Please note that the copy function is not enabled for this field.
If you wish to
modify
existing outcomes, please copy and paste the current outcome text into the Update field.
LOGIN
CREATE ACCOUNT
LOGIN
CREATE ACCOUNT
MY TRIALS
REGISTER TRIAL
FAQs
HINTS AND TIPS
DEFINITIONS
Trial Review
The ANZCTR website will be unavailable from 1pm until 3pm (AEDT) on Wednesday the 30th of October for website maintenance. Please be sure to log out of the system in order to avoid any loss of data.
The safety and scientific validity of this study is the responsibility of the study sponsor and investigators. Listing a study does not mean it has been endorsed by the ANZCTR. Before participating in a study, talk to your health care provider and refer to this
information for consumers
Download to PDF
Trial registered on ANZCTR
Registration number
ACTRN12621000666820
Ethics application status
Approved
Date submitted
25/02/2021
Date registered
1/06/2021
Date last updated
28/01/2024
Date data sharing statement initially provided
1/06/2021
Type of registration
Prospectively registered
Titles & IDs
Public title
A Randomized Controlled Trial comparing Dynamic Temporal and Tactile Cueing with usual care for Childhood Apraxia of Speech
Query!
Scientific title
A Randomized Controlled Trial comparing Dynamic Temporal and Tactile Cueing with usual care for Childhood Apraxia of Speech
Query!
Secondary ID [1]
302943
0
None
Query!
Universal Trial Number (UTN)
U1111-1263-0335
Query!
Trial acronym
Query!
Linked study record
Query!
Health condition
Health condition(s) or problem(s) studied:
Childhood Apraxia of Speech
319977
0
Query!
Condition category
Condition code
Physical Medicine / Rehabilitation
317908
317908
0
0
Query!
Speech therapy
Query!
Intervention/exposure
Study type
Interventional
Query!
Description of intervention(s) / exposure
INTERVENTION: Dynamic Therapy (Dynamic Temporal and Tactile Cueing or DTTC)
Dynamic Therapy is based on established integral stimulation techniques for speech motor learning (“look at me, listen to me, say what I say”) and involves intensive drills on a core set of meaningful but relatively simple words containing sounds that the child already can produce (e.g., “Hi daddy”) and those sounds that are emerging. Treatment words which are highly salient and frequently used are chosen with the child and their family.
In Dynamic Therapy, the clinician systematically works toward independent (non-imitated) production by fading cues in a hierarchy. Speaking rate is reduced, and the time between clinician model and child’s response is varied based on the child’s performance; tactile cues are provided as needed to demonstrate articulatory configurations. Rapid reinforcers are used to maximize the number of practice trials per session. Dynamic Therapy is flexible in providing children with severe apraxia the cues they need to acquire accurate words and phrases. It incorporates principles of motor learning, which refer to practice conditions that are thought to enhance learning (e.g., reducing feedback as the child improves; practicing the same target multiple times in a row before practicing targets in random order) (Maas et al., 2008).
MATERIALS:
Materials will include a laptop with an external microphone plus accessories, and videorecorder plus accessories (tripod, memory cards) for data collection and recording treatment sessions. Additional supplies will include standardized speech pathology behavioral tests and score forms, recruitment materials, data sheets, printing, participant costs, open access publishing, and office supplies.
WHO WILL DELIVER THE TREATMENT:
Speech Pathologists who have been trained by the research team in Dynamic Therapy will provide treatment to participants. An operationalized version of DTTC (Dynamic Therapy) co-developed with Dr. Edythe Strand will be used to train clinicians across the different clinical sites, allowing them to deliver the same therapy and allowing us to measure fidelity. This operationalized version will include a pre-practice phase to address precursors to learning.
CLINICIAN TRAINING:
Treating clinicians will complete training in Dynamic Therapy. This will include:
- Reading the tutorial article about Dynamic Temporal and Tactile Cueing (DTTC) (https://doi.org/10.1044/2019_ajslp-19-0005)
- View online videos and demonstrations instructing clinicians in the procedures relevant to Dynamic Therapy (duration: 2-4 hours)
- Read and implement the Dynamic Therapy treatment manual. A treatment manual has been designed for this study. Once all participants have completed their Dynamic Therapy treatment, the manual will be publicly available on the Dynamic Therapy website.
- Where possible, clinicians will be encouraged to treat a non-RCT child or children in their regular clinical practice with DTTC before treating research participants.
- Receive feedback on their treatment fidelity from the Fidelity Manager, Megan Leece.
- Receive a one-hour video coaching session from a Dynamic Therapy expert, AI Professor Edythe Strand.
An online community of practice will also be established. This community of practice will include a chat function for discussion between the clinicians moderated by one of the CIs or the Fidelity Manager, a questions portal for direct access to our group of Dynamic Therapy experts (CIs and AIs) and a resources portal where the clinicians will be able to re-visit training videos, the training manual, relevant research articles and ask questions.
MODE OF DELIVERY:
Participants will receive treatment in-person, face-to-face.
LOCATION:
In Australia and the United States, children will receive therapy at one of the identified clinical sites, or, if indicated by the participant's parent/carer, in community facilities (e.g. Libraries) or in the participant's home.
TREATMENT DOSAGE:
Children in this study will be randomised to one of two arms: the experimental treatment arm (Dynamic Therapy) (n=60) or the usual care arm (n=60).
Child participants in the experimental treatment arm will receive Dynamic therapy totalling 18 hours over five consecutive weeks (target = 4 sessions per week for 4 weeks, while allowing for five weeks to achieve the 18 total sessions). Prior to receiving the studied intervention, participants will engage in a probe data collection session (week 0/baseline). After they finish their final Dynamic Therapy session they will complete an immediate probe (completed on the same day) and one final probe session 4-weeks after their final treatment session. Electronic data will be collected about additional therapy the child may be receiving from their community-based speech pathologist on a weekly basis for the duration of their participation in this study (i.e., 9 weeks, commencing once they are in their first week of therapy).
TREATMENT FIDELITY:
To ensure all children are provided with the most effective treatment:
- All clinicians will undergo standardised training in how to provide Dynamic Therapy. Dr Edythe Strand will watch the treating clinician’s first, second or third Dynamic Therapy session with their first participant and will provide coaching feedback.
- A standardised treatment manual will be used.
- Treatment fidelity will be calculated on the first and second Dynamic Therapy treatment sessions and on a randomly selected third session. Fidelity calculations will be conducted synchronously and feedback will be provided to the treating clinician via email or a video conference call regarding any changes required. Treatment fidelity will be reported.
Query!
Intervention code [1]
319229
0
Behaviour
Query!
Comparator / control treatment
Usual Care Arm
Child participants in the Usual Care arm will continue their usual care which we will monitor for 9 consecutive weeks. For example, if the child was seeing a speech pathologist for one hour, once per week, prior to their involvement in this study, they can continue that care, although they are able to change or discontinue therapy as they wish. Electronic data will be collected on a weekly basis for participants in the Usual Care arm from either the treating speech pathologist or from their parent. Treatment data collected during this period will include treatment used, treatment goals, therapy progress and minutes of therapy per week the child attended. Other data collected from the community-based (i.e., usual care) treating speech pathologist will include their demographic data such as the speech pathologist’s highest level of qualification and their experience treating Childhood Apraxia of Speech. Children in this arm will complete probes at the beginning of the trial (pre-probe), at 5 weeks and at 9 weeks.
Usual Care Data Collection for all Participants
Although children will be randomised to one of the two arms (experimental treatment arm or Usual Care arm), the usual care questionnaire will be completed by community-based speech pathologists/family for all enrolled children to collect data for their entire enrolment period (starting from their first week).
Query!
Control group
Active
Query!
Outcomes
Primary outcome [1]
325919
0
Percentage of Phonemes Correct (PPC) will be calculated for treatment words and will be assessed for changes.
Instrument: Treatment words targeted in therapy will be recorded by the speech pathologist using a Single word assessment tool (Generalisation Probe created by the research team).
Query!
Assessment method [1]
325919
0
Query!
Timepoint [1]
325919
0
For both arms of the study: Baseline (Week 0), week 5 and week 9 post-intervention commencement.
Query!
Primary outcome [2]
326494
0
Percentage Phonemes Correct (PPC) across untreated words [generalisation].
Instrument: Single word assessment tool (Generalisation Probe created by the research team) plus the words in the Goldman Fristoe Test of Articulation.
Query!
Assessment method [2]
326494
0
Query!
Timepoint [2]
326494
0
For both arms of the study: Baseline (Week 0), week 5 and week 9 post-intervention commencement.
Query!
Secondary outcome [1]
389506
0
Untreated words in picture naming and direct imitation judged by a blinded assessor using a three-point scale; 2 = correct, 1 = one or two errors, 0 = more than two errors (Strand et al., 2013).
Instrument: Single word assessment tool (Generalisation Probe created by the research team).
Query!
Assessment method [1]
389506
0
Query!
Timepoint [1]
389506
0
For both arms of the study: Baseline (Week 0), week 5 and week 9 post-intervention commencement.
Query!
Secondary outcome [2]
389507
0
Performance on Speech Prosody Score, using the method as outlined in McCabe, Preston, Evans & Heard (submitted for publication). The single word assessment tool (Generalisation Probe created by the research team) will be used to calculate the Speech Prosody Score.
Query!
Assessment method [2]
389507
0
Query!
Timepoint [2]
389507
0
For both arms of the study: Baseline (Week 0), week 5 and week 9 post-intervention commencement.
Query!
Secondary outcome [3]
391686
0
Quality of life.
Instrument: The CHU-9D (Chen et al., 2014).
Query!
Assessment method [3]
391686
0
Query!
Timepoint [3]
391686
0
For both arms of the study: Baseline (Week 0), week 5 and week 9 post-intervention commencement.
Query!
Secondary outcome [4]
393868
0
Communicative participation.
Instrument: FOCUS-34 questionnaire (Thomas-Stonell et al., 2013).
Query!
Assessment method [4]
393868
0
Query!
Timepoint [4]
393868
0
For both arms of the study: Baseline (Week 0), week 5 and week 9 post-intervention commencement.
Query!
Secondary outcome [5]
393869
0
Speech Participation.
Instrument: The Speech Participation and Activity Assessment for Children (SPAA-C) (McLeod & McCormack, 2007).
Query!
Assessment method [5]
393869
0
Query!
Timepoint [5]
393869
0
For both arms of the study: Baseline (Week 0), week 5 and week 9 post-intervention commencement.
Query!
Secondary outcome [6]
407508
0
Cost effectiveness of speech pathology treatment. Instrument: Health Economics Survey (developed by the research team).
Query!
Assessment method [6]
407508
0
Query!
Timepoint [6]
407508
0
For both arms of the study: Baseline (Week 0), week 5 and week 9 post-intervention commencement.
Query!
Eligibility
Key inclusion criteria
1. Confirmed diagnosis of Apraxia using the criteria operationalised in the Diagnostic Evaluation of Motor Speech Skills (DEMSS).
2. Aged 3 years old- 7 years and 11 months at the time of the baseline probe.
3. Speech impairment in moderate-severe range as per the Goldman-Fristoe Test of Articulation-3 (Goldman & Fristoe, 2015).
4. Normal hearing and vision with or without corrective devices [glasses, hearing aids].
5. English as primary language of the child.
Query!
Minimum age
36
Months
Query!
Query!
Maximum age
8
Years
Query!
Query!
Sex
Both males and females
Query!
Can healthy volunteers participate?
No
Query!
Key exclusion criteria
1. Concomitant genetic or neurodevelopmental disorder e.g. autism, global developmental delay, primary dysarthria diagnosis.
2. Oral or facial structural deficit e.g. cleft palate.
Query!
Study design
Purpose of the study
Treatment
Query!
Allocation to intervention
Randomised controlled trial
Query!
Procedure for enrolling a subject and allocating the treatment (allocation concealment procedures)
The Clinic Site Lead will assign the child to one of the treating clinicians and request a random assignment from the Central Data Manager. The Central Data Manager will use a pre-randomised data sheet to allocate the participant to a group with blinding.
Query!
Methods used to generate the sequence in which subjects will be randomised (sequence generation)
Simple randomisation using a randomisation table created by computer software (i.e. computerised sequence generation).
Query!
Masking / blinding
Blinded (masking used)
Query!
Who is / are masked / blinded?
The people assessing the outcomes
The people analysing the results/data
Query!
Query!
Query!
Query!
Intervention assignment
Crossover
Query!
Other design features
N/A
Query!
Phase
Not Applicable
Query!
Type of endpoint/s
Efficacy
Query!
Statistical methods / analysis
NUMBER OF PARTICIPANTS
A total of 120 children (aged 3.0 years-7;11 years) with apraxia will be recruited. The pooled Improvement Rate Difference (the Single Case analogue to Risk Difference) obtained from the five experimental single case design studies reported in Table 1 is 0.65. According to guidelines reported by Parker, Vannest and Brown (2009), an IRD of 0.7 equates to a large effect size, with values 0.5 to 0.7 equating to moderate effect sizes. These values would convert an IRD of 0.65 to an approximate d = 0.75 or r = 0.45. With power set to 0.9 and alpha to 0.05, the primary comparison of percent phonemes correct after 18 sessions of DTTC (over 5 weeks) versus usual care would require an approximate sample size of 42 people per group, not allowing for the effects of nesting within treatment centres. The magnitude of nesting effects is unknown and data are not available to estimate it, so a conservative decision was made to increase sample sizes by 25% to account for loss of power through nesting, leading to a required sample size of 55 per group over 2 groups. Adding 10% for possible attrition we will recruit 120 children over three years. Based on our previous work, to achieve a total of 120 enrolled children across the 10 sites, we anticipate assessment of 150 potential participants (Murray, McCabe, & Ballard, 2015). Child verbal assent and carer written consent will be obtained.
STATISTICAL METHODS/ ANALYSIS PLAN
Initial analysis will use basic descriptive statistics: Means and standard deviations for the ratio-level primary outcome measures of percent phonemes correct and statistical control measures, such as age in months, and frequency counts for categorical demographic measures, such as country of residence and type of standard care. The planned analysis is a series of multi-level linear models for each of the primary outcome measures (percent phonemes correct for treated words and untreated words). The models will firstly test if the variables "clinician" and “site” are related to outcome and, if they are, treat them as a random variable, to enhance generalisability of findings to clinicians and sites not part of the study. Because the arms will be randomly allocated rather than matched, the models will also adjust for age of client and severity of condition, as potential confounders.
The overall effectiveness of the intervention will involve comparison of time points between the two primary arms (Aim 1):
1. Comparing baseline performance for both arms compared to immediate post (i.e., 5 weeks post baseline) to ascertain acquisition;
2. Comparing performance at immediate post (i.e., week 5) and subsequent follow up probes (i.e., week 9) to ascertain retention.
The Speech Prosody score and the Quality-of-Life measures will be analysed using multilevel linear models, as with the primary outcome measures.
Exploratory comparison of the two arms (A, B) will also be completed (Aim 2) using multilevel linear models as above.
3. Comparing baseline performance for both Arms A and B with immediate post (i.e., week 5).
4. Comparing baseline performance for both Arms A and B with performance at 4 weeks following completion of therapy (i.e., week 9).
Health Economics Evaluation (Aim 3)
A within-trial analysis will assess the cost-effectiveness of introducing Dynamic Therapy in two ways. First, a cost per improvement in child outcome measures (listed above) will be estimated. Cost collection will include the cost of Dynamic Therapy and the time taken for SP/ professionals to complete the assessments. Second, analyses will convert responses on the CHU-9D into utility values, using the CHU-9D algorithm for Australian and US populations. These utility values will be used in the calculation of a cost per quality-adjusted life year (QALY), also known as an incremental cost effectiveness ratio (ICER). Uncertainty will be investigated using univariate and multi-variate sensitivity analysis.
Query!
Recruitment
Recruitment status
Recruiting
Query!
Date of first participant enrolment
Anticipated
18/02/2022
Query!
Actual
1/06/2022
Query!
Date of last participant enrolment
Anticipated
1/04/2024
Query!
Actual
Query!
Date of last data collection
Anticipated
28/06/2024
Query!
Actual
Query!
Sample size
Target
120
Query!
Accrual to date
54
Query!
Final
Query!
Recruitment in Australia
Recruitment state(s)
ACT,NSW,QLD,TAS,WA,VIC
Query!
Recruitment postcode(s) [1]
32291
0
2006 - The University Of Sydney
Query!
Recruitment postcode(s) [2]
32292
0
2617 - University Of Canberra
Query!
Recruitment postcode(s) [3]
32293
0
6102 - Bentley
Query!
Recruitment postcode(s) [4]
32294
0
4811 - James Cook University
Query!
Recruitment postcode(s) [5]
33217
0
3053 - Carlton
Query!
Recruitment postcode(s) [6]
37075
0
7310 - Devonport
Query!
Recruitment outside Australia
Country [1]
23271
0
United States of America
Query!
State/province [1]
23271
0
Philadelphia
Query!
Country [2]
23446
0
United States of America
Query!
State/province [2]
23446
0
New York
Query!
Funding & Sponsors
Funding source category [1]
307366
0
Government body
Query!
Name [1]
307366
0
The National Health and Medical Research Council (NHMRC)
Query!
Address [1]
307366
0
National Health and Medical Research Council
GPO Box 1421
Canberra ACT 2601
Query!
Country [1]
307366
0
Australia
Query!
Primary sponsor type
University
Query!
Name
The University of Sydney
Query!
Address
The University of Sydney
NSW 2006
Australia
Query!
Country
Australia
Query!
Secondary sponsor category [1]
308121
0
None
Query!
Name [1]
308121
0
Query!
Address [1]
308121
0
Query!
Country [1]
308121
0
Query!
Ethics approval
Ethics application status
Approved
Query!
Ethics committee name [1]
307453
0
The University of Sydney Human Research Ethics Committee
Query!
Ethics committee address [1]
307453
0
Level 3, Administration Building (F23) Eastern Avenue, Camperdown University of Sydney NSW 2006
Query!
Ethics committee country [1]
307453
0
Australia
Query!
Date submitted for ethics approval [1]
307453
0
05/02/2021
Query!
Approval date [1]
307453
0
07/04/2021
Query!
Ethics approval number [1]
307453
0
Project Number: 2021/117
Query!
Ethics committee name [2]
307455
0
The Sydney Children's Hospitals Network Human Research Ethics Committee (SCHN HREC)
Query!
Ethics committee address [2]
307455
0
The Sydney Children's Hospitals Network Human Research Ethics Committee (SCHN HREC) Cnr Hawkesbury Road and Hainsworth Street, Westmead, NSW Australia Locked Bag 4001, Westmead 2145, NSW Australia
Query!
Ethics committee country [2]
307455
0
Australia
Query!
Date submitted for ethics approval [2]
307455
0
21/05/2021
Query!
Approval date [2]
307455
0
Query!
Ethics approval number [2]
307455
0
Query!
Ethics committee name [3]
307526
0
The Office of Research Integrity and Protections, Syracuse University
Query!
Ethics committee address [3]
307526
0
Lyman Hall, 900 S Crouse Ave Syracuse, NY, 13210, USA
Query!
Ethics committee country [3]
307526
0
United States of America
Query!
Date submitted for ethics approval [3]
307526
0
30/04/2021
Query!
Approval date [3]
307526
0
Query!
Ethics approval number [3]
307526
0
Query!
Summary
Brief summary
This research will explore the efficacy of Dynamic Temporal and Tactile Cuing (DTTC or Dynamic Therapy) a well-established treatment that has only been tested in small scale studies. The study will compare Dynamic Therapy with usual care which is the speech therapy that children routinely receive in the community. We will also estimate the cost of therapy and make recommendations for which treatment option is most cost-effective. The study is a two-arm randomised controlled trial. This is the first such study for children with apraxia who are under 8 years old.
Query!
Trial website
https://dynamic.sydney.edu.au
Query!
Trial related presentations / publications
Query!
Public notes
Sites actively recruiting participants as of 22nd January 2024: Curtin University (WA) Building Blocks Speech Pathology (Melbourne) Temple University (PA, USA)
Query!
Contacts
Principal investigator
Name
107286
0
Prof Patricia McCabe
Query!
Address
107286
0
Susan Wakil Health Building D18
Western Avenue, The University of Sydney, Camperdown, NSW 2006
Query!
Country
107286
0
Australia
Query!
Phone
107286
0
+61 2 9351 9747
Query!
Fax
107286
0
Query!
Email
107286
0
[email protected]
Query!
Contact person for public queries
Name
107287
0
Maryane Gomez
Query!
Address
107287
0
Susan Wakil Health Building D18
Western Avenue, The University of Sydney, Camperdown, NSW 2006
Query!
Country
107287
0
Australia
Query!
Phone
107287
0
+61 2 9351 0996
Query!
Fax
107287
0
Query!
Email
107287
0
[email protected]
Query!
Contact person for scientific queries
Name
107288
0
Patricia McCabe
Query!
Address
107288
0
Susan Wakil Health Building D18
Western Avenue, The University of Sydney, Camperdown, NSW 2006
Query!
Country
107288
0
Australia
Query!
Phone
107288
0
+61 2 9351 9747
Query!
Fax
107288
0
Query!
Email
107288
0
[email protected]
Query!
Data sharing statement
Will individual participant data (IPD) for this trial be available (including data dictionaries)?
No
Query!
No/undecided IPD sharing reason/comment
For the purposes of confidentiality and participant safety, individual participant data will not be made available for this trial.
Query!
What supporting documents are/will be available?
No Supporting Document Provided
Doc. No.
Type
Citation
Link
Email
Other Details
Attachment
9967
Study protocol
https://dynamic.sydney.edu.au/
The study protocol can be requested by emailing Pr...
[
More Details
]
9968
Statistical analysis plan
https://dynamic.sydney.edu.au/
The statistical plan can be requested by emailing ...
[
More Details
]
10076
Clinical study report
https://dynamic.sydney.edu.au/
The clinical study report can be requested by emai...
[
More Details
]
10757
Ethical approval
https://dynamic.sydney.edu.au/
Ethical approval has been granted by The Universit...
[
More Details
]
10759
Analytic code
https://dynamic.sydney.edu.au/
The analytic code can be requested by emailing Pro...
[
More Details
]
10760
Informed consent form
https://dynamic.sydney.edu.au/
The consent form can be requested by emailing Dr M...
[
More Details
]
Results publications and other study-related documents
Documents added manually
No documents have been uploaded by study researchers.
Documents added automatically
No additional documents have been identified.
Download to PDF