Please note that the copy function is not enabled for this field.
If you wish to
modify
existing outcomes, please copy and paste the current outcome text into the Update field.
LOGIN
CREATE ACCOUNT
LOGIN
CREATE ACCOUNT
MY TRIALS
REGISTER TRIAL
FAQs
HINTS AND TIPS
DEFINITIONS
Trial Review
The ANZCTR website will be unavailable from 1pm until 3pm (AEDT) on Wednesday the 30th of October for website maintenance. Please be sure to log out of the system in order to avoid any loss of data.
The safety and scientific validity of this study is the responsibility of the study sponsor and investigators. Listing a study does not mean it has been endorsed by the ANZCTR. Before participating in a study, talk to your health care provider and refer to this
information for consumers
Download to PDF
Trial registered on ANZCTR
Registration number
ACTRN12621001150831
Ethics application status
Approved
Date submitted
15/07/2021
Date registered
26/08/2021
Date last updated
26/08/2021
Date data sharing statement initially provided
26/08/2021
Type of registration
Retrospectively registered
Titles & IDs
Public title
How Does Choice Influence Drug Response?
Query!
Scientific title
How Does Choice Influence Side Effect Reporting in Response to an Inert Medication in Healthy Adults?
Query!
Secondary ID [1]
304767
0
None.
Query!
Universal Trial Number (UTN)
Query!
Trial acronym
Query!
Linked study record
Query!
Health condition
Health condition(s) or problem(s) studied:
Nocebo effect
322820
0
Query!
Attention to negative information
322821
0
Query!
Condition category
Condition code
Mental Health
320410
320410
0
0
Query!
Studies of normal psychology, cognitive function and behaviour
Query!
Intervention/exposure
Study type
Interventional
Query!
Description of intervention(s) / exposure
Previous research has shown that reducing patient choice both leads to higher levels of nocebo responding and diminishes the placebo effect (Bartley et al., 2016). This study seeks to explore the mechanisms through which this process occurs. One possibility is that reducing choice focuses attention to negative information about the medication. This study will investigate whether limiting choice will increase recall of negative information and influence both placebo and nocebo responding. As the medication in this research will be a placebo, reported side effects will be nocebo effects (the negative side effects of an inert agent) and reported medication efficacy will be placebo effects. The placebo itself comprises a capsule containing lactose monohydrate, microcrystalline cellulose and magnesium stearate, and will be administered orally at a single time point during the intervention session. Participation will involve randomisation to either a choice group (in which participants will select one of two “beta blockers” to take) or a no-choice group (participants will be led to believe that they will randomly receive one of the two beta blockers, when in actual fact, they will receive their non-preferred option). Participants will receive a beta blocker information brochure, which was designed specifically for this study and gives an overview of the mechanisms of beta blockers, their potential side effects, and how they may be useful for anxiety. After taking the placebo, participants will wait 10 minutes, and will be told that during this time period, the beta blocker should take effect. Immediately following this latent period, they will take part in 3 short tasks to simulate an examination setting (these include digit span, digit symbol matching, and a recall task). Heart rate and blood pressure measurements will be recorded at three time points throughout the session, along with questionnaires about anxiety and side effects. It is expected that the 3 exam-simulating tasks will take participants 15 minutes to complete. The overall session, including the completion of questionnaire and the repeated measurements of heart rate and blood pressure, will take 50 minutes total. The following day, participants will complete a brief follow-up questionnaire on anxiety and side effects experienced over the prior 24 hours. This will be sent via a link and completed online.
Query!
Intervention code [1]
321154
0
Behaviour
Query!
Comparator / control treatment
After completion of baseline questionnaires and measurements, participants will receive information about the two types of beta blockers, Lopressor and betacarm, and all participants will be provided with a form to select their preferred beta blocker option.
Participants will then be randomized to a 'choice' or a 'no-choice' group, Those in the comparator 'no-choice' group will be informed that they will now be randomized to receive either betacarm, or Lopressor. In actual fact, 'no-choice' group participants will receive their non-preferred option. Participants in the comparator group will also undergo the same assessments and questionnaires as the 'choice' group
Query!
Control group
Placebo
Query!
Outcomes
Primary outcome [1]
328251
0
Side effect reporting - measured through the Side Effect Attribution Scale (SEAS) (Mackrill et al., 2020).
Query!
Assessment method [1]
328251
0
Query!
Timepoint [1]
328251
0
10 minutes after participants take the beta blocker
Immediately following completion of the exam-simulating tasks
24 hours after taking part in the in-person session
Query!
Primary outcome [2]
328252
0
State anxiety, assessed using a short version of the State-Trait Anxiety Inventory
Query!
Assessment method [2]
328252
0
Query!
Timepoint [2]
328252
0
At baseline
10 minutes after participants take the beta blocker
Immediately following completion of the exam-simulating tasks
24 hours after taking part in the in-person session
Query!
Secondary outcome [1]
398255
0
Blood pressure, using a sphygmomanometer
Query!
Assessment method [1]
398255
0
Query!
Timepoint [1]
398255
0
At baseline
10 minutes after participants take the beta blocker
Immediately following completion of the exam-simulating tasks
Query!
Secondary outcome [2]
398256
0
Heart rate, measured by an iHealth Wireless Blood Pressure Monitor
Query!
Assessment method [2]
398256
0
Query!
Timepoint [2]
398256
0
At baseline
10 minutes after participants take the beta blocker
Immediately following completion of the exam-simulating tasks
Query!
Eligibility
Key inclusion criteria
18+ years old
English speaking
Query!
Minimum age
18
Years
Query!
Query!
Maximum age
No limit
Query!
Query!
Sex
Both males and females
Query!
Can healthy volunteers participate?
Yes
Query!
Key exclusion criteria
The research necessitates that those participating believe that they are taking a beta blocker. As such, exclusion criteria is as follows:
Those already taking beta blockers
Those taking taking calcium channel blocker medications or digoxin, which are known to interfere with beta blockers
Those with any conditions with which beta blockers are unable to be taken –
such as low heart rate or blood pressure, bronchospasms, diabetes, asthma
Those with any known reactions to beta blockers
Those who are pregnant, or trying to get pregnant.
Query!
Study design
Purpose of the study
Educational / counselling / training
Query!
Allocation to intervention
Randomised controlled trial
Query!
Procedure for enrolling a subject and allocating the treatment (allocation concealment procedures)
This was done via sealed opaque envelopes.
Query!
Methods used to generate the sequence in which subjects will be randomised (sequence generation)
This was achieved using a randomisation table created by computer software.
Query!
Masking / blinding
Open (masking not used)
Query!
Who is / are masked / blinded?
Query!
Query!
Query!
Query!
Intervention assignment
Parallel
Query!
Other design features
Query!
Phase
Not Applicable
Query!
Type of endpoint/s
Efficacy
Query!
Statistical methods / analysis
A total of 82 participants are required to detect a medium effect size in the difference in the number of symptoms reported between
the choice and no choice groups, at an alpha level of .05.
As such, the intention is to recruit 41 participants in each group (those provided with a choice of medication, and those allocated a
medication).
Query!
Recruitment
Recruitment status
Recruiting
Query!
Date of first participant enrolment
Anticipated
Query!
Actual
4/08/2021
Query!
Date of last participant enrolment
Anticipated
15/10/2021
Query!
Actual
Query!
Date of last data collection
Anticipated
Query!
Actual
Query!
Sample size
Target
82
Query!
Accrual to date
10
Query!
Final
Query!
Recruitment outside Australia
Country [1]
23966
0
New Zealand
Query!
State/province [1]
23966
0
Auckland
Query!
Funding & Sponsors
Funding source category [1]
309138
0
University
Query!
Name [1]
309138
0
University of Auckland
Query!
Address [1]
309138
0
Department of Psychological Medicine, University of Auckland
85 Park Road, Grafton, Auckland, 1023
Query!
Country [1]
309138
0
New Zealand
Query!
Primary sponsor type
University
Query!
Name
University of Auckland
Query!
Address
Department of Psychological Medicine, University of Auckland
85 Park Road, Grafton, Auckland, 1023
Query!
Country
New Zealand
Query!
Secondary sponsor category [1]
310092
0
None
Query!
Name [1]
310092
0
Query!
Address [1]
310092
0
Query!
Country [1]
310092
0
Query!
Other collaborator category [1]
281913
0
University
Query!
Name [1]
281913
0
University of New South Wales
Query!
Address [1]
281913
0
High St
Kensington, NSW 2052
Australia
Query!
Country [1]
281913
0
Australia
Query!
Ethics approval
Ethics application status
Approved
Query!
Ethics committee name [1]
309005
0
University of Auckland Human Participants Ethics Committee
Query!
Ethics committee address [1]
309005
0
University of Auckland Office of Research Strategy and Integrity Level 3, 49 Symonds Street Private Bag 92019 Auckland 1142
Query!
Ethics committee country [1]
309005
0
New Zealand
Query!
Date submitted for ethics approval [1]
309005
0
07/07/2021
Query!
Approval date [1]
309005
0
19/07/2021
Query!
Ethics approval number [1]
309005
0
UAHPEC22835
Query!
Summary
Brief summary
Previous research has shown that reducing choice both leads to higher levels of nocebo responding and diminishes the placebo effect (Bartley, Faasse, Horne & Petrie, 2016). This study seeks to explore the mechanisms through which this process occurs. One possibility is that reducing choice focuses attention on negative information about medication. In a study where participants are randomised to either get a choice of medication or not, we investigate whether a lack of choice increases focus and recall of negative information about a medication. As the medication in this research will be a placebo, reported side effects will be nocebo effects (the reported side effects from an inert agent) and reported medication efficacy will be placebo effects. Hypothesis 1: Providing participants with a choice in medication will result in fewer nocebo effects and greater placebo response than participants who have been given no choice of medication (replication of Bartley et al. 2016). Hypothesis 2: The no choice group will show a greater recall of negative information supplied about the medication.
Query!
Trial website
Query!
Trial related presentations / publications
Query!
Public notes
Query!
Contacts
Principal investigator
Name
112626
0
Prof Keith Petrie
Query!
Address
112626
0
Department of Psychological Medicine
University of Auckland
85 Park Road
Grafton, 1023
Auckland
Query!
Country
112626
0
New Zealand
Query!
Phone
112626
0
+64211117222
Query!
Fax
112626
0
Query!
Email
112626
0
[email protected]
Query!
Contact person for public queries
Name
112627
0
Keith Petrie
Query!
Address
112627
0
Department of Psychological Medicine
University of Auckland
85 Park Road
Grafton, 1023
Auckland
Query!
Country
112627
0
New Zealand
Query!
Phone
112627
0
+64211117222
Query!
Fax
112627
0
Query!
Email
112627
0
[email protected]
Query!
Contact person for scientific queries
Name
112628
0
Keith Petrie
Query!
Address
112628
0
Department of Psychological Medicine
University of Auckland
85 Park Road
Grafton, 1023
Auckland
Query!
Country
112628
0
New Zealand
Query!
Phone
112628
0
+64211117222
Query!
Fax
112628
0
Query!
Email
112628
0
[email protected]
Query!
Data sharing statement
Will individual participant data (IPD) for this trial be available (including data dictionaries)?
No
Query!
No/undecided IPD sharing reason/comment
Data will be available only to the research team for the purposes of analysis.
Query!
What supporting documents are/will be available?
No Supporting Document Provided
Doc. No.
Type
Citation
Link
Email
Other Details
Attachment
12530
Informed consent form
382392-(Uploaded-09-08-2021-12-09-31)-Study-related document.pdf
Results publications and other study-related documents
Documents added manually
No documents have been uploaded by study researchers.
Documents added automatically
No additional documents have been identified.
Download to PDF