Please note that the copy function is not enabled for this field.
If you wish to
modify
existing outcomes, please copy and paste the current outcome text into the Update field.
LOGIN
CREATE ACCOUNT
LOGIN
CREATE ACCOUNT
MY TRIALS
REGISTER TRIAL
FAQs
HINTS AND TIPS
DEFINITIONS
Trial Review
The ANZCTR website will be unavailable from 1pm until 3pm (AEDT) on Wednesday the 30th of October for website maintenance. Please be sure to log out of the system in order to avoid any loss of data.
The safety and scientific validity of this study is the responsibility of the study sponsor and investigators. Listing a study does not mean it has been endorsed by the ANZCTR. Before participating in a study, talk to your health care provider and refer to this
information for consumers
Download to PDF
Trial registered on ANZCTR
Registration number
ACTRN12623000921684
Ethics application status
Approved
Date submitted
20/02/2023
Date registered
28/08/2023
Date last updated
28/10/2024
Date data sharing statement initially provided
28/08/2023
Date results provided
28/10/2024
Type of registration
Retrospectively registered
Titles & IDs
Public title
Efficacy of physical therapist applied treatment (massage, ultrasound, transcutaneous electrical nerve stimulation, low-level laser and exercise program) on pain, disability, psychological and health status of patients with chronic low back pain: A prospective study.
Query!
Scientific title
Efficacy of physical therapist applied treatment (massage, ultrasound, transcutaneous electrical nerve stimulation, low-level laser and exercise program) on pain, disability, psychological and health status of patients with chronic low back pain: A prospective study.
Query!
Secondary ID [1]
307723
0
None
Query!
Universal Trial Number (UTN)
U1111-1288-6732
Query!
Trial acronym
Query!
Linked study record
Query!
Health condition
Health condition(s) or problem(s) studied:
Anxiety
329080
0
Query!
Depression
329081
0
Query!
Somatic symptom disorders
329082
0
Query!
Disability
329083
0
Query!
Pain
329084
0
Query!
Chronic low back pain
329086
0
Query!
Condition category
Condition code
Mental Health
326060
326060
0
0
Query!
Anxiety
Query!
Mental Health
326622
326622
0
0
Query!
Depression
Query!
Mental Health
326623
326623
0
0
Query!
Other mental health disorders
Query!
Physical Medicine / Rehabilitation
326624
326624
0
0
Query!
Physiotherapy
Query!
Neurological
326625
326625
0
0
Query!
Other neurological disorders
Query!
Intervention/exposure
Study type
Interventional
Query!
Description of intervention(s) / exposure
The conventional intervention was administered to lumbosacral part by a physical therapist (one-on-one), including massage, ultrasound, TENS, low-level laser and exercise program (a sum of 10 sessions with all components of the intervention, 5 consecutive weekdays using a session attendance log). Massage (with deep stroking, wringing, friction, pulling and rolling techniques) and continuous ultrasound (frequency : 1 MHz, intensity : 1.5 W/cm2) lasted for 15 minutes and 5 minutes, respectively. Additionally, TENS was applied to lumbosacral part with four cutaneous electrodes for 20 minutes. Exercise program consisted of a strengthening part of the back and frontal abdominal muscles performed for 20 minutes with a set of 10 repetitions on each exercise (pelvic tilt, abdominal hollowing, knee to chest, oblique crunch, supine plank, bird and dog, cat and camel, lower abdominal and back extension exercises), as well as a stretching part of the hip flexors, hamstrings and lumbar extensors performed for 30 seconds on each muscle group. Last but not least, continuous low-level laser was applied with a contact method at four points over both sides of the spinal column for 80 seconds (830 nm, 120 m, 0-50000 Hz). During the treatment, patients could select to sit in a chair or lie down on a bed in the prone position in order to control for positional intolerance.
Query!
Intervention code [1]
325483
0
Diagnosis / Prognosis
Query!
Comparator / control treatment
No control group
Query!
Control group
Uncontrolled
Query!
Outcomes
Primary outcome [1]
333935
0
Somatic symptom disorders (mean and median) assesd using Somatic Symptom Scale-8 (SSS-8)
Query!
Assessment method [1]
333935
0
Query!
Timepoint [1]
333935
0
Timepoint: Baseline , 2 weeks (primary endpoint) and 26 weeks after the intervention commencement.
Query!
Primary outcome [2]
334481
0
Anxiety (mean and median) assesed using Hospital Anxiety and Depression Scale (HADS)
Query!
Assessment method [2]
334481
0
Query!
Timepoint [2]
334481
0
Timepoint: Baseline, 2 weeks primary endpoint) and 26 weeks after the intervention commencement.
Query!
Primary outcome [3]
334482
0
Depression (mean and median) assesed using Hospital Anxiety and Depression Scale (HADS)
Query!
Assessment method [3]
334482
0
Query!
Timepoint [3]
334482
0
Timepoint: Baseline, 2 weeks (primary endpoint) and 26 weeks after the intervention commencement.
Query!
Secondary outcome [1]
418776
0
Pain (mean and median) assesed using Pain Numerical Rating Scale (PNRS)
Query!
Assessment method [1]
418776
0
Query!
Timepoint [1]
418776
0
Timepoint: Baseline, 2 weeks and 26 weeks after the intervention commencement.
Query!
Secondary outcome [2]
420832
0
Disability (mean and median) assesed using Rolland-Morris Disability Questionnaire (RMDQ)
Query!
Assessment method [2]
420832
0
Query!
Timepoint [2]
420832
0
Timepoint: Baseline, 2 weeks and 26 weeks after the intervention commencement.
Query!
Secondary outcome [3]
420834
0
Health-related quality of life (mean and median) assesed using EuroQol-5D 5 level edition (EQ-5D-5L)
Query!
Assessment method [3]
420834
0
Query!
Timepoint [3]
420834
0
Timepoint: Baseline, 2 weeks and 26 weeks after the intervention commencement.
Query!
Eligibility
Key inclusion criteria
Patients with Chronic Low Back Pain
Query!
Minimum age
18
Years
Query!
Query!
Maximum age
No limit
Query!
Query!
Sex
Both males and females
Query!
Can healthy volunteers participate?
No
Query!
Key exclusion criteria
Subjects with previous spinal surgery or cancer, fibromyalgia syndrome, psoriatic arthritis, rheumatoid arthritis, spinal fracture, cauda equina syndrome, spondylolisthesis, scoliosis less than or equal to 20* and ankylosing spondylitis (red flags).
Query!
Study design
Purpose of the study
Treatment
Query!
Allocation to intervention
Non-randomised trial
Query!
Procedure for enrolling a subject and allocating the treatment (allocation concealment procedures)
Query!
Methods used to generate the sequence in which subjects will be randomised (sequence generation)
Query!
Masking / blinding
Open (masking not used)
Query!
Who is / are masked / blinded?
Query!
Query!
Query!
Query!
Intervention assignment
Single group
Query!
Other design features
Query!
Phase
Not Applicable
Query!
Type of endpoint/s
Efficacy
Query!
Statistical methods / analysis
Quantitative variables were summarized in mean (Standard Deviation) and in median (interquartile range), while Qualitative variables were summarized in absolute and relative frequencies. Mann-Whitney test was used for the comparison of continuous variables be-tween two groups and Kruskall-Wallis test for the comparison of continuous var-iables among more than two groups. Spearman correlations coefficients were used to explore the association of two continuous variables. Spearman’s correla-tion coefficient values (rs) greater than 0.7, of 0.69–0.4, and of less than 0.39-0.1 were considered strong, moderate and weak correlations, respectively.Multiple linear regression analyses were conducted with dependent the health status, disa-bility and pain scales in a stepwise method (p for entry 0.05, p for removal 0.10). The factors that were included as independent variables in the model were socio-demographic (age, sex, marital and employment status, educational level), life-style (Body Mass Index, physical exercise), SSD, depression and anxiety as measured by the SSS-8 and HADS questionnaires, respectively. Adjusted regres-sion coefficients (ß) with standard errors (SE) were computed from the results of the linear regression analyses. Multiple linear regression analyses were conduct-ed after having the dependent variables logarithmically transformed. All report-ed p values are two-tailed. Wilcoxon signed tests were used for pre-post intervention comparisons of all under study-scales. Repeated measurements analysis of variance (ANOVA) was used to assess the variations watched closely in all under-study scales and their association with gender and BMI over the follow up period. Bonferroni correction was adopted in case of multiple testing in order to control for type I error. Repeated measurements analysis was conducted after logarithmic transformations of the scales. Cohen’s d was adopted in order to assess the clinical significance of the intervention effects, whose values of 0. 20, 0. 50 and 0. 80 are suggestive of small, medium and large effect sizes, accordingly. Quantitative variables were expressed as mean values (SD), while qualitative varia-bles were expressed as absolute and relative frequencies. Friedman’s test was used for score comparisons between pre-, post-treatment and 6 months measurements. Bonfer-roni correction was used in order to control for type I error. The effect size estimate Kendall's W value for Friedman test was computed via the formula W = ?2/N(K-1); where ?2 is the Friedman test statistic value; N is the sample size and K the number of measurements. [40] Kendalls uses the Cohen’s interpretation guidelines of 0.1 - 0.29 (small effect), 0.3 - 0.49 (moderate effect) and >= 0.5 (large effect). [41] Multiple linear regression analysis was used with dependent the scores at 6 months. The regression equation included terms for demographics and pre-treatment scores. Adjusted regres-sion coefficients (ß) with standard errors (SE) were computed from the results of the linear regression analyses. Logarithmic transformations of the dependent variables were used due to lack of normal distribution. All reported p values are two - tailed. Statistical analyses were completed using SPSS statistical software (version 22.0) and minimum level of significance was set at p < 0.05
Query!
Recruitment
Recruitment status
Completed
Query!
Date of first participant enrolment
Anticipated
Query!
Actual
1/04/2021
Query!
Date of last participant enrolment
Anticipated
Query!
Actual
30/12/2023
Query!
Date of last data collection
Anticipated
Query!
Actual
30/06/2024
Query!
Sample size
Target
154
Query!
Accrual to date
Query!
Final
159
Query!
Recruitment outside Australia
Country [1]
25276
0
Greece
Query!
State/province [1]
25276
0
Attiki
Query!
Funding & Sponsors
Funding source category [1]
311996
0
Self funded/Unfunded
Query!
Name [1]
311996
0
Query!
Address [1]
311996
0
Query!
Country [1]
311996
0
Query!
Primary sponsor type
University
Query!
Name
School of Medicine, National and Kapodistrian University of Athens
Query!
Address
Address: 75, Mikras Asias str.,
Goudi, 11527 Athens, Greece
Query!
Country
Greece
Query!
Secondary sponsor category [1]
313490
0
Hospital
Query!
Name [1]
313490
0
medical ethics board of primary healthcare services of TYPET (Greek acronym of the Mutual Health Fund of National Bank of Greece Personnel)
Query!
Address [1]
313490
0
Sofokleous 15, 10551 Athens, Greece
Query!
Country [1]
313490
0
Greece
Query!
Ethics approval
Ethics application status
Approved
Query!
Ethics committee name [1]
311418
0
TYPET (Greek acronym of the Mutual Health Fund of National Bank of Greece Personnel)
Query!
Ethics committee address [1]
311418
0
Sofokleous 15, 10551 Athens, Greece
Query!
Ethics committee country [1]
311418
0
Greece
Query!
Date submitted for ethics approval [1]
311418
0
12/10/2020
Query!
Approval date [1]
311418
0
19/10/2020
Query!
Ethics approval number [1]
311418
0
005294/19-10-2020
Query!
Ethics committee name [2]
312479
0
School of Medicine of National and Kapodistrian University of Athens
Query!
Ethics committee address [2]
312479
0
Address: 75, Mikras Asias str., Goudi, 11527 Athens, Greece
Query!
Ethics committee country [2]
312479
0
Greece
Query!
Date submitted for ethics approval [2]
312479
0
10/06/2020
Query!
Approval date [2]
312479
0
19/10/2020
Query!
Ethics approval number [2]
312479
0
1920031321/27/07/2020
Query!
Summary
Brief summary
Many studies have suggested that psychological factors, including anxiety, depression and somatic symptom disorders (SSDs) are risk factors of LBP and predictors of poor outcomes, thus shaping the concept of a “biopsychosocial pain syndrome”. Notwithstanding, few studies have explored the association between psychological factors and especially SSDs and with pain, disability and quality of life in patients with Chronic Low Back Pain LBP in Greece. Namely, SSDs are one of the most prevalent mental health disorders in medical settings and general populations, and are associated with increased healthcare services use and socioeconomic costs, as a consequence of repeated investigations and treatments. Accordingly, strategies to identify SSD at an earlier stage, such as the use of the newly, standardized and validated questionnaire of Somatic Symptom Scale-8 (SSS-8), are essential both for the provision of an optimal targeted treatment and for minimizing its direct, indirect and overall economic burden. Furthermore, a brief (requires only two minutes to complete and score), easy-to-use, highly accurate diagnostic tool for detecting SSD should be systematically incorporated in routine clinical care, with an emphasis on settings with restricted assessment time, like busy primary care surgeries and hospitals. Consequentially, the aim of this doctoral thesis is to investigate changes in pain, disability and quality of life among patients with Chronic Low Back Pain after the implementation of a physical therapy regimen, and to explore the impact of different psychological factors on the above parameters. Sub-objective of the study is to determine the prevalence of somatic symptom disorders, anxiety and depression in those subjects. The study design is prospective and the participants will be followed for six months after the physical therapy intervention. During this period of time three measurements will take place (baseline measurement before intervention and second at the end of it, and then at six months later) using generic and disease-specific self-administered questionnaires, like the Numerical Pain Scale (NPS) for pain, the Rolland-Morris for disability, the EuroQoL 5-dimension 5-level (EQ-5D-5L) for health status, the Somatic Symptom Scale-8 (SSS-8) for somatic symptom burden, the Hospital Anxiety and Depression Scale (HADS) for anxiety and depression and a questionnaire about sociodemographic characteristics.
Query!
Trial website
Query!
Trial related presentations / publications
Query!
Public notes
Query!
Contacts
Principal investigator
Name
121026
0
Mr Matthaios Petrelis
Query!
Address
121026
0
Sokratous 34, 13344 Ano Liosia, Greece
TYPET Physiotherapy Department, Athens, Greece
Query!
Country
121026
0
Greece
Query!
Phone
121026
0
+306977275939
Query!
Fax
121026
0
Query!
Email
121026
0
[email protected]
Query!
Contact person for public queries
Name
121027
0
Matthaios Petrelis
Query!
Address
121027
0
Sokratous 34, 13344 Ano Liosia, Greece
TYPET Physiotherapy Department, Athens, Greece
Query!
Country
121027
0
Greece
Query!
Phone
121027
0
+306977275939
Query!
Fax
121027
0
Query!
Email
121027
0
[email protected]
Query!
Contact person for scientific queries
Name
121028
0
Matthaios Petrelis
Query!
Address
121028
0
Sokratous 34, 13344 Ano Liosia, Greece
TYPET Physiotherapy Department, Athens, Greece
Query!
Country
121028
0
Greece
Query!
Phone
121028
0
+306977275939
Query!
Fax
121028
0
Query!
Email
121028
0
[email protected]
Query!
Data sharing statement
Will individual participant data (IPD) for this trial be available (including data dictionaries)?
No
Query!
No/undecided IPD sharing reason/comment
Query!
What supporting documents are/will be available?
No Supporting Document Provided
Results publications and other study-related documents
Documents added manually
No documents have been uploaded by study researchers.
Documents added automatically
No additional documents have been identified.
Download to PDF