Please note that the copy function is not enabled for this field.
If you wish to
modify
existing outcomes, please copy and paste the current outcome text into the Update field.
LOGIN
CREATE ACCOUNT
LOGIN
CREATE ACCOUNT
MY TRIALS
REGISTER TRIAL
FAQs
HINTS AND TIPS
DEFINITIONS
Trial Review
The ANZCTR website will be unavailable from 1pm until 3pm (AEDT) on Wednesday the 30th of October for website maintenance. Please be sure to log out of the system in order to avoid any loss of data.
The safety and scientific validity of this study is the responsibility of the study sponsor and investigators. Listing a study does not mean it has been endorsed by the ANZCTR. Before participating in a study, talk to your health care provider and refer to this
information for consumers
Download to PDF
Trial registered on ANZCTR
Registration number
ACTRN12621001622897
Ethics application status
Approved
Date submitted
27/04/2021
Date registered
29/11/2021
Date last updated
29/11/2021
Date data sharing statement initially provided
29/11/2021
Type of registration
Prospectively registered
Titles & IDs
Public title
Efficacy and safety of intra-articular botulinum toxin A versus corticosteroid injections in knee osteoarthritis: A randomised control trial
Query!
Scientific title
Efficacy and safety of intra-articular botulinum toxin A versus corticosteroid injections in knee osteoarthritis: A randomised control trial
Query!
Secondary ID [1]
304075
0
Nil known
Query!
Universal Trial Number (UTN)
Query!
Trial acronym
Query!
Linked study record
Query!
Health condition
Health condition(s) or problem(s) studied:
Knee osteoarthritis
321734
0
Query!
Condition category
Condition code
Musculoskeletal
319474
319474
0
0
Query!
Osteoarthritis
Query!
Anaesthesiology
321377
321377
0
0
Query!
Pain management
Query!
Intervention/exposure
Study type
Interventional
Query!
Description of intervention(s) / exposure
Intervention group
Intra-articular injection with botulinum toxin A (100 units) reconstituted with 0.9% normal saline (5ml) - once only.
The intra-articular injection will be administered by a radiologist under ultrasound guidance.
Patients will be followed up at 2 weeks, 6 weeks, 3 months, 6 months and 12 months post-injection at outpatient clinic appointments. Patients will be required to complete questionnaires, an adverse event logbook and an analgesia record and bring these to each appointment.
Query!
Intervention code [1]
320406
0
Treatment: Drugs
Query!
Comparator / control treatment
Coomparator group
Intra-articular injection with triamcinolone acetonide (40mg) and ropivacaine 0.75% (5ml).
The intra-articular injection will be administered by a radiologist under ultrasound guidance - once only.
Patients will be followed up at 2 weeks, 6 weeks, 3 months, 6 months and 12 months post-injection at outpatient clinic appointments. Patients will be required to complete questionnaires, an adverse event logbook and an analgesia record and bring these to each appointment.
Query!
Control group
Active
Query!
Outcomes
Primary outcome [1]
327349
0
The first primary outcome is level of pain post-injection assessed using the Visual Analogue Scale.
Query!
Assessment method [1]
327349
0
Query!
Timepoint [1]
327349
0
Baseline data pre-injection.
Two weeks post-injection.
Six weeks post-injection.
3 months post-injection.
6 months post-injection.
12 months post-injection - primary end-point.
Query!
Primary outcome [2]
329152
0
The second primary outcome is level of function post-injection assessed using the Oxford Knee Score questionnaire.
Query!
Assessment method [2]
329152
0
Query!
Timepoint [2]
329152
0
Baseline data pre-injection.
Two weeks post-injection.
Six weeks post-injection.
3 months post-injection.
6 months post-injection.
12 months post-injection - primary end-point.
Query!
Primary outcome [3]
329610
0
The third primary outcome is level of function post-injection assessed using the EQ-5D-5L questionnaire.
Query!
Assessment method [3]
329610
0
Query!
Timepoint [3]
329610
0
Baseline data pre-injection.
Two weeks post-injection.
Six weeks post-injection.
3 months post-injection.
6 months post-injection.
12 months post-injection - primary end-point.
Query!
Secondary outcome [1]
394677
0
One secondary outcome will assess analgesia requirements post-injection by asking participants to record their typical analgesia use pre-injection and then to keep a daily log of their analgesia use post-injection.
Query!
Assessment method [1]
394677
0
Query!
Timepoint [1]
394677
0
Baseline data pre-injection.
Two weeks post-injection.
Six weeks post-injection.
3 months post-injection.
6 months post-injection.
12 months post-injection.
Query!
Secondary outcome [2]
401661
0
Another secondary outcome is the safety profile of each injection which will be assessed by requiring participants to complete an adverse events checklist that the researchers will compile based on the established side effects of each intra-articular (IA) injection. Participants can simply check ‘yes’ or ‘no’ for each potential side effect. There will also be a section where participants can describe any other adverse event experienced in free text.
Query!
Assessment method [2]
401661
0
Query!
Timepoint [2]
401661
0
Two weeks post-injection.
Six weeks post-injection.
3 months post-injection.
6 months post-injection.
12 months post-injection.
Query!
Eligibility
Key inclusion criteria
1. Age more than or equal to 40 years.
2. Diagnosis of knee OA confirmed on clinical exam and radiologically by Kellgren-Lawrence Grading Scale (Grade III or IV);
3. Symptoms present for more than or equal to 6 months; and
4. Ability to understand and participate in the trial.
Query!
Minimum age
40
Years
Query!
Query!
Maximum age
No limit
Query!
Query!
Sex
Both males and females
Query!
Can healthy volunteers participate?
No
Query!
Key exclusion criteria
1. Age less than 40 years;
2. Any intra-articular injection within the past 12 months;
3. History of trauma to the knee within the past 12 months;
4. History of surgery to the knee within the past 12 months;
5. Neuromuscular disorders (for example, myasthenia gravis, Lambert-Eaton, amyotrophic lateral sclerosis et cetera);
6. Other knee arthropathy (for example, RA, gout et cetera);
7. Lower extremity dysfunction due to a neurological or medical cause (for example, due to a cerebrovascular accident or traumatic brain injury, diabetic neuropathy et cetera);
8. Serious coagulation disorders or anticoagulant use; and
9. Pregnancy or breastfeeding.
Query!
Study design
Purpose of the study
Treatment
Query!
Allocation to intervention
Randomised controlled trial
Query!
Procedure for enrolling a subject and allocating the treatment (allocation concealment procedures)
Participants will be randomly allocated in a concealed manner to one of the two treatment groups using a standard randomisation software tool.
Query!
Methods used to generate the sequence in which subjects will be randomised (sequence generation)
Query!
Masking / blinding
Blinded (masking used)
Query!
Who is / are masked / blinded?
The people receiving the treatment/s
The people assessing the outcomes
The people analysing the results/data
Query!
Query!
Query!
Query!
Intervention assignment
Query!
Other design features
Query!
Phase
Phase 2 / Phase 3
Query!
Type of endpoint/s
Safety/efficacy
Query!
Statistical methods / analysis
This study will use an intention-to-treat analysis. All statistical tests performed will be blinded to treatment group and performed as two-sided with an a of 0.05. Baseline characteristics for both treatment groups will be reported in a table and independent samples T-tests will be performed to assess for any significant differences between the groups. The primary outcomes of pain and function will be analysed using independent sample T-tests to assess differences between groups at each data collection time point. Paired sample T-tests will be used to assess difference within each group across the data collection time points. An ANOVA test will be conducted to assess for differences in pain and function based on a sub-group analyses of Kellgren-Lawrence Grade III versus Grade IV. The secondary outcome regarding analgesia use will be performed by categorising analgesia use into opioid and non-opioid categories and then performing a conversion to a numerical rating to enable independent sample T-tests to assess for significant differences between groups. The secondary outcome regarding adverse events will be presented as a qualitative data table with events categories as ‘minor’ and ‘major’.
Query!
Recruitment
Recruitment status
Not yet recruiting
Query!
Date of first participant enrolment
Anticipated
1/02/2022
Query!
Actual
Query!
Date of last participant enrolment
Anticipated
1/02/2023
Query!
Actual
Query!
Date of last data collection
Anticipated
Query!
Actual
Query!
Sample size
Target
100
Query!
Accrual to date
Query!
Final
Query!
Recruitment in Australia
Recruitment state(s)
WA
Query!
Recruitment hospital [1]
20667
0
Royal Perth Hospital - Perth
Query!
Recruitment postcode(s) [1]
35458
0
6000 - Perth
Query!
Funding & Sponsors
Funding source category [1]
308459
0
Hospital
Query!
Name [1]
308459
0
Royal Perth Hospital
Query!
Address [1]
308459
0
Victoria Square, Perth WA 6000
Query!
Country [1]
308459
0
Australia
Query!
Primary sponsor type
Individual
Query!
Name
Stephanie Babic
Query!
Address
Royal Perth Hospital
Orthopaedic Department
Victoria Square, Perth WA 6000
Query!
Country
Australia
Query!
Secondary sponsor category [1]
309297
0
None
Query!
Name [1]
309297
0
Query!
Address [1]
309297
0
Query!
Country [1]
309297
0
Query!
Ethics approval
Ethics application status
Approved
Query!
Ethics committee name [1]
308415
0
Royal Perth Hospital Human Research Ethics Committee
Query!
Ethics committee address [1]
308415
0
197 Wellington Street Perth WA 6000
Query!
Ethics committee country [1]
308415
0
Australia
Query!
Date submitted for ethics approval [1]
308415
0
30/04/2021
Query!
Approval date [1]
308415
0
24/08/2021
Query!
Ethics approval number [1]
308415
0
RGS0000004752
Query!
Summary
Brief summary
This study aims to address gaps in the current literature and Australian treatment guidelines for knee osteoarthritis by conducting a high quality randomised control trial to compare the impact of intra-articular botulinum toxin A injections with intra-articular corticosteroid injections on knee pain and function. It is hypothesised that the intra-articular botulinum toxin A injection will significantly reduce knee pain and improve function compared with the intra-articular corticosteroid injection. It is also hypothesised that the intra-articular botulinum toxin A injection group will require less analgesia for knee pain post-injection than the intra-articular corticosteroid injection group. Finally it is hypothesised that there will be no difference in adverse event rate between groups.
Query!
Trial website
Query!
Trial related presentations / publications
Query!
Public notes
Query!
Contacts
Principal investigator
Name
110634
0
Dr Stephanie Babic
Query!
Address
110634
0
Royal Perth Hospital
Orthopaedic Department
Victoria Square, Perth WA 6000
Query!
Country
110634
0
Australia
Query!
Phone
110634
0
+61 450908747
Query!
Fax
110634
0
Query!
Email
110634
0
[email protected]
Query!
Contact person for public queries
Name
110635
0
Stephanie Babic
Query!
Address
110635
0
Royal Perth Hospital
Orthopaedic Department
Victoria Square, Perth WA 6000
Query!
Country
110635
0
Australia
Query!
Phone
110635
0
+61 450908747
Query!
Fax
110635
0
Query!
Email
110635
0
[email protected]
Query!
Contact person for scientific queries
Name
110636
0
Stephanie Babic
Query!
Address
110636
0
Royal Perth Hospital
Orthopaedic Department
Victoria Square, Perth WA 6000
Query!
Country
110636
0
Australia
Query!
Phone
110636
0
+61 450908747
Query!
Fax
110636
0
Query!
Email
110636
0
[email protected]
Query!
Data sharing statement
Will individual participant data (IPD) for this trial be available (including data dictionaries)?
Yes
Query!
What data in particular will be shared?
Deidentified individual participant data underlying the published results and the statistical code.
Query!
When will data be available (start and end dates)?
Available 3 months following publication.
Ending 5 years post-main results publication.
Query!
Available to whom?
All trial investigators will have access to the trial dataset (on a running and final basis). No external parties will have access to the trial dataset until the final dataset and statistical code is published on a public data repository e.g. Dryad.
Query!
Available for what types of analyses?
Any purpose.
Query!
How or where can data be obtained?
The final dataset and statistical code will be published on a nominated public data repository e.g. Dryad.
Query!
What supporting documents are/will be available?
No Supporting Document Provided
Current supporting documents:
Doc. No.
Type
Citation
Link
Email
Other Details
Attachment
11511
Study protocol
[email protected]
The protocol has been submitted for publication to...
[
More Details
]
11512
Ethical approval
381894-(Uploaded-06-10-2021-22-58-34)-Study-related document.pdf
11513
Informed consent form
381894-(Uploaded-06-10-2021-22-58-51)-Study-related document.pdf
Updated to:
Doc. No.
Type
Citation
Link
Email
Other Details
Attachment
11511
Study protocol
[email protected]
A copy has been attached
381894-(Uploaded-22-03-2023-23-45-43)-Study-related document.docx
11512
Ethical approval
381894-(Uploaded-06-10-2021-22-58-34)-Study-related document.pdf
11513
Informed consent form
381894-(Uploaded-23-05-2023-11-21-52)-Study-related document.docx
Results publications and other study-related documents
Documents added manually
No documents have been uploaded by study researchers.
Documents added automatically
No additional documents have been identified.
Download to PDF