Please note that the copy function is not enabled for this field.
If you wish to
modify
existing outcomes, please copy and paste the current outcome text into the Update field.
LOGIN
CREATE ACCOUNT
LOGIN
CREATE ACCOUNT
MY TRIALS
REGISTER TRIAL
FAQs
HINTS AND TIPS
DEFINITIONS
Trial Review
The ANZCTR website will be unavailable from 1pm until 3pm (AEDT) on Wednesday the 30th of October for website maintenance. Please be sure to log out of the system in order to avoid any loss of data.
The safety and scientific validity of this study is the responsibility of the study sponsor and investigators. Listing a study does not mean it has been endorsed by the ANZCTR. Before participating in a study, talk to your health care provider and refer to this
information for consumers
Download to PDF
Trial registered on ANZCTR
Registration number
ACTRN12623001246673
Ethics application status
Approved
Date submitted
2/11/2023
Date registered
1/12/2023
Date last updated
22/09/2024
Date data sharing statement initially provided
1/12/2023
Type of registration
Prospectively registered
Titles & IDs
Public title
Testing different ways to explain coronary calcium artery scoring for support of shared decision making in adults who do not have a history of cardiovascular disease
Query!
Scientific title
Testing different ways to explain coronary calcium artery scoring for support of shared decision making in adults who do not have a history of cardiovascular disease: A Study on Participant Understanding of cardiovascular disease risk
Query!
Secondary ID [1]
310886
0
None
Query!
Universal Trial Number (UTN)
Query!
Trial acronym
Query!
Linked study record
Query!
Health condition
Health condition(s) or problem(s) studied:
Cardiovascular disease
331939
0
Query!
Condition category
Condition code
Cardiovascular
328664
328664
0
0
Query!
Coronary heart disease
Query!
Public Health
328665
328665
0
0
Query!
Health promotion/education
Query!
Intervention/exposure
Study type
Interventional
Query!
Description of intervention(s) / exposure
Design: The study will be a randomised experiment. We will conduct a national survey recruited through Dynata to experimentally test different content options amongst consumers with varying health literacy. A 2 x 2 factorial design will test how to present risk assessment and management options (basic vs detailed) and uncertainty (implicit vs explicit) to enhance understanding.
Methods: A national sample will be recruited for an online survey through Qualtrics, with stratified education, gender and age groups (45-79 years). Participants will complete a 10-minute survey where they will: 1) respond to questions about demographics and health literacy; and 2) respond to various information: group 1 and 3 will receive basic description of CVD risk factors/management options, group 2 and 4 will receive detailed description of the triage method and intervention effects. We will also compare standard presentation of probabilities with a version that has explicit information about different types of uncertainty: aleatory (randomness of future events, represented implicitly via probabilities) for group 1 and 2; and epistemic (with explicit statements about uncertainty around numeric estimates and the quality of underlying evidence) for group 3 and 4. There will be two outcome scenarios within each of the four groups. Participants will be shown a hypothetical scenario of a person receiving an intermediate result for their heart disease risk, which will be reclassified as either low risk or high risk. Participants will receive a debriefing document at the end to explain the aims of the study and that the data is based on a hypothetical scenario which do not apply to their own situation. The survey is anonymous.
The eight groups participants can be randomised to are summarised below:
1a. Information: Basic; Uncertainty: Implicit; Final risk: Low
1b. Information: Basic; Uncertainty: Implicit; Final risk: High
2a. Information: Detailed; Uncertainty: Implicit; Final risk: Low
2b. Information: Detailed; Uncertainty: Implicit; Final risk: High
3a. Information: Basic; Uncertainty: Explicit; Final risk: Low
3b. Information: Basic; Uncertainty: Explicit; Final risk: High
4a. Information: Detailed; Uncertainty: Explicit; Final risk: Low
4b. Information: Detailed; Uncertainty: Explicit; Final risk: High
Query!
Intervention code [1]
327307
0
Prevention
Query!
Intervention code [2]
327308
0
Lifestyle
Query!
Intervention code [3]
327309
0
Behaviour
Query!
Comparator / control treatment
The design is 2x2, There are two different risk outcomes within each group, therefore participants will be randomised to one of eight groups, all of which will be compared against one another.
'Comparator' Information: Basic; Uncertainty: Implicit; Final risk: Low
Query!
Control group
Active
Query!
Outcomes
Primary outcome [1]
336460
0
Understanding of CVD risk assessment
Query!
Assessment method [1]
336460
0
Knowledge-based multiple choice questions containing 6 items. Participants will be asked questions regarding their understanding of CVD risk assessment. These questions are specific to this study.
Query!
Timepoint [1]
336460
0
Immediately post-intervention
Query!
Primary outcome [2]
336461
0
Understanding of management options
Query!
Assessment method [2]
336461
0
A 4 items, 2 response (Yes or No) Decisional Conflict Scale SURE Test: ‘Do you feel sure about the best choice for you?’, ‘Do you know the benefits and risks of each option?’, ‘Are you clear about which benefits and risks matter most to you?’, ‘Do you have enough information to make a choice?’
Query!
Timepoint [2]
336461
0
Immediately post-intervention
Query!
Secondary outcome [1]
428479
0
Intentions to get Coronary Calcium Artery Scoring (CACS) scan
Query!
Assessment method [1]
428479
0
The participant's level of agreement/disagreement on a 7-item Likert-type scale to the post-intervention statement: 'I intend to get the CACS heart scan in the next 4 weeks'
Query!
Timepoint [1]
428479
0
Immediately post-intervention
Query!
Secondary outcome [2]
428480
0
Risk perception
Query!
Assessment method [2]
428480
0
A total of 8 items multiple choice on perceived risk category and understanding of information and uncertainty. Participants will be asked questions about the hypothetical scenario shown to them regarding the initial/final/ overall risk results, risk of heart attack or stroke, risk calculator results and heart scan results. These questions are specific to this study.
Query!
Timepoint [2]
428480
0
Immediately post-intervention
Query!
Secondary outcome [3]
428481
0
Perceived credibility
Query!
Assessment method [3]
428481
0
A 4-item Likert scale (from 1 [Strongly disagree] to [Strongly agree]): ‘I felt that the numbers received were “my numbers”’, ‘I found the results to be written personally for me’, ‘I felt that the information was relevant to me’, ‘I felt that the information was designed specifically for me’
Query!
Timepoint [3]
428481
0
Immediately post-intervention
Query!
Secondary outcome [4]
428482
0
Emotional response
Query!
Assessment method [4]
428482
0
A 6-item Likert-type scale (from 1 [Not at all] to 7 [extremely]). The three positive (Assured, Hopeful, Relieved) and the three negative (afraid, anxious, worried) subscales will be scored based on the average of the relevant items.
Query!
Timepoint [4]
428482
0
Immediately post intervention
Query!
Secondary outcome [5]
429055
0
Intentions to discuss with GP about medication
Query!
Assessment method [5]
429055
0
The participant's level of agreement/disagreement on a 7-item Likert-type scale to the post-intervention statements: 'I intend to talk to my GP about taking medication in the next 4 weeks'
Query!
Timepoint [5]
429055
0
Immediately post-intervention
Query!
Secondary outcome [6]
429056
0
Intentions to discuss with GP about lifestyle modification
Query!
Assessment method [6]
429056
0
The participant's level of agreement/disagreement on a 7-item Likert-type scale to the post-intervention statements: 'I intend to make healthy lifestyle changes in the next 4 weeks'.
Query!
Timepoint [6]
429056
0
Immediately post-intervention
Query!
Eligibility
Key inclusion criteria
Individuals will be eligible if they are aged 45-79; living in Australia, able to communicate and read English; never had a heart attack or stroke nor been diagnosed with a CVD.
Query!
Minimum age
45
Years
Query!
Query!
Maximum age
79
Years
Query!
Query!
Sex
Both males and females
Query!
Can healthy volunteers participate?
Yes
Query!
Key exclusion criteria
None
Query!
Study design
Purpose of the study
Prevention
Query!
Allocation to intervention
Randomised controlled trial
Query!
Procedure for enrolling a subject and allocating the treatment (allocation concealment procedures)
The survey itself will be hosted on the Qualtrics platform. The Qualtrics platform includes a “Randomiser” tool to evenly allocate participants to each condition. Participants will be evenly randomised to one of the eight groups, participants only be exposed to one group. A debrief document will only be available at the end of the survey. There is no way participants will have knowledge of other groups and which group they are allocated to.
Query!
Methods used to generate the sequence in which subjects will be randomised (sequence generation)
The Qualtrics platform includes a “Randomizer” tool to evenly allocate participants to one of the eight groups,
Query!
Masking / blinding
Query!
Who is / are masked / blinded?
Query!
Query!
Query!
Query!
Intervention assignment
Query!
Other design features
Query!
Phase
Not Applicable
Query!
Type of endpoint/s
Query!
Statistical methods / analysis
Query!
Recruitment
Recruitment status
Completed
Query!
Date of first participant enrolment
Anticipated
4/12/2023
Query!
Actual
4/12/2023
Query!
Date of last participant enrolment
Anticipated
15/12/2023
Query!
Actual
12/12/2023
Query!
Date of last data collection
Anticipated
15/12/2023
Query!
Actual
12/12/2023
Query!
Sample size
Target
1624
Query!
Accrual to date
Query!
Final
1629
Query!
Recruitment in Australia
Recruitment state(s)
ACT,NSW,NT,QLD,SA,TAS,WA,VIC
Query!
Funding & Sponsors
Funding source category [1]
315144
0
Charities/Societies/Foundations
Query!
Name [1]
315144
0
National Heart Foundation of Australia
Query!
Address [1]
315144
0
Level 3 80 William Street, East Sydney NSW 2011
Query!
Country [1]
315144
0
Australia
Query!
Primary sponsor type
University
Query!
Name
The University of Sydney
Query!
Address
Edward Ford Building A27, The University of Sydney, NSW 2006
Query!
Country
Australia
Query!
Secondary sponsor category [1]
317164
0
None
Query!
Name [1]
317164
0
Query!
Address [1]
317164
0
Query!
Country [1]
317164
0
Query!
Ethics approval
Ethics application status
Approved
Query!
Ethics committee name [1]
314082
0
The University of Sydney Human Research Ethics Committees
Query!
Ethics committee address [1]
314082
0
Level 3, Michael Spence Building (F23), The University of Sydney, NSW 2006
Query!
Ethics committee country [1]
314082
0
Australia
Query!
Date submitted for ethics approval [1]
314082
0
16/08/2023
Query!
Approval date [1]
314082
0
18/10/2023
Query!
Ethics approval number [1]
314082
0
2023/671
Query!
Summary
Brief summary
The aim of this study is to improve knowledge of consumers about new and emerging CVD risk assessment methods, addressing different levels of health literacy; and to improve the uptake of evidence-based risk assessment methods by health professionals by providing them with communication tools that allow them to quickly and automatically apply the evidence to their patients. This project will use a novel approach to: 1) identify the best way to communicate the known benefits/harms and uncertainties of these tests, for patients with varying health literacy levels; and 2) develop novel patient decision aids on these issues to support revised national guidelines before they are implemented.
Query!
Trial website
Query!
Trial related presentations / publications
Query!
Public notes
Query!
Contacts
Principal investigator
Name
130346
0
Dr Carissa Bonner
Query!
Address
130346
0
Edward Ford Building A27, The University of Sydney, NSW 2006
Query!
Country
130346
0
Australia
Query!
Phone
130346
0
+61293517125
Query!
Fax
130346
0
Query!
Email
130346
0
[email protected]
Query!
Contact person for public queries
Name
130347
0
Carissa Bonner
Query!
Address
130347
0
Edward Ford Building A27, The University of Sydney, NSW 2006
Query!
Country
130347
0
Australia
Query!
Phone
130347
0
+61293517125
Query!
Fax
130347
0
Query!
Email
130347
0
[email protected]
Query!
Contact person for scientific queries
Name
130348
0
Carissa Bonner
Query!
Address
130348
0
Edward Ford Building A27, The University of Sydney, NSW 2006
Query!
Country
130348
0
Australia
Query!
Phone
130348
0
+61293517125
Query!
Fax
130348
0
Query!
Email
130348
0
[email protected]
Query!
Data sharing statement
Will individual participant data (IPD) for this trial be available (including data dictionaries)?
No
Query!
No/undecided IPD sharing reason/comment
Query!
What supporting documents are/will be available?
No Supporting Document Provided
Results publications and other study-related documents
Documents added manually
No documents have been uploaded by study researchers.
Documents added automatically
No additional documents have been identified.
Download to PDF