Please note that the copy function is not enabled for this field.
If you wish to
modify
existing outcomes, please copy and paste the current outcome text into the Update field.
LOGIN
CREATE ACCOUNT
LOGIN
CREATE ACCOUNT
MY TRIALS
REGISTER TRIAL
FAQs
HINTS AND TIPS
DEFINITIONS
Trial Review
The ANZCTR website will be unavailable from 1pm until 3pm (AEDT) on Wednesday the 30th of October for website maintenance. Please be sure to log out of the system in order to avoid any loss of data.
The safety and scientific validity of this study is the responsibility of the study sponsor and investigators. Listing a study does not mean it has been endorsed by the ANZCTR. Before participating in a study, talk to your health care provider and refer to this
information for consumers
Download to PDF
Trial details imported from ClinicalTrials.gov
For full trial details, please see the original record at
https://clinicaltrials.gov/study/NCT00877006
Registration number
NCT00877006
Ethics application status
Date submitted
3/04/2009
Date registered
7/04/2009
Date last updated
5/02/2018
Titles & IDs
Public title
Study of Bendamustine Hydrochloride and Rituximab (BR) Compared With R-CVP or R-CHOP in the First-Line Treatment of Patients With Advanced Indolent Non-Hodgkin's Lymphoma (NHL) or Mantle Cell Lymphoma (MCL) - Referred to as the BRIGHT Study
Query!
Scientific title
An Open-Label, Randomized, Parallel-Group Study of Bendamustine Hydrochloride and Rituximab (BR) Compared With Rituximab, Cyclophosphamide, Vincristine, and Prednisone (R-CVP) or Rituximab, Cyclophosphamide, Doxorubicin, Vincristine, and Prednisone (R-CHOP) in the First-Line Treatment of Patients With Advanced Indolent Non-Hodgkin's Lymphoma (NHL) or Mantle Cell Lymphoma (MCL)
Query!
Secondary ID [1]
0
0
C18083/3064/NL/MN
Query!
Universal Trial Number (UTN)
Query!
Trial acronym
Query!
Linked study record
Query!
Health condition
Health condition(s) or problem(s) studied:
Non-Hodgkin's Lymphoma
0
0
Query!
Mantle Cell Lymphoma
0
0
Query!
Condition category
Condition code
Cancer
0
0
0
0
Query!
Lymphoma (non Hodgkin's lymphoma) - High grade lymphoma
Query!
Cancer
0
0
0
0
Query!
Lymphoma (non Hodgkin's lymphoma) - Low grade lymphoma
Query!
Intervention/exposure
Study type
Interventional
Query!
Description of intervention(s) / exposure
Experimental: Bendamustine and Rituximab (BR) - Participants received the investigational bendamustine and rituximab regimen for 6 to 8 28-day cycles: bendamustine 90 mg/m\^2 intravenous (IV) on Days 1 and 2; rituximab 375 mg/m\^2 IV on Day 1
Active comparator: R-CHOP/R-CVP - Participants received the standard regimen (R-CHOP or R-CVP) for 6 to 8 21-days cycles.
R-CHOP: rituximab 375 mg/m\^2 IV on Day 1; vincristine 1.4 mg/m\^2 (up to 2 mg/m\^2 maximum dose) IV on Day 1; doxorubicin 50 mg/m\^2 IV Day 1; cyclophosphamide 750 mg/m\^2 IV Day 1; prednisone 100 mg oral on Days 1 to 5
R-CVP: rituximab 375 mg/m\^2 IV on Day 1; cyclophosphamide 750 mg/m\^2 IV on Day 1 or cyclophosphamide 1000 mg/m\^2 IV on Day 1; vincristine 1.4 mg/m\^2 (up to 2 mg/m\^2 maximum dose) IV on Day 1; prednisone 100 mg oral on Days 1 to 5
Query!
Comparator / control treatment
Query!
Control group
Query!
Outcomes
Primary outcome [1]
0
0
Percentage of Participants With Complete Response (CR) at End of Treatment Period
Query!
Assessment method [1]
0
0
CR=complete disappearance of all detectable clinical evidence of disease and disease-related symptoms, if present pretherapy; protocol-specified positron emission tomography (PET) scan assessment criteria; (if the spleen and/or liver were enlarged on the basis of physical examination and/or anatomic imaging before treatment) the liver and/or spleen were considered normal size on physical examination and by anatomic imaging after therapy, with disappearance of all nodules related to lymphoma; (if the bone marrow was involved by lymphoma before treatment) the infiltrate must have cleared on subsequent bone marrow biopsies.
Query!
Timepoint [1]
0
0
6 to 8 21 or 28-day cycles (18-32 weeks)
Query!
Secondary outcome [1]
0
0
Percentage of Participants With Overall Response at End of Treatment Period
Query!
Assessment method [1]
0
0
Overall Response=participants with Complete Remission (CR) + those with Partial Remission (PR). CR=see Outcome Measure 1 for details. PR= at least a 50% decrease in the sum of the product of the greatest diameters (SPD) of up to 6 of the largest dominant nodes/masses; at least a 50% decrease in the SPD of hepatic and splenic nodules in their greatest transverse diameter; no increase in the size of the liver, spleen, and other nodes; no measurable disease in organs other than the liver or spleen; no new sites of disease; protocol-specified PET scan and bone marrow criteria.
Query!
Timepoint [1]
0
0
6 to 8 21 or 28-day cycles (18-32 weeks)
Query!
Secondary outcome [2]
0
0
Number of Participants With Adverse Events (AEs), Serious Adverse Events (SAEs), Deaths and Discontinuations Due to AEs at End of Treatment Period
Query!
Assessment method [2]
0
0
AE=any untoward medical occurrence that develops or worsens in severity after dispensation of the study drug and does not necessarily have a causal relationship to the study drug. An AE can, therefore, be any unfavorable and unintended physical sign, symptom, or laboratory parameter that develops or worsens in severity during the course of the study, or significant worsening of the disease under study (or any concurrent disease), whether or not considered related to the study drug. AEs were graded as 1 (mild), 2 (moderate), 3 (severe), 4 (life-threatening), 5 (death). SAE=an adverse event occurring at any dose that results in: death, a life-threatening adverse event, inpatient hospitalization or prolongation of existing hospitalization, a persistent or significant disability/incapacity (a substantial disruption of one's ability to conduct normal life functions), a congenital anomaly/birth defect, or other important medical event.
Query!
Timepoint [2]
0
0
32 weeks
Query!
Secondary outcome [3]
0
0
Worst Overall Common Terminology Criteria for Adverse Events (CTCAE) Grades for Serum Chemistry Laboratory Test Results
Query!
Assessment method [3]
0
0
Clinical laboratory data were graded according to National Cancer Institute's (NCI) CTCAE version 3, and graded as 1 (mild), 2 (moderate), 3 (severe), 4 (life-threatening), 5 (death). The table presents the worst CTCAE grades for serum chemistry test results experienced by participants overall (i.e., the worst post-baseline grade value for each participant and laboratory test across all cycles).
Query!
Timepoint [3]
0
0
32 weeks (conducted at screening, Day 1 of each cycle, and end-of-treatment visit)
Query!
Secondary outcome [4]
0
0
Worst Overall CTCAE Grade for Hematology Laboratory Test Results
Query!
Assessment method [4]
0
0
Hematology test data were graded according to National Cancer Institute's (NCI) CTCAE version 3, and graded as 1 (mild), 2 (moderate), 3 (severe), 4 (life-threatening), 5 (death). The table presents the worst CTCAE grades for hematology test results experienced by participants overall (i.e., the worst post-baseline grade value for each participant and hematology test across all cycles).
Query!
Timepoint [4]
0
0
32 weeks (conducted at screening, Day 1 of each cycle, weekly during treatment, and at the end-of-treatment visit)
Query!
Secondary outcome [5]
0
0
Clinically Significant Abnormal Vital Signs
Query!
Assessment method [5]
0
0
Query!
Timepoint [5]
0
0
32 weeks (conducted at screening, Day 1 of each cycle, and end-of-treatment visit)
Query!
Secondary outcome [6]
0
0
Potentially Clinically Significant Abnormal Weight
Query!
Assessment method [6]
0
0
Participants were weighed at Baseline and at Endpoint (Week 32); those participants with an increase or decrease of \>=10% were considered potentially clinically significant.
Query!
Timepoint [6]
0
0
Baseline, Week 32
Query!
Secondary outcome [7]
0
0
Eastern Cooperative Oncology Group (ECOG) Performance Status at the End of Treatment Period
Query!
Assessment method [7]
0
0
Participants' ECOG Performance Status was evaluated at the end of treatment as improved, stayed the same, or worsened from baseline (see Baseline Characteristics for ECOG Performance Status).
Query!
Timepoint [7]
0
0
Week 32
Query!
Secondary outcome [8]
0
0
Therapeutic Classification of Prior Medications
Query!
Assessment method [8]
0
0
Query!
Timepoint [8]
0
0
prior to start of treatment
Query!
Secondary outcome [9]
0
0
Therapeutic Classification of Concomitant Medications
Query!
Assessment method [9]
0
0
Query!
Timepoint [9]
0
0
32 weeks
Query!
Secondary outcome [10]
0
0
Change From Baseline to End of Treatment in the Global Health Status Score of the European Organization for Research and Treatment of Cancer (EORTC) 30-item Core Quality of Life Questionnaire (QLQ-C30)
Query!
Assessment method [10]
0
0
EORTC QLQ-C30 is a 30-item questionnaire to assess the overall quality of life in cancer patients. EORTC QLQ-C30 includes functional scales (physical, role, cognitive, emotional, and social), global health status, symptom scales (fatigue, pain, nausea/vomiting), and other (dyspnoea, appetite loss, insomnia, constipation/diarrhea, and financial difficulties). This outcome reports the global health status on a scale of 0-100 with a high score for the global health status/QOL represents a high quality of life.
Query!
Timepoint [10]
0
0
Day 1 (prior to treatment), 32 weeks
Query!
Secondary outcome [11]
0
0
Participants With Disease Progression, Relapse or Death At the End of the Treatment Period or the Long-Term Follow-up Period
Query!
Assessment method [11]
0
0
Relapsed disease (after CR) and progressive disease (PD) (after PR or SD):
* Lymph nodes were considered abnormal if the long axis was greater than 1.5 cm. Lymph nodes with a long axis of 1.1 to 1.5 cm were considered abnormal if its short axis was greater than 1.0 cm.
* In patients with no prior history of pulmonary lymphoma, new lung nodules identified by CT require histologic confirmation.
* \>= 50% increase from nadir in sum of the products of the greatest diameters (SPD) of any previously involved nodes, or in a single involved node, or the size of other lesions (eg, splenic or hepatic nodules). To be considered progressive disease, a lymph node with a diameter of the short axis of less than 1.0 cm must have increased by 2: 50% and to a size of 1.5 cm by 1.5 cm, or more than 1.5 cm in the long axis
* other conditions as specified in the protocol
Query!
Timepoint [11]
0
0
Treatment Period: 18-32 weeks Long-Term Follow-up Period: up to 5 years after the Treatment Period
Query!
Secondary outcome [12]
0
0
Kaplan-Meier Estimate for Progression-free Survival (PFS)
Query!
Assessment method [12]
0
0
PFS was defined as the time from randomization to disease progression or relapse, or death from any cause, whichever occurred first.
Query!
Timepoint [12]
0
0
Day 1 up to 5.6 years (Treatment Period + Long-Term Follow-up Period)
Query!
Secondary outcome [13]
0
0
Kaplan-Meier Estimate for Event-free Survival (EFS)
Query!
Assessment method [13]
0
0
EFS was defined as the time from randomization to treatment failure, disease progression or relapse, other malignancies, or death from any cause, whichever occurred first.
Treatment failure was defined as failure to achieve a CR or PR after 6 cycles of treatment. If a patient failed to achieve CR or PR by the time of data analysis or early withdrawal, the treatment failure date was set at 126 days (6 cycles of treatment) after randomization or the new anticancer treatment date, whichever is earlier.
Query!
Timepoint [13]
0
0
Day 1 up to 5.6 years (Treatment Period + Long-Term Follow-up Period)
Query!
Secondary outcome [14]
0
0
Kaplan-Meier Estimate for Duration of Response (DOR)
Query!
Assessment method [14]
0
0
DOR was defined as the time from first response (CR or PR) to disease progression or relapse, or death due to any cause.
Query!
Timepoint [14]
0
0
Day 1 up to 5.6 years (Treatment Period + Long-Term Follow-up Period)
Query!
Secondary outcome [15]
0
0
Overall Survival (OS)
Query!
Assessment method [15]
0
0
OS was defined as the time from randomization to death from any cause.
Query!
Timepoint [15]
0
0
Day 1 up to 5.6 years (Treatment Period + Long-Term Follow-up Period)
Query!
Secondary outcome [16]
0
0
Participants Who Died At the End of the Treatment Period or the Long-Term Follow-up Period
Query!
Assessment method [16]
0
0
Death is due to any cause. Data are broken out by patients who died within 30 days of the last dose of study medications, and those who died greater than 30 days of the last dose of study medications.
Query!
Timepoint [16]
0
0
Treatment Period: 18-32 weeks Long-Term Follow-up Period: up to 5 years after the Treatment Period
Query!
Eligibility
Key inclusion criteria
Key
* Histopathologic confirmation of one of the following cluster of differentiation antigen 20 positive (CD20+) B-cell non-Hodgkin's lymphomas (tissue diagnostic procedures must be performed within 6 months of study entry and with biopsy material available for review):
* follicular lymphoma (NCI CTCAE grade 1 or 2)
* immunoplasmacytoma/immunocytoma (Waldenstrom's macroglobulinemia)
* splenic marginal zone B-cell lymphoma
* extra-nodal marginal zone lymphoma of mucosa-associated lymphoid tumor (MALT) type
* nodal marginal zone B-cell lymphoma
* mantle cell lymphoma
* Meets one of the following need-for-treatment criteria (with the exception of mantle cell lymphoma for which treatment is indicated):
* presence of at least one of the following B-symptoms:
1. fever (>38ºC) of unclear etiology
2. night sweats
3. weight loss of greater than 10% within the prior 6 months
* large tumor mass (bulky disease)
* presence of lymphoma-related complications, including narrowing of ureters or bile ducts, tumor-related compression of a vital organ, lymphoma-induced pain, cytopenias related to lymphoma/leukemia, splenomegaly, pleural effusions, or ascites
* hyperviscosity syndrome due to monoclonal gammopathy
* CD20+ B cells in lymph node biopsy or other lymphoma pathology specimen.
* No prior treatment (patients on "watch and wait" may enter the study if a recent biopsy [obtained within the last 6 months] is available)
* Adequate hematologic function (unless abnormalities related to lymphoma infiltration of the bone marrow or hypersplenism due to lymphoma) as follows:
* hemoglobin of >= 10.0 g/dL
* absolute neutrophil count (ANC) >=1.5*10^9/L
* platelet count >=100*10^9/L
* Bidimensionally measurable disease (field not previously radiated)
* Able to provide written informed consent
* Eastern Cooperative Oncology Group (ECOG) Performance Status <=2
* Estimated life expectancy >=6 months
* Serum creatinine of <=2.0 mg/dL or creatinine clearance >=50 mL/min
* Alanine aminotransferase (ALT) and aspartate transaminase (AST) =2.5*upper limit of normal (ULN), and alkaline phosphatase and total bilirubin within normal limits
* Left ventricular ejection fraction (LVEF) >= 50% by multiple gated acquisition scan (MUGA) or cardiac echocardiogram (ECHO), prior for any patient to be treated with R-CHOP
* A medically accepted method of contraception to be used by women of childbearing potential (not surgically sterile or at least 12 months naturally postmenopausal)
* Men capable of producing offspring and not surgically sterile must practice abstinence or use a barrier method of birth control.
Key
Query!
Minimum age
18
Years
Query!
Query!
Maximum age
No limit
Query!
Query!
Sex
Both males and females
Query!
Can healthy volunteers participate?
No
Query!
Key exclusion criteria
* Chronic lymphocytic leukemia, small lymphocytic lymphoma (SLL), or grade 3 follicular lymphoma
* Transformed disease (bone marrow blasts are permitted; however, transformed disease indicating leukemic involvement is not permitted)
* Central nervous system (CNS) lymphomatous involvement or leptomeningeal lymphoma
* Prior radiation for NHL, except for a single course of locally delimited radiation therapy with a radiation field not exceeding 2 adjacent lymph node regions
* Active malignancy, other than NHL, within the past 3 years except for localized prostate cancer treated with hormone therapy, cervical carcinoma in situ, breast cancer in situ, or non-melanoma skin cancer following definitive treatment
* New York Heart Association (NYHA) Class III or IV heart failure, arrhythmias or unstable angina, electrocardiograph (ECG) evidence of active ischemia or active conduction system abnormalities, or myocardial infarction within the last 6 months (prior to study entry, ECG abnormalities at screening must be documented by the investigator as not medically relevant)
* Known human immunodeficiency virus (HIV) positivity
* Active hepatitis B or hepatitis C infection (hepatitis B surface antigen testing required)
* Women who are pregnant or lactating
* Corticosteroids for treatment of lymphoma within 28 days of study entry Chronically administered low-dose corticosteroids (e.g., prednisone =20 mg/day) for indications other than lymphoma or lymphoma-related complications are permitted
* Any serious uncontrolled, medical or psychological disorder that would impair the ability of the patient to receive therapy
* Any condition which places the patient at unacceptable risk or confounds the ability of the investigators to interpret study data
* Any other investigational agent within 28 days of study entry
* Known hypersensitivity to bendamustine, mannitol, or other study-related drugs
* Ann Arbor stage I disease.
Query!
Study design
Purpose of the study
Treatment
Query!
Allocation to intervention
Randomised controlled trial
Query!
Procedure for enrolling a subject and allocating the treatment (allocation concealment procedures)
Query!
Methods used to generate the sequence in which subjects will be randomised (sequence generation)
Query!
Masking / blinding
Open (masking not used)
Query!
Who is / are masked / blinded?
Query!
Query!
Query!
Query!
Intervention assignment
Parallel
Query!
Other design features
Query!
Phase
Phase 3
Query!
Type of endpoint/s
Query!
Statistical methods / analysis
Query!
Recruitment
Recruitment status
Completed
Query!
Data analysis
Query!
Reason for early stopping/withdrawal
Query!
Other reasons
Query!
Date of first participant enrolment
Anticipated
Query!
Actual
30/04/2009
Query!
Date of last participant enrolment
Anticipated
Query!
Actual
Query!
Date of last data collection
Anticipated
Query!
Actual
31/03/2012
Query!
Sample size
Target
Query!
Accrual to date
Query!
Final
447
Query!
Recruitment in Australia
Recruitment state(s)
WA
Query!
Recruitment hospital [1]
0
0
Teva Investigational Site 315 - Perth
Query!
Recruitment hospital [2]
0
0
Teva Investigational Site 305 - Concord
Query!
Recruitment hospital [3]
0
0
Teva Investigational Site 317 - Douglas
Query!
Recruitment hospital [4]
0
0
Teva Investigational Site 308 - East Melbourne
Query!
Recruitment hospital [5]
0
0
Teva Investigational Site 310 - Fitzroy
Query!
Recruitment hospital [6]
0
0
Teva Investigational Site 311 - Fitzroy
Query!
Recruitment hospital [7]
0
0
Teva Investigational Site 301 - Garran
Query!
Recruitment hospital [8]
0
0
Teva Investigational Site 316 - Geelong
Query!
Recruitment hospital [9]
0
0
Teva Investigational Site 304 - Hobart
Query!
Recruitment hospital [10]
0
0
Teva Investigational Site 312 - Kurralta Park
Query!
Recruitment hospital [11]
0
0
Teva Investigational Site 307 - Melbourne
Query!
Recruitment hospital [12]
0
0
Teva Investigational Site 318 - Parkville
Query!
Recruitment hospital [13]
0
0
Teva Investigational Site 300 - South Brisbane
Query!
Recruitment hospital [14]
0
0
Teva Investigational Site 303 - Westmead
Query!
Recruitment hospital [15]
0
0
Teva Investigational Site 314 - Wodonga
Query!
Recruitment hospital [16]
0
0
Teva Investigational Site 313 - Woodville
Query!
Recruitment hospital [17]
0
0
Teva Investigational Site 309 - Woolloongabba
Query!
Recruitment postcode(s) [1]
0
0
- Perth
Query!
Recruitment postcode(s) [2]
0
0
- Concord
Query!
Recruitment postcode(s) [3]
0
0
- Douglas
Query!
Recruitment postcode(s) [4]
0
0
- East Melbourne
Query!
Recruitment postcode(s) [5]
0
0
- Fitzroy
Query!
Recruitment postcode(s) [6]
0
0
- Garran
Query!
Recruitment postcode(s) [7]
0
0
- Geelong
Query!
Recruitment postcode(s) [8]
0
0
- Hobart
Query!
Recruitment postcode(s) [9]
0
0
- Kurralta Park
Query!
Recruitment postcode(s) [10]
0
0
- Melbourne
Query!
Recruitment postcode(s) [11]
0
0
- Parkville
Query!
Recruitment postcode(s) [12]
0
0
- South Brisbane
Query!
Recruitment postcode(s) [13]
0
0
- Westmead
Query!
Recruitment postcode(s) [14]
0
0
- Wodonga
Query!
Recruitment postcode(s) [15]
0
0
- Woodville
Query!
Recruitment postcode(s) [16]
0
0
- Woolloongabba
Query!
Recruitment outside Australia
Country [1]
0
0
United States of America
Query!
State/province [1]
0
0
Arizona
Query!
Country [2]
0
0
United States of America
Query!
State/province [2]
0
0
Arkansas
Query!
Country [3]
0
0
United States of America
Query!
State/province [3]
0
0
California
Query!
Country [4]
0
0
United States of America
Query!
State/province [4]
0
0
Colorado
Query!
Country [5]
0
0
United States of America
Query!
State/province [5]
0
0
Connecticut
Query!
Country [6]
0
0
United States of America
Query!
State/province [6]
0
0
Florida
Query!
Country [7]
0
0
United States of America
Query!
State/province [7]
0
0
Georgia
Query!
Country [8]
0
0
United States of America
Query!
State/province [8]
0
0
Illinois
Query!
Country [9]
0
0
United States of America
Query!
State/province [9]
0
0
Indiana
Query!
Country [10]
0
0
United States of America
Query!
State/province [10]
0
0
Iowa
Query!
Country [11]
0
0
United States of America
Query!
State/province [11]
0
0
Kansas
Query!
Country [12]
0
0
United States of America
Query!
State/province [12]
0
0
Kentucky
Query!
Country [13]
0
0
United States of America
Query!
State/province [13]
0
0
Louisiana
Query!
Country [14]
0
0
United States of America
Query!
State/province [14]
0
0
Maine
Query!
Country [15]
0
0
United States of America
Query!
State/province [15]
0
0
Massachusetts
Query!
Country [16]
0
0
United States of America
Query!
State/province [16]
0
0
Minnesota
Query!
Country [17]
0
0
United States of America
Query!
State/province [17]
0
0
Missouri
Query!
Country [18]
0
0
United States of America
Query!
State/province [18]
0
0
New Jersey
Query!
Country [19]
0
0
United States of America
Query!
State/province [19]
0
0
New Mexico
Query!
Country [20]
0
0
United States of America
Query!
State/province [20]
0
0
New York
Query!
Country [21]
0
0
United States of America
Query!
State/province [21]
0
0
North Carolina
Query!
Country [22]
0
0
United States of America
Query!
State/province [22]
0
0
North Dakota
Query!
Country [23]
0
0
United States of America
Query!
State/province [23]
0
0
Ohio
Query!
Country [24]
0
0
United States of America
Query!
State/province [24]
0
0
Oregon
Query!
Country [25]
0
0
United States of America
Query!
State/province [25]
0
0
Pennsylvania
Query!
Country [26]
0
0
United States of America
Query!
State/province [26]
0
0
South Carolina
Query!
Country [27]
0
0
United States of America
Query!
State/province [27]
0
0
Tennessee
Query!
Country [28]
0
0
United States of America
Query!
State/province [28]
0
0
Texas
Query!
Country [29]
0
0
United States of America
Query!
State/province [29]
0
0
Utah
Query!
Country [30]
0
0
United States of America
Query!
State/province [30]
0
0
Virginia
Query!
Country [31]
0
0
United States of America
Query!
State/province [31]
0
0
Washington
Query!
Country [32]
0
0
United States of America
Query!
State/province [32]
0
0
West Virginia
Query!
Country [33]
0
0
United States of America
Query!
State/province [33]
0
0
Wisconsin
Query!
Country [34]
0
0
Brazil
Query!
State/province [34]
0
0
Barretos
Query!
Country [35]
0
0
Brazil
Query!
State/province [35]
0
0
Brasilia
Query!
Country [36]
0
0
Brazil
Query!
State/province [36]
0
0
Curitiba
Query!
Country [37]
0
0
Brazil
Query!
State/province [37]
0
0
Goiânia
Query!
Country [38]
0
0
Brazil
Query!
State/province [38]
0
0
Jau
Query!
Country [39]
0
0
Brazil
Query!
State/province [39]
0
0
Lajeado
Query!
Country [40]
0
0
Brazil
Query!
State/province [40]
0
0
Porto Alegre
Query!
Country [41]
0
0
Brazil
Query!
State/province [41]
0
0
Rio De Janeiro
Query!
Country [42]
0
0
Brazil
Query!
State/province [42]
0
0
Santo Andre
Query!
Country [43]
0
0
Brazil
Query!
State/province [43]
0
0
Sao Paulo
Query!
Country [44]
0
0
Canada
Query!
State/province [44]
0
0
Barrie
Query!
Country [45]
0
0
Canada
Query!
State/province [45]
0
0
Calgary
Query!
Country [46]
0
0
Canada
Query!
State/province [46]
0
0
Halifax
Query!
Country [47]
0
0
Canada
Query!
State/province [47]
0
0
Ottawa
Query!
Country [48]
0
0
Canada
Query!
State/province [48]
0
0
Vancouver
Query!
Country [49]
0
0
Canada
Query!
State/province [49]
0
0
Winnipeg
Query!
Country [50]
0
0
Mexico
Query!
State/province [50]
0
0
Aguascalientes
Query!
Country [51]
0
0
Mexico
Query!
State/province [51]
0
0
Hermosillo
Query!
Country [52]
0
0
Mexico
Query!
State/province [52]
0
0
Monterrey
Query!
Country [53]
0
0
New Zealand
Query!
State/province [53]
0
0
Auckland
Query!
Country [54]
0
0
New Zealand
Query!
State/province [54]
0
0
Christchurch
Query!
Country [55]
0
0
New Zealand
Query!
State/province [55]
0
0
Newtown
Query!
Country [56]
0
0
New Zealand
Query!
State/province [56]
0
0
Palmerston North
Query!
Country [57]
0
0
New Zealand
Query!
State/province [57]
0
0
Takapuna
Query!
Country [58]
0
0
Peru
Query!
State/province [58]
0
0
Lima
Query!
Country [59]
0
0
Peru
Query!
State/province [59]
0
0
Miraflores
Query!
Funding & Sponsors
Primary sponsor type
Commercial sector/industry
Query!
Name
Teva Branded Pharmaceutical Products R&D, Inc.
Query!
Address
Query!
Country
Query!
Ethics approval
Ethics application status
Query!
Summary
Brief summary
The primary objective of the study is to compare the complete response (CR) rate of bendamustine and rituximab (BR) with that of standard treatment regimens of either rituximab, cyclophosphamide, vincristine, and prednisone (R-CVP) or rituximab, cyclophosphamide, doxorubicin, vincristine, and prednisone (R-CHOP) in patients with advanced, indolent non-Hodgkin's lymphoma (NHL) or mantle cell lymphoma (MCL).
Query!
Trial website
https://clinicaltrials.gov/study/NCT00877006
Query!
Trial related presentations / publications
Flinn IW, van der Jagt R, Kahl BS, Wood P, Hawkins TE, Macdonald D, Hertzberg M, Kwan YL, Simpson D, Craig M, Kolibaba K, Issa S, Clementi R, Hallman DM, Munteanu M, Chen L, Burke JM. Randomized trial of bendamustine-rituximab or R-CHOP/R-CVP in first-line treatment of indolent NHL or MCL: the BRIGHT study. Blood. 2014 May 8;123(19):2944-52. doi: 10.1182/blood-2013-11-531327. Epub 2014 Mar 3. Flinn IW, van der Jagt R, Kahl B, Wood P, Hawkins T, MacDonald D, Simpson D, Kolibaba K, Issa S, Chang J, Trotman J, Hallman D, Chen L, Burke JM. First-Line Treatment of Patients With Indolent Non-Hodgkin Lymphoma or Mantle-Cell Lymphoma With Bendamustine Plus Rituximab Versus R-CHOP or R-CVP: Results of the BRIGHT 5-Year Follow-Up Study. J Clin Oncol. 2019 Apr 20;37(12):984-991. doi: 10.1200/JCO.18.00605. Epub 2019 Feb 27. Burke JM, van der Jagt RH, Kahl BS, Wood P, Hawkins TE, MacDonald D, Hertzberg M, Simpson D, Craig M, Kolibaba K, Issa S, Munteanu M, Victor TW, Flinn IW. Differences in Quality of Life Between Bendamustine-Rituximab and R-CHOP/R-CVP in Patients With Previously Untreated Advanced Indolent Non-Hodgkin Lymphoma or Mantle Cell Lymphoma. Clin Lymphoma Myeloma Leuk. 2016 Apr;16(4):182-190.e1. doi: 10.1016/j.clml.2016.01.001. Epub 2016 Jan 15.
Query!
Public notes
Query!
Contacts
Principal investigator
Name
0
0
Sponsor's Medical Expert
Query!
Address
0
0
Cephalon
Query!
Country
0
0
Query!
Phone
0
0
Query!
Fax
0
0
Query!
Email
0
0
Query!
Contact person for public queries
Name
0
0
Query!
Address
0
0
Query!
Country
0
0
Query!
Phone
0
0
Query!
Fax
0
0
Query!
Email
0
0
Query!
Contact person for scientific queries
No information has been provided regarding IPD availability
What supporting documents are/will be available?
No Supporting Document Provided
Results publications and other study-related documents
Type
Citations or Other Details
Journal
Flinn IW, van der Jagt R, Kahl BS, Wood P, Hawkins...
[
More Details
]
Results are available at
https://clinicaltrials.gov/study/NCT00877006
Download to PDF