Please note that the copy function is not enabled for this field.
If you wish to
modify
existing outcomes, please copy and paste the current outcome text into the Update field.
LOGIN
CREATE ACCOUNT
LOGIN
CREATE ACCOUNT
MY TRIALS
REGISTER TRIAL
FAQs
HINTS AND TIPS
DEFINITIONS
Trial Review
The ANZCTR website will be unavailable from 1pm until 3pm (AEDT) on Wednesday the 30th of October for website maintenance. Please be sure to log out of the system in order to avoid any loss of data.
The safety and scientific validity of this study is the responsibility of the study sponsor and investigators. Listing a study does not mean it has been endorsed by the ANZCTR. Before participating in a study, talk to your health care provider and refer to this
information for consumers
Download to PDF
Trial registered on ANZCTR
Registration number
ACTRN12620001169932
Ethics application status
Approved
Date submitted
10/09/2020
Date registered
6/11/2020
Date last updated
6/11/2020
Date data sharing statement initially provided
6/11/2020
Type of registration
Prospectively registered
Titles & IDs
Public title
Team Approach to Polypharmacy Evaluation and Reduction
for General Practice patients: the Australian TAPER (AusTAPER) study
Query!
Scientific title
Team Approach to Polypharmacy Evaluation and Reduction
for General Practice patients: the Australian TAPER (AusTAPER) study
Query!
Secondary ID [1]
302250
0
Nil known
Query!
Universal Trial Number (UTN)
Query!
Trial acronym
AusTAPER General
Query!
Linked study record
Query!
Health condition
Health condition(s) or problem(s) studied:
Polypharmacy
318972
0
Query!
Condition category
Condition code
Public Health
316943
316943
0
0
Query!
Health service research
Query!
Intervention/exposure
Study type
Interventional
Query!
Description of intervention(s) / exposure
Participants in the intervention group will receive the The Team Approach to Polypharmacy Evaluation and Reduction (TAPER) intervention.
TAPER is a structured pathway for a comprehensive medication review by the pharmacist and general practitioners (GPs) with input from the patient aimed at reducing medication burden. The ‘Team’ in this intervention model refers to the patient, pharmacist and GP. The focus is on maintaining essential drugs while supporting potential reduction in medicines that are: (i) having an adverse effect, (ii) risk outweighs benefit, (iii) medications that are no longer of benefit or reasons for talking them are unclear and (iv) potential medication benefit that is no longer aligned with goals of patient.
TAPER uses a web-based application (available at https://meds.tapermd.org) to facilitate the decision making process. TaperMD performs a ‘machine screen’ comprising a drug-drug interaction checker and listing of potentially inappropriate medicines. TaperMD also provides links to existing evidence-based tools providing Numbers Needed to Treat/Harm, decision aids for deprescribing and where available, and tapering guidelines.
The key steps for TAPER are:
1. Study pharmacist consultation:
The participant will be engaged in a medication-focused interview with a study pharmacist.
Information will be collected about medications taken, dosages, indications for medications and other mediation-related information if available, any perceived or known medicine problems or side effects, prioritised functional and symptom goals for medical treatment, and overall preferences for care. This data will be entered directly into TaperMD. Through application of automated filters within the TaperMD program, a list potentially inappropriate medications, medication interactions and warnings will be identified and flag medications which are candidates for discontinuation or dose reduction.
The study pharmacist will then carry out a comprehensive medication review and engage the participant in a discussion about medications suitable for discontinuation or dose reduction informed by this list, reported medication-related adverse effects and the participant’s goals for treatment. The study pharmacist will then make recommendations (referred to as the preliminary plan) based on the discussion and comprehensive medication review, and add these to the TAPER clinical pathway. This preliminary plan, all supporting information and the machine screen dashboard data will be available to the participant's GP for review. The study pharmacist will make an appointment with the GP to discuss the recommended TAPER plan prior to the GP meeting with the patient/participant, if the GP is available/wishes to do so.
2. GP consultation:
Approximately one week (and less than 2 weeks) after the study pharmacist/participant meeting, the participant will have an appointment with their GP to discuss medications that may be suitable for a ‘pause and monitor’ trial of discontinuation or dose reduction as described in the preliminary plan. The GP will have available the pharmacist generated accurate medicine list with flagged recommendations and evidence and tools to support deprescribing linked to the TaperMD program. The GP may modify or add information to the TAPER plan if necessary. S/he will discuss the participant’s priorities and preferences for care, and these will inform a prioritised medication plan for appropriate discontinuations and a template for monitoring frequency, duration and criteria for medicine recommencement. If medications have been prescribed by a specialist, the GP/study pharmacist will follow their usual clinical process for seeking specialist advice if appropriate. If the participant wishes to have a support person present, a relative or carer can be present at this interview.
The prioritised medication plan will be cut and pasted into participant’s record in the GP’s eMR using the TAPER Snapshot function. The TaperMD software can then be used to record the planned monitoring parameters and track progress of the TAPER medication withdrawal plan during subsequent follow-up consultations, as a seamless clinical and decision support pathway.
3. Review and then ‘pause and monitor’ discontinuation:
Follow-up appointments will be made as clinically indicated by monitoring and follow-up needs of individual participants. It is anticipated these will occur 2 weeks after any new medication changes but will be ultimately be at the GP’s discretion. If there are no changes being made to a person's medications, then the timing of monitoring visits will be determined by the GP and participant. At each monitoring visit, participants will have a brief GP consultation to review progress with the TAPER plan, and address any concerns as clinically appropriate.
Query!
Intervention code [1]
318539
0
Treatment: Other
Query!
Comparator / control treatment
Participants in the control group will receive usual standard of care provided by their general practitioners. Standard care refers to GP assessment and healthcare services that are usually provided to patients (outside of the clinical trial context)..
Query!
Control group
Active
Query!
Outcomes
Primary outcome [1]
325042
0
Change in the mean number of medications [medication reconciliation using the following sources - participant-reported, community pharmacy dispensing records and audit of GP electronic medical record]
Query!
Assessment method [1]
325042
0
Query!
Timepoint [1]
325042
0
Baseline, 6 months and 12 months (primary timepoint)
Query!
Secondary outcome [1]
386652
0
The mean number of medication discontinuations [medication reconciliation using the following sources - participant-reported, community pharmacy dispensing records and audit of GP electronic medical record]
Query!
Assessment method [1]
386652
0
Query!
Timepoint [1]
386652
0
Baseline, 6 months and 12 months
Query!
Secondary outcome [2]
386653
0
The mean number of dose reductions [medication reconciliation using the following sources - participant-reported, community pharmacy dispensing records and audit of GP electronic medical record]
Query!
Assessment method [2]
386653
0
Query!
Timepoint [2]
386653
0
Baseline, 6 months and 12 months
Query!
Secondary outcome [3]
386654
0
Composite outcome of the mean number of medication discontinuations and dose reductions [medication reconciliation using the following sources - participant-reported, community pharmacy dispensing records and audit of GP electronic medical record]
Query!
Assessment method [3]
386654
0
Query!
Timepoint [3]
386654
0
Baseline, 6 months and 12 months
Query!
Secondary outcome [4]
386655
0
Potentially inappropriate medications assessed using the AGS 2019 Beers Criteria
Query!
Assessment method [4]
386655
0
Query!
Timepoint [4]
386655
0
Baseline, 6 months and 12 months
Query!
Secondary outcome [5]
386656
0
Medication Regimen Complexity Index
Query!
Assessment method [5]
386656
0
Query!
Timepoint [5]
386656
0
Baseline, 6 months and 12 months
Query!
Secondary outcome [6]
386657
0
Drug Burden Index
Query!
Assessment method [6]
386657
0
Query!
Timepoint [6]
386657
0
Baseline, 6 months and 12 months
Query!
Secondary outcome [7]
386658
0
Falls [participant-reported and audit of GP electronic medical record]
Query!
Assessment method [7]
386658
0
Query!
Timepoint [7]
386658
0
1 week, 3 months, 6 months and 12 months
Query!
Secondary outcome [8]
386659
0
Serious adverse drug withdrawal events [participant-reported and audit of GP electronic medical record]
Query!
Assessment method [8]
386659
0
Query!
Timepoint [8]
386659
0
1 week, 3 months, 6 months and 12 months
Query!
Secondary outcome [9]
386660
0
Hospitalisations [participant-reported and audit of GP electronic medical record]
Query!
Assessment method [9]
386660
0
Query!
Timepoint [9]
386660
0
1 week, 3 months, 6 months and 12 months
Query!
Secondary outcome [10]
387663
0
Quality of life assessed using EQ-5D-5L and Short Form 12
Query!
Assessment method [10]
387663
0
Query!
Timepoint [10]
387663
0
Baseline, 6 months and 12 months
Query!
Secondary outcome [11]
387664
0
Cognition assessed using Modified Telephone Interview for Cognitive Status
Query!
Assessment method [11]
387664
0
Query!
Timepoint [11]
387664
0
Baseline, 6 months and 12 months
Query!
Secondary outcome [12]
387665
0
Adverse events [participant-reported and audit of GP electronic medical record]
Query!
Assessment method [12]
387665
0
Query!
Timepoint [12]
387665
0
1 week, 3 months, 6 months and 12 months
Query!
Secondary outcome [13]
387666
0
Emergency Department attendances (p[anned) [participant-reported and audit of GP electronic medical record]
Query!
Assessment method [13]
387666
0
Query!
Timepoint [13]
387666
0
1 week, 3 months, 6 months and 12 months
Query!
Secondary outcome [14]
387667
0
Emergency Department attendances (unplanned) [participant-reported and audit of GP electronic medical record]
Query!
Assessment method [14]
387667
0
Query!
Timepoint [14]
387667
0
1 week, 3 months, 6 months and 12 months
Query!
Secondary outcome [15]
387668
0
Care level transitions [participant-reported and audit of GP electronic medical record]
Query!
Assessment method [15]
387668
0
Query!
Timepoint [15]
387668
0
1 week, 3 months, 6 months and 12 months
Query!
Secondary outcome [16]
387669
0
Primary care consultation [participant-reported and audit of the GP electronic medical record]
Query!
Assessment method [16]
387669
0
Query!
Timepoint [16]
387669
0
1 week, 3 months, 6 months and 12 months
Query!
Secondary outcome [17]
387670
0
Composite outcome of healthcare resource utilisation comprising hospitalisations and emergency department attendances (planned and unplanned), care level transitions and primary care consultation [participant-reported and audit of the GP electronic medical record]
Query!
Assessment method [17]
387670
0
Query!
Timepoint [17]
387670
0
1 week, 3 months, 6 months and 12 months
Query!
Eligibility
Key inclusion criteria
1. Person aged 70 years or older
2. Taking 5 or more medicines
3. Regular patient at the participating GP practice
4. Living in community
5. Patient willing to consider discontinuation of some medications
Query!
Minimum age
70
Years
Query!
Query!
Maximum age
No limit
Query!
Query!
Sex
Both males and females
Query!
Can healthy volunteers participate?
No
Query!
Key exclusion criteria
1. Diagnosis of dementia (as recorded by the GP)
2. Inadequate language skills to participate
3. Place of residence is a Residential Aged Care Facility (RACF)
4. Are in terminal phase of life
5. Had a home medicines review by an accredited pharmacist (within the last 12 months)
Query!
Study design
Purpose of the study
Treatment
Query!
Allocation to intervention
Randomised controlled trial
Query!
Procedure for enrolling a subject and allocating the treatment (allocation concealment procedures)
Participants will be randomly allocated 1:1 to intervention or control group using an internet accessible computerised system.
Query!
Methods used to generate the sequence in which subjects will be randomised (sequence generation)
The randomisation sequence will be generated centrally using a computerised system by our collaborator's biostatistician and will be maintained outside the research team.
Query!
Masking / blinding
Open (masking not used)
Query!
Who is / are masked / blinded?
Query!
Query!
Query!
Query!
Intervention assignment
Parallel
Query!
Other design features
Query!
Phase
Not Applicable
Query!
Type of endpoint/s
Safety/efficacy
Query!
Statistical methods / analysis
A sample size of 160 per group is sufficient to detect a difference in mean number of medications of 2, assuming a starting mean of 7 (+3) and a static control group (power set at 80%, significance level 5%). Allowance has been made for 10% attrition, therefore the final sample size target is 180 per group (total N=360)
Data will primarily be analysed on an intention-to-treat basis. Significance will be set at alpha=0.05 for all analyses. Descriptive statistics will be used to analyse the baseline characteristics reported by group as count (%) for categorical variables and mean (SD) or median (interquartile range) for continuous variables. Contingency tables will be analysed by chi-square tests plus confidence limits for proportions. Means will be compared by t-tests for independent groups. Pre-specified subgroup analyses for gender, age and level of frailty and test interactions will be performed. Trial analysis and reporting will follow the CONSORT guideline.
Query!
Recruitment
Recruitment status
Not yet recruiting
Query!
Date of first participant enrolment
Anticipated
16/11/2020
Query!
Actual
Query!
Date of last participant enrolment
Anticipated
31/08/2022
Query!
Actual
Query!
Date of last data collection
Anticipated
30/06/2023
Query!
Actual
Query!
Sample size
Target
360
Query!
Accrual to date
Query!
Final
Query!
Recruitment in Australia
Recruitment state(s)
NSW
Query!
Funding & Sponsors
Funding source category [1]
306671
0
Charities/Societies/Foundations
Query!
Name [1]
306671
0
Ageing and Alzheimers Institute
Query!
Address [1]
306671
0
Concord Repatriation General Hospital
Hospital Road,
Concord NSW 2139
Query!
Country [1]
306671
0
Australia
Query!
Funding source category [2]
306702
0
Charities/Societies/Foundations
Query!
Name [2]
306702
0
McKnight Charitable Trust
Query!
Address [2]
306702
0
GPO Box 4172
Sydney NSW 2001
Australia
Query!
Country [2]
306702
0
Australia
Query!
Primary sponsor type
University
Query!
Name
University Of Sydney
Query!
Address
Camperdown NSW 2006
Query!
Country
Australia
Query!
Secondary sponsor category [1]
307243
0
None
Query!
Name [1]
307243
0
Query!
Address [1]
307243
0
Query!
Country [1]
307243
0
Query!
Other collaborator category [1]
281470
0
Individual
Query!
Name [1]
281470
0
A/Prof Christopher Etherton-Beer
Query!
Address [1]
281470
0
School of Allied Health
University of Western Australia (M364)
35 Stirling Highway,
Crawley WA 6009
Query!
Country [1]
281470
0
Australia
Query!
Other collaborator category [2]
281471
0
Individual
Query!
Name [2]
281471
0
Prof Rhonda Clifford
Query!
Address [2]
281471
0
School of Allied Health
University of Western Australia (M364)
35 Stirling Highway,
Crawley WA 6009
Query!
Country [2]
281471
0
Australia
Query!
Other collaborator category [3]
281472
0
Individual
Query!
Name [3]
281472
0
Prof Derelie Managin
Query!
Address [3]
281472
0
Department of Family Medicine, McMaster University
1280 Main Street West,
Hamilton, Ontarino, L8S 4L8
Query!
Country [3]
281472
0
Canada
Query!
Other collaborator category [4]
281473
0
Individual
Query!
Name [4]
281473
0
A/Prof Gillian Caughey
Query!
Address [4]
281473
0
University of South Australia
101 Currie Street,
Adelaide SA 5001
Query!
Country [4]
281473
0
Australia
Query!
Other collaborator category [5]
281474
0
Individual
Query!
Name [5]
281474
0
Prof Sarah Hilmer
Query!
Address [5]
281474
0
Laboratory of Ageing and Pharmacology, Kolling Institute
10 Westbourne Street,
St Leonards NSW 2064
Query!
Country [5]
281474
0
Australia
Query!
Other collaborator category [6]
281475
0
Individual
Query!
Name [6]
281475
0
Prof Andrew McLachlan
Query!
Address [6]
281475
0
Sydney School of Pharmacy, The University of Sydney
Camperdown NSW 2006
Query!
Country [6]
281475
0
Australia
Query!
Other collaborator category [7]
281476
0
Individual
Query!
Name [7]
281476
0
Dr Amy Page
Query!
Address [7]
281476
0
Centre for Medicine Use and Safety, Monash University
Wellington Road,
Clayton VIC 3800
Query!
Country [7]
281476
0
Australia
Query!
Other collaborator category [8]
281477
0
Individual
Query!
Name [8]
281477
0
Prof Lynne Parkinson
Query!
Address [8]
281477
0
Central Queensland University
Bruce Highway,
Norman Gardens QLD 4702
Query!
Country [8]
281477
0
Australia
Query!
Other collaborator category [9]
281478
0
Individual
Query!
Name [9]
281478
0
Prof Julie Redfern
Query!
Address [9]
281478
0
Faculty of Medicine and Research, University of Sydney
Camperdown NSW 2006
Query!
Country [9]
281478
0
Australia
Query!
Other collaborator category [10]
281479
0
Individual
Query!
Name [10]
281479
0
Ms Sarita Lo
Query!
Address [10]
281479
0
Centre for Education and Research on Ageing, Concord Repatriation General Hospital
Hospital Road,
Concord NSW 2139
Query!
Country [10]
281479
0
Australia
Query!
Ethics approval
Ethics application status
Approved
Query!
Ethics committee name [1]
306851
0
University of Sydney Human Research Ethics Committee
Query!
Ethics committee address [1]
306851
0
Research Integrity & Ethics Administration Research Portfolio Level 3, F23 Administration Building The University of Sydney NSW 2006 Australia
Query!
Ethics committee country [1]
306851
0
Australia
Query!
Date submitted for ethics approval [1]
306851
0
Query!
Approval date [1]
306851
0
01/09/2020
Query!
Ethics approval number [1]
306851
0
Query!
Summary
Brief summary
The use of multiple medicines (polypharmacy) is associated with poor clinical outcomes. It has been reported that more than a third (36.1%) of older Australians (aged 70 years or older) living in the community were affected by polypharmacy. There has been a move towards deprescribing (the process of withdrawing an inappropriate medication that is supervised by a health care professional with the goal of managing polypharmacy and improving outcomes). However, there are many barriers to deprescribing from the perspectives of both the patients and prescribers. The Team Approach to Polypharmacy Evaluation and Reduction (TAPER) medication review process has been developed to directly address these barriers. The focus is on maintaining essential drugs while supporting reduction in medicines with known associations with adverse effects, some of which could lead to emergency presentations and/or unplanned admissions to hospital, and those in which risks outweighs benefits. Participants attend sequential linked consultations with a pharmacist and their GP to collaboratively stop/reduce potentially inappropriate medications (in the context of their personal preferences and goals of care), using a structured ‘pause and monitor’ period. This randomised control trial will compare the TAPER intervention to usual care in older adults living in the community to determine the effect of TAPER in participants taking 5 or more medicines on the participants' medication use, wellbeing and health system utilisation including emergency presentations and/or unplanned admission to hospital. Addressing polypharmacy in older people may reduce adverse events and save money. There is evidence to suggest that there will be cost benefits by both reduced medicines costs, and reduced adverse events leading to reduced health service utilisation.
Query!
Trial website
Query!
Trial related presentations / publications
Query!
Public notes
Query!
Contacts
Principal investigator
Name
105230
0
Prof Vasi Naganathan
Query!
Address
105230
0
Centre for Education and Research on Ageing,
Concord Repatriation General Hospital
Hospital Road
Concord NSW 2139
Query!
Country
105230
0
Australia
Query!
Phone
105230
0
+61 2 9767 7212
Query!
Fax
105230
0
+61 2 9767 5419
Query!
Email
105230
0
[email protected]
Query!
Contact person for public queries
Name
105231
0
Vasi Naganathan
Query!
Address
105231
0
Centre for Education and Research on Ageing,
Concord Repatriation General Hospital
Hospital Road
Concord NSW 2139
Query!
Country
105231
0
Australia
Query!
Phone
105231
0
+61 2 9767 7212
Query!
Fax
105231
0
+61 2 9767 5419
Query!
Email
105231
0
[email protected]
Query!
Contact person for scientific queries
Name
105232
0
Vasi Naganathan
Query!
Address
105232
0
Centre for Education and Research on Ageing,
Concord Repatriation General Hospital
Hospital Road
Concord NSW 2139
Query!
Country
105232
0
Australia
Query!
Phone
105232
0
+61 2 9767 7212
Query!
Fax
105232
0
+61 2 9767 5419
Query!
Email
105232
0
[email protected]
Query!
Data sharing statement
Will individual participant data (IPD) for this trial be available (including data dictionaries)?
No
Query!
No/undecided IPD sharing reason/comment
Only the aggregated results will be published
Query!
What supporting documents are/will be available?
No Supporting Document Provided
Results publications and other study-related documents
Documents added manually
No documents have been uploaded by study researchers.
Documents added automatically
No additional documents have been identified.
Download to PDF