Please note that the copy function is not enabled for this field.
If you wish to
modify
existing outcomes, please copy and paste the current outcome text into the Update field.
LOGIN
CREATE ACCOUNT
LOGIN
CREATE ACCOUNT
MY TRIALS
REGISTER TRIAL
FAQs
HINTS AND TIPS
DEFINITIONS
Trial Review
The ANZCTR website will be unavailable from 1pm until 3pm (AEDT) on Wednesday the 30th of October for website maintenance. Please be sure to log out of the system in order to avoid any loss of data.
The safety and scientific validity of this study is the responsibility of the study sponsor and investigators. Listing a study does not mean it has been endorsed by the ANZCTR. Before participating in a study, talk to your health care provider and refer to this
information for consumers
Download to PDF
Trial registered on ANZCTR
Registration number
ACTRN12623001229662
Ethics application status
Approved
Date submitted
1/11/2023
Date registered
29/11/2023
Date last updated
1/08/2024
Date data sharing statement initially provided
29/11/2023
Type of registration
Prospectively registered
Titles & IDs
Public title
The Effects of a Short Video Intervention on Critically Appraising Online Health Information
Query!
Scientific title
The Effects of a Short Video Intervention on Young Australian (aged 18-39) Online Health Literacy Skills
Query!
Secondary ID [1]
310861
0
Nil known
Query!
Universal Trial Number (UTN)
Query!
Trial acronym
Query!
Linked study record
Query!
Health condition
Health condition(s) or problem(s) studied:
Online health literacy
331903
0
Query!
e-health literacy
332052
0
Query!
Condition category
Condition code
Public Health
328634
328634
0
0
Query!
Health promotion/education
Query!
Intervention/exposure
Study type
Interventional
Query!
Description of intervention(s) / exposure
We will test the following research questions:
Can we improve health literacy skills and knowledge using an intervention informed by psychology and communication theory to improve critical appraisal of online information?
Is the delivery method of information going to affect knowledge outcomes? If so, which delivery method is most effective?
This study is a survey which will be conducted online through the Qualtrics platform. We will recruit an online sample stratified by high and low education via Qualtrics.
Eligible panel members will be invited to participate. This will include any adults aged 18-39, with quota sampling based on gender and education groups. Participants will read the participant information sheet and click a button to indicate consent to participate. They will complete a 10-minute online survey including baseline measures, viewing one of the three health literacy interventions or no intervention (control), and completing outcome measures.
This will be a four-arm randomised-control trial among Australian adults 18-39 years.
The participants will be randomly allocated to receive the health literacy information via either one of the three interventions: 1) written text information, 2) animated videos, 3) TikTok-style videos, or they will be assigned to the control group.
1) Written text condition:
The text condition for critically appraising online health information was based on various critical appraisal tools including the "Trust it or Trash it?" method (“Trust it or trash it?” http://www.trustortrash.org/). The text focuses on a tool called WHO-WHEN-WHY which was developed by the researchers. This is a critical appraisal tool that can be used as a practical guide to assess the quality of online health information.
To address the general education levels of the sample, relevant written information was run through the SHeLL editor (https://shell.techlab.works/ ), a tool that identifies issues like complex language and long sentences and suggests alternatives to improve understandability.
Participants will be required to spend at least 3 minutes reading the information.
2) Animation
Two animated videos for the interventions are based on the WHO-WHEN-WHY model above. These videos are both 2 minutes long. These videos were commissioned online using the services of a professional animation film making freelancer. All members of the research team were involved in the production of these videos, including providing feedback to the animator and refining the script to suit the format of the video.
3) Tiktok conditions:
The videos for the interventions are based on the WHO-WHEN-WHY model above. Two videos were created by a health communicator to model the Tiktok format of videos. These videos are both 2 minutes long.
Query!
Intervention code [1]
327284
0
Behaviour
Query!
Intervention code [2]
327396
0
Treatment: Other
Query!
Comparator / control treatment
Control participants will be given written Australian dietary guidelines, including visual information regarding the Australian Guide to Healthy Eating.
Query!
Control group
Active
Query!
Outcomes
Primary outcome [1]
336443
0
Online Health Literacy
Query!
Assessment method [1]
336443
0
Measured using the average score to 5 questions, that were designed specifically for this study.
Query!
Timepoint [1]
336443
0
Immediately post-intervention
Query!
Secondary outcome [1]
428425
0
Click-through-rate (frequency of clicking on a website link to access further information about the topic)
Query!
Assessment method [1]
428425
0
Click-through-rate information will be collected both via Qualtrics and Google Analytics associate with the webpage.
Query!
Timepoint [1]
428425
0
Immediately post-intervention
Query!
Secondary outcome [2]
428426
0
eHealth Literacy skill
Query!
Assessment method [2]
428426
0
eHealth Literacy Scale (Norman and Skinner, 2006)
Query!
Timepoint [2]
428426
0
Pre- and post-intervention immediately
Query!
Secondary outcome [3]
428427
0
Perceptions of the information/video
Query!
Assessment method [3]
428427
0
5 point scale adapted from Davis et al. (2013)
Query!
Timepoint [3]
428427
0
immediately post-intervention
Query!
Secondary outcome [4]
428428
0
Personal relevance
Query!
Assessment method [4]
428428
0
personal relevance question adapted from Scherer et al (2013)
Query!
Timepoint [4]
428428
0
immediately post-intervention
Query!
Secondary outcome [5]
428429
0
Intention to share on socials
Query!
Assessment method [5]
428429
0
single purpose-built question for this study
Query!
Timepoint [5]
428429
0
immediately post-intervention
Query!
Secondary outcome [6]
428430
0
Helpfulness of the WHO-WHY-WHEN guide, purpose-built item
Query!
Assessment method [6]
428430
0
an open-ended single purpose-built question for this study
Query!
Timepoint [6]
428430
0
Immediately post-intervention
Query!
Secondary outcome [7]
428431
0
Novelty of information (a three-item purpose-built measure)
Query!
Assessment method [7]
428431
0
three-item purpose-built measure for this study
Query!
Timepoint [7]
428431
0
Immediately post-intervention
Query!
Secondary outcome [8]
438210
0
Heat-map questions to assess critical skills for identifying trustworthy information on websites
Query!
Assessment method [8]
438210
0
Click data on a heat map, two-item purpose-built measure for this study
Query!
Timepoint [8]
438210
0
Query!
Secondary outcome [9]
438211
0
Heat-map questions to assess critical skills for identifying trustworthy information on websites
Query!
Assessment method [9]
438211
0
Click data on a heat map, two-item purpose-built measure for this study
Query!
Timepoint [9]
438211
0
Immediately post-intervention only
Query!
Eligibility
Key inclusion criteria
Live in Australia, aged 18-39
Query!
Minimum age
18
Years
Query!
Query!
Maximum age
39
Years
Query!
Query!
Sex
Both males and females
Query!
Can healthy volunteers participate?
Yes
Query!
Key exclusion criteria
None
Query!
Study design
Purpose of the study
Educational / counselling / training
Query!
Allocation to intervention
Randomised controlled trial
Query!
Procedure for enrolling a subject and allocating the treatment (allocation concealment procedures)
Participants will be recruited from the general Australian public using a market research company, Qualtrics, which has an extensive participant database. Participants will be able to read the PIS and Consent Form before accessing the survey questions.
The survey itself will be hosted on the Qualtrics platform, which allows randomisation of participants such that participants are evenly randomised to each given condition using the inbuilt automated algorithm of the platform. Thus, the allocation is concealed through the platform's inbuilt randomisation tool.
Query!
Methods used to generate the sequence in which subjects will be randomised (sequence generation)
The Qualtrics platform includes a “Randomizer” tool to evenly allocate participants to each condition. Participants will be randomised once, to the control, the written text, Animation, or TikTok condition.
Query!
Masking / blinding
Open (masking not used)
Query!
Who is / are masked / blinded?
Query!
Query!
Query!
Query!
Intervention assignment
Parallel
Query!
Other design features
Query!
Phase
Not Applicable
Query!
Type of endpoint/s
Query!
Statistical methods / analysis
Statistical analysis will be conducted using planned contrasts between the three intervention arms and control arm, implemented in regression models. The influence of age, gender, language, education, health literacy, self-assessed health status, and the presence of pre-existing or chronic health conditions, will be examined by including appropriate interaction terms within the regression models. The total sample size required is N=2120. This is based on the primary outcome of critical appraisal skill level and an expected small effect size of 0.1. The number of participants required per arm (4 arms), to provide 90% power at error type I (alpha =0.05) is 530 (this is a balanced design).
Query!
Recruitment
Recruitment status
Recruiting
Query!
Date of first participant enrolment
Anticipated
26/06/2024
Query!
Actual
8/07/2024
Query!
Date of last participant enrolment
Anticipated
7/08/2024
Query!
Actual
Query!
Date of last data collection
Anticipated
7/08/2024
Query!
Actual
Query!
Sample size
Target
2120
Query!
Accrual to date
1839
Query!
Final
Query!
Recruitment in Australia
Recruitment state(s)
ACT,NSW,NT,QLD,SA,TAS,WA,VIC
Query!
Funding & Sponsors
Funding source category [1]
315117
0
Government body
Query!
Name [1]
315117
0
National Health and Medical Research Council, NHMRC
Query!
Address [1]
315117
0
National Health and Medical Research Council GPO Box 1421 Canberra ACT 2601
Query!
Country [1]
315117
0
Australia
Query!
Primary sponsor type
University
Query!
Name
Sydney Health Literacy Lab at the University of Sydney
Query!
Address
Room 128C Edward Ford Building A27, The University of Sydney, NSW 2006
Query!
Country
Australia
Query!
Secondary sponsor category [1]
317135
0
None
Query!
Name [1]
317135
0
Query!
Address [1]
317135
0
Query!
Country [1]
317135
0
Query!
Ethics approval
Ethics application status
Approved
Query!
Ethics committee name [1]
314055
0
Human Research Ethics Committee, The University of Sydney
Query!
Ethics committee address [1]
314055
0
Administration Building (F23) The University of Sydney NSW 2006
Query!
Ethics committee country [1]
314055
0
Australia
Query!
Date submitted for ethics approval [1]
314055
0
06/04/2023
Query!
Approval date [1]
314055
0
22/05/2023
Query!
Ethics approval number [1]
314055
0
2023/275
Query!
Summary
Brief summary
Social media has transformed communication and during the pandemic has had an alarming influence on public health communication. For example, younger adults and those with greater social media use showed higher endorsement of misinformation and lower support for official health advice provided during the global pandemic in Australia and worldwide. This study aims to develop and assess the effect of an online health literacy intervention on critical appraisal of online information. Participants will receive the intervention either via TikTok-style videos, animated videos, or informative written materials. Outcomes will be compared between the conditions.
Query!
Trial website
Query!
Trial related presentations / publications
Query!
Public notes
Query!
Contacts
Principal investigator
Name
130258
0
Prof Kirsten McCaffery
Query!
Address
130258
0
Room 128B Edward Ford Building A27, The University of Sydney, NSW 2006
Query!
Country
130258
0
Australia
Query!
Phone
130258
0
+61 2 9351 7220
Query!
Fax
130258
0
Query!
Email
130258
0
[email protected]
Query!
Contact person for public queries
Name
130259
0
Kirsten McCaffery
Query!
Address
130259
0
Room 128B Edward Ford Building A27, The University of Sydney, NSW 2006
Query!
Country
130259
0
Australia
Query!
Phone
130259
0
+61 2 9351 7220
Query!
Fax
130259
0
Query!
Email
130259
0
[email protected]
Query!
Contact person for scientific queries
Name
130260
0
Kirsten McCaffery
Query!
Address
130260
0
Room 128B Edward Ford Building A27, The University of Sydney, NSW 2006
Query!
Country
130260
0
Australia
Query!
Phone
130260
0
+61 2 9351 7220
Query!
Fax
130260
0
Query!
Email
130260
0
[email protected]
Query!
Data sharing statement
Will individual participant data (IPD) for this trial be available (including data dictionaries)?
No
Query!
No/undecided IPD sharing reason/comment
Query!
What supporting documents are/will be available?
No Supporting Document Provided
Results publications and other study-related documents
Documents added manually
No documents have been uploaded by study researchers.
Documents added automatically
No additional documents have been identified.
Download to PDF