Please note that the copy function is not enabled for this field.
If you wish to
modify
existing outcomes, please copy and paste the current outcome text into the Update field.
LOGIN
CREATE ACCOUNT
LOGIN
CREATE ACCOUNT
MY TRIALS
REGISTER TRIAL
FAQs
HINTS AND TIPS
DEFINITIONS
Trial Review
The ANZCTR website will be unavailable from 1pm until 3pm (AEDT) on Wednesday the 30th of October for website maintenance. Please be sure to log out of the system in order to avoid any loss of data.
The safety and scientific validity of this study is the responsibility of the study sponsor and investigators. Listing a study does not mean it has been endorsed by the ANZCTR. Before participating in a study, talk to your health care provider and refer to this
information for consumers
Download to PDF
Trial registered on ANZCTR
Registration number
ACTRN12621001144808
Ethics application status
Approved
Date submitted
15/07/2021
Date registered
25/08/2021
Date last updated
23/02/2024
Date data sharing statement initially provided
25/08/2021
Date results provided
23/02/2024
Type of registration
Prospectively registered
Titles & IDs
Public title
Using virtual reality to teach real-time ultrasound-guided needling skills: A randomised controlled trial
Query!
Scientific title
The effectiveness of virtual reality (VR) training against standard (face-to-face, didactic) training of ultrasound-guided nerve blocks for medical students.
Query!
Secondary ID [1]
304768
0
Nil known
Query!
Universal Trial Number (UTN)
Query!
Trial acronym
Query!
Linked study record
Query!
Health condition
Health condition(s) or problem(s) studied:
Medical Simulation
322822
0
Query!
Medical Education
322823
0
Query!
Condition category
Condition code
Anaesthesiology
320413
320413
0
0
Query!
Anaesthetics
Query!
Public Health
320676
320676
0
0
Query!
Health service research
Query!
Intervention/exposure
Study type
Interventional
Query!
Description of intervention(s) / exposure
This is a prospective, double-blinded, randomised controlled trial, single-site study comparing the effectiveness of VR training against standard training (a face-to-face, didactic training). Participants will be medical students with no experience in ultrasound-guided procedures or regional anaesthesia. Demographic data such as age, gender, years of video game use and mental health using the Depression Anxiety Stress Scale-21 will be collected.
All participants will be asked to view a 10-minute online video before the training day, with a link provided 1 month in advance, which explains the basic ultrasound physics, transducer movements and needle guidance. This video is a composite of two publicly available YouTube educational videos from the Departments of Anaesthesia, University of California San Francisco, USA, and Queen Victoria Hospital, East Grinstead, UK.
The practical component of the trial will be held over two consecutive days in May 2023, at the Thomas Moore simulation centre, Liverpool Hospital. All participants will be shown the video again, and their baseline needling skill will be tested. Participants will attempt an ultrasound-guided needle procedure, placing 1ml of saline above and below the target tendon structure on pork meat embedded with bovine tendon, within 600 seconds. Two assessors will independently score the performance of each participant using a global rating scale for Ultrasound Guided Regional Anaesthesia (UGRA) and composite error score checklist. Assessors are expert regional anaesthesia consultants. Participants will be asked to complete the National Aeronautics and Space Administration (NASA) task load index questionnaire (NASA-TLX), which scores mental and physical demand, effort and frustration level immediately after completion of the task.
Participants will then be randomised into VR group (intervention) and standard teaching group (control). Our research group has created a bespoke VR software and holds intellectual property. There was no commercial funding or commercial conflicts of interest with the use of the VR training software. VR participants will experience 2x 30-minute sessions of VR training using the virtual reality trainer, with a 10-minute rest between sessions. Virtual reality software will be on a Lenovo gaming laptop and displayed to the participant via head mounted display with dual hand controllers. Each participant will have their own device. A researcher will be present at all times to assist with the set up and running of the VR software but will not interfere with the training. The control group will have a didactic and practical workshop.
The final test will be conducted immediately after the training sessions on the same day. As the final test, all study participants will then be reassessed using baseline test; ultrasound-guided nerve blocks on the pork model. Two independent assessors will score using the same global rating scale for UGRA and composite error scale checklist. Participants will be asked to complete the NASA-TLX questionnaire again.
Query!
Intervention code [1]
321150
0
Treatment: Other
Query!
Comparator / control treatment
Standard training group will undergo a didactic workshop taught by an experienced medical doctor. It is designed to mimic a typical workshop found in conferences and departmental registrar teaching sessions. There will be 2x identical 30min sessions, with a 10 min rest period. Each session is composed of 2 stations of 15 min each, one station to teach ultrasound skills using a pork-tendon model to practice skills. A researcher will be present at all times to assist and monitor the running of the session but will not interfere with the training.
Query!
Control group
Active
Query!
Outcomes
Primary outcome [1]
328258
0
Difference in student performance of ultrasound guided techniques will be determined using the global rating scale (7-item 5-point Likert scale) for UGRA final scores between the virtual reality group and standard group, marked by two independent assessors through an iterative process.
This global rating scale has been used in previous regional anaesthesia studies and are validated with moderate to high inter-observer reliability.
Query!
Assessment method [1]
328258
0
Query!
Timepoint [1]
328258
0
Immediately after the final test.
Query!
Secondary outcome [1]
398267
0
Difference in composite error scores using a checklist for needling tasks in ultrasound-guided regional anaesthesia between the virtual reality group and standard group, when measured by the same two independent assessors.
This composite error score has been used in previous regional anaesthesia studies and are validated with moderate to high inter-observer reliability.
Query!
Assessment method [1]
398267
0
Query!
Timepoint [1]
398267
0
Immediately after the final test.
Query!
Secondary outcome [2]
399247
0
Self-assessment of cognitive task load using the NASA-TLX questionnaire within the groups.
Query!
Assessment method [2]
399247
0
Query!
Timepoint [2]
399247
0
Immediately after the final test.
Query!
Secondary outcome [3]
419771
0
Individualised learning curves generated from data collected automatically by the VR software during VR training
Query!
Assessment method [3]
419771
0
Query!
Timepoint [3]
419771
0
immediately after the final test
Query!
Eligibility
Key inclusion criteria
Medical students who are novices to ultrasound-guided procedures or regional anaesthesia (no prior exposure to lectures, tutorials, workshops or clinical hands-on experience with ultrasound or nerve blocks).
Query!
Minimum age
18
Years
Query!
Query!
Maximum age
No limit
Query!
Query!
Sex
Both males and females
Query!
Can healthy volunteers participate?
Yes
Query!
Key exclusion criteria
No exclusion criteria apart from prior exposure to ultrasound and/or regional anaesthesia procedures.
Query!
Study design
Purpose of the study
Educational / counselling / training
Query!
Allocation to intervention
Randomised controlled trial
Query!
Procedure for enrolling a subject and allocating the treatment (allocation concealment procedures)
Allocation concealed using central randomisation by a computer
Query!
Methods used to generate the sequence in which subjects will be randomised (sequence generation)
Computer generated randomisation, 1:1 allocation, in blocks of 4, stratified by gender.
Query!
Masking / blinding
Blinded (masking used)
Query!
Who is / are masked / blinded?
The people assessing the outcomes
The people analysing the results/data
Query!
Query!
Query!
Query!
Intervention assignment
Parallel
Query!
Other design features
Query!
Phase
Not Applicable
Query!
Type of endpoint/s
Efficacy
Query!
Statistical methods / analysis
Participant data will be evaluated descriptively. The continuous primary outcome of global rating scale scores will be analysed with analysis of covariance (ANCOVA) to account for change in baseline scores. Confounding variables (eg. DASS anxiety score, gaming experience) will be assessed via Directed Acyclic Graphs and change in effect with the estimates adjusted accordingly.
Composite error scores are typically non-parametric and will be analysed using the Mann-Whitney U test. Inter-rater agreement between assessor scoring will use 2-way, mixed effect, average measures, absolute agreement, intra-class correlation coefficient (ICC 2A,k) model. NASA-TLX scores will be assessed within-groups paired t-test to determine rate of change after training. The level of virtual reality presence will be descriptively reported from the Witmer and Singer score.
Data analyses will be performed using R version 4.0.1, and RStudio.
Query!
Recruitment
Recruitment status
Completed
Query!
Date of first participant enrolment
Anticipated
13/05/2023
Query!
Actual
13/05/2023
Query!
Date of last participant enrolment
Anticipated
14/05/2023
Query!
Actual
14/05/2023
Query!
Date of last data collection
Anticipated
14/05/2023
Query!
Actual
14/05/2023
Query!
Sample size
Target
40
Query!
Accrual to date
Query!
Final
45
Query!
Recruitment in Australia
Recruitment state(s)
NSW
Query!
Recruitment hospital [1]
19969
0
Liverpool Hospital - Liverpool
Query!
Recruitment postcode(s) [1]
34677
0
2170 - Liverpool
Query!
Funding & Sponsors
Funding source category [1]
309133
0
Charities/Societies/Foundations
Query!
Name [1]
309133
0
Australian and New Zealand College of Anaesthetists
Query!
Address [1]
309133
0
ANZCA House,
630 St Kilda Road,
Melbourne, Victoria 3004
Query!
Country [1]
309133
0
Australia
Query!
Primary sponsor type
Hospital
Query!
Name
Liverpool Hospital
Query!
Address
Thomas and Rachel Moore Education Centre,
Liverpool Hospital,
Elizabeth Street,
Liverpool NSW 2170
Query!
Country
Australia
Query!
Secondary sponsor category [1]
310105
0
None
Query!
Name [1]
310105
0
Query!
Address [1]
310105
0
Query!
Country [1]
310105
0
Query!
Ethics approval
Ethics application status
Approved
Query!
Ethics committee name [1]
308999
0
South Western Sydney HREC
Query!
Ethics committee address [1]
308999
0
‘Research and Ethics Office’ Locked Bag 7103 LIVERPOOL BC NSW 1871
Query!
Ethics committee country [1]
308999
0
Australia
Query!
Date submitted for ethics approval [1]
308999
0
Query!
Approval date [1]
308999
0
15/07/2021
Query!
Ethics approval number [1]
308999
0
Query!
Summary
Brief summary
Ultrasound-guided nerve blocks require integration of motor skills, visuo-spatial orientation, and cognitive processing. This complex medical procedure is usually taught through intensive one-on-one teaching with an expert tutor. VR is a computer-generated, artificial environment designed to replace real-world sensory inputs. Participants can interact within this world, using hand controllers to manipulate objects, while user head movements are replicated by shifting fields of view. Training using VR also engages muscle memory, allowing users to practice the same motor movements that they would have to reproduce in real-life situations. This trial seeks to investigate if a virtual reality teaching program be just as effective in teaching ultrasound-guided nerve blocks as a human tutor, with great potential for future medical education. It is a prospective, double-blinded, RCT, single-site study comparing the effectiveness of VR training against standard training (a face-to-face, didactic training). Participants will be medical students with no anaesthetic training at Liverpool Hospital. The VR software is a bespoke trainer programmed by the research group. Data collected will be the difference in the Global Rating Scale and composite error scores between VR and standard training groups, measured by two independent assessors. If shown to be useful, VR training has several advantages: 1. The opportunity to pre-train skills prior to attendance at hands-on workshops to reinforce teachings 2. Pre-training prior to clinical exposure, potentially reducing errors and improving safety 3. Enable remote learning, and not constrained by access to expert teaching faculty, particularly useful in COVID lockdowns 4. Computer-based learning calculates errors accurately, giving audible and visual cues which is more precise and consistent than a human teacher.
Query!
Trial website
Query!
Trial related presentations / publications
Query!
Public notes
Query!
Contacts
Principal investigator
Name
112606
0
A/Prof Alwin Chuan
Query!
Address
112606
0
Department of Anaesthesia
Room 124, Level 1, New Clinical Building
Liverpool Hospital
Elizabeth Street
Liverpool
NSW 2170
Query!
Country
112606
0
Australia
Query!
Phone
112606
0
+61407743668
Query!
Fax
112606
0
Query!
Email
112606
0
[email protected]
Query!
Contact person for public queries
Name
112607
0
Alwin Chuan
Query!
Address
112607
0
Department of Anaesthesia
Room 124, Level 1, New Clinical Building
Liverpool Hospital
Elizabeth Street
Liverpool
NSW 2170
Query!
Country
112607
0
Australia
Query!
Phone
112607
0
+61407743668
Query!
Fax
112607
0
Query!
Email
112607
0
[email protected]
Query!
Contact person for scientific queries
Name
112608
0
Alwin Chuan
Query!
Address
112608
0
Department of Anaesthesia
Room 124, Level 1, New Clinical Building
Liverpool Hospital
Elizabeth Street
Liverpool
NSW 2170
Query!
Country
112608
0
Australia
Query!
Phone
112608
0
+61407743668
Query!
Fax
112608
0
Query!
Email
112608
0
[email protected]
Query!
Data sharing statement
Will individual participant data (IPD) for this trial be available (including data dictionaries)?
No
Query!
No/undecided IPD sharing reason/comment
Query!
What supporting documents are/will be available?
No Supporting Document Provided
Doc. No.
Type
Citation
Link
Email
Other Details
Attachment
12546
Ethical approval
[email protected]
Results publications and other study-related documents
Documents added manually
No documents have been uploaded by study researchers.
Documents added automatically
No additional documents have been identified.
Download to PDF