Please note that the copy function is not enabled for this field.
If you wish to
modify
existing outcomes, please copy and paste the current outcome text into the Update field.
LOGIN
CREATE ACCOUNT
LOGIN
CREATE ACCOUNT
MY TRIALS
REGISTER TRIAL
FAQs
HINTS AND TIPS
DEFINITIONS
Trial Review
The ANZCTR website will be unavailable from 1pm until 3pm (AEDT) on Wednesday the 30th of October for website maintenance. Please be sure to log out of the system in order to avoid any loss of data.
The safety and scientific validity of this study is the responsibility of the study sponsor and investigators. Listing a study does not mean it has been endorsed by the ANZCTR. Before participating in a study, talk to your health care provider and refer to this
information for consumers
Download to PDF
Trial registered on ANZCTR
Registration number
ACTRN12622001435774p
Ethics application status
Not yet submitted
Date submitted
22/10/2022
Date registered
9/11/2022
Date last updated
9/11/2022
Date data sharing statement initially provided
9/11/2022
Type of registration
Prospectively registered
Titles & IDs
Public title
Postoperative analgesia in robot assisted nephrectomy: a comparitve study.
Query!
Scientific title
Robot assisted nephrectomy: comparison between subarachnoid analgesia, Transversus Abdominis Plane block associated to Quadratus Lumborum Block and intravenous analgesia in postoperative pain control.
Query!
Secondary ID [1]
308042
0
None
Query!
Universal Trial Number (UTN)
Query!
Trial acronym
Query!
Linked study record
Query!
Health condition
Health condition(s) or problem(s) studied:
Postoperative pain in robot assisted nephrectomy
327730
0
Query!
Kidney cancer
327744
0
Query!
Condition category
Condition code
Anaesthesiology
324798
324798
0
0
Query!
Pain management
Query!
Cancer
324816
324816
0
0
Query!
Kidney
Query!
Intervention/exposure
Study type
Interventional
Query!
Description of intervention(s) / exposure
Group TQ: After the tracheal intubation transversus abdominis plane block (TAP block) and Quadratus Lumborum Blocks type 1 and 2 will be performed by an anaesthesist of the study team with ultrasound guidance using an in-plane technique. In the subcostal and posterior TAP-Block + Quadratus Lumborum Block type 1 the posterior abdominal wall will be infiltrated once only with an anesthetic mixture of ropivacaine 75 mg, clonidine 30 mcg, dexamethasone 2 mg, in a total volume of 20 ml. In the Quadratus Lumborum Block type 2, the anesthetic mixture is injected into the posterior segment of the Quadratus Lumborum muscle under ultrasound guidance. In the type 3 block, on the other hand, the needle is positioned between the Quadratus Lumborum muscle and the psoas muscle fascia at the level of L4 transverse process. For each block (performed at the side of intervention) an anesthetic mixture of ropivacaine 50 mg clonidine 15 mcg, dexamethasone 2 mg, in a total volume of 15 ml per block will be injected.
GROUP S: Before general anesthesia, a subarachnoid analgesia will be performed by an anaesthesist of the study team using a 27 G Whitacre needle, in L1-L2 or L2-L3 intervertebral spaces, using:10 mg of ropivacaine, 0,4 µg/kg (ideal weight) of Clonidine 150µg/ml, 2 µg/kg (ideal weight) of morphine 100µg/ml, 0,02 µg/kg (ideal weight) of sufentanil 5 µg/ml in a total volume of 5 ml of saline.
The following parameters will be evaluated right after the recovery from general anesthesia (T0) and at 3, 6, 12, 24,and 48 hours (T3, T6, T12, T24, T48, respectively) from the end of the intervention: static and dynamic NRS, bladder spasms evaluated with a 5 points Likert scale, opioids side effects (nausea, vomiting, dizziness, sedation, itching). We will also record the time between the end of the surgery and the request for the first analgesic additional dose, the number of additional analgesic doses in the first postoperative 48 hours, the possible occurrence of side effects related to the performed procedures, the time between the recovery of gut motility and patient's ability to autonomously walk; we will also evaluate the length of hospital stay and the degree of patient's satisfaction measured with a 5 point Likert scale.
STUDY DURATION TIME: 6 months.
Query!
Intervention code [1]
324704
0
Treatment: Other
Query!
Intervention code [2]
324824
0
Treatment: Drugs
Query!
Comparator / control treatment
Group IV: patients will receive 5mg of intramuscular morphine once only and 1g of intravenous paracetamol once only 30 minutes before the end of the surgery immediately followed by a continuous intravenous infusion of of morphine 10mg and clonidine 1mcg/kg in the first 24 hours. We will monitor the adherence to the intervention through audit of medication charts. Surgical wound will be infiltrated with 20ml of ropivacaine 2mg/ml. Rescue medications will be administered in the following order if pain (measured with numeric rating scale, NRS) is equal or more than 4: paracetamol 1g intravenous once only and, if the pain persists, 2mg of intravenous morphine every 15 minutes up to a maximum total dose of 10mg to reach a NRS lower than 4.
Query!
Control group
Active
Query!
Outcomes
Primary outcome [1]
332629
0
Pain measured with numeric rating scale (NRS).
Query!
Assessment method [1]
332629
0
Query!
Timepoint [1]
332629
0
Every 15 minutes for the first hour postoperatively, and at 3, 6, 12 (primary endpoint), 24, and 48 hours post-surgery.
Query!
Secondary outcome [1]
414125
0
Bladder spasm assessed by a patient self reported 5 Likert scale: 1-no spasm; 2-mild; 3-moderate; 4- severe; 5- intolerable.
Query!
Assessment method [1]
414125
0
Query!
Timepoint [1]
414125
0
Right after the recovery from general anesthesia (T0) and at 3, 6, 12, 24,and 48 hours (T3, T6, T12, T24, T48, respectively) from the end of the intervention.
Query!
Secondary outcome [2]
415002
0
Time to mobilization assessed by accessing nursing notes
Query!
Assessment method [2]
415002
0
Query!
Timepoint [2]
415002
0
First 48 hours after surgery
Query!
Secondary outcome [3]
415003
0
Intraoperative opioids consumption evaluated by accessing medication charts
Query!
Assessment method [3]
415003
0
Query!
Timepoint [3]
415003
0
End of the surgery
Query!
Secondary outcome [4]
415004
0
Time between the end of surgery and the request for the first additional dose of analgesic determined by accessing medication charts
Query!
Assessment method [4]
415004
0
Query!
Timepoint [4]
415004
0
First 48 hours after surgery
Query!
Secondary outcome [5]
415005
0
Total amount of postoperative additional analgesic drugs; this information will be collected from the medication charts
Query!
Assessment method [5]
415005
0
Query!
Timepoint [5]
415005
0
First postoperative 48 hours
Query!
Secondary outcome [6]
415006
0
Time to recovery gut motility; this information will be collected by nursing notes.
Query!
Assessment method [6]
415006
0
Query!
Timepoint [6]
415006
0
First 48 hours after surgery
Query!
Secondary outcome [7]
415007
0
Length of hospital stay; these data will be collected from medical records
Query!
Assessment method [7]
415007
0
Query!
Timepoint [7]
415007
0
First 72 hours after surgery
Query!
Secondary outcome [8]
415008
0
Patient's satisfaction measured by a 5-point Likert scale
Query!
Assessment method [8]
415008
0
Query!
Timepoint [8]
415008
0
First 48 hours after surgery
Query!
Eligibility
Key inclusion criteria
Age > 18 years
ASA I-III
Body Mass Index between 18.5 and 35 kg/m2
Query!
Minimum age
18
Years
Query!
Query!
Maximum age
85
Years
Query!
Query!
Sex
Both males and females
Query!
Can healthy volunteers participate?
No
Query!
Key exclusion criteria
Severe respiratory or cardiovascular deficits
Neuromuscular Deficit (such as Muscular Dystrophies, Myasthenia Gravis, Guillain-Barrè Syndrome, Amyotrophic lateral sclerosis)
Renal failure (creatinine clearance <30mL/min/1,73m2)
Hepatic Failure (Child-Pugh score B and C)
Psychiatric disorders
Allergy or hypersensitivity to drugs used in our protocol
Absolute contraindication to subarachnoid anesthesia (patient refuse, congenital or acquired coagulopathy, surgical site infection, clinically relevant valvular diseases, increased intracranial pressure, severe hypovolemia, sepsis).
Psychotropic drugs ongoing therapy
Chronic therapy with opioids
Concomitant participation to other scientific studies
Incapability to understand risks connected to the study or to provide informed consent
Query!
Study design
Purpose of the study
Treatment
Query!
Allocation to intervention
Randomised controlled trial
Query!
Procedure for enrolling a subject and allocating the treatment (allocation concealment procedures)
Central randomisation by computer
Query!
Methods used to generate the sequence in which subjects will be randomised (sequence generation)
The allocation will be performed by a random sequence of numbers generated by a computer
Query!
Masking / blinding
Open (masking not used)
Query!
Who is / are masked / blinded?
Query!
Query!
Query!
Query!
Intervention assignment
Parallel
Query!
Other design features
Query!
Phase
Not Applicable
Query!
Type of endpoint/s
Efficacy
Query!
Statistical methods / analysis
Data will be first analyzed with Shapiro test to assess the normal distribution. Parametric data will be presented as mean and standard deviation (SD), whereas non parametric data as median and interquartile range (IQR). Statistical analysis will be performed through analysis of variance (ANOVA) for parametric data and Kruskal-Wallis test for non parametric data; ANOVA post hoc analysis will be performed with Tukey test, whereas Kruskal-Wallis post hoc analysis will be performed with Dunn test. Differences will be considered statistically significant when p<0.05.
We determined the sample size assuming alpha=0.05, beta=0.10, and, a standard deviation of 2 in order to detect a difference in NRS at 12 hours after intervention of 1 point; we estimated a sample size of 16 patients for each of the three groups. We enrolled 20 patients per group, considering a potential 20% drop out rate.
Query!
Recruitment
Recruitment status
Not yet recruiting
Query!
Date of first participant enrolment
Anticipated
1/12/2022
Query!
Actual
Query!
Date of last participant enrolment
Anticipated
Query!
Actual
Query!
Date of last data collection
Anticipated
Query!
Actual
Query!
Sample size
Target
60
Query!
Accrual to date
Query!
Final
Query!
Recruitment outside Australia
Country [1]
25019
0
Italy
Query!
State/province [1]
25019
0
Query!
Funding & Sponsors
Funding source category [1]
312300
0
Hospital
Query!
Name [1]
312300
0
Azienda Ospedaliera Universitaria -Federico II
Query!
Address [1]
312300
0
Via Sergio Pansini 5, 80131, Neaples
Query!
Country [1]
312300
0
Italy
Query!
Primary sponsor type
Individual
Query!
Name
Pasquale Buonanno
Query!
Address
University Hospital "Federico II" Via Sergio Pansini 5, 80131, Neaples
Query!
Country
Italy
Query!
Secondary sponsor category [1]
313851
0
Individual
Query!
Name [1]
313851
0
Nicola Logrieco
Query!
Address [1]
313851
0
University hospital "Federico II" Via Sergio Pansini, 5 80131, Neaples
Query!
Country [1]
313851
0
Italy
Query!
Ethics approval
Ethics application status
Not yet submitted
Query!
Ethics committee name [1]
311669
0
Comitato Etico Università Federico II
Query!
Ethics committee address [1]
311669
0
Via Sergio Pansini 5, 80131, Napoli
Query!
Ethics committee country [1]
311669
0
Italy
Query!
Date submitted for ethics approval [1]
311669
0
15/11/2022
Query!
Approval date [1]
311669
0
Query!
Ethics approval number [1]
311669
0
Query!
Summary
Brief summary
The postoperative pain treatment in robot assisted nephrectomy is generally based on the use of systemic analgesic drugs and opioids play a fundamental role. These drugs are characterized by various side effects. In order to optimize pain control, it is possible to combine general anesthesia with subarachnoid analgesia, a technique which allows a dramatic reduction of drug dose and consequently a reduction of side effects by the direct administration of the opioid in the central nervous system. Subarachnoid analgesia (SAA) has proved to be a safe technique, especially when performed at the lumbar level, and it is associated with serious complications only in rare cases. Another technique that effectively reduces intra and postoperative pain in total nephrectomy is represented by the combination of the Transversus Abdominis Plain Block (TAPB) and the Quadratus Lumborum Block (QLB); these approaches showed to be reliable as the ultrasound-guide allows to visualize all the structures involved in the procedure. Our aim is to compare the efficacy of SAA, TAPB associated to QLB, and intravenous analgesia in postoperative pain control in robot assisted total nephrectomy.
Query!
Trial website
Query!
Trial related presentations / publications
Query!
Public notes
Query!
Contacts
Principal investigator
Name
121930
0
Dr Pasquale Buonanno
Query!
Address
121930
0
University hospital "Federico II" Via Pansini 5, 80131, Naples
Query!
Country
121930
0
Italy
Query!
Phone
121930
0
+390817463552
Query!
Fax
121930
0
Query!
Email
121930
0
[email protected]
Query!
Contact person for public queries
Name
121931
0
Pasquale Buonanno
Query!
Address
121931
0
University hospital "Federico II" Via Pansini 5, 80131, Naples
Query!
Country
121931
0
Italy
Query!
Phone
121931
0
+390817463552
Query!
Fax
121931
0
Query!
Email
121931
0
[email protected]
Query!
Contact person for scientific queries
Name
121932
0
Pasquale Buonanno
Query!
Address
121932
0
University hospital "Federico II" Via Pansini 5, 80131, Naples
Query!
Country
121932
0
Italy
Query!
Phone
121932
0
+390817463552
Query!
Fax
121932
0
Query!
Email
121932
0
[email protected]
Query!
Data sharing statement
Will individual participant data (IPD) for this trial be available (including data dictionaries)?
No
Query!
No/undecided IPD sharing reason/comment
Privacy matters
Query!
What supporting documents are/will be available?
No Supporting Document Provided
Results publications and other study-related documents
Documents added manually
No documents have been uploaded by study researchers.
Documents added automatically
No additional documents have been identified.
Download to PDF