Please note that the copy function is not enabled for this field.
If you wish to
modify
existing outcomes, please copy and paste the current outcome text into the Update field.
LOGIN
CREATE ACCOUNT
LOGIN
CREATE ACCOUNT
MY TRIALS
REGISTER TRIAL
FAQs
HINTS AND TIPS
DEFINITIONS
Trial Review
The ANZCTR website will be unavailable from 1pm until 3pm (AEDT) on Wednesday the 30th of October for website maintenance. Please be sure to log out of the system in order to avoid any loss of data.
The safety and scientific validity of this study is the responsibility of the study sponsor and investigators. Listing a study does not mean it has been endorsed by the ANZCTR. Before participating in a study, talk to your health care provider and refer to this
information for consumers
Download to PDF
Trial registered on ANZCTR
Registration number
ACTRN12623000011684
Ethics application status
Approved
Date submitted
19/12/2022
Date registered
9/01/2023
Date last updated
26/07/2024
Date data sharing statement initially provided
9/01/2023
Type of registration
Prospectively registered
Titles & IDs
Public title
A double-blinded randomised control human clinical trial evaluating the safety and effectiveness of colloidal silver sinonasal rinse versus standard of care on post-operative symptomatic outcomes in the treatment of Chronic Rhinosinusitis in adults.
Query!
Scientific title
Randomised Controlled double blinded Human Clinical Trial on the Effectiveness of CS Sinonasal Rinse vs CS Sinonasal Rinse and ABX, vs topical ABX vs oral ABX and saline Sinonasal Rinse (standard of care) in the Management of Patients with CRS
Query!
Secondary ID [1]
308607
0
CALHN reference number MYIP 14173
Query!
Universal Trial Number (UTN)
U1111-1286-0828
Query!
Trial acronym
SFSilver2020
Query!
Linked study record
The current study is a follow up to study with AZTCTR registration number ACTRN12616001558415
Query!
Health condition
Health condition(s) or problem(s) studied:
chronic rhinosinusitis
328497
0
Query!
Condition category
Condition code
Surgery
325525
325525
0
0
Query!
Other surgery
Query!
Inflammatory and Immune System
325526
325526
0
0
Query!
Other inflammatory or immune system disorders
Query!
Respiratory
325527
325527
0
0
Query!
Other respiratory disorders / diseases
Query!
Infection
325528
325528
0
0
Query!
Other infectious diseases
Query!
Intervention/exposure
Study type
Interventional
Query!
Description of intervention(s) / exposure
Patients with symptomatic chronic rhinosinusitis who have had previous sinus surgery and have evidence of chronic rhinosinusitis on endoscopic examination will be recruited into this trial.
Patients will be blindly, randomly selected into one of three treatment arms (each n=11). Treatments will be dispensed and explained to the participants after informed consent has been gained at the outpatient clinic at The Queen Elizabeth Hospital (TQEH) or the private rooms of the Chief investigator. These tasks will be performed by the laboratory research coordinator.
Arm 2:
One arm (termed Treatment arm 2 in the study protocol) will receive both green synthesised colloidal silver produced at the Basil Hetzel Institute under sterile conditions (10ml stock of 44ppm in 200ml 5% dextrose nasal wash) delivered via sinonasal rinse and culture specific topical antibiotic (mupirocin 10 % nasal irrigation gel is delivered at a final concentration of 0.05% and tobramycin 125 mg/mL nasal irrigation solution at a final concentration of 0.625mg/ml in 200 mL saline nasal wash) for 28 days and placebo oral antibiotics (Microcrystalline cellulose capsules) 1 twice daily for 10 days.
Arm 3:
Another group (Treatment arm 3) will receive culture specific topical antibiotics (mupirocin and tobramycin as above) with placebo colloidal silver (5% dextrose with colouring agents 102, 133 and 124 in 200ml sinonasal wash) via sinonasal rinse for 28 days and placebo oral antibiotics (Microcrystalline cellulose capsules) 1 twice daily for 10 days.
Arm 4:
The final group (Treatment arm 4) will receive colloidal silver (as above) with placebo topical antibiotics (Hypromellose gel) twice daily for 28 days delivered via sinonasal rinse, and placebo oral antibiotics (Microcrystalline cellulose capsules) 1 twice daily for 10 days.
Query!
Intervention code [1]
325109
0
Treatment: Drugs
Query!
Comparator / control treatment
The control group will receive placebo colloidal silver (5% dextrose with colouring agents 102, 133 and 124 in 200ml sinonasal wash) and placebo topical antibiotics (Hypromellose gel) via sinonasal rinse and culture directed oral antibiotics (either Ciprofloxacin 500mg tablet 1 twice daily for 7 days or amoxicillin 875 mg (as trihydrate) and clavulanic acid 125 mg (as potassium) tablet 1 twice daily for 10 days). This is standard of care for recalcitrant chronic rhinosinusitis (CRS). This is referred to as Treatment arm 1 in the study protocol.
Query!
Control group
Active
Query!
Outcomes
Primary outcome [1]
333412
0
Change in burden of CRS bacterial infection in sinonasal tract via microbiology assays (assessment of colony forming units)
Query!
Assessment method [1]
333412
0
Query!
Timepoint [1]
333412
0
0 days (baseline), 28 days (primary timepoint) and 3 months after first intervention
Query!
Primary outcome [2]
333413
0
Assessment of safety of colloidal silver and topical antibiotic sinonasal rinse via documentation of adverse events. This will be assessed by participant discussion with clinician at time points below and filling in an adverse events diary throughout the study duration.
Query!
Assessment method [2]
333413
0
Query!
Timepoint [2]
333413
0
Participant discussion with clinician: 0 days (baseline), 28 days (primary time point) and 3 months after first intervention. Adverse Events diary: Filled out daily by participant from 0 days (baseline) to 3 months after first intervention. Adverse events diary collected by research coordinator at 28 days (primary timepoint) and 3 months after first intervention.
Query!
Primary outcome [3]
333414
0
Assessment of CRS symptoms by LKS (Lund Kennedy score) by endoscopic examination of the sinonasal tract by the chief investigator.
Query!
Assessment method [3]
333414
0
Query!
Timepoint [3]
333414
0
0 days (baseline), 28 days (primary time point) and 3 months after first intervention
Query!
Secondary outcome [1]
416977
0
Makeup of the sinus microbiome as assessed by sequencing of DNA extracted from swabs taken of the microbiome by the chief investigator
Query!
Assessment method [1]
416977
0
Query!
Timepoint [1]
416977
0
0 days, 28 days and 3 months after first intervention
Query!
Secondary outcome [2]
417204
0
Assessment of CRS symptoms by participant completion of SNOT 22 (Sino-nasal Outcome Test) questionnaire. This is an additional primary outcome.
Query!
Assessment method [2]
417204
0
Query!
Timepoint [2]
417204
0
0 days (baseline), 28 days (primary timepoint) and 3 months after initial intervention
Query!
Secondary outcome [3]
417205
0
Assessment of CRS symptoms by participant completion of VAS (Visual analogue scale) questionnaire. This is an additional primary outcome.
Query!
Assessment method [3]
417205
0
Query!
Timepoint [3]
417205
0
0 days (baseline), 28 days (primary timepoint) and 3 months after initial intervention.
Query!
Eligibility
Key inclusion criteria
Participants must have had at least two of the following symptoms of chronic rhinosinusitis (nasal discharge, postnasal drip, nasal obstruction, facial pain and pressure or lack of sense of smell) that has been previously persistent for greater than 3 months.
Participants must have had endoscopic sinus surgery (ESS) and be able to start the trial anytime from two weeks post-operative.
Participants must show evidence of chronic sinusitis by direct endoscopic examination. Participants must show evidence of infectious exacerbation by direct endoscopic examination and have a positive culture diagnosis with pathogens that show sensitivity to mupirocin and/or tobramycin and/or oral antibiotic.
Participants must have the ability to administer daily sinus rinses for the duration of the treatment period.
Participants must be aged 18 years or over.
Participants must be able to give written informed consent.
Participants must have the ability and willingness to attend several visits to the outpatients.
Participants must have the willingness and ability to comply with the requirements of the protocol as determined by the Investigator.
Query!
Minimum age
18
Years
Query!
Query!
Maximum age
No limit
Query!
Query!
Sex
Both males and females
Query!
Can healthy volunteers participate?
No
Query!
Key exclusion criteria
Participants who are unlikely to comply with the study protocol or, in the opinion of the investigator, would not be a suitable candidate for participation in the study. Pregnant and breastfeeding women will also be excluded.
Participants who are actively taking oral steroids or antibiotics will be excluded from the study.
Query!
Study design
Purpose of the study
Treatment
Query!
Allocation to intervention
Randomised controlled trial
Query!
Procedure for enrolling a subject and allocating the treatment (allocation concealment procedures)
Allocation concealment by central randomisation by computer
Query!
Methods used to generate the sequence in which subjects will be randomised (sequence generation)
Simple randomisation generated by computer software
Query!
Masking / blinding
Blinded (masking used)
Query!
Who is / are masked / blinded?
The people receiving the treatment/s
The people administering the treatment/s
The people assessing the outcomes
The people analysing the results/data
Query!
Query!
Query!
Query!
Intervention assignment
Parallel
Query!
Other design features
Query!
Phase
Phase 1 / Phase 2
Query!
Type of endpoint/s
Safety/efficacy
Query!
Statistical methods / analysis
A total of 44 participants will be enrolled in the study, which will allow for 11 participants in each study arm. This sample size was determined with formal statistical power calculations and accounted for a 10% loss to follow up.
A mean difference in SNOT-22 tests of 9.5 (standard deviation (SD) =15.9) was “a little better” by Hopkins et al. 2009 (Table 3). A mean difference in SNOT-22 tests of 23.3 (standard deviation =18.4) was “much better” by Hopkins et al. 2009 (Table 3).
A two-sample t tests assuming equal variance was performed (Figure 1) assuming “a little better” improvement (mean difference=9.5, SD=15.9), with power of 80%, alpha=0.05 for a 2-sided test. The sample size calculated was 45 per group (so total N=180 for 4 groups).
A two-sample t tests assuming equal variance was performed (Figure 2) assuming “much better” improvement (mean difference=23.3, SD=18.4), with power of 80%, alpha=0.05 for a 2-sided test. The sample size calculated was 11 per group (so total N=44 for 4 groups).
The statistical software used was SAS 9.4 (SAS Institute Inc., Cary, NC, USA).
Query!
Recruitment
Recruitment status
Recruiting
Query!
Date of first participant enrolment
Anticipated
6/02/2023
Query!
Actual
6/02/2023
Query!
Date of last participant enrolment
Anticipated
31/12/2024
Query!
Actual
Query!
Date of last data collection
Anticipated
31/03/2025
Query!
Actual
Query!
Sample size
Target
44
Query!
Accrual to date
19
Query!
Final
Query!
Recruitment in Australia
Recruitment state(s)
SA
Query!
Recruitment hospital [1]
23740
0
The Queen Elizabeth Hospital - Woodville
Query!
Recruitment postcode(s) [1]
39182
0
5011 - Woodville
Query!
Funding & Sponsors
Funding source category [1]
312852
0
University
Query!
Name [1]
312852
0
The University of Adelaide
Query!
Address [1]
312852
0
Adelaide, South Australia
5005 Australia
Query!
Country [1]
312852
0
Australia
Query!
Funding source category [2]
312880
0
Hospital
Query!
Name [2]
312880
0
The Queen Elizabeth Hospital
Query!
Address [2]
312880
0
28 Woodville Rd
Woodville South SA 5011
Query!
Country [2]
312880
0
Australia
Query!
Primary sponsor type
Government body
Query!
Name
Central Adelaide Local Health Network
Query!
Address
CALHN Research Services, Central Adelaide Local Health Network Inc., SA Health.
Level 3, Roma Mitchell Building, 136 North Terrace, Adelaide, SA 5000
Query!
Country
Australia
Query!
Secondary sponsor category [1]
314501
0
None
Query!
Name [1]
314501
0
Query!
Address [1]
314501
0
Query!
Country [1]
314501
0
Query!
Ethics approval
Ethics application status
Approved
Query!
Ethics committee name [1]
312129
0
Central Adelaide Local Health Network Human Research Ethics Committee
Query!
Ethics committee address [1]
312129
0
Level 3, Roma Mitchell House 136 North Terrace Adelaide, South Australia, 5000
Query!
Ethics committee country [1]
312129
0
Australia
Query!
Date submitted for ethics approval [1]
312129
0
26/08/2021
Query!
Approval date [1]
312129
0
30/11/2021
Query!
Ethics approval number [1]
312129
0
Query!
Summary
Brief summary
Chronic sinusitis is a debilitating and costly disease. Consistent inflammation and infection of the sinuses causes headaches, facial pain, blockage of the nose and discharge from the nose. The cause of this condition is not fully understood, and it is difficult to treat with surgery being the recommended treatment for some patients. But even after surgery, many patient’s symptoms return, and they may need repeat surgeries in the future. We currently recommend sinus rinses after surgery as a way of keeping sinuses clean and clear and to assist with healing and reducing inflammation and infection. We have previously found that proper care post-operatively can reduce the chances of requiring further surgeries and part of our research has been assessing the different rinses. Our laboratory studies have shown that colloidal silver reduces infection load significantly. In the laboratory, we have improved this product’s manufacturing process by using extracts from gum tree fresh leaves which are abundant in Australia. The safety of colloidal silver was tested in the lab and according to the results it is safe to the sinuses. This clinical trial is aimed at assessing 1. The safety of colloidal silver administration by sino-nasal rinse by documenting any adverse effects and 2. The effect of sinonasal rinse of colloidal silver combined with topical antibiotics on infection load in chronic sinusitis, compared to standard-of-care oral antibiotic tablets. This will be assessed by endoscopic assessment of the sino-nasal tract by a doctor, measuring bacterial load in the laboratory and completion of symptom questionnaires by participants.
Query!
Trial website
Query!
Trial related presentations / publications
Query!
Public notes
Query!
Contacts
Principal investigator
Name
123582
0
Prof Peter-John Wormald
Query!
Address
123582
0
Name: Central Adelaide Local Health Network (CALHN)
Address: The Queen Elizabeth Hospital
Department of Otolaryngology, Head and Neck Surgery
Tower Block 3C
37 Woodville Road
Woodville South SA 5011
Country: Australia
Query!
Country
123582
0
Australia
Query!
Phone
123582
0
+61882227158
Query!
Fax
123582
0
Query!
Email
123582
0
[email protected]
Query!
Contact person for public queries
Name
123583
0
Peter-John Wormald
Query!
Address
123583
0
Name: Central Adelaide Local Health Network (CALHN)
Address: The Queen Elizabeth Hospital
Department of Otolaryngology, Head and Neck Surgery
Tower Block 3C
37 Woodville Road
Woodville South SA 5011
Country: Australia
Query!
Country
123583
0
Australia
Query!
Phone
123583
0
+61882227158
Query!
Fax
123583
0
Query!
Email
123583
0
[email protected]
Query!
Contact person for scientific queries
Name
123584
0
Peter-John Wormald
Query!
Address
123584
0
Name: Central Adelaide Local Health Network (CALHN)
Address: The Queen Elizabeth Hospital
Department of Otolaryngology, Head and Neck Surgery
Tower Block 3C
37 Woodville Road
Woodville South SA 5011
Country: Australia
Query!
Country
123584
0
Australia
Query!
Phone
123584
0
+61882227158
Query!
Fax
123584
0
Query!
Email
123584
0
[email protected]
Query!
Data sharing statement
Will individual participant data (IPD) for this trial be available (including data dictionaries)?
No
Query!
No/undecided IPD sharing reason/comment
We will publish the results of the trial in a suitable scientific journal. This will not include individual participant data, summary tables and statistical analysis only
Query!
What supporting documents are/will be available?
No Supporting Document Provided
Results publications and other study-related documents
Documents added manually
No documents have been uploaded by study researchers.
Documents added automatically
No additional documents have been identified.
Download to PDF