Please note that the copy function is not enabled for this field.
If you wish to
modify
existing outcomes, please copy and paste the current outcome text into the Update field.
LOGIN
CREATE ACCOUNT
LOGIN
CREATE ACCOUNT
MY TRIALS
REGISTER TRIAL
FAQs
HINTS AND TIPS
DEFINITIONS
Trial Review
The ANZCTR website will be unavailable from 1pm until 3pm (AEDT) on Wednesday the 30th of October for website maintenance. Please be sure to log out of the system in order to avoid any loss of data.
The safety and scientific validity of this study is the responsibility of the study sponsor and investigators. Listing a study does not mean it has been endorsed by the ANZCTR. Before participating in a study, talk to your health care provider and refer to this
information for consumers
Download to PDF
Trial registered on ANZCTR
Registration number
ACTRN12622000049774
Ethics application status
Approved
Date submitted
18/11/2021
Date registered
17/01/2022
Date last updated
17/01/2022
Date data sharing statement initially provided
17/01/2022
Date results provided
17/01/2022
Type of registration
Retrospectively registered
Titles & IDs
Public title
Is there a relationship between processed electroencephalogram (EEG) characteristics during anaesthesia and general level of health?
Query!
Scientific title
A preliminary investigation of the relationship between EEG alpha power during anaesthesia and frailty in older adults.
Query!
Secondary ID [1]
305814
0
NONE
Query!
Universal Trial Number (UTN)
U1111-1271-7134
Query!
Trial acronym
EEGLoH
Query!
Linked study record
Query!
Health condition
Health condition(s) or problem(s) studied:
Frailty
324342
0
Query!
Cognitive ability
324343
0
Query!
Physical ability
324344
0
Query!
Condition category
Condition code
Mental Health
322053
322053
0
0
Query!
Studies of normal psychology, cognitive function and behaviour
Query!
Intervention/exposure
Study type
Observational
Query!
Patient registry
False
Query!
Target follow-up duration
Query!
Target follow-up type
Query!
Description of intervention(s) / exposure
Preoperative administration of:
the Montreal Cognitive Assessment (MOCA),
the WHO disability assessment schedule (WHODAS),
the Edmonton Frailty assessment - and
a timed ‘get up & go test’ (TUG).
Administered/overseen by a single study researcher (for consistency) in the hospital setting prior to surgery. The assessments take approximately 30 minutes in total and, excepting the WHODAS, carried out only once.
The WHODAS to be repeated (in-house) at Day 1 post-op and, usually, via telephone at Day 30 post-op. Duration of each follow-up approximately 5-10 minutes.
EEG monitoring will be carried out by the procedural anaesthetist in the normal way and data collection will commence 15 minutes after the induction of anaesthesia and continue for a total of 20 minutes.
Study description: Participants recruited between October 2018 and January 2019. Subjects were surgical candidates 65 years or older. Exclusion criteria included cardiac, neurological, or hip procedures, or inability to complete the initial health assessment questionnaires. Consenting participants completed four assessments: The WHO Disability Assessment Schedule (WHODAS), the Edmonton Frail Scale, the Timed Get Up and Go (TUG) and the Montreal Cognitive Assessment (MoCA). During anaesthesia a Masimo Sedline pEEG monitor was used. Anesthesia management was not standardized. Raw EEG data from the four frontal channels used by Sedline were downloaded and analysed offline. The primary outcome measure was mean absolute alpha power over the 20 min period commencing 15min after induction of anaesthesia. WHODAS was repeated at post-op days 1 & one month.
Query!
Intervention code [1]
322220
0
Diagnosis / Prognosis
Query!
Comparator / control treatment
No control group.
Query!
Control group
Uncontrolled
Query!
Outcomes
Primary outcome [1]
329593
0
Mean absolute alpha power, assessed using EEG
Query!
Assessment method [1]
329593
0
Query!
Timepoint [1]
329593
0
The 20-minute period beginning 15 minutes after induction of anaesthesia.
Query!
Primary outcome [2]
329811
0
Cognitive ability assessed using the Montreal Cognitive Assessment (MOCA)
Query!
Assessment method [2]
329811
0
Query!
Timepoint [2]
329811
0
Assessed on day of surgery (DOS) prior to patient presentation to operating theatre.
Query!
Primary outcome [3]
329812
0
TUG - assessed on DOS prior to surgery.
Using a stopwatch, the researcher records the time it takes for a patient to rise from chair, walk to a three-metre distant mark on the floor, return to same chair and sit down. The recorded time on the stopwatch from ‘Go’ to reseating is their TUG.TUG score
Query!
Assessment method [3]
329812
0
Query!
Timepoint [3]
329812
0
Assessed on day of surgery (DOS) prior to patient presentating to operating theatre.
Query!
Secondary outcome [1]
403112
0
Change in activity level, as measured by the WHODAS score. The WHODAS is an internationally-recognised and ratified scoring questionnaire designed to assess the level of ability or disability in the patient's daily living activities.
Query!
Assessment method [1]
403112
0
Query!
Timepoint [1]
403112
0
Pre-operative assessment.
Day 1 post-operative.
Day 30 post-operative.
Query!
Eligibility
Key inclusion criteria
Patients aged 65 years and over in whom the anaesthetist plans to use processed EEG monitoring. No significant dementia and sufficiently fluent in English to give consent and be able to complete the questionnaires. Patients selected to allow the preoperative assessments to be conducted without delaying surgery.
Query!
Minimum age
65
Years
Query!
Query!
Maximum age
No limit
Query!
Query!
Sex
Both males and females
Query!
Can healthy volunteers participate?
No
Query!
Key exclusion criteria
Patients undergoing intracranial or cardiac surgery;
Patients with neck of femur fractures;
Patients with significant dementia;
Patients lacking fluency in English.
Query!
Study design
Purpose
Query!
Duration
Query!
Selection
Query!
Timing
Query!
Statistical methods / analysis
We investigated the correlation between the energy of the EEG with the preoperative MOCA and “frailty” scores. We also looked at change in activity level, as measured by the WHODAS score. Given the small numbers, we would not expect to see any correlation with major morbidity or mortality. The EEG was recorded and intensity of spectrogram derived off line. The intensity of the spectrogram was scored on an empirical scale. We used a general linear model, adjusting for differences in age and anaesthetic agent. Excel, GraphPad Prism and R were used for data analysis. Analysis carried out in conjunction with the NZ Brain Research Institute.
Query!
Recruitment
Recruitment status
Completed
Query!
Date of first participant enrolment
Anticipated
Query!
Actual
29/10/2018
Query!
Date of last participant enrolment
Anticipated
Query!
Actual
30/01/2019
Query!
Date of last data collection
Anticipated
Query!
Actual
4/03/2019
Query!
Sample size
Target
50
Query!
Accrual to date
Query!
Final
48
Query!
Recruitment outside Australia
Country [1]
24329
0
New Zealand
Query!
State/province [1]
24329
0
Query!
Funding & Sponsors
Funding source category [1]
310162
0
Other Collaborative groups
Query!
Name [1]
310162
0
Christchurch Anaesthetists Instrument Pool
Query!
Address [1]
310162
0
c/- Department of Anaesthesia
Christchurch Hospital,
2 Riccarton Avenue,
Riccarton,
Christchurch 8410
Query!
Country [1]
310162
0
New Zealand
Query!
Primary sponsor type
Hospital
Query!
Name
Christchurch Hospital
Query!
Address
2 Riccarton Avenue,
Riccarton
Christchurch 8410
South Island
New Zealand
Query!
Country
New Zealand
Query!
Secondary sponsor category [1]
311247
0
None
Query!
Name [1]
311247
0
Query!
Address [1]
311247
0
Query!
Country [1]
311247
0
Query!
Ethics approval
Ethics application status
Approved
Query!
Ethics committee name [1]
309851
0
The Northern A Health and Disability Ethics Committee, NZ Health and Disability Ethics Committee
Query!
Ethics committee address [1]
309851
0
Ministry of Health, 133 Molesworth Street, POBOX 5013, Wellington 6011, NZ
Query!
Ethics committee country [1]
309851
0
New Zealand
Query!
Date submitted for ethics approval [1]
309851
0
13/08/2018
Query!
Approval date [1]
309851
0
10/09/2018
Query!
Ethics approval number [1]
309851
0
18/NTA/140
Query!
Summary
Brief summary
The purpose of this study was to explore the relationship between measures of general level of health and EEG characteristics, in particular power in the alpha (8-13Hz) band, during routine anaesthesia. This was done by comparing EEG energy with assessment of the patient's physical and cognitive abilities and the self-assessed ability with which they could carry out routine tasks required of everyday living. We hypothesized that prior awareness of poor physical or cognitive health may allow the anaesthetist to take steps to reduce the risk of post-operative cognitive complications.
Query!
Trial website
Query!
Trial related presentations / publications
Query!
Public notes
Query!
Contacts
Principal investigator
Name
115606
0
A/Prof R. Ross Kennedy
Query!
Address
115606
0
Specialist Anaesthetist
Department of Anaesthesia
Christchurch Hospital
2 Riccarton Avenue
Riccarton
Christchurch 8410
Query!
Country
115606
0
New Zealand
Query!
Phone
115606
0
+64 3 3640288
Query!
Fax
115606
0
Query!
Email
115606
0
[email protected]
Query!
Contact person for public queries
Name
115607
0
Margie McKellow
Query!
Address
115607
0
Clinical Research Co-ordinator
Clinical Audit Co-ordinator
Department of Anaesthesia
Christchurch Hospital
2 Riccarton Avenue
Riccarton
Christchurch 8410
Query!
Country
115607
0
New Zealand
Query!
Phone
115607
0
+64 3 3640288
Query!
Fax
115607
0
Query!
Email
115607
0
[email protected]
Query!
Contact person for scientific queries
Name
115608
0
R. Ross Kennedy
Query!
Address
115608
0
Specialist Anaesthetist
Department of Anaesthesia
Christchurch Hospital
2 Riccarton Avenue
Riccarton
Christchurch 8410
Query!
Country
115608
0
New Zealand
Query!
Phone
115608
0
+64 3 3640288
Query!
Fax
115608
0
Query!
Email
115608
0
[email protected]
Query!
Data sharing statement
Will individual participant data (IPD) for this trial be available (including data dictionaries)?
No
Query!
No/undecided IPD sharing reason/comment
IPD will be shared amongst the study team only.
Study results will be shared more widely.
Documents listed below can be made available to other researchers if requested.
Query!
What supporting documents are/will be available?
No Supporting Document Provided
Doc. No.
Type
Citation
Link
Email
Other Details
Attachment
14140
Other
[email protected]
Project Outline available for viewing at link belo...
[
More Details
]
383137-(Uploaded-18-11-2021-09-02-02)-Study-related document.pdf
14141
Informed consent form
[email protected]
Patient Information Sheet and Informed Consent For...
[
More Details
]
383137-(Uploaded-18-11-2021-08-29-25)-Study-related document.pdf
14143
Ethical approval
[email protected]
NZ Northern A Health and Disability Ethics Committ...
[
More Details
]
Results publications and other study-related documents
Documents added manually
No documents have been uploaded by study researchers.
Documents added automatically
No additional documents have been identified.
Download to PDF