Please note that the copy function is not enabled for this field.
If you wish to
modify
existing outcomes, please copy and paste the current outcome text into the Update field.
LOGIN
CREATE ACCOUNT
LOGIN
CREATE ACCOUNT
MY TRIALS
REGISTER TRIAL
FAQs
HINTS AND TIPS
DEFINITIONS
Trial Review
The ANZCTR website will be unavailable from 1pm until 3pm (AEDT) on Wednesday the 30th of October for website maintenance. Please be sure to log out of the system in order to avoid any loss of data.
The safety and scientific validity of this study is the responsibility of the study sponsor and investigators. Listing a study does not mean it has been endorsed by the ANZCTR. Before participating in a study, talk to your health care provider and refer to this
information for consumers
Download to PDF
Trial registered on ANZCTR
Registration number
ACTRN12623001010684
Ethics application status
Approved
Date submitted
9/02/2023
Date registered
18/09/2023
Date last updated
18/09/2023
Date data sharing statement initially provided
18/09/2023
Type of registration
Prospectively registered
Titles & IDs
Public title
Comparison of longitudinal K-wire immobilisation verses custom thermoplastic orthosis for uncomplicated mallet finger deformity: A randomised controlled trial
Query!
Scientific title
Comparison of longitudinal K-wire immobilisation verses custom thermoplastic orthosis for uncomplicated mallet finger deformity: A randomised controlled trial
Query!
Secondary ID [1]
308792
0
None
Query!
Universal Trial Number (UTN)
Query!
Trial acronym
Query!
Linked study record
Query!
Health condition
Health condition(s) or problem(s) studied:
Mallet Finger Deformity
328875
0
Query!
Condition category
Condition code
Musculoskeletal
325868
325868
0
0
Query!
Other muscular and skeletal disorders
Query!
Injuries and Accidents
328095
328095
0
0
Query!
Other injuries and accidents
Query!
Surgery
328096
328096
0
0
Query!
Surgical techniques
Query!
Intervention/exposure
Study type
Interventional
Query!
Description of intervention(s) / exposure
Group 1: Percutaneous Longitudinal K-wire Immobilisation
Longitudinal K-wire immobilisation involves placement of a K-wire from the fingertip, retrograde across the distal interphalangeal joint (DIPJ). The surgery can be completed as a procedure under digital block anaesthesia or under general anaesthesia. The pin will be placed into at least 50% of the length of the medullary canal of the middle phalanx. This mitigates the risk of pin migration. The pin is cut below the skin and the percutaneous incision is closed with a quick-acting skin adhesive. The pin will be removed in theatre at 8 weeks. The surgery is anticipated to take 30-60 minutes. Operative intervention must be performed by consultant surgeons, or by fellows or SET-accredited registrars following discussion of the operative plan with the supervising consultant.
Query!
Intervention code [1]
325327
0
Treatment: Surgery
Query!
Intervention code [2]
326921
0
Treatment: Devices
Query!
Comparator / control treatment
Group 2: Custom Thermoplastic Splint Immobilisation
The distal interphalangeal joint (DIPJ) is immobilised in slight hyperextension for a period of 8 weeks. The patients will be instructed to wear the splint 24 hours per day / 7 days per week. The custom made thermoplastic splint will be made by an accredited hand therapist in the outpatients department following diagnosis of mallet finger deformity and randomisation to group 2. The participant will be reviewed every 1-2 weeks in hand therapy clinic to monitor adherence to the thermoplastic splint and whether the hand therapist assesses the splint needs to be re-made. Our patient satisfaction questionnaire includes a question for group 2 on compliance.
Query!
Control group
Active
Query!
Outcomes
Primary outcome [1]
333699
0
The primary outcome assessed will be patient satisfaction. This will be assessed at baseline, 8 weeks, 3, 6, and 12-months. The patient satisfaction survey/questionnaire has been specifically designed for this study. It includes both 11-point likert scales Over time, the likert scales will be used to compare the difference in patient reported satisfaction between the interventions.
Currently, there is no validated orthopaedic measure of patient satisfaction.
Query!
Assessment method [1]
333699
0
Query!
Timepoint [1]
333699
0
The outcome will be assessed at 8 weeks, 3 months, 6 months, and 12 months following surgery or application of the splint.
Query!
Secondary outcome [1]
417987
0
The crawford criteria, which consists of extension lag level, DIP flexion and the visual Analogue Scale (VAS) score to evaluate pain. This examination will be completed by an accredited hand therapist.
Query!
Assessment method [1]
417987
0
Query!
Timepoint [1]
417987
0
8 weeks, 3-, 6- and 12-months post-treatment.
Query!
Secondary outcome [2]
426268
0
Overall hand function assessed using Michigan Hand Questionnaire (MHQ). This examination will be completed by an accredited hand therapist.
Query!
Assessment method [2]
426268
0
Query!
Timepoint [2]
426268
0
8 weeks, 3-, 6- and 12-months post-treatment
Query!
Secondary outcome [3]
426269
0
Time out of work assessed using the Disability of Arm, Shoulder and Hand [DASH] questionnaireThis examination will be completed by an accredited hand therapist.
Query!
Assessment method [3]
426269
0
Query!
Timepoint [3]
426269
0
8 weeks, 3-, 6- and 12-months post-treatment
Query!
Secondary outcome [4]
426270
0
The complications observed/reported for both groups will be recorded. This will include those that are patient-reported and those observed by the research team.
Query!
Assessment method [4]
426270
0
Query!
Timepoint [4]
426270
0
These will be recorded throughout the duration of the controlled trial.
Query!
Secondary outcome [5]
426271
0
The EQ-5D-5L is a patient reported questionnaire that measure quality of life on a 5-component scale that incorporates mobility, self-care, usual activities, pain/discomfort, and anxiety/depression.
Query!
Assessment method [5]
426271
0
Query!
Timepoint [5]
426271
0
8 weeks, 3-, 6- and 12-months post-treatment
Query!
Secondary outcome [6]
426272
0
Prospective cost analysis of both interventions. The costs of both interventions will be recorded for later analysis. The operative group will incur more cost initially due to theatre expenses, however, the splint group will require more hand therapy outpatient appointments. The following items are anticipated expenses: consultant/SET surgeon and junior orthopaedic doctors, accredited hand therapist, operating theatre (i.e. hardware, theatre staff, anaesthesia), orthosis-related expenses, outpatient department appoints for hand therapy and orthopaedics, imaging (x-ray), and complication related expenses (i.e. antibiotics for infection). The items incurred by each participant will be recorded to compare the expenses generated by each group.
Query!
Assessment method [6]
426272
0
Query!
Timepoint [6]
426272
0
These will be recorded throughout the duration of the controlled trial.
Query!
Secondary outcome [7]
426273
0
The global rating of change will also be applied to the participants in the patient satisfaction questionnaire. This will be useful to quantify the patient's perceived improvement or deterioration over time in addition to the primary outcome.
Query!
Assessment method [7]
426273
0
Query!
Timepoint [7]
426273
0
8 weeks, 3-, 6- and 12-months post-treatment
Query!
Eligibility
Key inclusion criteria
- Patients diagnosed with an uncomplicated closed mallet finger: Soft tissue/tendinous mallet deformity, avulsion fracture of the distal phalanx articular surface that involves less than 1/3 the total articular surface, absence of volar joint subluxation
- Patients assessed on radiographs [confirmed by Consultant Surgeon]
- Aged over 18 years
- Able to provide informed consent
Query!
Minimum age
18
Years
Query!
Query!
Maximum age
No limit
Query!
Query!
Sex
Both males and females
Query!
Can healthy volunteers participate?
No
Query!
Key exclusion criteria
- Associated significant soft tissue injury (including open/tendon damage)
- Pathological fracture
- Presentation >3 weeks
- Unable to comply with the assessment requirements or rehabilitation.
- Fracture best managed by only one of the included intervention options, or another option, as decided by the Consultant Surgeon
Query!
Study design
Purpose of the study
Treatment
Query!
Allocation to intervention
Randomised controlled trial
Query!
Procedure for enrolling a subject and allocating the treatment (allocation concealment procedures)
Eligible participants will be randomly allocated to the operative or non-operative group via block randomisation. Distance randomization will be performed through an online randomisation service and data storage service - REDcap. After consenting the patient, a member of the research team will enter the patient's details into REDcap, which will then provide the group allocation for the treating clinician to document. Participants will be identified by all orthopaedic doctors but allocation will only be performed by the research team.
Query!
Methods used to generate the sequence in which subjects will be randomised (sequence generation)
As above, this process will be controlled by an online randomisation service and data storage service - REDcap.
Query!
Masking / blinding
Open (masking not used)
Query!
Who is / are masked / blinded?
Query!
Query!
Query!
Query!
Intervention assignment
Parallel
Query!
Other design features
Query!
Phase
Not Applicable
Query!
Type of endpoint/s
Efficacy
Query!
Statistical methods / analysis
79 patients per arm, 158 patients in total.
Patient satisfaction will be measured using an 11 point likert scale as per the patient satisfaction survey. This will be measured at baseline (pre-treatment), 1 week, 8-weeks, and 3, 6, and 12 months. The primary outcome will be the difference between baseline and 6-months. This sample size power calculation has been determined based on the satisfaction outcomes presented in the study by Aksan et al. who reported approximately 80% satisfaction in the surgical group, compared to 55% satisfaction in the conservative group. The above sample size has accounted for a 10% drop out rate, with an alpha of 0.05 and confidence interval of 90%.
Given there is no validated orthopaedic satisfaction scale, the research team has used the above study as the minimum clinically important difference. We will complete an interim post hoc analysis to confirm the sample size after 50 participants.
Query!
Recruitment
Recruitment status
Not yet recruiting
Query!
Date of first participant enrolment
Anticipated
1/01/2024
Query!
Actual
Query!
Date of last participant enrolment
Anticipated
12/12/2025
Query!
Actual
Query!
Date of last data collection
Anticipated
12/12/2026
Query!
Actual
Query!
Sample size
Target
158
Query!
Accrual to date
Query!
Final
Query!
Recruitment in Australia
Recruitment state(s)
NSW,QLD
Query!
Recruitment hospital [1]
25483
0
Gold Coast University Hospital - Southport
Query!
Recruitment hospital [2]
25484
0
Hornsby Ku-ring-gai Hospital - Hornsby
Query!
Recruitment hospital [3]
25533
0
Nepean Hospital - Kingswood
Query!
Recruitment postcode(s) [1]
41295
0
4215 - Southport
Query!
Recruitment postcode(s) [2]
41296
0
2077 - Hornsby
Query!
Recruitment postcode(s) [3]
41355
0
2747 - Kingswood
Query!
Funding & Sponsors
Funding source category [1]
313008
0
Hospital
Query!
Name [1]
313008
0
Gold Coast University Hospital
Query!
Address [1]
313008
0
1 Hospital Blvd, Southport QLD 4215
Query!
Country [1]
313008
0
Australia
Query!
Primary sponsor type
Hospital
Query!
Name
Gold Coast University Hospital
Query!
Address
1 Hospital Blvd, Southport QLD 4215
Query!
Country
Australia
Query!
Secondary sponsor category [1]
314695
0
None
Query!
Name [1]
314695
0
Query!
Address [1]
314695
0
Query!
Country [1]
314695
0
Query!
Ethics approval
Ethics application status
Approved
Query!
Ethics committee name [1]
312272
0
Gold Coast Hospital and Health Service HREC
Query!
Ethics committee address [1]
312272
0
1 Hospital Blvd, Southport QLD 4215
Query!
Ethics committee country [1]
312272
0
Australia
Query!
Date submitted for ethics approval [1]
312272
0
02/02/2023
Query!
Approval date [1]
312272
0
12/09/2023
Query!
Ethics approval number [1]
312272
0
Query!
Summary
Brief summary
Mallet finger deformity is a common injury to the extensor tendon of the fingers. Currently, there are no published randomised clinical trials comparing operative and non-operative management of this condition. Traditionally, non-operative management has been considered the ‘gold standard’ treatment for uncomplicated mallet finger deformity. However, recent studies have suggested superior patient outcomes regarding compliance amongst patients, patient satisfaction, incidence of skin complications, time out of work and treatment outcomes in the operative management group. Therefore, this randomised clinical trial is required to identify which treatment path is optimal following mallet injury.
Query!
Trial website
Query!
Trial related presentations / publications
Query!
Public notes
Query!
Contacts
Principal investigator
Name
124062
0
Prof Randy Bindra
Query!
Address
124062
0
Gold Coast University Hospital, Orthopaedic Department, 1 Hospital Blvd, Southport QLD 4215
Query!
Country
124062
0
Australia
Query!
Phone
124062
0
+61 07 5687 0001
Query!
Fax
124062
0
Query!
Email
124062
0
[email protected]
Query!
Contact person for public queries
Name
124063
0
Max McCarthy
Query!
Address
124063
0
Gold Coast University Hospital, 1 Hospital Blvd, Southport QLD 4215
Query!
Country
124063
0
Australia
Query!
Phone
124063
0
+61 07 5687 0001
Query!
Fax
124063
0
Query!
Email
124063
0
[email protected]
Query!
Contact person for scientific queries
Name
124064
0
Randy Bindra
Query!
Address
124064
0
Gold Coast University Hospital, Orthopaedic Department, 1 Hospital Blvd, Southport QLD 4215
Query!
Country
124064
0
Australia
Query!
Phone
124064
0
+61 07 5687 0001
Query!
Fax
124064
0
Query!
Email
124064
0
[email protected]
Query!
Data sharing statement
Will individual participant data (IPD) for this trial be available (including data dictionaries)?
No
Query!
No/undecided IPD sharing reason/comment
Query!
What supporting documents are/will be available?
No Supporting Document Provided
Results publications and other study-related documents
Documents added manually
No documents have been uploaded by study researchers.
Documents added automatically
No additional documents have been identified.
Download to PDF