
0
Acceptability of the secondary outcome [1] (breast milk sodium and potassium levels as measured by an ion selective electrode) assessed using an online secure survey (REDCap). The survey is designed specifically for this study.
Query!
Assessment method [6]
390101
0
Query!
Timepoint [6]
390101
0
Timepoint 4: 10 days after intervention commencement.
Query!
Secondary outcome [7]
417408
0
Global Rating of Change (GRC) scale
Query!
Assessment method [7]
417408
0
Query!
Timepoint [7]
417408
0
Timepoint 2: 1 day after intervention commencement (day 2, pre day 2 intervention),. Timepoint 3: 2 days after intervention commencement (day 3, pre day 3 intervention). Timepoint 4: 10 days after intervention commencement.
Query!
Eligibility
Key inclusion criteria
Lactating women over the age of 18, greater than 7 days postpartum, presenting with; a) at least 1 current local breast inflammatory symptom (e.g. breast pain, redness, increased temperature, swelling) AND b) at least 1 systemic inflammatory symptom (e.g. fever, chills, aching, lethargy, headache) this current episode.
Query!
Minimum age
18
Years
Query!
Query!
Maximum age
No limit
Query!
Query!
Sex
Females
Query!
Can healthy volunteers participate?
No
Query!
Key exclusion criteria
History of breast cancer or breast surgery (including breast implants), pacemaker, preterm birth, multiple birth.
Query!
Study design
Purpose of the study
Treatment
Query!
Allocation to intervention
Randomised controlled trial
Query!
Procedure for enrolling a subject and allocating the treatment (allocation concealment procedures)
Non-trial personnel will prepare sequentially numbered sealed opaque envelopes, signifying participant number. Inside the envelopes there will be the letter A, B or C written on the enclosed paper, signifying group allocation. The allocation sequence will be randomised, using an online computer program (www.random.org). The physiotherapist will open the envelopes sequentially, post baseline outcome measurement. The physiotherapist will have 1 TUS machine (Astar Physiogo 300), with 3 pre-set programs (A, B and C) and 3 corresponding sound heads clearly labelled, A, B or C. One will be set to deliver high intensity (2 Wcm2) TUS, one to deliver low intensity (1 Wcm2) TUS and one to deliver sham TUS.
Query!
Methods used to generate the sequence in which subjects will be randomised (sequence generation)
Randomisation will be stratified in blocks of 9, within the sites. The online computer program (www.random.org) will be used to generate the random allocation sequences separately for each block of 9, at each of the three recruitment sites.
Query!
Masking / blinding
Blinded (masking used)
Query!
Who is / are masked / blinded?
The people receiving the treatment/s
The people administering the treatment/s
The people assessing the outcomes
The people analysing the results/data
Query!
Query!
Query!
Query!
Intervention assignment
Parallel
Query!
Other design features
Query!
Phase
Not Applicable
Query!
Type of endpoint/s
Efficacy
Query!
Statistical methods / analysis
A priori sample size calculation based on the expected difference between groups for size of breast hardness area over 3 days (unpublished data from previous study by researcher Dr Leanda McKenna) revealed a sample of n= 156 (52 per group) has 80% power to show an effect size difference f= 0.20 (based on mean difference= 2.0cm2, standard deviation (SD)= 5.0cm2), in a linear mixed model with 3 groups and 4 timepoints (G*Power V3.1.9.4). The expected difference in breast milk sodium levels produced similar mean and SD values, thus we are adequately powered for breast milk analysis.
A blinded interim analysis will be conducted by the trial’s statistician when this minimum sample size (n= 156) has been reached, specifically to assess the distribution of antibiotic use across the trial groups. If significant disproportion exists, further recruitment may be necessary to allow statistical comparison. At any time throughout the trial, women will be able to seek medical treatment, given ICLBs can rapidly progress in severity to a serious illness.
Data analysis will be blinded and completed according to intention-to-treat. Stata (StataCrop, College Station, TX) will be used to perform a generalised linear mixed model (GLMM) analysis of the relationship between the 3 different TUS treatments and the primary and secondary outcomes. Antibiotic use, for the current ICLB episode, will be entered as a fixed effect into the model. Treatment fidelity will be inspected and potentially entered into the model as confounders. Visual inspection of residual plots will be undertaken to evaluate normality and homogeneity of variance, and 95% confidence intervals and p-values will be obtained by likelihood ratio tests.
Query!
Recruitment
Recruitment status
Recruiting
Query!
Date of first participant enrolment
Anticipated
15/12/2021
Query!
Actual
26/12/2021
Query!
Date of last participant enrolment
Anticipated
22/03/2025
Query!
Actual
Query!
Date of last data collection
Anticipated
31/03/2025
Query!
Actual
Query!
Sample size
Target
187
Query!
Accrual to date
56
Query!
Final
Query!
Recruitment in Australia
Recruitment state(s)
VIC
Query!
Recruitment hospital [1]
17921
0
Mercy Hospital for Women - Heidelberg
Query!
Recruitment hospital [2]
21604
0
The Royal Women's Hospital - Parkville
Query!
Recruitment postcode(s) [1]
31784
0
3084 - Heidelberg
Query!
Recruitment postcode(s) [2]
36527
0
3052 - Parkville
Query!
Funding & Sponsors
Funding source category [1]
306448
0
University
Query!
Name [1]
306448
0
Curtin University PhD research support fund
Query!
Address [1]
306448
0
Curtin University, School of Physiotherapy and Exercise Science, Kent Street, Bentley, Perth, Western Australia 6102. Postal address: GPO Box U1987, Perth WA 6845.
Query!
Country [1]
306448
0
Australia
Query!
Funding source category [2]
307175
0
Government body
Query!
Name [2]
307175
0
Australian Government Department of Education, Skills and Employment Research Training Program Scholarship
Query!
Address [2]
307175
0
Department of Education, Skills and Employment
GPO Box 9880
Canberra ACT 2601
Australia
Query!
Country [2]
307175
0
Australia
Query!
Funding source category [3]
310669
0
Hospital
Query!
Name [3]
310669
0
Mercy Health Small Grant 2021/2022
Query!
Address [3]
310669
0
Mercy Health Services Academic Research & Development Committee
Werribee Mercy Hospital
300 Princes Highway
Werribee VIC 3030
Query!
Country [3]
310669
0
Australia
Query!
Funding source category [4]
312952
0
Hospital
Query!
Name [4]
312952
0
Mercy Health Small Grant 2022/23
Query!
Address [4]
312952
0
Mercy Health Services Academic Research & Development Committee Werribee Mercy Hospital 300 Princes Highway Werribee VIC 3030
Query!
Country [4]
312952
0
Australia
Query!
Primary sponsor type
Individual
Query!
Name
Leanda McKenna
Query!
Address
Curtin University, Kent Street, Bentley, WA 6102
Query!
Country
Australia
Query!
Secondary sponsor category [1]
308164
0
Individual
Query!
Name [1]
308164
0
Emma Heron
Query!
Address [1]
308164
0
Curtin University, Kent Street, Bentley, WA 6102
Query!
Country [1]
308164
0
Australia
Query!
Other collaborator category [1]
281426
0
Individual
Query!
Name [1]
281426
0
Dr Adelle McArdle
Query!
Address [1]
281426
0
Monash University, Northways Road, Churchill VIC 3842
Query!
Country [1]
281426
0
Australia
Query!
Other collaborator category [2]
281427
0
Individual
Query!
Name [2]
281427
0
Prof Donna Geddes
Query!
Address [2]
281427
0
The University of Western Australia M310, 35 Stirling Highway, Crawley, WA 6009
Query!
Country [2]
281427
0
Australia
Query!
Other collaborator category [3]
281521
0
Individual
Query!
Name [3]
281521
0
Melinda Cooper
Query!
Address [3]
281521
0
MMC Physiotherapy, PO Box 785, Kyneton Vic 3444
Query!
Country [3]
281521
0
Australia
Query!
Ethics approval
Ethics application status
Approved
Query!
Ethics committee name [1]
306654
0
Mercy Health Human Research Ethics Committee
Query!
Ethics committee address [1]
306654
0
Administrative Officer, Human Research Ethics Committee c/- Mercy Hospital for Women 163 Studley Road Heidelberg, VIC. 3084
Query!
Ethics committee country [1]
306654
0
Australia
Query!
Date submitted for ethics approval [1]
306654
0
13/01/2021
Query!
Approval date [1]
306654
0
06/05/2021
Query!
Ethics approval number [1]
306654
0
2021-007
Query!
Ethics committee name [2]
308588
0
Curtin University Human Research Ethics Committee
Query!
Ethics committee address [2]
308588
0
Curtin University, Kent Street, Bentley, Perth, Western Australia 6102
Query!
Ethics committee country [2]
308588
0
Australia
Query!
Date submitted for ethics approval [2]
308588
0
11/05/2021
Query!
Approval date [2]
308588
0
18/11/2021
Query!
Ethics approval number [2]
308588
0
HRE2021-0315-01
Query!
Ethics committee name [3]
310259
0
Monash University Human Research Ethics Committee
Query!
Ethics committee address [3]
310259
0
Wellington Road, Clayton Victoria 3800
Query!
Ethics committee country [3]
310259
0
Australia
Query!
Date submitted for ethics approval [3]
310259
0
14/05/2021
Query!
Approval date [3]
310259
0
27/05/2021
Query!
Ethics approval number [3]
310259
0
29150
Query!
Summary
Brief summary
Inflammatory conditions of the lactating breast (ICLBs), such as engorgement, blocked duct, mastitis and breast abscess, commonly occur in the early postpartum period and all present with local breast inflammatory symptoms (e.g. breast pain, hardness/tightness, redness) and, often, systemic flu-like symptoms (e.g. fever, aches, chills, lethargy). These conditions are often debilitating for new mothers, having significant impact on their physical and emotional health and functioning, and are a commonly cited reason for premature stopping of breastfeeding. Therapeutic ultrasound (TUS) is the most common treatment used by Australian physiotherapists for women with ICLBs, however very few studies have looked at the effects of TUS on ICLBs. Additionally, physiotherapists across Australia currently use significantly different TUS settings for ICLB treatment. Physiotherapists from New South Wales and Victoria use high intensity TUS settings (to produce a heating effect), physiotherapists from Western Australia use low intensity TUS settings (a non-heating treatment) and some physiotherapists do not use TUS due to lack of evidence. Thus, the purpose of this study is to compare the use of these different TUS settings to treat ICLBs. We hypothesise that high intensity and low intensity TUS settings are more effective than no intensity TUS for reducing the severity of local inflammatory breast symptoms and systemic symptoms in women with ICLBs.
Query!
Trial website
Query!
Trial related presentations / publications
Query!
Public notes
Query!
Contacts
Principal investigator
Name
104570
0
Mrs Emma Heron
Query!
Address
104570
0
Curtin University, Kent Street, Bentley, WA 6102
Query!
Country
104570
0
Australia
Query!
Phone
104570
0
+61 3 9481 6312
Query!
Fax
104570
0
+61 3 9489 1273
Query!
Email
104570
0
[email protected]
Query!
Contact person for public queries
Name
104571
0
Leanda McKenna
Query!
Address
104571
0
Curtin University, Kent Street, Bentley, WA 6102
Query!
Country
104571
0
Australia
Query!
Phone
104571
0
+61 8 9266 3660
Query!
Fax
104571
0
+61 8 9266 0000
Query!
Email
104571
0
[email protected]
Query!
Contact person for scientific queries
Name
104572
0
Leanda McKenna
Query!
Address
104572
0
Curtin University, Kent Street, Bentley, WA 6102
Query!
Country
104572
0
Australia
Query!
Phone
104572
0
+61 8 9266 3660
Query!
Fax
104572
0
+61 8 9266 0000
Query!
Email
104572
0
[email protected]
Query!
Data sharing statement
Will individual participant data (IPD) for this trial be available (including data dictionaries)?
No
Query!
No/undecided IPD sharing reason/comment
Query!
What supporting documents are/will be available?
No Supporting Document Provided
Doc. No.
Type
Citation
Link
Email
Other Details
Attachment
9815
Study protocol
380378-(Uploaded-05-12-2022-12-27-52)-Study-related document.docx
9816
Statistical analysis plan
380378-(Uploaded-05-12-2022-12-35-23)-Study-related document.docx
9817
Informed consent form
380378-(Uploaded-14-10-2021-15-20-56)-Study-related document.docx
9819
Other
Participant information statement
380378-(Uploaded-05-12-2022-12-38-27)-Study-related document.docx
Results publications and other study-related documents
Documents added manually
No documents have been uploaded by study researchers.
Documents added automatically
No additional documents have been identified.
Download to PDF