Please note that the copy function is not enabled for this field.
If you wish to
modify
existing outcomes, please copy and paste the current outcome text into the Update field.
LOGIN
CREATE ACCOUNT
LOGIN
CREATE ACCOUNT
MY TRIALS
REGISTER TRIAL
FAQs
HINTS AND TIPS
DEFINITIONS
Trial Review
The ANZCTR website will be unavailable from 1pm until 3pm (AEDT) on Wednesday the 30th of October for website maintenance. Please be sure to log out of the system in order to avoid any loss of data.
The safety and scientific validity of this study is the responsibility of the study sponsor and investigators. Listing a study does not mean it has been endorsed by the ANZCTR. Before participating in a study, talk to your health care provider and refer to this
information for consumers
Download to PDF
Trial registered on ANZCTR
Registration number
ACTRN12621000386831
Ethics application status
Approved
Date submitted
9/02/2021
Date registered
7/04/2021
Date last updated
14/10/2024
Date data sharing statement initially provided
7/04/2021
Type of registration
Prospectively registered
Titles & IDs
Public title
The Effect of Abdominal Functional Electrical Stimulation On Bowel Function In Spinal Cord Injury
Query!
Scientific title
The Effect of Abdominal Functional Electrical Stimulation On Bowel Function In Adults with a Spinal Cord Injury: A prospective cohort trial
Query!
Secondary ID [1]
302986
0
None
Query!
Universal Trial Number (UTN)
U1111-1262-5380
Query!
Trial acronym
Query!
Linked study record
Query!
Health condition
Health condition(s) or problem(s) studied:
Spinal Cord Injury
320037
0
Query!
Tetraplegia
320038
0
Query!
Paralysis
320039
0
Query!
Condition category
Condition code
Neurological
317962
317962
0
0
Query!
Other neurological disorders
Query!
Physical Medicine / Rehabilitation
317963
317963
0
0
Query!
Other physical medicine / rehabilitation
Query!
Injuries and Accidents
317964
317964
0
0
Query!
Other injuries and accidents
Query!
Intervention/exposure
Study type
Interventional
Query!
Description of intervention(s) / exposure
Colorectal, anal and pelvic floor complications are common in people with spinal cord injury (SCI). The abdominal muscles are one of the major muscle groups used during expiratory and expulsive manoeuvres such as defecation and coughing. We have shown that surface Functional Electrical Stimulation (FES) of the abdominal muscles, termed Abdominal FES, can improve respiratory function. Furthermore, there is evidence that abdominal FES may also improve bowel function in people with SCI via increased intra-abdominal pressure. However, there is a lack of data from randomised, controlled trials to substantiate this evidence and there is no standard Abdominal FES protocol for improving bowel function.
34 people will be recruited to this prospective cohort trial. Participants will be recruited who are greater than 1 year post SCI. Abdominal FES will be applied to the abdominal muscles for eight week day bowel management (BM) sessions (which will last for the duration of the bowel routine for an estimated 30-60 minutes) over an estimated period of three to four weeks. This will be delivered by the participant pressing a button (where able) to trigger the FES when required, and by a carer or researcher when this is not possible
Specifically, Abdominal FES will be delivered, via electrodes placed over the posterolateral surface of the abdomen. The stimulation amplitude will initially be set to cause a strong visible muscle contraction (typically 60 - 80 mA). In addition, the stimulation amplitude will be evaluated every five minutes to ensure that stimulation is still tolerable and causing a suitable muscle contraction. A patient diary will also be used to monitor bowel management time for six sessions, prior to and also after the intervention period.
Query!
Intervention code [1]
319273
0
Treatment: Devices
Query!
Intervention code [2]
319274
0
Rehabilitation
Query!
Comparator / control treatment
Control period: participants or their carers will record the duration of six bowel routines immediately prior to the intervention period.
Intervention period: Together, researchers, participants and carers will record the duration of eight bowel routines, where they will receive Abdominal FES during and for 10 mins prior to their bowel routines.
Efficacy period: participants or their carers will record the duration of six bowel routines immediately post the intervention period.
Outcomes: Difference in average Bowel Management Time (BMT) between control period (no Abdominal FES) and active intervention (Abdominal FES)
Query!
Control group
Active
Query!
Outcomes
Primary outcome [1]
325979
0
Difference between the mean bowel management (BM) time measured during the six baseline control (no stimulation) BM sessions and the last 6 (75%) of the active BM (abdominal FES) sessions
BM time will be measured using a diary designed for this study by recording the start and end time of the routine based on consistent BM events, that have been agreed between the participant, researcher and carer.
Query!
Assessment method [1]
325979
0
Query!
Timepoint [1]
325979
0
First day of enrolment (pre-intervention), the day following the last day of the 6 bowel management sessions (efficacy period).
Query!
Secondary outcome [1]
389753
0
Quality of Life measured using the EQ-5D-5L Health Questionnaire
Query!
Assessment method [1]
389753
0
Query!
Timepoint [1]
389753
0
First day of enrolment (pre-intervention), the day following the last day of the 6 bowel management sessions (efficacy period).
Query!
Secondary outcome [2]
389755
0
bowel function measured using the International SCI bowel function basic data set questionnaire
Query!
Assessment method [2]
389755
0
Query!
Timepoint [2]
389755
0
First day of enrolment (pre-intervention), the day following the last day of the 6 bowel management sessions (efficacy period).
Query!
Secondary outcome [3]
389756
0
Composite measure of bowel management strategy measured via analysis of daily diary entries regarding bowel movements (time taken and frequency), Bristol stool scale, use of laxatives and manual procedures
Query!
Assessment method [3]
389756
0
Query!
Timepoint [3]
389756
0
On each day there is a bowel management session, for 6 control sessions, 8 intervention sessions, 6 efficacy sessions
Query!
Secondary outcome [4]
389762
0
bladder function measured using the Neurogenic Bladder Symptom Score
Query!
Assessment method [4]
389762
0
Query!
Timepoint [4]
389762
0
First day of enrolment (pre-intervention), the day following the last day of the 6 bowel management sessions (efficacy period).
Query!
Eligibility
Key inclusion criteria
- Chronic SCI (> 12 months since injury) above the level ofT8
- >= 18 years of age
- A measurable and consistent start and end bowel routine event
Query!
Minimum age
18
Years
Query!
Query!
Maximum age
No limit
Query!
Query!
Sex
Both males and females
Query!
Can healthy volunteers participate?
No
Query!
Key exclusion criteria
- American Spinal Injuries Association Impairment Scale E
- Current bowel conditions such as irritable bowel syndrome, gastro-oesophagheal reflux, bowel obstruction, Crohn’s disease or diverticulitis
- Physical obstacles that prevent Abdominal FES (e.g. pregnancy, abdominal trauma, cardiac pacemaker or other implanted electromedical devices)
- No response to Abdominal FES (e.g. lower motor neuron impairment)
- Self-reported Bowel management time of <30 minutes
- Severely obese patients (>40 BMI)
- Lack of understanding of English
- Unable to give informed consent
- Previous history of recurrent episodes of AD
- Resting systolic blood pressure reported as > 140mmHg
Query!
Study design
Purpose of the study
Treatment
Query!
Allocation to intervention
Non-randomised trial
Query!
Procedure for enrolling a subject and allocating the treatment (allocation concealment procedures)
Not required
Query!
Methods used to generate the sequence in which subjects will be randomised (sequence generation)
Not required
Query!
Masking / blinding
Open (masking not used)
Query!
Who is / are masked / blinded?
The people receiving the treatment/s
The people assessing the outcomes
The people analysing the results/data
Query!
Query!
Query!
Query!
Intervention assignment
Single group
Query!
Other design features
Query!
Phase
Not Applicable
Query!
Type of endpoint/s
Efficacy
Query!
Statistical methods / analysis
Participant variables will be presented using means and standard deviations for continuous normally distributed variables, medians and interquartile ranges for continuous non-normally distributed variables, and proportions and absolute numbers for categorical variables.
A paired T Test will be used to compare the primary outcome of BMT difference between control and intervention periods, when controlling for injury level, severity of injury (ASIA score) and age. Paired T Tests will also be used to compare secondary outcomes including bowel and bladder symptoms between conditions, when controlling for injury level, severity of injury (ASIA score) and age. An exploratory analysis will be used to investigate the effect of abdominal FES on quality of life and relations between bowel management (and medications) on BMT.
All adverse events will be recorded and summarised with descriptive statistics.
Query!
Recruitment
Recruitment status
Recruiting
Query!
Date of first participant enrolment
Anticipated
1/11/2021
Query!
Actual
1/11/2022
Query!
Date of last participant enrolment
Anticipated
30/06/2025
Query!
Actual
Query!
Date of last data collection
Anticipated
29/08/2025
Query!
Actual
Query!
Sample size
Target
34
Query!
Accrual to date
2
Query!
Final
Query!
Recruitment in Australia
Recruitment state(s)
ACT,NSW,NT,QLD,SA,TAS,WA,VIC
Query!
Recruitment hospital [1]
18179
0
Neuroscience Research Australia (NeuRA) - Randwick
Query!
Recruitment postcode(s) [1]
32226
0
2031 - Randwick
Query!
Funding & Sponsors
Funding source category [1]
307396
0
Government body
Query!
Name [1]
307396
0
NSW Health
Query!
Address [1]
307396
0
1 Reserve Rd, St Leonards NSW 2065
Query!
Country [1]
307396
0
Australia
Query!
Primary sponsor type
Other
Query!
Name
Neuroscience Research Australia
Query!
Address
139 Barker Street
Randwick
NSW 2031
Query!
Country
Australia
Query!
Secondary sponsor category [1]
308060
0
None
Query!
Name [1]
308060
0
Query!
Address [1]
308060
0
Query!
Country [1]
308060
0
Query!
Ethics approval
Ethics application status
Approved
Query!
Ethics committee name [1]
307483
0
University of New South Wales Human Research Ethics Committee
Query!
Ethics committee address [1]
307483
0
UNSW Research Ethics & Compliance Support The University of New South Wales Sydney NSW 2052 Australia
Query!
Ethics committee country [1]
307483
0
Australia
Query!
Date submitted for ethics approval [1]
307483
0
11/02/2021
Query!
Approval date [1]
307483
0
19/03/2021
Query!
Ethics approval number [1]
307483
0
HC210106
Query!
Summary
Brief summary
People with a spinal cord injury (SCI) have high rates of bowel related morbidity, even compared with those with other neurological disorders. This includes high rates of abdominal pain, constipation, faecal incontinence and bloating. These problems lower the quality of life of people with a SCI and place a financial burden on the health system. The abdominal muscles are one of the major muscle groups used during expiratory and expulsive manoeuvres such as defecation and coughing. Surface electrical stimulation of the abdominal muscles, termed Abdominal Functional Electrical Stimulation (FES), can make the abdominal muscles contract, even when ‘paralysed’. There is some limited evidence that abdominal FES may improve bowel function in people with SCI via increased intra-abdominal pressure. The primary objective of this study is to investigate the effectiveness of Abdominal FES to improve bowel management time for people with chronic Spinal Cord Injury (SCI). Secondary objectives will evaluate whether Abdominal FES can improve: 1) bowel related quality of life, 2) bowel function , 3) bowel management strategy 4) respiratory function and 5) bladder function . In addition, a cost-utility analysis will determine if there is a financial benefit resulting from improved bowel function associated with Abdominal FES.
Query!
Trial website
Query!
Trial related presentations / publications
Query!
Public notes
Query!
Contacts
Principal investigator
Name
107390
0
Prof Simon Gandevia
Query!
Address
107390
0
Neuroscience Research Australia
139 Barker Street
Randwick
NSW 2031
Query!
Country
107390
0
Australia
Query!
Phone
107390
0
+61 293991064
Query!
Fax
107390
0
Query!
Email
107390
0
[email protected]
Query!
Contact person for public queries
Name
107391
0
Keith McNaughton
Query!
Address
107391
0
Neuroscience Research Australia
139 Barker Street
Randwick
NSW 2031
Query!
Country
107391
0
Australia
Query!
Phone
107391
0
+61 293991064
Query!
Fax
107391
0
Query!
Email
107391
0
[email protected]
Query!
Contact person for scientific queries
Name
107392
0
Keith McNaughton
Query!
Address
107392
0
Neuroscience Research Australia
139 Barker Street
Randwick
NSW 2031
Query!
Country
107392
0
Australia
Query!
Phone
107392
0
+61 293991064
Query!
Fax
107392
0
Query!
Email
107392
0
[email protected]
Query!
Data sharing statement
Will individual participant data (IPD) for this trial be available (including data dictionaries)?
Yes
Query!
What data in particular will be shared?
All study data
Query!
When will data be available (start and end dates)?
Upon publication, no end date post publication
Query!
Available to whom?
All
Query!
Available for what types of analyses?
IPD meta-analysis
Query!
How or where can data be obtained?
unrestricted access via publication
Query!
What supporting documents are/will be available?
No Supporting Document Provided
Results publications and other study-related documents
Documents added manually
No documents have been uploaded by study researchers.
Documents added automatically
Source
Title
Year of Publication
DOI
Embase
Effectiveness of Abdominal Functional Electrical Stimulation for Improving Bowel Function in People With a Spinal Cord Injury: A Study Protocol for a Double-Blinded Randomized Placebo-Controlled Clinical Trial.
2022
https://dx.doi.org/10.46292/sci22-00008
N.B. These documents automatically identified may not have been verified by the study sponsor.
Download to PDF