Please note that the copy function is not enabled for this field.
If you wish to
modify
existing outcomes, please copy and paste the current outcome text into the Update field.
LOGIN
CREATE ACCOUNT
LOGIN
CREATE ACCOUNT
MY TRIALS
REGISTER TRIAL
FAQs
HINTS AND TIPS
DEFINITIONS
Trial Review
The safety and scientific validity of this study is the responsibility of the study sponsor and investigators. Listing a study does not mean it has been endorsed by the ANZCTR. Before participating in a study, talk to your health care provider and refer to this
information for consumers
Download to PDF
Trial registered on ANZCTR
Registration number
ACTRN12623000782639
Ethics application status
Approved
Date submitted
19/06/2023
Date registered
18/07/2023
Date last updated
11/01/2024
Date data sharing statement initially provided
18/07/2023
Type of registration
Prospectively registered
Titles & IDs
Public title
RESHAP-ED: comparing primary-contact physiotherapy with standard care for musculoskeletal conditions in emergency departments.
Query!
Scientific title
RESHAP-ED: A pragmatic, multicentre, two-arm, parallel randomised controlled trial comparing length of stay for primary-contact physiotherapy versus standard care (primary contact is doctor or nurse) for musculoskeletal conditions in emergency departments.
Query!
Secondary ID [1]
309609
0
None
Query!
Universal Trial Number (UTN)
U1111-1292-2883
Query!
Trial acronym
Query!
Linked study record
Query!
Health condition
Health condition(s) or problem(s) studied:
Acute musculoskeletal condition
329930
0
Query!
Condition category
Condition code
Musculoskeletal
326831
326831
0
0
Query!
Other muscular and skeletal disorders
Query!
Public Health
327368
327368
0
0
Query!
Health service research
Query!
Intervention/exposure
Study type
Interventional
Query!
Description of intervention(s) / exposure
This is a pragmatic multicentre, two-arm, parallel randomised controlled trial with nested process and economic evaluations. The intervention group in this trial will be the primary-contact physiotherapist in the Hospital Emergency Department. The primary-contact physiotherapist will nominate themselves as the care provider in the Cerner FirstNet® system to indicate they are seeing the patient and then see the patient immediately. This process of recording who provides initial care in Cerner® is usual practice in emergency departments.
The physiotherapy intervention will consist of a senior level 4 physiotherapist individually assessing and managing the patient as primary contact in the Hospital Emergency Department. After their initial assessment, the primary-contact physiotherapist will choose the best course of management with consultation with the patient. Care for the low back pain cases will be provided according to recommendations from the Australian Low Back Pain Clinical Care Standard, and other musculoskeletal conditions will be managed via best practice as recommended by the Emergency Care Institute.
The primary-contact physiotherapist may consult a medical/nurse practitioner (collaborative model of care) or autonomously manage eligible patients. In the autonomous model of care, the physiotherapist is responsible for selecting eligible patients from the triage list, assessment, management, diagnosis, and discharge with no involvement of a medical/nurse practitioner. In the collaborative model of care, after selecting and assessing the patient, the primary-contact physiotherapist shares discharge and management decision making with a medical/nurse practitioner.
All patients will be provided a discharge plan, including timely follow-up in the outpatient setting. Outpatient care will be provided by existing outpatient services such as outpatient physiotherapy, specialist clinics if required, virtual hospitals, and GP clinics. About 40 patients allocated to the primary-contact physiotherapy group will be invited to participate in a 30-45 minute audio-recorded semi-structured qualitative interview by their treating primary-contact physiotherapist during the emergency department visit. We will report data from the first 40 patients who agree to participate. This semi-structure interview will be conducted by a member of the research team. About 40 clinicians will also be invited to participate in a 30-45 minute audio-recorded semi-structured qualitative interview.
Adherence to the intervention will be monitored using data from the electronic medical record.
Every patient enrolled in this study will be followed for a period of 42 days. We expect the total duration of this study to be four years.
The Australian Low Back Pain Clinical Care Standard (2022) can be accessed at: https://www.safetyandquality.gov.au/publications-and-resources/resource-library/low-back-pain-clinical-care-standard-2022.
Emergency Care Institute guidelines for other musculoskeletal conditions can be accessed at: https://aci.health.nsw.gov.au/networks/eci
Query!
Intervention code [1]
326034
0
Treatment: Other
Query!
Comparator / control treatment
The control group consists of primary-contact care pathway by a doctor and/or nurse practitioner. Those in the control group will not be seen by the primary-contact physiotherapist and will be left for the doctors or nurse practitioner to see. The doctors and/or nurse practitioners will allocate themselves as primary care provider in the Cerner FirstNet® system and see the patient as usual. This is usual practice in the emergency department. The care provided will be decided by the emergency department doctors and nurses, as per usual. Emergency doctors and/or nurses may refer the patient to see the physiotherapist in the emergency department as secondary-contact, or to the outpatient physiotherapy department after discharge. About 40 clinicians will also be invited to participate in a 30-45 minute audio-recorded semi-structured qualitative interview. This semi-structure interview will be conducted by a member of the research team.
Query!
Control group
Active
Query!
Outcomes
Primary outcome [1]
334685
0
The emergency department length of stay, which is defined as: the period between when the patient presents at an emergency department, and when the patient is recorded as having physically departed from the emergency department. This outcome will be assessed using data from the electronic medical record system.
Query!
Assessment method [1]
334685
0
Query!
Timepoint [1]
334685
0
Upon discharge from the emergency department visit, following randomisation.
Query!
Secondary outcome [1]
421649
0
Time to clinical care (i.e. time elapsed in minutes for each patient from presentation in the emergency department to the commencement of the emergency department non-admitted clinical care). This outcome will be assessed using data from the electronic medical record system.
Query!
Assessment method [1]
421649
0
Query!
Timepoint [1]
421649
0
Day 0 (emergency department visit) following randomisation.
Query!
Secondary outcome [2]
421650
0
Duration of clinical care (i.e. the period between when clinical care commences and the end of the non-admitted patient emergency department episode, i.e. physical departure from the emergency department). This outcome will be assessed using data from the electronic medical record system.
Query!
Assessment method [2]
421650
0
Query!
Timepoint [2]
421650
0
Upon discharge from the emergency department visit, following randomisation.
Query!
Secondary outcome [3]
421651
0
Proportion of patients whose emergency department length of stay (as defined above) is less than or equal to four hours (proportion completed within four hours). This outcome will be assessed using data from the electronic medical record system.
Query!
Assessment method [3]
421651
0
Query!
Timepoint [3]
421651
0
At conclusion of the study.
Query!
Secondary outcome [4]
421652
0
Proportion of patients 'seen on time' (i.e. the proportion of presentations for which the waiting time to commencement of clinical care was within the time specified in the definition of the triage category: urgent (within 30 minutes), semi-urgent (within 60 minutes), non-urgent (within 120 minutes). This outcome will be assessed using data from the electronic medical record system.
Query!
Assessment method [4]
421652
0
Query!
Timepoint [4]
421652
0
At conclusion of the study.
Query!
Secondary outcome [5]
421653
0
Proportion of patients admitted to EDSSU (Emergency Department Short Stay Unit). This outcome will be assessed using data from the electronic medical record system.
Query!
Assessment method [5]
421653
0
Query!
Timepoint [5]
421653
0
At conclusion of the study.
Query!
Secondary outcome [6]
421654
0
Proportion of patients admitted to hospital inpatient units. This outcome will be assessed using data from the electronic medical record system.
Query!
Assessment method [6]
421654
0
Query!
Timepoint [6]
421654
0
At conclusion of the study.
Query!
Secondary outcome [7]
421655
0
Proportion of patients that received imaging. This outcome will be assessed using data from the electronic medical record system.
Query!
Assessment method [7]
421655
0
Query!
Timepoint [7]
421655
0
At conclusion of the study.
Query!
Secondary outcome [8]
421656
0
Proportion of patients that received opioids. This outcome will be assessed using data from the electronic medical record system.
Query!
Assessment method [8]
421656
0
Query!
Timepoint [8]
421656
0
At conclusion of the study.
Query!
Secondary outcome [9]
421657
0
Proportion of patients that received gabapentinoids. This outcome will be assessed using data from the electronic medical record system.
Query!
Assessment method [9]
421657
0
Query!
Timepoint [9]
421657
0
At conclusion of the study.
Query!
Secondary outcome [10]
421658
0
Proportion of patients that received specialist consult within the emergency department. This outcome will be assessed using data from the electronic medical record system.
Query!
Assessment method [10]
421658
0
Query!
Timepoint [10]
421658
0
At conclusion of the study.
Query!
Secondary outcome [11]
421659
0
Proportion of patients referred to specialist clinic. This outcome will be assessed using data from the electronic medical record system.
Query!
Assessment method [11]
421659
0
Query!
Timepoint [11]
421659
0
At conclusion of the study.
Query!
Secondary outcome [12]
421660
0
Proportion of patients representing to the emergency department for the same chief complaint within 72 hours of discharge. This outcome will be assessed using data from the electronic medical record system.
Query!
Assessment method [12]
421660
0
Query!
Timepoint [12]
421660
0
At conclusion of the study.
Query!
Secondary outcome [13]
421661
0
Proportion of patients readmitted to hospital inpatient units for the same chief complaint within 30 days of index inpatient admission. This outcome will be assessed using data from the electronic medical record system.
Query!
Assessment method [13]
421661
0
Query!
Timepoint [13]
421661
0
At conclusion of the study.
Query!
Secondary outcome [14]
421662
0
Patient-reported outcome - Pain intensity (numeric rating scale, range 0–10).
Query!
Assessment method [14]
421662
0
Query!
Timepoint [14]
421662
0
At Day 1, Day 7, and Day 42 following randomisation.
Query!
Secondary outcome [15]
422906
0
Patient-reported outcome - Quality of life (Euro-Qol-5D).
Query!
Assessment method [15]
422906
0
Query!
Timepoint [15]
422906
0
At Day 1, Day 7, and Day 42 following randomisation.
Query!
Secondary outcome [16]
422907
0
Patient-reported outcome - Satisfaction with care (1 item from the Emergency Department Patient Experience of Care (EDPEC) Survey)
Query!
Assessment method [16]
422907
0
Query!
Timepoint [16]
422907
0
At Day 1 following randomisation.
Query!
Secondary outcome [17]
422914
0
Implementation outcomes: patients qualitative semi-structured interview.
- Acceptability
- Adoption
- Appropriateness
Query!
Assessment method [17]
422914
0
Query!
Timepoint [17]
422914
0
Patient's qualitative semi-structure interview - completed by patients between Day 1 and Day 42 post emergency department discharge following randomisation.
Query!
Secondary outcome [18]
423768
0
Implementation outcomes: clinicians qualitative semi-structured interview.
- Acceptability
- Adoption
- Appropriateness
Query!
Assessment method [18]
423768
0
Query!
Timepoint [18]
423768
0
Clinician's qualitative semi-structure interview - completed by clinicians after 50 patients are randomised at a participating site.
Query!
Secondary outcome [19]
423769
0
Implementation outcome: this outcomes will be assessed using data from the electronic medical record system that will be recorded in the trial logbook.
- Fidelity
Query!
Assessment method [19]
423769
0
Query!
Timepoint [19]
423769
0
At conclusion of the study
Query!
Secondary outcome [20]
424359
0
Implementation outcome: this outcomes will be assessed using data from the electronic medical record system that will be recorded in the trial logbook. The cost utility and cost-effectiveness analyses will be carried out to compare the value for money between the primary-contact physiotherapy pathway to the doctor/nurse pathway. We will collect data from the hospital records on healthcare use costs using presentation level costing data used for reporting and funding purposes by local health districts. Intervention costs will be collected from trial records. The effectiveness outcomes of the economic evaluation will be: i) quality adjusted life years (QALY) gained over 6 weeks (cost-utility analysis); ii) time spent in the emergency department avoided (cost-effectiveness analysis).
- Implementation cost
Query!
Assessment method [20]
424359
0
Query!
Timepoint [20]
424359
0
At conclusion of the study
Query!
Secondary outcome [21]
424366
0
Adverse events: Adverse events will be collected as following;
- On day 1, after emergency department discharge, participants will complete an online survey that will include a question prompting participants to report the occurrence of any adverse event during the emergency department stay. Participants experiencing an adverse event will have the opportunity to include more information about the adverse event as free text. Then, the investigators will review the clinical notes of participants reporting adverse events, extract adverse event data from the electronic medical records, and record the data in REDCap. The Medical Dictionary for Regulatory Activities (MedDRA) will be used to code adverse event data. A blinded independent assessor will review adverse event data and assign attribution to study interventions.
Query!
Assessment method [21]
424366
0
Query!
Timepoint [21]
424366
0
At Day 1, after emergency department discharge.
Query!
Eligibility
Key inclusion criteria
- Adult patient (equal or greater than 18 years);
- Presents to the emergency department with a simple musculoskeletal condition. This would include, but is not limited to, soft tissue injuries (joint, ligament, tendon or muscle pain), musculoskeletal neck and low back pain, closed peripheral fractures not requiring reduction or orthopaedic fixation (indicated from triage notes), spontaneously reduced joint dislocations; and
- Triage score 3 (urgent), 4 (semi-urgent) or 5 (non-urgent) as per Australian Triage Scale. Triage score 2 will also be included whenever an adult presents to the emergency department with an isolated joint dislocation including: shoulder, digit, patella or temporomandibular joint (indicated by triage notes).
Query!
Minimum age
18
Years
Query!
Query!
Maximum age
No limit
Query!
Query!
Sex
Both males and females
Query!
Can healthy volunteers participate?
No
Query!
Key exclusion criteria
- Already assessed by a doctor or other primary-contact health practitioner in the emergency department as indicated on the Cerner FirstNet® list; or
- Any non-musculoskeletal/non-orthopaedic condition, such as open wounds, eye problems, foreign bodies, and poisonings; or
- Presentations outside the primary-contact physiotherapists’ working hours; or
- Triage notes indication of soft tissue injuries that may require surgical intervention; or
- Triage notes indication of fracture requiring reduction and/or surgical fixation; or
- Triage notes indication of signs or symptoms of serious pathology (for example: spinal fracture, cauda equina syndrome, malignancy, infection, inflammatory origin of pain); or
- Co-morbidities requiring immediate emergency care (for example: cardiac, respiratory; or psychiatric issues as indicated on the triage note).
Query!
Study design
Purpose of the study
Treatment
Query!
Allocation to intervention
Randomised controlled trial
Query!
Procedure for enrolling a subject and allocating the treatment (allocation concealment procedures)
Online randomisation using the REDCap software.
Query!
Methods used to generate the sequence in which subjects will be randomised (sequence generation)
Randomisation will be conducted using computer-generated random numbers in SAS. A 1:1 random allocation sequence will be generated using randomly permuted blocks of variable size (2 and 4).
Query!
Masking / blinding
Blinded (masking used)
Query!
Who is / are masked / blinded?
The people assessing the outcomes
The people analysing the results/data
Query!
Query!
Query!
Query!
Intervention assignment
Parallel
Query!
Other design features
Query!
Phase
Not Applicable
Query!
Type of endpoint/s
Efficacy
Query!
Statistical methods / analysis
Sample size: With a total sample size of 620 patients (310 per arm), the study will have 90% power to detect a difference of 30 minutes in emergency department length of stay assuming a standard-deviation of 115 minutes.
We do not anticipate any missing data for the primary outcome since length of stay is recorded systematically for every patient admitted to the emergency department.
Statistical Analysis Plan: The main analysis of the primary and secondary outcomes will be conducted by including all randomised patients analysed according to the group they were randomised to and regardless of protocol adherence (i.e. following the intention to treat (ITT) principle). The main analysis of length of stay will be performed using linear regression adjusted for hospital as a random effect. The effect of the intervention will be estimated as the adjusted mean difference and 95% confidence interval. While length of stay is unlikely to follow a normal distribution, the large sample size will allow us to make inference about the mean. In case of important heteroscedasticity, as assessed using a plot of residuals against fitted values, we will conduct a sensitivity analysis using a log-transformation.
A detailed analysis plan including mock tables will be developed prior to unblinding. Analyses pre-specified in the analysis plan will be programmed using randomly scrambled treatment allocations. Unblinded results will be presented to the study team once all analyses have been programmed and validated and the database locked.
Query!
Recruitment
Recruitment status
Recruiting
Query!
Date of first participant enrolment
Anticipated
1/08/2023
Query!
Actual
22/11/2023
Query!
Date of last participant enrolment
Anticipated
1/12/2024
Query!
Actual
Query!
Date of last data collection
Anticipated
1/02/2025
Query!
Actual
Query!
Sample size
Target
620
Query!
Accrual to date
4
Query!
Final
Query!
Recruitment in Australia
Recruitment state(s)
NSW
Query!
Recruitment hospital [1]
24681
0
Royal Prince Alfred Hospital - Camperdown
Query!
Recruitment hospital [2]
24682
0
Grafton Base Hospital - Grafton
Query!
Recruitment hospital [3]
25196
0
The Sutherland Hospital - Caringbah
Query!
Recruitment hospital [4]
25197
0
Broken Hill Base Hospital - Broken Hill
Query!
Recruitment hospital [5]
25198
0
Ryde Hospital - Eastwood
Query!
Recruitment hospital [6]
25985
0
Gosford Hospital - Gosford
Query!
Recruitment hospital [7]
25986
0
Wyong Public Hospital - Hamlyn Terrace
Query!
Recruitment postcode(s) [1]
40301
0
2050 - Camperdown
Query!
Recruitment postcode(s) [2]
40302
0
2460 - Grafton
Query!
Recruitment postcode(s) [3]
40866
0
2229 - Caringbah
Query!
Recruitment postcode(s) [4]
40867
0
2880 - Broken Hill
Query!
Recruitment postcode(s) [5]
40868
0
2122 - Eastwood
Query!
Recruitment postcode(s) [6]
41836
0
2250 - Gosford
Query!
Recruitment postcode(s) [7]
41837
0
2259 - Hamlyn Terrace
Query!
Funding & Sponsors
Funding source category [1]
313789
0
Government body
Query!
Name [1]
313789
0
Department of Health and Aged Care - Medical Research Future Fund (MRFF)
Query!
Address [1]
313789
0
Department of Health and Aged Care
GPO Box 9848
Canberra ACT 2601
Australia
Query!
Country [1]
313789
0
Australia
Query!
Primary sponsor type
University
Query!
Name
The University of Sydney
Query!
Address
The University of Sydney NSW 2006
Query!
Country
Australia
Query!
Secondary sponsor category [1]
315622
0
None
Query!
Name [1]
315622
0
Query!
Address [1]
315622
0
Query!
Country [1]
315622
0
Query!
Ethics approval
Ethics application status
Approved
Query!
Ethics committee name [1]
312957
0
Sydney Local Health District HREC
Query!
Ethics committee address [1]
312957
0
Research Ethics & Governance Office, Royal Prince Alfred Hospital, Missenden Rd, Camperdown NSW 2050
Query!
Ethics committee country [1]
312957
0
Australia
Query!
Date submitted for ethics approval [1]
312957
0
24/04/2023
Query!
Approval date [1]
312957
0
13/06/2023
Query!
Ethics approval number [1]
312957
0
X23-0143
Query!
Summary
Brief summary
Musculoskeletal conditions, including low back pain, are among the top 10 reasons for presentation to Australian emergency departments (EDs). Current evidence have shown that timely access to physiotherapy in EDs reduces wait-time, and overall ED length of stay. Primary-contact physiotherapists have been present in some Australian EDs for approximately 20 years, however the level of service provision varies across sites and access is inequitable. This may be because strong evidence of effectiveness is lacking, i.e. predominately observational studies or trials of low quality. The RESHAP-ED trial will determine the effectiveness, cost-effectiveness, and scalability of a primary-contact physiotherapy service when compared to usual care (doctors and nurses service) in managing musculoskeletal conditions in the ED. Our hypothesis is that a primary-contact physiotherapy pathway in the emergency department, to assess and manage patients who present with musculoskeletal conditions, will reduce time spent in emergency departments.
Query!
Trial website
Query!
Trial related presentations / publications
Query!
Public notes
Query!
Contacts
Principal investigator
Name
126478
0
Dr Gustavo Machado
Query!
Address
126478
0
School of Public Health, The University of Sydney
Level 10, North, King George V Building, Missenden Rd, Camperdown NSW 2050
Query!
Country
126478
0
Australia
Query!
Phone
126478
0
+61 2 8627 6243
Query!
Fax
126478
0
+61 2 8627 6262
Query!
Email
126478
0
[email protected]
Query!
Contact person for public queries
Name
126479
0
Dr Gustavo Machado
Query!
Address
126479
0
School of Public Health, The University of Sydney
Level 10, North, King George V Building, Missenden Rd, Camperdown NSW 2050
Query!
Country
126479
0
Australia
Query!
Phone
126479
0
+61 2 8627 6243
Query!
Fax
126479
0
+61 2 8627 6262
Query!
Email
126479
0
[email protected]
Query!
Contact person for scientific queries
Name
126480
0
Dr Gustavo Machado
Query!
Address
126480
0
School of Public Health, The University of Sydney
Level 10, North, King George V Building, Missenden Rd, Camperdown NSW 2050
Query!
Country
126480
0
Australia
Query!
Phone
126480
0
+61 2 8627 6243
Query!
Fax
126480
0
+61 2 8627 6262
Query!
Email
126480
0
[email protected]
Query!
Data sharing statement
Will individual participant data (IPD) for this trial be available (including data dictionaries)?
No
Query!
No/undecided IPD sharing reason/comment
Query!
What supporting documents are/will be available?
No Supporting Document Provided
Doc. No.
Type
Citation
Link
Email
Other Details
Attachment
19108
Study protocol
[email protected]
19109
Statistical analysis plan
[email protected]
19110
Ethical approval
[email protected]
385855-(Uploaded-13-06-2023-13-56-48)-Study-related document.pdf
Results publications and other study-related documents
Documents added manually
No documents have been uploaded by study researchers.
Documents added automatically
No additional documents have been identified.
Download to PDF