Please note that the copy function is not enabled for this field.
If you wish to
modify
existing outcomes, please copy and paste the current outcome text into the Update field.
LOGIN
CREATE ACCOUNT
LOGIN
CREATE ACCOUNT
MY TRIALS
REGISTER TRIAL
FAQs
HINTS AND TIPS
DEFINITIONS
Trial Review
The ANZCTR website will be unavailable from 1pm until 3pm (AEDT) on Wednesday the 30th of October for website maintenance. Please be sure to log out of the system in order to avoid any loss of data.
The safety and scientific validity of this study is the responsibility of the study sponsor and investigators. Listing a study does not mean it has been endorsed by the ANZCTR. Before participating in a study, talk to your health care provider and refer to this
information for consumers
Download to PDF
Trial registered on ANZCTR
Registration number
ACTRN12623000054617p
Ethics application status
Submitted, not yet approved
Date submitted
13/10/2022
Date registered
17/01/2023
Date last updated
17/01/2023
Date data sharing statement initially provided
17/01/2023
Type of registration
Prospectively registered
Titles & IDs
Public title
Chest x-ray versus low dose high resolution computed tomography in screening Queensland workers for occupational dust lung disease.
Query!
Scientific title
A study comparing the diagnostic accuracy of the current imaging method for screening of occupational lung diseases in dust-exposed workers (International Labour Organization (ILO) chest x-ray (CXR)) to low-dose high resolution computed tomography (LD HRCT).
Query!
Secondary ID [1]
307965
0
Nil known
Query!
Universal Trial Number (UTN)
U1111-1282-4807
Query!
Trial acronym
Query!
Linked study record
Query!
Health condition
Health condition(s) or problem(s) studied:
Occupational Lung Disease
327626
0
Query!
Condition category
Condition code
Respiratory
324713
324713
0
0
Query!
Other respiratory disorders / diseases
Query!
Respiratory
324714
324714
0
0
Query!
Chronic obstructive pulmonary disease
Query!
Intervention/exposure
Study type
Observational
Query!
Patient registry
False
Query!
Target follow-up duration
Query!
Target follow-up type
Query!
Description of intervention(s) / exposure
The research intervention is a single low dose (LD) high resolution computed tomography (HRCT) scan (non-contrast).
The LD HRCT scan will be done in a fully accredited imaging clinic by an accredited radiologist.
There is no dye injection, and no special preparation required.
The scan is performed within a CT scan machine, and takes less than 15 minutes.
The participant will be asked to breathe in and out for different scan images.
The CT scan can be performed on the same day as the workers standard care International Labour Organisation chest x-ray (ILO CXR) or within 3 months of their ILO CXR (to fulfill inclusion criteria).
No further radiological and/or clinical investigation will be undertaken as part of this study.
Query!
Intervention code [1]
324425
0
Early Detection / Screening
Query!
Comparator / control treatment
Standard care ILO CXR (performed on the same day or within 3 months of the CT scan).
Query!
Control group
Active
Query!
Outcomes
Primary outcome [1]
332544
0
Diagnostic accuracy assessment of ILO CXR vs LD HRCT in triggering a radiology positive screening result requiring further investigation; defined as, findings leading to an ILO score of >0/1; and/or classifiable pleural disease; and/or identification of emphysema or interstitial fibrosis. Determined by the sensitivity, specificity, positive predictive value of ILO CXR calculated relative to gold standard (CT). These measures will be assessed as a composite primary outcome.
Query!
Assessment method [1]
332544
0
Query!
Timepoint [1]
332544
0
Once all the scans are assessed by the thoracic radiologists.
Query!
Primary outcome [2]
332561
0
Comparison of accuracy of CXR and LD HRCT in screening workers for clinically relevant disease, the diagnosis of which may be based on radiological and non-radiological assessment. Determined by the sensitivity, specificity, positive predictive value (as a composite primary outcome) of ILO CXR v LD HRCT calculated relative to gold standard of eventual clinical diagnosis of a dust-related lung disease. A dust-related lung disease is defined as one or more of a number of diseases including pneumoconiosis, chronic obstructive pulmonary disease (including emphysema), lung cancer, asbestosis and mesothelioma. These measures will be assessed as a composite primary outcome.
Query!
Assessment method [2]
332561
0
Query!
Timepoint [2]
332561
0
6 months after all the scans are assessed by the thoracic radiologists.
Query!
Secondary outcome [1]
414262
0
Comparison of diagnostic performance of the ILO CXR vs LD HRCT using different thresholds of positivity on the ILO score triggering a positive screening result. The comparison will be between using an ILO score of 0/1 as a trigger vs the current standard of 1/0. Determined by the sensitivity, specificity, positive predictive value and an overall summary statistic of the area under the receiver operating curve (AUC) for the ILO CXR result binarised (positive/negative) calculated relative to LD HRCT result, reporting on these metrics for the two different thresholds for binarisation. These measures will be assessed as a composite secondary outcome.
Query!
Assessment method [1]
414262
0
Query!
Timepoint [1]
414262
0
Once all the scans are assessed by the thoracic radiologists.
Query!
Secondary outcome [2]
414263
0
Cohort analysis for eventual clinical diagnosis of disease (both dust-related and non-dust related) identified through the ILO CXR and LD HRCT investigations as a composite secondary outcome. A dust related lung disease is defined as one or more of a number of diseases including pneumoconiosis, chronic obstructive pulmonary disease (including emphysema), lung cancer, asbestosis and mesothelioma. A non dust related disease includes other disease identified through the diagnostic process, which include heart disease, bony trauma, thyroid lesions, liver lesions, kidney lesions and lung infection (pneumonia). The confirmed diagnostic data will be sourced from the patient’s dust screening program records, obtained through their allocated medical practitioner or screening program records (whichever is appropriate). This will be presented as a population cohort report documenting the prevalence of findings and incidence of identifiable disease.
Query!
Assessment method [2]
414263
0
Query!
Timepoint [2]
414263
0
6 months after all the scans are assessed by the thoracic radiologists.
Query!
Eligibility
Key inclusion criteria
• Minimum of 18 years of age
• Work/have worked in Queensland industry (i.e. coal mine, hard rock mine, quarry and other respirable crystalline silica-exposed work)
• Have at least ten years of occupational dust exposure (coal mine dust or respirable crystalline silica)
• Be undergoing an occupational health assessment that includes an ILO CXR
Query!
Minimum age
18
Years
Query!
Query!
Maximum age
No limit
Query!
Query!
Sex
Both males and females
Query!
Can healthy volunteers participate?
No
Query!
Key exclusion criteria
• Engineered stone-exposed stonemasons or history of exposure to engineered stone products
• Patients with an existing diagnosis of coal workers pneumoconiosis or silicosis
• Patients undergoing ILO CXR for ongoing medical management of disease diagnosed or suspected through previous occupational screening assessment
• Patients with a CT chest study obtained and available to review within the preceding 6 months
• Pregnant or breastfeeding mothers
Query!
Study design
Purpose
Screening
Query!
Duration
Cross-sectional
Query!
Selection
Defined population
Query!
Timing
Prospective
Query!
Statistical methods / analysis
Statistical analysis will be undertaken by an external consulting statistician, to ensure independence in analysis, as well as expertise in interpretation of data and application of appropriate tests. Sensitivity, specificity, negative and positive predictive values and AUC will be reported for the ILO CXR modality compared to the LD HRCT, for the primary and secondary endpoints where applicable.
In the subset of workers who undergo further radiological and/or clinical investigation, a direct comparison of ILO CXR and LD HRCT performance in identifying screening positive cases leading to diagnosis will also be performed.
Query!
Recruitment
Recruitment status
Not yet recruiting
Query!
Date of first participant enrolment
Anticipated
23/01/2023
Query!
Actual
Query!
Date of last participant enrolment
Anticipated
31/07/2025
Query!
Actual
Query!
Date of last data collection
Anticipated
31/10/2025
Query!
Actual
Query!
Sample size
Target
500
Query!
Accrual to date
Query!
Final
Query!
Recruitment in Australia
Recruitment state(s)
QLD
Query!
Recruitment hospital [1]
23272
0
The Wesley Hospital - Auchenflower
Query!
Recruitment postcode(s) [1]
38641
0
4066 - Auchenflower
Query!
Funding & Sponsors
Funding source category [1]
312232
0
Government body
Query!
Name [1]
312232
0
The State of Queensland through the Office of Industrial Relations
Query!
Address [1]
312232
0
1 William Street Brisbane Qld 4000
Query!
Country [1]
312232
0
Australia
Query!
Primary sponsor type
Commercial sector/Industry
Query!
Name
I-MED Radiology Network
Query!
Address
Level 12, 345 George Street, Sydney NSW 2000
Query!
Country
Australia
Query!
Secondary sponsor category [1]
313767
0
None
Query!
Name [1]
313767
0
Query!
Address [1]
313767
0
Query!
Country [1]
313767
0
Query!
Ethics approval
Ethics application status
Submitted, not yet approved
Query!
Ethics committee name [1]
311611
0
The UnitingCare Health Human Research Ethics Committee
Query!
Ethics committee address [1]
311611
0
PO Box 499 Toowong QLD 4066
Query!
Ethics committee country [1]
311611
0
Australia
Query!
Date submitted for ethics approval [1]
311611
0
23/08/2022
Query!
Approval date [1]
311611
0
Query!
Ethics approval number [1]
311611
0
Query!
Summary
Brief summary
This study is a comparative study investigating how ILO chest x-ray compares to low dose high resolution computed tomography (LD HRCT) for early diagnosis of occupational lung disease. As part of this study participants will be asked to undergo a LD HRCT scan, which is new technology using very low levels of radiation. HRCT scans are better at diagnosing early stage of occupational lung diseases than chest radiography. This study will answer the question about whether the low radiation dose HRCT scan used in this study picks up more early stage lung diseases such as black lung, emphysema and silicosis. No Australian evidence has been collected to demonstrate the use the use of LD HRCT in the screening of occupational lung diseases.
Query!
Trial website
Query!
Trial related presentations / publications
Query!
Public notes
Query!
Contacts
Principal investigator
Name
121710
0
Dr Catherine Jones
Query!
Address
121710
0
I-Med Radiology
Level 4, 11 Commercial Road,
Newstead, QLD 4006
Query!
Country
121710
0
Australia
Query!
Phone
121710
0
+61 07 3371 9588
Query!
Fax
121710
0
Query!
Email
121710
0
[email protected]
Query!
Contact person for public queries
Name
121711
0
Katrina Kildey
Query!
Address
121711
0
I-MED Radiology
Level 1, 87 Lang Parade
Auchenflower, QLD, 4066
Query!
Country
121711
0
Australia
Query!
Phone
121711
0
+61 07 3377 5979
Query!
Fax
121711
0
Query!
Email
121711
0
[email protected]
Query!
Contact person for scientific queries
Name
121712
0
Catherine Jones
Query!
Address
121712
0
I-Med Radiology
Level 4, 11 Commercial Road,
Newstead, QLD 4006
Query!
Country
121712
0
Australia
Query!
Phone
121712
0
+61 07 3371 9588
Query!
Fax
121712
0
Query!
Email
121712
0
[email protected]
Query!
Data sharing statement
Will individual participant data (IPD) for this trial be available (including data dictionaries)?
No
Query!
No/undecided IPD sharing reason/comment
In our patient information and consent form we only ask for approval for information to be provided to: people with a need to access patient information required for clinical care, or for the purposes of conducting the research as described, by authorised persons only, and while meeting all legal, ethical and policy requirements.
Query!
What supporting documents are/will be available?
No Supporting Document Provided
Doc. No.
Type
Citation
Link
Email
Other Details
Attachment
17317
Study protocol
384663-(Uploaded-10-10-2022-16-12-58)-Study-related document.docx
17318
Informed consent form
384663-(Uploaded-10-10-2022-16-17-36)-Study-related document.docx
17319
Ethical approval
[email protected]
Results publications and other study-related documents
Documents added manually
No documents have been uploaded by study researchers.
Documents added automatically
No additional documents have been identified.
Download to PDF