Please note that the copy function is not enabled for this field.
If you wish to
modify
existing outcomes, please copy and paste the current outcome text into the Update field.
LOGIN
CREATE ACCOUNT
LOGIN
CREATE ACCOUNT
MY TRIALS
REGISTER TRIAL
FAQs
HINTS AND TIPS
DEFINITIONS
Trial Review
The ANZCTR website will be unavailable from 1pm until 3pm (AEDT) on Wednesday the 30th of October for website maintenance. Please be sure to log out of the system in order to avoid any loss of data.
The safety and scientific validity of this study is the responsibility of the study sponsor and investigators. Listing a study does not mean it has been endorsed by the ANZCTR. Before participating in a study, talk to your health care provider and refer to this
information for consumers
Download to PDF
Trial registered on ANZCTR
Registration number
ACTRN12623000890639
Ethics application status
Approved
Date submitted
24/07/2023
Date registered
21/08/2023
Date last updated
1/11/2023
Date data sharing statement initially provided
21/08/2023
Type of registration
Prospectively registered
Titles & IDs
Public title
Mate whenua: follow up after early medical abortion
Query!
Scientific title
Feasibility of self-assessment of ongoing pregnancy after early medical abortion; an RCT
Query!
Secondary ID [1]
307562
0
nil known
Query!
Universal Trial Number (UTN)
Query!
Trial acronym
Query!
Linked study record
Query!
Health condition
Health condition(s) or problem(s) studied:
early medical abortion
327009
0
Query!
Condition category
Condition code
Reproductive Health and Childbirth
324189
324189
0
0
Query!
Abortion
Query!
Intervention/exposure
Study type
Interventional
Query!
Description of intervention(s) / exposure
Self-assessment method of follow up after early medical abortion - using a low sensitivity urine pregnancy test at 3 weeks after taking medications (mifepristone). It takes 1-2 minutes, can be performed at home, and will be followed up by telephone or text with health practitioner.
Query!
Intervention code [1]
326780
0
Diagnosis / Prognosis
Query!
Comparator / control treatment
Serum beta hcg follow up after early medical abortion - comparing level at baseline to level at day 5 to 7 after taking medications (mifepristone). Results are available within 24 hours, is performed at a laboratory, and will be follow up by telephone or text with health practitioner.
Query!
Control group
Active
Query!
Outcomes
Primary outcome [1]
335187
0
Lost to follow up, using audit of patient medical records
Query!
Assessment method [1]
335187
0
Query!
Timepoint [1]
335187
0
6 weeks after early medical abortion (EMA)
Query!
Secondary outcome [1]
423419
0
timing of follow up test, using audit of patient medical records
Query!
Assessment method [1]
423419
0
Query!
Timepoint [1]
423419
0
6 weeks after EMA
Query!
Secondary outcome [2]
423479
0
Ongoing viable (live) pregnancy, using audit of patient medical records
Query!
Assessment method [2]
423479
0
Query!
Timepoint [2]
423479
0
up to 8 months after EMA
Query!
Secondary outcome [3]
423480
0
Successful abortion, defined as termination of pregnancy without need for surgery, audit of patient medical records
Query!
Assessment method [3]
423480
0
Query!
Timepoint [3]
423480
0
6 weeks after EMA
Query!
Secondary outcome [4]
423481
0
Incomplete abortion/retained pregnancy tissue/retained products of conception, audit of patient medical records
Query!
Assessment method [4]
423481
0
Query!
Timepoint [4]
423481
0
6 weeks after EMA
Query!
Secondary outcome [5]
423482
0
Haemorrhage, defined as estimated blood loss 500mL or more (categorised as requiring red blood cell transfusion or not), audit of patient medical records
Query!
Assessment method [5]
423482
0
Query!
Timepoint [5]
423482
0
6 weeks after EMA
Query!
Secondary outcome [6]
423483
0
Uterine infection, defined clinically as fever, tachycardia, tender on exam, or purulent vaginal discharge AND received broad spectrum intravenous antibiotics, audit of patient medical records
Query!
Assessment method [6]
423483
0
Query!
Timepoint [6]
423483
0
6 weeks after EMA
Query!
Secondary outcome [7]
423484
0
Uterine rupture, defined as clinically significant rupture involving the full thickness of the uterine wall and requiring surgical repair, audit of patient medical records
Query!
Assessment method [7]
423484
0
Query!
Timepoint [7]
423484
0
6 weeks after EMA
Query!
Secondary outcome [8]
423485
0
Additional investigations (categorised as blood test, pelvic ultrasound scan, or other), audit of patient medical records
Query!
Assessment method [8]
423485
0
Query!
Timepoint [8]
423485
0
6 weeks after EMA
Query!
Secondary outcome [9]
423486
0
Additional community prescription dispensed (categorised as antibiotics, painkillers, or other), audit of patient medical records
Query!
Assessment method [9]
423486
0
Query!
Timepoint [9]
423486
0
6 weeks after EMA
Query!
Secondary outcome [10]
423487
0
Additional health care visit (categorised as to abortion service, hospital emergency department or mental health service), audit of medical patient records
Query!
Assessment method [10]
423487
0
Query!
Timepoint [10]
423487
0
6 weeks after EMA
Query!
Secondary outcome [11]
423488
0
Surgical intervention, audit of patient medical records
Query!
Assessment method [11]
423488
0
Query!
Timepoint [11]
423488
0
6 weeks after EMA
Query!
Secondary outcome [12]
423489
0
Hospitalisation, audit of patient medical records
Query!
Assessment method [12]
423489
0
Query!
Timepoint [12]
423489
0
6 weeks after EMA
Query!
Secondary outcome [13]
423490
0
Admission to intensive care unit or equivalent, audit of patient medical records
Query!
Assessment method [13]
423490
0
Query!
Timepoint [13]
423490
0
6 weeks after EMA
Query!
Secondary outcome [14]
423491
0
Death
Query!
Assessment method [14]
423491
0
Query!
Timepoint [14]
423491
0
6 weeks after EMA
Query!
Secondary outcome [15]
423492
0
Patient experience, assessed by questionnaire developed specifically for this study, based on published similar patient experience questionnaires
Query!
Assessment method [15]
423492
0
Query!
Timepoint [15]
423492
0
6 weeks after EMA
Query!
Secondary outcome [16]
423493
0
ectopic pregnancy (categorised as ruptured or not), audit of patient medical records
Query!
Assessment method [16]
423493
0
Query!
Timepoint [16]
423493
0
6 weeks after EMA
Query!
Secondary outcome [17]
423494
0
Contraception use, assessed by patient questionnaire, developed specifically for this study
Query!
Assessment method [17]
423494
0
Query!
Timepoint [17]
423494
0
12 months after EMA
Query!
Secondary outcome [18]
423495
0
Pregnancy, assessed by patient questionnaire, developed specifically for this study
Query!
Assessment method [18]
423495
0
Query!
Timepoint [18]
423495
0
12 months after EMA
Query!
Secondary outcome [19]
423496
0
Pregnancy outcome (e.g. miscarriage, abortion, birth), assessed by patient questionnaire, developed specifically for this study
Query!
Assessment method [19]
423496
0
Query!
Timepoint [19]
423496
0
12 months after EMA
Query!
Secondary outcome [20]
423498
0
Seen the primary care health practitioner (if yes, main reason), assessed by patient questionnaire developed specifically for this study
Query!
Assessment method [20]
423498
0
Query!
Timepoint [20]
423498
0
12 months after EMA
Query!
Secondary outcome [21]
423499
0
Staff satisfaction, assessed by questionnaire developed specifically for this study, based on published similar staff satisfaction questionnaires
Query!
Assessment method [21]
423499
0
Query!
Timepoint [21]
423499
0
6 months into recruitment
Query!
Secondary outcome [22]
423501
0
Health care utilisation cost, using the dataset, and basing it on pharmaceutical, equipment and consumable costs, and health care utilisation cost
Query!
Assessment method [22]
423501
0
Query!
Timepoint [22]
423501
0
at end of trial
Query!
Secondary outcome [23]
423502
0
Incremental cost effective ratio for lost to follow up (LFU) rate, using the dataset
Query!
Assessment method [23]
423502
0
Query!
Timepoint [23]
423502
0
at end of trial
Query!
Secondary outcome [24]
425463
0
Gestational age in weeks at detection of ongoing pregnancy, audit of patient medical records
Query!
Assessment method [24]
425463
0
Query!
Timepoint [24]
425463
0
8 months after EMA
Query!
Secondary outcome [25]
425464
0
outcome of ongoing pregnancy (categorised as live birth, stillbirth, miscarriage, ectopic pregnancy, surgical abortion, medical abortion), audit of patient medical records
Query!
Assessment method [25]
425464
0
Query!
Timepoint [25]
425464
0
8 months after EMA
Query!
Secondary outcome [26]
425465
0
number of additional investigations, audit of medical patient records
Query!
Assessment method [26]
425465
0
Query!
Timepoint [26]
425465
0
6 weeks after EMA
Query!
Secondary outcome [27]
425466
0
number of additional prescriptions, audit of patient medical records
Query!
Assessment method [27]
425466
0
Query!
Timepoint [27]
425466
0
6 weeks after EMA
Query!
Secondary outcome [28]
425467
0
number of additional health care visits, audit of patient medical records
Query!
Assessment method [28]
425467
0
Query!
Timepoint [28]
425467
0
6 weeks after EMA
Query!
Secondary outcome [29]
425468
0
type of additional surgical intervention, audit of medical patient records
Query!
Assessment method [29]
425468
0
Query!
Timepoint [29]
425468
0
6 weeks after EMA
Query!
Secondary outcome [30]
425469
0
length of stay in intensive care, audit of patient medical records
Query!
Assessment method [30]
425469
0
Query!
Timepoint [30]
425469
0
6 weeks after EMA
Query!
Secondary outcome [31]
425470
0
primary reason for admission to intensive care, audit of patient medical records
Query!
Assessment method [31]
425470
0
Query!
Timepoint [31]
425470
0
6 weeks after EMA
Query!
Eligibility
Key inclusion criteria
Included are women having an early medical abortion at 10.0 weeks' pregnant or less, who provide informed consent.
Query!
Minimum age
16
Years
Query!
Query!
Maximum age
50
Years
Query!
Query!
Sex
Females
Query!
Can healthy volunteers participate?
No
Query!
Key exclusion criteria
Excluded are women over 10.0 weeks pregnant, or where the health practitioner believes that a specific method of follow up is contraindicated.
Query!
Study design
Purpose of the study
Treatment
Query!
Allocation to intervention
Randomised controlled trial
Query!
Procedure for enrolling a subject and allocating the treatment (allocation concealment procedures)
Central randomisation using RedCap randomisation module on a computer.
Query!
Methods used to generate the sequence in which subjects will be randomised (sequence generation)
Stratified block randomisation (varying block sizes of 2 and 4), and stratified by centre.
Query!
Masking / blinding
Open (masking not used)
Query!
Who is / are masked / blinded?
Query!
Query!
Query!
Query!
Intervention assignment
Parallel
Query!
Other design features
Query!
Phase
Not Applicable
Query!
Type of endpoint/s
Safety/efficacy
Query!
Statistical methods / analysis
Baseline demographic and clinical characteristics of each study group will be described. Analyses will follow the principle of intention-to-treat, where participants will be analysed according to the assigned treatment group at randomisation. Multivariable models will control for potentially confounding variables. Binary outcomes will be analysed using log-binomial regression. Continuous outcomes will be analysed using multiple linear regression modelling or non-parametric analysis. A p-value of 0.05 will be considered to be statistically significant. Per-protocol sensitivity analyses will also be conducted excluding participants who had major protocol violations.
Non-inferiority for the ongoing live pregnancy outcome will be evaluated by observing whether the lower bound of the two-sided 95% confidence intervals for the difference between the two groups is above the non-inferiority limit of -5. If non-inferiority is evident, assessment as to whether the intervention group has effectiveness superior to that of standard care will be carried out using the same approach but comparing to a zero difference.
Query!
Recruitment
Recruitment status
Recruiting
Query!
Date of first participant enrolment
Anticipated
4/09/2023
Query!
Actual
27/10/2023
Query!
Date of last participant enrolment
Anticipated
30/06/2025
Query!
Actual
Query!
Date of last data collection
Anticipated
30/06/2026
Query!
Actual
Query!
Sample size
Target
736
Query!
Accrual to date
3
Query!
Final
Query!
Recruitment outside Australia
Country [1]
25611
0
New Zealand
Query!
State/province [1]
25611
0
Nationally
Query!
Funding & Sponsors
Funding source category [1]
311837
0
Government body
Query!
Name [1]
311837
0
Health Research Council New Zealand
Query!
Address [1]
311837
0
Level 1 South Tower, 110 Symonds Street, Grafton, Auckland 1010
Query!
Country [1]
311837
0
New Zealand
Query!
Primary sponsor type
University
Query!
Name
University of Auckland
Query!
Address
Private Bag 92019
Auckland 1142
New Zealand
Query!
Country
New Zealand
Query!
Secondary sponsor category [1]
313312
0
None
Query!
Name [1]
313312
0
Query!
Address [1]
313312
0
Query!
Country [1]
313312
0
Query!
Ethics approval
Ethics application status
Approved
Query!
Ethics committee name [1]
311279
0
Northern B Health and Disability Ethics Committee
Query!
Ethics committee address [1]
311279
0
Postal address: Ministry of Health Health and Disability Ethics Committees PO Box 5013 Wellington 6140 Street address: 133 Molesworth Street Thorndon Wellington 6011
Query!
Ethics committee country [1]
311279
0
New Zealand
Query!
Date submitted for ethics approval [1]
311279
0
06/06/2023
Query!
Approval date [1]
311279
0
15/06/2023
Query!
Ethics approval number [1]
311279
0
Query!
Summary
Brief summary
One in four women in Aotearoa New Zealand (NZ) will have an abortion during her lifetime. Recent abortion law reform, and current health care reform, on a background of a pandemic-fuelled health workforce crisis and a paradigm shift to telehealth, creates the perfect opportunity for this research project to be relevant and timely. This research will progress knowledge about abortion in a NZ context, and the findings will fill a global knowledge gap. Early medical abortion (EMA) is safe and effective; an uncommon but crucial outcome is ongoing live pregnancy. The best method of follow up after EMA to detect ongoing pregnancy is a critical research gap. Few trials compare blood or urine pregnancy tests to ultrasound scan, and no trial compares these tests to each other. Half the abortion services in NZ use comparative blood tests whilst the other half use self-assessment; services estimate that 10-20% of women having an EMA have no follow up. Primary Aim: To assess the effectiveness of self-assessment follow up compared to serial blood test follow up on the rate of lost to follow up (LFU) in women having EMA. Secondary Aims: To assess other outcomes between the two methods of follow up: • Adverse and serious adverse events • Participant satisfaction and acceptability • Health practitioner satisfaction and acceptability • Cost effectiveness Almost 5,000 women have EMA each year. By applying the principle of partnership with wahine and whanau, we anticipate greater uptake with the follow up test, better detection of the uncommon but important outcome of ongoing live pregnancy, and a reduction in unplanned follow up care. Results of this study will inform women, health practitioners and the new national EMA telehealth service about how best to follow up after EMA. Self-assessment will potentially save significant resources in health practitioner time, testing costs, and direct contact with health services.
Query!
Trial website
Query!
Trial related presentations / publications
Query!
Public notes
Query!
Contacts
Principal investigator
Name
120550
0
A/Prof Michelle R Wise
Query!
Address
120550
0
The University of Auckland
Level 1, Building 507, 22-30 Park Avenue Grafton
Auckland
1023
Query!
Country
120550
0
New Zealand
Query!
Phone
120550
0
+64 21302978
Query!
Fax
120550
0
Query!
Email
120550
0
[email protected]
Query!
Contact person for public queries
Name
120551
0
Ashleigh O'Mara Baker
Query!
Address
120551
0
The University of Auckland
Level 1, Building 507, 22-30 Park Avenue Grafton
Auckland
1023
Query!
Country
120551
0
New Zealand
Query!
Phone
120551
0
+64 93737599
Query!
Fax
120551
0
Query!
Email
120551
0
[email protected]
Query!
Contact person for scientific queries
Name
120552
0
Michelle Wise
Query!
Address
120552
0
The University of Auckland
Level 1, Building 507, 22-30 Park Avenue Grafton
Auckland
1023
Query!
Country
120552
0
New Zealand
Query!
Phone
120552
0
+64 21302978
Query!
Fax
120552
0
Query!
Email
120552
0
[email protected]
Query!
Data sharing statement
Will individual participant data (IPD) for this trial be available (including data dictionaries)?
Yes
Query!
What data in particular will be shared?
deidentified dataset including all of the individual participant data collected during the trial
Query!
When will data be available (start and end dates)?
after primary paper is published, with no end date
Query!
Available to whom?
to other PIs
Query!
Available for what types of analyses?
to be determined
Query!
How or where can data be obtained?
on request to the PI, email
[email protected]
Query!
What supporting documents are/will be available?
No Supporting Document Provided
Doc. No.
Type
Citation
Link
Email
Other Details
Attachment
20007
Ethical approval
384373-(Uploaded-14-08-2023-09-24-28)-Study-related document.pdf
20008
Study protocol
[email protected]
20009
Statistical analysis plan
[email protected]
20010
Informed consent form
[email protected]
Results publications and other study-related documents
Documents added manually
No documents have been uploaded by study researchers.
Documents added automatically
No additional documents have been identified.
Download to PDF