Please note that the copy function is not enabled for this field.
If you wish to
modify
existing outcomes, please copy and paste the current outcome text into the Update field.
LOGIN
CREATE ACCOUNT
LOGIN
CREATE ACCOUNT
MY TRIALS
REGISTER TRIAL
FAQs
HINTS AND TIPS
DEFINITIONS
Trial Review
The safety and scientific validity of this study is the responsibility of the study sponsor and investigators. Listing a study does not mean it has been endorsed by the ANZCTR. Before participating in a study, talk to your health care provider and refer to this
information for consumers
Download to PDF
Trial registered on ANZCTR
Registration number
ACTRN12622001033730
Ethics application status
Approved
Date submitted
1/07/2022
Date registered
25/07/2022
Date last updated
25/07/2022
Date data sharing statement initially provided
25/07/2022
Type of registration
Retrospectively registered
Titles & IDs
Public title
Evaluation of Co-Designed Psychoeducation Practices and Guidelines for Addressing Sexuality After Traumatic Brain Injury
Query!
Scientific title
Assessing the Impact of Psychoeducation on Sexuality following Moderate-to-Severe Traumatic Brain Injury in Adults
Query!
Secondary ID [1]
307463
0
Nil known
Query!
Universal Trial Number (UTN)
Query!
Trial acronym
Query!
Linked study record
Query!
Health condition
Health condition(s) or problem(s) studied:
Traumatic brain injury
326855
0
Query!
Condition category
Condition code
Physical Medicine / Rehabilitation
324070
324070
0
0
Query!
Other physical medicine / rehabilitation
Query!
Neurological
324152
324152
0
0
Query!
Other neurological disorders
Query!
Injuries and Accidents
324153
324153
0
0
Query!
Other injuries and accidents
Query!
Public Health
324154
324154
0
0
Query!
Health service research
Query!
Intervention/exposure
Study type
Interventional
Query!
Description of intervention(s) / exposure
At present, basic psychoeducation on post-TBI sexuality rarely occurs in Traumatic Brain Injury (TBI) rehabilitation healthcare settings. Psychoeducation practices and guidelines will be produced through a series of co-design focus group sessions with rehabilitation health professionals who work with individuals with TBI at the Epworth Healthcare Acquired Brain Injury (ABI) Rehabilitation Unit. These focus group sessions and the co-designed outcomes are expected to create a system-level change at the unit. From which point, all patients admitted at the unit will receive basic psychoeducation on post-TBI sexuality as part of routine care.
Clinician participants of the co-design focus group study will attend two two-hour sessions, which will be held approximately 4 weeks apart. The focus group study will take place immediately before the commencement and implementation of the co-designed psychoeducation practices in the Unit. Due to the co-design nature of the focus group study, the exact outcomes and consequent intervention cannot yet be determined until the completion of said study. However, it is expected that the intervention is likely to include a new set of workplace protocols, procedures, and resources to ensure basic psychoeducation is part of routine care at the unit.
Some examples of possible co-designed outcomes include the amendment of current workplace protocols so that the provision of basic psychoeducation will be become routine and that every patient with TBI will be spoken to about sexuality by either the inpatient or outpatient team at least once. This will represent a huge shift in current practices as both clinicians and patients very rarely raise the issue of sexuality in TBI healthcare at present. Sexuality champions on both the inpatient and outpatient team may be identified during these focus group sessions, who will oversee sexuality discussions staying in the forefront of TBI rehabilitation treatment goals. Focus group participants may co-design the content for take home information sheets that provide basic information on post-TBI sexuality for patients to refer to in their own time. They may also co-design a checklist of psychoeducation content or a clinician decision tree for having such discussions (e.g., a short script for asking permission to speak about sexuality, types of sexuality-related changes that can happen, what patients may experience sexually after returning home, who to approach should there be changes, provision of take-home information sheets or to ask for permission to send info sheet by email, etc.).
To monitor adherence to the intervention, a study-specific questionnaire for patients will include require them to reflect on whether they were provided any sexuality support either verbally, in print, or in written format.
Query!
Intervention code [1]
323920
0
Rehabilitation
Query!
Comparator / control treatment
Source:
The majority of patients with TBI who were admitted from the ABI rehabilitation unit for TBI would have provided consent to be approached for research through a longitudinal follow up study that has been run at the unit by the Monash-Epworth Rehabilitation Research Centre over the past 30 years.
Time period:
Patients who provided consent to be contacted for research will be recruited for this psychoeducation intervention study approximately six months post-discharge, and asked to complete the survey. This historical, treatment-as-usual control group will be recruited over a period of a year. It will be ensured that, at the time of recruitment, these patients would have been discharged from the unit prior to the commencement of focus group sessions and implementation of the intervention at the unit.
Query!
Control group
Historical
Query!
Outcomes
Primary outcome [1]
331854
0
The Brain Injury Questionnaire of Sexuality (BIQS; Stolwyk et al., 2013) is a 15-item self-report questionnaire comprising three subscales measuring sexual functioning, relationship quality and self-esteem, and mood.
Query!
Assessment method [1]
331854
0
Query!
Timepoint [1]
331854
0
Participants will be contacted for recruitment approximately 6 months after discharge from hospital. Participants are expected to complete the survey by 14 days after providing consent.
Query!
Primary outcome [2]
331855
0
For the purposes of this study, the authors developed a rating scale to measure participants' subjective satisfaction with their sexuality. Participants are asked to rate the following question ‘How satisfied are you with your current sexuality?’ on a 5-point Likert scale ranging from “extremely unsatisfied” to “extremely satisfied”.
Query!
Assessment method [2]
331855
0
Query!
Timepoint [2]
331855
0
Participants will be contacted for recruitment approximately 6 months after discharge from hospital. Participants are expected to complete the survey by 14 days after providing consent.
Query!
Primary outcome [3]
331856
0
Participants rate their experiences and satisfaction on different areas of their rehabilitation experience. This is to indicate whether participants received the intervention and if so, to measure satisfaction ratings and feedback of the intervention. Open-text questions allow for the provision of any other feedback regarding satisfaction of sexuality support received, if any.
Query!
Assessment method [3]
331856
0
Query!
Timepoint [3]
331856
0
Participants will be contacted for recruitment approximately 6 months after discharge from hospital. Participants are expected to complete the survey by 14 days after providing consent.
Query!
Secondary outcome [1]
411403
0
The Hospital Anxiety and Depression Scale (HADS; Snaith & Zigmund, 1994) is used as a 14-item measure of anxiety and depression symptoms. Each item consists of a statement about a symptom (e.g., “I feel tense or wound up”) and respondents indicate the degree to which they experienced that symptom over the past week on a 4-point Likert scale ranging from “not at all” to “most of the time”.
Query!
Assessment method [1]
411403
0
Query!
Timepoint [1]
411403
0
Participants will be contacted for recruitment approximately 6 months after discharge from hospital. Participants are expected to complete the survey by 14 days after providing consent.
Query!
Secondary outcome [2]
411760
0
This is a primary outcome.
Participants are asked to rate how they feel 'at the moment' on the following question, "I feel confident in my ability to take care of my own sexual needs" on a 5-point Likert scale ranging from “Strongly disagree” to “Strongly agree”.
Query!
Assessment method [2]
411760
0
Query!
Timepoint [2]
411760
0
Participants will be contacted for recruitment approximately 6 months after discharge from hospital. Participants are expected to complete the survey by 14 days after providing consent.
Query!
Secondary outcome [3]
411761
0
This is a primary outcome.
Participants are asked to rate how they feel 'at the moment' on the following question, "I feel comfortable initiating sexual activities" on a 5-point Likert scale ranging from “Strongly disagree” to “Strongly agree”.
Query!
Assessment method [3]
411761
0
Query!
Timepoint [3]
411761
0
Participants will be contacted for recruitment approximately 6 months after discharge from hospital. Participants are expected to complete the survey by 14 days after providing consent.
Query!
Secondary outcome [4]
411762
0
This is a primary outcome.
Participants are asked to rate how they feel 'at the moment' on the following question, "I worry about the sexual aspects of my life" on a 5-point Likert scale ranging from “Strongly disagree” to “Strongly agree”.
Query!
Assessment method [4]
411762
0
Query!
Timepoint [4]
411762
0
Participants will be contacted for recruitment approximately 6 months after discharge from hospital. Participants are expected to complete the survey by 14 days after providing consent.
Query!
Secondary outcome [5]
411763
0
This is a primary outcome.
Participants are asked to rate how they feel 'at the moment' on the following question, "I feel discouraged when I think about my sex life" on a 5-point Likert scale ranging from “Strongly disagree” to “Strongly agree”.
Query!
Assessment method [5]
411763
0
Query!
Timepoint [5]
411763
0
Participants will be contacted for recruitment approximately 6 months after discharge from hospital. Participants are expected to complete the survey by 14 days after providing consent.
Query!
Secondary outcome [6]
411764
0
This is a primary outcome.
Participants are asked to rate how they feel 'at the moment' on the following question, "I am disappointed with the quality of my sexual experiences" on a 5-point Likert scale ranging from “Strongly disagree” to “Strongly agree”.
Query!
Assessment method [6]
411764
0
Query!
Timepoint [6]
411764
0
Participants will be contacted for recruitment approximately 6 months after discharge from hospital. Participants are expected to complete the survey by 14 days after providing consent.
Query!
Eligibility
Key inclusion criteria
- community dwelling individuals with traumatic brain injury aged 18 and above.
- TBI based on clinical and/or neuroimaging evidence
- Adequate English and cognitive skills to complete questionnaires independently
- Moderate to severe TBI as defined by a post-traumatic amnesia duration of more than 24 hours
- Admission to the Epworth Healthcare ABI Rehabilitation Unit for TBI
Query!
Minimum age
18
Years
Query!
Query!
Maximum age
No limit
Query!
Query!
Sex
Both males and females
Query!
Can healthy volunteers participate?
No
Query!
Key exclusion criteria
- Mild uncomplicated TBI (i.e., PTA duration < 1 day; no abnormality on CT scan)
- Inadequate cognitive capacity to provide informed consent
Query!
Study design
Purpose of the study
Prevention
Query!
Allocation to intervention
Non-randomised trial
Query!
Procedure for enrolling a subject and allocating the treatment (allocation concealment procedures)
Allocation is not concealed
Query!
Methods used to generate the sequence in which subjects will be randomised (sequence generation)
Query!
Masking / blinding
Open (masking not used)
Query!
Who is / are masked / blinded?
Query!
Query!
Query!
Query!
Intervention assignment
Other
Query!
Other design features
This is a cross-sectional study that utilizes a historical control group that will be recruited prior to the development of the intervention. The intervention group will be recruited after the intervention has been developed and implemented.
Query!
Phase
Not Applicable
Query!
Type of endpoint/s
Efficacy
Query!
Statistical methods / analysis
The minimum number of participants required was determined by an a priori power analysis using G*Power3 (Faul et al., 2007) to test the difference between two independent group means using a two-tailed test, a large effect size (d = .80) and an alpha of .05. Results showed that a total sample of 84 with two equal sized groups of n = 42 is required to achieve a power of .95.
The research survey responses will be downloaded from Qualtrics at the end of the study period. Data cleaning and analyses will be conduction with Rstudio. Missing data will be calculated to investigate whether nonresponse is an issue for specific items. If missing data is determined to be missing completely at random or if proportions of missing data are below approximately 5%, complete case analysis or pairwise deletion may be applied (Kang, 2013). Should the proportions of missing data be above 5% and determined to be missing at random or missing not at random, multiple imputation will be applied (Jakobsen et al., 2017).
For comparison of BIQS scores between the treatment-as-usual control group and intervention group, a subscale score will only be computed for a participant if all items on that subscale is completed. A total BIQS score for each participant will only be computed if a score on each of the 3 subscales is available.
Descriptive statistics will be computed for each group for the BIQS subscales and total, as well as the HADS and remaining survey questions. A series of independent samples t-tests will be used to compare the intervention and historical control group on measures of sexuality, mood, and satisfaction with sexuality support during the rehabilitation process at six months after discharge from hospital and return to community. Group differences in age, sex and injury severity will be controlled for.
Query!
Recruitment
Recruitment status
Recruiting
Query!
Date of first participant enrolment
Anticipated
Query!
Actual
5/03/2022
Query!
Date of last participant enrolment
Anticipated
26/04/2024
Query!
Actual
Query!
Date of last data collection
Anticipated
10/05/2024
Query!
Actual
Query!
Sample size
Target
144
Query!
Accrual to date
12
Query!
Final
Query!
Recruitment in Australia
Recruitment state(s)
VIC
Query!
Recruitment hospital [1]
22657
0
Epworth Richmond - Richmond
Query!
Recruitment postcode(s) [1]
37933
0
3121 - Richmond
Query!
Funding & Sponsors
Funding source category [1]
311736
0
Government body
Query!
Name [1]
311736
0
National Health and Medical Research Council
Query!
Address [1]
311736
0
414 La Trobe St
Melbourne VIC 3000
Query!
Country [1]
311736
0
Australia
Query!
Primary sponsor type
University
Query!
Name
Monash University
Query!
Address
Wellington Road
Clayton VIC 3800
Australia
Query!
Country
Australia
Query!
Secondary sponsor category [1]
313198
0
None
Query!
Name [1]
313198
0
Query!
Address [1]
313198
0
Query!
Country [1]
313198
0
Query!
Ethics approval
Ethics application status
Approved
Query!
Ethics committee name [1]
311183
0
Monash Health Human Research Ethics Committee
Query!
Ethics committee address [1]
311183
0
Monash Health
Level 2, I Block
Monash Medical Centre
246 Clayton Road
Clayton Victoria 3168
Query!
Ethics committee country [1]
311183
0
Australia
Query!
Date submitted for ethics approval [1]
311183
0
16/11/2021
Query!
Approval date [1]
311183
0
24/01/2022
Query!
Ethics approval number [1]
311183
0
80518
Query!
Summary
Brief summary
Sexuality is a fundamental aspect of the human experience and is widely considered to be a crucial component of holistic healthcare. While up to 50% of individuals with TBI will experience persistent changes in sexual functioning or wellbeing, post-TBI sexuality is rarely addressed in acute and rehabilitation treatment settings. Addressing TBI sexuality should be a priority healthcare concern alongside other rehabilitation outcomes such as return to work, driving and social participation.
The aim of this study is to evaluate the efficacy of routine psychoeducation on post-TBI sexuality in improving patient sexuality outcomes and general satisfaction levels with sexuality-related rehabilitation experiences. With the severe lack of evidence-based interventions for sexuality issues after TBI, this study may potentially provide empirical evidence to support the practice of using simple psychoeducation to ameliorate sexual problems, which is relatively inexpensive and easily implementable across most healthcare settings.
Query!
Trial website
Query!
Trial related presentations / publications
Query!
Public notes
Query!
Contacts
Principal investigator
Name
120246
0
Prof Jennie Ponsford
Query!
Address
120246
0
Monash Epworth Rehabilitation Research Centre
Turner Institute for Brain and Mental Health
School of Psychological Sciences
Monash University
18 Innovation Walk
Clayton VIC 3800
Query!
Country
120246
0
Australia
Query!
Phone
120246
0
+61 419 320 671
Query!
Fax
120246
0
+61399053948
Query!
Email
120246
0
[email protected]
Query!
Contact person for public queries
Name
120247
0
Prof Jennie Ponsford
Query!
Address
120247
0
Monash Epworth Rehabilitation Research Centre
Turner Institute for Brain and Mental Health
School of Psychological Sciences
Monash University
18 Innovation Walk
Clayton VIC 3800
Query!
Country
120247
0
Australia
Query!
Phone
120247
0
+61 419 320 671
Query!
Fax
120247
0
+61399053948
Query!
Email
120247
0
[email protected]
Query!
Contact person for scientific queries
Name
120248
0
Prof Jennie Ponsford
Query!
Address
120248
0
Monash Epworth Rehabilitation Research Centre
Turner Institute for Brain and Mental Health
School of Psychological Sciences
Monash University
18 Innovation Walk
Clayton VIC 3800
Query!
Country
120248
0
Australia
Query!
Phone
120248
0
+61 419 320 671
Query!
Fax
120248
0
+61399053948
Query!
Email
120248
0
[email protected]
Query!
Data sharing statement
Will individual participant data (IPD) for this trial be available (including data dictionaries)?
No
Query!
No/undecided IPD sharing reason/comment
IPD will not be available in data dictionaries. We do not have ethical approval for this.
Query!
What supporting documents are/will be available?
No Supporting Document Provided
Results publications and other study-related documents
Documents added manually
No documents have been uploaded by study researchers.
Documents added automatically
No additional documents have been identified.
Download to PDF