Please note that the copy function is not enabled for this field.
If you wish to
modify
existing outcomes, please copy and paste the current outcome text into the Update field.
LOGIN
CREATE ACCOUNT
LOGIN
CREATE ACCOUNT
MY TRIALS
REGISTER TRIAL
FAQs
HINTS AND TIPS
DEFINITIONS
Trial Review
The ANZCTR website will be unavailable from 1pm until 3pm (AEDT) on Wednesday the 30th of October for website maintenance. Please be sure to log out of the system in order to avoid any loss of data.
The safety and scientific validity of this study is the responsibility of the study sponsor and investigators. Listing a study does not mean it has been endorsed by the ANZCTR. Before participating in a study, talk to your health care provider and refer to this
information for consumers
Download to PDF
Trial registered on ANZCTR
Registration number
ACTRN12622001472763
Ethics application status
Approved
Date submitted
7/11/2022
Date registered
22/11/2022
Date last updated
22/11/2022
Date data sharing statement initially provided
22/11/2022
Type of registration
Retrospectively registered
Titles & IDs
Public title
Defining and characterising malnutrition and sarcopenia in patients undergoing oesophageal and gastric cancer surgery: a pilot observational study.
Query!
Scientific title
Defining and characterising malnutrition and sarcopenia, and the relationship with clinical and patient outcomes, throughout the treatment pathway for oesophagogastric cancer surgery: a pilot observational study.
Query!
Secondary ID [1]
308250
0
None
Query!
Universal Trial Number (UTN)
Query!
Trial acronym
Query!
Linked study record
Query!
Health condition
Health condition(s) or problem(s) studied:
Oesophageal cancer
328028
0
Query!
Gastric cancer
328029
0
Query!
Malnutrition
328030
0
Query!
Sarcopenia
328031
0
Query!
Oesophagectomy surgery
328032
0
Query!
Gastrectomy surgery
328033
0
Query!
Condition category
Condition code
Cancer
325089
325089
0
0
Query!
Oesophageal (gullet)
Query!
Cancer
325090
325090
0
0
Query!
Stomach
Query!
Surgery
325091
325091
0
0
Query!
Other surgery
Query!
Diet and Nutrition
325249
325249
0
0
Query!
Other diet and nutrition disorders
Query!
Musculoskeletal
325250
325250
0
0
Query!
Other muscular and skeletal disorders
Query!
Intervention/exposure
Study type
Observational
Query!
Patient registry
False
Query!
Target follow-up duration
Query!
Target follow-up type
Query!
Description of intervention(s) / exposure
Condition observed
1. Malnutrition: baseline (before surgery) and 2 weeks, 6 weeks, 12 weeks, 6 months, and 12 months postoperatively. Assessment of malnutrition includes measuring body weight, body mass index (BMI), weight loss, muscle mass and dietary intake (3-day food diary). Muscle mass will be assessed using computed tomography (CT) when the images are taken at 3 time points for routine clinical purposes (initial diagnosis, preoperative restaging, and 12-month surveillance). Bioelectrical impedance spectroscopy (BIS) will also be used to measure muscle mass before surgery, and 2 weeks, 6 weeks, 12 weeks, 6 months, and 12 months after surgery.
2. Sarcopenia: baseline (before surgery) and 2 weeks, 6 weeks, 12 weeks, 6 months, and 12 months postoperatively. Sarcopenia diagnosis includes assessment of muscle strength (hand-grip strength dynamometer), muscle mass (CT or BIS body composition assessment), muscle quality or density (CT body composition assessment), and physical function (6-meter walk test).
3. Quality of life (QOL): baseline (before surgery) and 2 weeks, 6 weeks, 12 weeks, 6 months, and 12 months postoperatively. Assessed using the European Organisation for Research Treatment of Cancer (EORTC) quality of life questionnaire (QLQ-C30, version 3) and the oesophagogastric cancer specific module (EORTC QLQ-OG25).
Additional information regarding the assessment of the above-mentioned conditions:
1. CT body composition analysis. The CT image used to assess body composition is those taken for routine clinical purposes at initial diagnosis, for restaging after chemotherapy and/or radiotherapy (this time point is before surgery) and at 12 months after surgery. This will take approximately 30-40 minutes to analyze the scan and obtain the results. Assessment of the CT image is done outside of the participant contact time. The CT body composition assessment is completed by a trained and competent dietitian, with supervision and assistance from a radiologist as required. A second trained dietitian will assess 10% of the CT images to determine inter-rater reliability.
2. Sarcopenia diagnosis. The three measurements required to diagnose sarcopenia are muscle mass (fat-free mass index using bioimpedance spectroscopy (BIS)), muscle strength (using hand-grip strength dynamometer), and physical function (using a 6-meter timed walk test). At each time point, these assessments will be carried out by a dietitian who is trained to operate and interpret the results from the BIS machine (no supervision is required). The assessments will take place in the surgical outpatient clinic rooms at Alfred Hospital. We anticipate that it may take up to 30 minutes to complete these assessments.
3. Questionnaires. The QOL surveys and 3-day food diaries are intended to be completed by the participant prior to their study appointment. On the occasion where the survey has not been completed, we estimate that it may take 15-20 minutes for the dietitian to complete them with the patient. Supervision is not required. Completion of the questionnaires will take place in the surgical outpatient clinic at The Alfred Hospital.
Exposure
Potentially curative surgical resection of oesophageal, gastric, or oesophagogastric junction cancer.
Query!
Intervention code [1]
324710
0
Diagnosis / Prognosis
Query!
Comparator / control treatment
No control group
Query!
Control group
Uncontrolled
Query!
Outcomes
Primary outcome [1]
332908
0
Assessment of skeletal muscle index (SMI, cm2/m2) and skeletal muscle density (muscle quality), as a composite measure, using computed tomography (CT) image body composition analysis.
Query!
Assessment method [1]
332908
0
Query!
Timepoint [1]
332908
0
Baseline (diagnosis), preoperatively (re-staging), 12 months postoperatively.
Query!
Primary outcome [2]
333101
0
Sarcopenia diagnosis as defined by the European Working Group on Sarcopenia in Older People (EWGSOP) consensus, using the CT body composition results for the muscle assessment component.
Query!
Assessment method [2]
333101
0
Query!
Timepoint [2]
333101
0
Baseline (diagnosis), preoperatively (re-staging), 12 months postoperatively.
Query!
Secondary outcome [1]
415078
0
Assessment of muscle mass, as fat-free mass index (FFMI, kg/m2), using bioimpedance spectroscopy (BIS) body composition analysis.
Query!
Assessment method [1]
415078
0
Query!
Timepoint [1]
415078
0
Preoperatively, and 2 weeks, 6 weeks, 12 weeks, 6 months, and 12 months postoperatively.
Query!
Secondary outcome [2]
415803
0
Sarcopenia diagnosis as defined by the European Working Group on Sarcopenia in Older People (EWGSOP) consensus, using the BIS body composition results for the muscle assessment component.
Query!
Assessment method [2]
415803
0
Query!
Timepoint [2]
415803
0
Preoperatively, and 2 weeks, 6 weeks, 12 weeks, 6 months, and 12 months postoperatively.
Query!
Secondary outcome [3]
415804
0
Malnutrition diagnosis is defined by the Global Leadership Initiative on Malnutrition (GLIM) criteria, the International Classification of Diseases, edition 10 (ICD-10) and the European Society of Enteral and Parenteral Nutrition (ESPEN) definition. The criteria used to diagnose malnutrition using each of the definitions, and subsequent malnutrition diagnosis will be collected prospectively at each study assessment at the pre-determined time points.
Query!
Assessment method [3]
415804
0
Query!
Timepoint [3]
415804
0
Preoperatively, and 2 weeks, 6 weeks, 12 weeks, 6 months, and 12 months postoperatively.
Query!
Secondary outcome [4]
415805
0
Body weight (measured in kg using calibrated digital scales), height (measured in metres, using height stadiometer), body mass index (BMI, kg/m2), and percentage weight loss (as a composite measure).
Query!
Assessment method [4]
415805
0
Query!
Timepoint [4]
415805
0
Preoperatively, and 2 weeks, 6 weeks, 12 weeks, 6 months, and 12 months postoperatively.
Query!
Secondary outcome [5]
415806
0
Dietary intake, including food, fluids, oral nutrition support, and enteral nutrition, was measured using a patient-recorded 3-day food diary.
Query!
Assessment method [5]
415806
0
Query!
Timepoint [5]
415806
0
Preoperatively, and 2 weeks, 6 weeks, 12 weeks, 6 months, and 12 months postoperatively.
Query!
Secondary outcome [6]
415807
0
Muscle strength, using a hand-grip dynamometer, in accordance with the EWGSOP definition of sarcopenia.
Query!
Assessment method [6]
415807
0
Query!
Timepoint [6]
415807
0
Preoperatively, and 2 weeks, 6 weeks, 12 weeks, 6 months, and 12 months postoperatively.
Query!
Secondary outcome [7]
415808
0
Physical function, using a 6-meter timed walk test, according to the EWGSOP definition of sarcopenia.
Query!
Assessment method [7]
415808
0
Query!
Timepoint [7]
415808
0
Preoperatively, and 2 weeks, 6 weeks, 12 weeks, 6 months, and 12 months postoperatively.
Query!
Secondary outcome [8]
415809
0
Quality of life is measured as a composite outcome using the European Organisation for Research Treatment of Cancer (EORTC) quality of life questionnaire (QLQ-C30, version 3) and the module specific to oesophagogastric cancer (EORTC QLQ-OG25).
Query!
Assessment method [8]
415809
0
Query!
Timepoint [8]
415809
0
Preoperatively, and 2 weeks, 6 weeks, 12 weeks, 6 months, and 12 months postoperatively.
Query!
Secondary outcome [9]
415810
0
Postoperative complications according to the Clavien-Dindo Classification of Surgical Complications criteria.
Query!
Assessment method [9]
415810
0
Query!
Timepoint [9]
415810
0
Postoperatively, within hospital admission.
Query!
Secondary outcome [10]
415811
0
Length of postoperative hospital stay, measured from the date of surgery to the date of acute hospital discharge. Length of stay data will be measured prospectively and taken at the point of hospital discharge and verified using hospital records.
Query!
Assessment method [10]
415811
0
Query!
Timepoint [10]
415811
0
Measured at point of discharge from the acute hospital setting.
Query!
Eligibility
Key inclusion criteria
Adults greater than or equal to 18 years of age.
Diagnosis of an oesophageal, oesophagogastric junction, or gastric carcinoma.
Eligible for oesophagectomy, total gastrectomy or total extended gastrectomy, partial gastrectomy, or distal gastrectomy with curative intent.
Must be a patient of the Alfred Health Upper Gastrointestinal Surgery unit with multimodal treatment options discussed at The Alfred UGIS oncology multidisciplinary meeting.
Query!
Minimum age
18
Years
Query!
Query!
Maximum age
No limit
Query!
Query!
Sex
Both males and females
Query!
Can healthy volunteers participate?
No
Query!
Key exclusion criteria
• Patients less than 18 years of age
• Resection of the oesophagus or stomach for reasons other than carcinoma resection
• Planned for a palliative surgical procedure
Resection of benign cancers, e.g. gastrointestinal stromal tumours (GIST)
Ineligible to undergo BIS assessment due to BMI greater than or equal to 35kg/m2, patients with clinical signs of oedema, patients with endocrine diseases that influence body composition (e.g. Cushing syndrome), patients who have a pacemaker or an electronic implantable device, or patients treated with growth hormone. NOTE: these patients will only be excluded from the BIS component of the study, their CT images can still be obtained to assess body composition.
Patients who do not wish to have their medical follow-up at The Alfred Hospital and who are not willing to come to the Alfred for research purposes only
Patients who are unable to comply with the requirements of the study due to cognitive impairment
Query!
Study design
Purpose
Screening
Query!
Duration
Longitudinal
Query!
Selection
Defined population
Query!
Timing
Prospective
Query!
Statistical methods / analysis
According to relevant studies, approximately 50% of OGC patients are sarcopenic (low muscularity) prior to surgery. Based on the capacity to differentiate a minimum of two distinct groups of patients (sarcopenia and non-sarcopenic) using measures of muscularity the assumption was made that the mean difference in skeletal muscle index (measured by CT) was 10.5cm2/m2 (± 11.9). Given a significance level of p <0.05 and a statistical power (1-ß) of 80% the minimum sample size required to detect the above-mentioned difference in muscularity between groups is 34 participants. To account for a recruitment rate of 85% and allow for a 20% dropout rate or complications preventing repeat measures or mortality, a recruitment target of 46 participants would be required.
Statistical analysis will be undertaken using SPSS Statistics Version 23 (IBM Corp., New York, USA). Parametric and non-parametric tests will be used for normalised and non-normalised variables, respectively. A repeated measures ANOVA analysis will be used to assess changes over time within groups of sarcopenia and non-sarcopenic participants. Correlation (Pearson’s or Spearman coefficient) analysis will be used to explore the relationship between sarcopenia diagnosis, physical function, muscularity and other variables. Regression analysis will be used to assess the impact of sarcopenia on functional recovery adjusting for known or probable predictors using a stepwise variable selection procedure. Hypothesis tests will be considered significant if p <0.05. If encountered, multiple testing will be controlled for (a Bonferroni correction will be applied).
Query!
Recruitment
Recruitment status
Completed
Query!
Date of first participant enrolment
Anticipated
Query!
Actual
27/07/2018
Query!
Date of last participant enrolment
Anticipated
Query!
Actual
14/09/2021
Query!
Date of last data collection
Anticipated
Query!
Actual
13/09/2022
Query!
Sample size
Target
46
Query!
Accrual to date
Query!
Final
50
Query!
Recruitment in Australia
Recruitment state(s)
VIC
Query!
Recruitment hospital [1]
23437
0
The Alfred - Melbourne
Query!
Recruitment postcode(s) [1]
38839
0
3004 - Melbourne
Query!
Funding & Sponsors
Funding source category [1]
312506
0
Hospital
Query!
Name [1]
312506
0
Alfred Health
Query!
Address [1]
312506
0
The Alfred Hospital
55 Commercial Rd, Melbourne, VIC, 3004.
Query!
Country [1]
312506
0
Australia
Query!
Primary sponsor type
Hospital
Query!
Name
Alfred Health
Query!
Address
The Alfred Hospital
55 Commercial Rd, Melbourne, VIC, 3004.
Query!
Country
Australia
Query!
Secondary sponsor category [1]
314094
0
None
Query!
Name [1]
314094
0
Query!
Address [1]
314094
0
Query!
Country [1]
314094
0
Query!
Ethics approval
Ethics application status
Approved
Query!
Ethics committee name [1]
311842
0
The Alfred Hospital
Query!
Ethics committee address [1]
311842
0
55 Commercial Rd, Melbourne, VIC, 3004.
Query!
Ethics committee country [1]
311842
0
Australia
Query!
Date submitted for ethics approval [1]
311842
0
22/03/2018
Query!
Approval date [1]
311842
0
17/04/2018
Query!
Ethics approval number [1]
311842
0
104/18
Query!
Summary
Brief summary
This study will focus on patients who are planned for surgical resection of the oesophagus or stomach as part of curative treatment for oesophageal, oesophagogastric junction (OGJ) or gastric (stomach) cancer. Oesophagogastric (OG) cancer surgery is associated with significant morbidity with specific challenges related to consuming enough food and fluids, poor nutrition status, reduced physical performance and impaired health related quality of life (QOL). Malnutrition and low muscularity (or low muscle mass) is common in patients with gastrointestinal cancer regardless of body weight or body mass index (BMI). Routine diagnostic computed tomography (CT) images can be used to assess body composition and have shown that low muscularity prior to surgery can lead to increased hospital length of stay, postoperative complications, mortality and reduced overall survival after gastrointestinal cancer surgery. Sarcopenia, commonly used to describe age related loss of skeletal muscle mass with low muscle strength and/or low physical performance, is also associated with poor health related outcomes but is yet to be explored in the context of the surgical oncology population. This prospective observational pilot study aims understand the clinical, nutritional and functional differences between sarcopenic and non-sarcopenic patients undergoing surgical treatment for oesophagogastric carcinoma, thereby defining two distinct syndromes. In addition, we aim to assess changes in the specific components of sarcopenia after OG cancer surgery and the influence on postoperative recovery. As a pilot study we aim to identify areas of potential difference between these sarcopenic and non-sarcopenic groups that may account for differences in treatment outcomes and lead to future larger scale research endeavours that consider specific interventions to prevent or reduce the development of sarcopenia.
Query!
Trial website
Query!
Trial related presentations / publications
Query!
Public notes
Query!
Contacts
Principal investigator
Name
122562
0
Ms Lisa Murnane
Query!
Address
122562
0
The Alfred Hospital, Nutrition Department
55 Commercial Rd, Melbourne, VIC, 3004.
Query!
Country
122562
0
Australia
Query!
Phone
122562
0
+61 487180858
Query!
Fax
122562
0
Query!
Email
122562
0
[email protected]
Query!
Contact person for public queries
Name
122563
0
Lisa Murnane
Query!
Address
122563
0
The Alfred Hospital, Nutrition Department
55 Commercial Rd, Melbourne, VIC, 3004.
Query!
Country
122563
0
Australia
Query!
Phone
122563
0
+61 487180858
Query!
Fax
122563
0
Query!
Email
122563
0
[email protected]
Query!
Contact person for scientific queries
Name
122564
0
Lisa Murnane
Query!
Address
122564
0
The Alfred Hospital, Nutrition Department
55 Commercial Rd, Melbourne, VIC, 3004.
Query!
Country
122564
0
Australia
Query!
Phone
122564
0
+61 487180858
Query!
Fax
122564
0
Query!
Email
122564
0
[email protected]
Query!
Data sharing statement
Will individual participant data (IPD) for this trial be available (including data dictionaries)?
No
Query!
No/undecided IPD sharing reason/comment
Data will be shared in the form of one/several peer-reviewed publications. It was specified in the ethics application that all reported data will be pooled, not available as individual patient data.
Query!
What supporting documents are/will be available?
No Supporting Document Provided
Results publications and other study-related documents
Documents added manually
No documents have been uploaded by study researchers.
Documents added automatically
No additional documents have been identified.
Download to PDF