Please note that the copy function is not enabled for this field.
If you wish to
modify
existing outcomes, please copy and paste the current outcome text into the Update field.
LOGIN
CREATE ACCOUNT
LOGIN
CREATE ACCOUNT
MY TRIALS
REGISTER TRIAL
FAQs
HINTS AND TIPS
DEFINITIONS
Trial Review
The ANZCTR website will be unavailable from 1pm until 3pm (AEDT) on Wednesday the 30th of October for website maintenance. Please be sure to log out of the system in order to avoid any loss of data.
The safety and scientific validity of this study is the responsibility of the study sponsor and investigators. Listing a study does not mean it has been endorsed by the ANZCTR. Before participating in a study, talk to your health care provider and refer to this
information for consumers
Download to PDF
Trial registered on ANZCTR
Registration number
ACTRN12622001156774
Ethics application status
Approved
Date submitted
21/07/2022
Date registered
24/08/2022
Date last updated
24/08/2022
Date data sharing statement initially provided
24/08/2022
Date results provided
24/08/2022
Type of registration
Retrospectively registered
Titles & IDs
Public title
Parenting for life long health: Assessing the feasibility, acceptability, implementation aspects and outcomes of an adapted parenting course for parents in North India
Query!
Scientific title
Parenting for life long health: Assessing the feasibility, acceptability, implementation aspects and outcomes of an adapted parenting course for parents in North India
Query!
Secondary ID [1]
307548
0
Nil
Query!
Universal Trial Number (UTN)
Query!
Trial acronym
Query!
Linked study record
Query!
Health condition
Health condition(s) or problem(s) studied:
Child abuse
326981
0
Query!
Poor parenting
326982
0
Query!
Low resilience
326983
0
Query!
Gender discrimination
326984
0
Query!
Poor mental health
326985
0
Query!
Condition category
Condition code
Mental Health
324175
324175
0
0
Query!
Other mental health disorders
Query!
Intervention/exposure
Study type
Interventional
Query!
Description of intervention(s) / exposure
Parenting for Lifelong Health (PLH) for adolescents is an intervention designed and developed in South Africa, for parents and adolescents from the age of 13 to 18 years. This intervention is an evidence based program on parenting principles such as parent teen communication and parent teen problem solving for risks inside and outside homes. The intervention has 14 modules which were adapted for the Indian context, in consultation with an Experts by Experience group, and called 'Parwarish'.
Parwarish seeks to reduce harsh parenting and violence within families through new attitudes and skill building between parents and adolescents. Module content includes spending quality time together, communicating positively, managing strong emotions such as anger and finding safe support when needed as well as problem-solving, conflict resolution and finance skills, including how to manage a household budget and uses role-plays, activity-based learning and home rehearsal and activities building on social learning.
Parwarish was implemented by the Emmanuel Hospital Association (EHA) Community Health and Development Programme teams based in Agra, Robertsganj (Uttar Pradesh - UP) and Khunti (Jharkhand). A coach was appointed and trained face to face for each location and took responsibility for recruiting facilitators as well as training and coaching facilitators. Trainers from PLH-Teens South Africa facilitated a 10-day face to face course for Parwarish facilitators, and a 3-day face to face training for coaches (total n=25 participants) less than 2 months before the start of the intervention. The facilitators were then coached/trained face to face once every two weeks by the coaches.
The facilitators then led the 14 Parwarish modules over 14 - 18 weeks with groups of 10 - 15 parent-teens dyads, with meetings of 1.5 to two hours and encouraged participants to complete the weekly activity to try at home using a hard copy home-work booklet specifically designed for this intervention E.g., family eats dinner together. Home visits by facilitators, with those who missed a session to review the topic for the week, included a summary of the discussion topic and encouragement to attend the next session and was not more than 30 minutes for each visit.
In each site, a local ‘coach’ supported facilitators with weekly meetings during the intervention, reflecting on their facilitation while a fortnightly coach-the-coaches meeting was led online with someone from PLH-Teens South Africa.
Implementation of Parwarish groups was conducted by pairs of community facilitators with the following criteria for facilitation selection:
Parents of adolescents who were resident in the target community.
Represent an equal mix of genders willing to work as a pair in facilitation (over half of facilitators worked as a married couple).
Trusted and accepted as a leader by the community.
Effective communicators.
Had at least passed class 10th and were fluent in the local dialect or language.
Quality of implementation (adherence to training) was monitored using attendance and checklists filled by coaches and facilitators (summarised below). Separately, a project officer at each location was responsible for research components of the project and supported baseline and endline data collection as well as monitoring and evaluation of Parwarish sessions with other EHA community coordinators in the team. Coaches filled a paper register at each site on the following measures for monitoring adherence to intervention:
• Facilitation and fidelity: 14 of 14 sessions self-reported by facilitators using a 5-point checklist where a score of 1 indicated Poor quality and a score of 5 indicated High quality. The following components of the intervention were assessed with this scale: physical exercise, emotional check in, main teaching topic, role play and completion of home activity.
• Facilitation and fidelity: 4 of 14 sessions for each Parwarish group were observed and measured by the coach, EHA project manager or a researcher who had all been trained to fill using the same criteria. Fidelity assessed the five aspects above and two additional aspects, namely: facilitator engagement, and completion of registers.
• Attendance of facilitators and coaches at trainings and coaching: attendance register.
• Attendance of parents and adolescents: attendance register
• Completion of assigned home activities: register.
• Home visits completed by facilitators: register.
Query!
Intervention code [1]
324005
0
Prevention
Query!
Comparator / control treatment
No control group
Query!
Control group
Uncontrolled
Query!
Outcomes
Primary outcome [1]
331984
0
Any change in positive and harsh parenting assessed by subscales from the Alabama Parenting Questionnaire
Query!
Assessment method [1]
331984
0
Query!
Timepoint [1]
331984
0
18 weeks after starting the course (immediately after completion of the 14 modules of Parwarish)
Query!
Primary outcome [2]
331985
0
Any change in parental monitoring assessed by subscales from the Alabama Parenting Questionnaire
Query!
Assessment method [2]
331985
0
Query!
Timepoint [2]
331985
0
18 weeks after starting the course (immediately after completion of the 14 modules of Parwarish)
Query!
Primary outcome [3]
331986
0
Any change in adolescent behavioral problems assessed by Strengths and Difficulties Questionnaire
Query!
Assessment method [3]
331986
0
Query!
Timepoint [3]
331986
0
18 weeks after starting the course (immediately after completion of the 14 modules of Parwarish)
Query!
Secondary outcome [1]
411811
0
Any change in discipline methods used by parents assessed by ISPCAN Child Abuse screening tool
Query!
Assessment method [1]
411811
0
Query!
Timepoint [1]
411811
0
18 weeks after starting the course (immediately after completion of the 14 modules of Parwarish)
Query!
Secondary outcome [2]
411812
0
Any change in the use of corporal punishment assessed by ISPCAN Child Abuse screening tool
Query!
Assessment method [2]
411812
0
Query!
Timepoint [2]
411812
0
18 weeks after starting the course (immediately after completion of the 14 modules of Parwarish)
Query!
Secondary outcome [3]
411813
0
Any change in depression assessed by Patient Health Questionnaire 9 (PHQ9)
Query!
Assessment method [3]
411813
0
Query!
Timepoint [3]
411813
0
18 weeks after starting the course (immediately after completion of the 14 modules of Parwarish)
Query!
Secondary outcome [4]
411814
0
Any change in gender views and attitudes assessed by Gender Attitudes scale (GEMS)
Query!
Assessment method [4]
411814
0
Query!
Timepoint [4]
411814
0
18 weeks after starting the course (immediately after completion of the 14 modules of Parwarish)
Query!
Secondary outcome [5]
411815
0
Any change in adolescent resilience to adversity assessed by Child Youth Resilience Measure (CYRM)
Query!
Assessment method [5]
411815
0
Query!
Timepoint [5]
411815
0
18 weeks after starting the course (immediately after completion of the 14 modules of Parwarish)
Query!
Secondary outcome [6]
412590
0
Acceptability and feasibility of the Parwarish program using a paper register at each site on the following measures:
• Facilitation and fidelity: 14 of 14 sessions self-reported by facilitators using a 5-point checklist where a score of 1 indicated Poor quality and a score of 5 indicated High quality. The following components of the intervention were assessed with this scale: physical exercise, emotional check in, main teaching topic, role play and completion of home activity.
• Facilitation and fidelity: 4 of 14 sessions for each Parwarish group were observed and measured by the coach, EHA project manager or a researcher who had all been trained to fill using the same criteria. Fidelity assessed the five aspects above and two additional aspects, namely: facilitator engagement, and completion of registers.
• Attendance of facilitators and coaches at trainings and coaching: attendance register.
• Attendance of parents and adolescents: attendance register
• Completion of assigned home activities: register.
• Home visits completed by facilitators: register.
These components will be analysed together as a composite outcome to indicate the acceptability and feasibility of the study.
Query!
Assessment method [6]
412590
0
Query!
Timepoint [6]
412590
0
During the 18 weeks of intervention
Query!
Eligibility
Key inclusion criteria
Young people and their parents resident in target areas of EHA Community Health and Development Programme teams based in Agra, Robertsganj (UP) and Khunti (Jharkhand).
Aged 13 - 18 years
Query!
Minimum age
13
Years
Query!
Query!
Maximum age
No limit
Query!
Query!
Sex
Both males and females
Query!
Can healthy volunteers participate?
Yes
Query!
Key exclusion criteria
Young people and families not residing in the area for the ensuing 15 weeks.
Query!
Study design
Purpose of the study
Prevention
Query!
Allocation to intervention
Non-randomised trial
Query!
Procedure for enrolling a subject and allocating the treatment (allocation concealment procedures)
Query!
Methods used to generate the sequence in which subjects will be randomised (sequence generation)
Query!
Masking / blinding
Open (masking not used)
Query!
Who is / are masked / blinded?
Query!
Query!
Query!
Query!
Intervention assignment
Single group
Query!
Other design features
Pre-post uncontrolled study
Query!
Phase
Not Applicable
Query!
Type of endpoint/s
Efficacy
Query!
Statistical methods / analysis
Basic descriptive statistics and t-test to determine significant change in mean scores. Regression analysis.
The qualitative data was analysed using thematic analysis to manually code and group data into themes (Braun and Clarke 2006) to better understand the acceptability, feasibility and implementation aspects of the parenting intervention.
Realist evaluation was done to understand context and mechanism linked to outcomes
Query!
Recruitment
Recruitment status
Completed
Query!
Date of first participant enrolment
Anticipated
Query!
Actual
15/04/2019
Query!
Date of last participant enrolment
Anticipated
Query!
Actual
1/06/2019
Query!
Date of last data collection
Anticipated
Query!
Actual
31/12/2019
Query!
Sample size
Target
115
Query!
Accrual to date
Query!
Final
239
Query!
Recruitment outside Australia
Country [1]
24890
0
India
Query!
State/province [1]
24890
0
Uttar Pradesh and Jharkhand
Query!
Funding & Sponsors
Funding source category [1]
311821
0
Hospital
Query!
Name [1]
311821
0
Herbertpur Christian Hospital
Query!
Address [1]
311821
0
Athan Bagh, Herbertpur, Uttarakhand 248142
Query!
Country [1]
311821
0
India
Query!
Primary sponsor type
Individual
Query!
Name
Kaaren Mathias
Query!
Address
University of Canterbury
20 Kirkwood Avenue, Upper Riccarton, Christchurch 8041
NZ
Query!
Country
New Zealand
Query!
Secondary sponsor category [1]
313296
0
Individual
Query!
Name [1]
313296
0
Pooja S Pillai
Query!
Address [1]
313296
0
Herbertpur Christian Hospital, Emmanuel Hospital Association,
Athan Bagh, Herbertpur, Uttarakhand 248142
Query!
Country [1]
313296
0
India
Query!
Ethics approval
Ethics application status
Approved
Query!
Ethics committee name [1]
311265
0
Emmanuel Hospital Association Institutional Ethics Committee
Query!
Ethics committee address [1]
311265
0
808/92 Deepali Building, Nehru place, New Delhi, 110019
Query!
Ethics committee country [1]
311265
0
India
Query!
Date submitted for ethics approval [1]
311265
0
01/11/2018
Query!
Approval date [1]
311265
0
10/01/2019
Query!
Ethics approval number [1]
311265
0
Protocol 191
Query!
Summary
Brief summary
This parwarish intervention has 14 modules on parenting, which were adapted for the Indian context, in consultation with an Experts by Experience group. Parwarish seeks to reduce harsh parenting and violence within families through new attitudes and skill building between parents and adolescents. Parwarish was implemented by the EHA Community Health and Development Programme teams based in Agra, Robertsganj (UP) and Khunti (Jharkhand). Our hypothesis was; Does the parenting intervention developed by WHO (parenting for lifelong Health; PLH - adolescents) lead to better outcomes for parents and adolescents in resource poor settings in North India? The overall aim of the study was to assess the acceptability, feasibility, implementation aspects and outcomes of a parenting intervention for parents of adolescents aged 13 to 18 years in urban slums of North India.
Query!
Trial website
Query!
Trial related presentations / publications
Query!
Public notes
Process evaluation has been published with the following reference: Mathias K, Nayak P, Singh P, et al Is the Parwarish parenting intervention feasible and relevant for young people and parents in diverse settings in India? A mixed methods process evaluation BMJ Open 2022;12:e054553. doi: 10.1136/bmjopen-2021-054553
Query!
Contacts
Principal investigator
Name
120502
0
Mrs Pooja S Pillai
Query!
Address
120502
0
Herbertpur christian Hospital,
Athan Bagh, Herbertpur, Dehradun, 248142
Query!
Country
120502
0
India
Query!
Phone
120502
0
+917300836960
Query!
Fax
120502
0
Query!
Email
120502
0
[email protected]
Query!
Contact person for public queries
Name
120503
0
Pooja S Pillai
Query!
Address
120503
0
Herbertpur christian Hospital,
Athan Bagh, Herbertpur, Dehradun, 248142
Query!
Country
120503
0
India
Query!
Phone
120503
0
+917300836960
Query!
Fax
120503
0
Query!
Email
120503
0
[email protected]
Query!
Contact person for scientific queries
Name
120504
0
Kaaren Mathias
Query!
Address
120504
0
University of Canterbury, School of health sciences, Arts road, 8041
Christchurch, New Zealand
Query!
Country
120504
0
New Zealand
Query!
Phone
120504
0
+642041497530
Query!
Fax
120504
0
Query!
Email
120504
0
[email protected]
Query!
Data sharing statement
Will individual participant data (IPD) for this trial be available (including data dictionaries)?
No
Query!
No/undecided IPD sharing reason/comment
Sensitive data pertaining to mental health status cannot be shared and needs to maintain confidentiality.
Query!
What supporting documents are/will be available?
No Supporting Document Provided
Doc. No.
Type
Citation
Link
Email
Other Details
Attachment
16697
Ethical approval
384361-(Uploaded-20-07-2022-17-05-47)-Study-related document.pdf
16699
Other
Mathias K, Nayak P, Singh P, et al, Is the Parwarish parenting intervention feasible and relevant for young people and parents in diverse settings in India? A mixed methods process evaluationBMJ Open 2022;12:e054553. doi: 10.1136/bmjopen-2021-054553
384361-(Uploaded-20-07-2022-18-31-32)-Study-related document.pdf
Results publications and other study-related documents
Documents added manually
No documents have been uploaded by study researchers.
Documents added automatically
No additional documents have been identified.
Download to PDF