Please note that the copy function is not enabled for this field.
If you wish to
modify
existing outcomes, please copy and paste the current outcome text into the Update field.
LOGIN
CREATE ACCOUNT
LOGIN
CREATE ACCOUNT
MY TRIALS
REGISTER TRIAL
FAQs
HINTS AND TIPS
DEFINITIONS
Trial Review
The safety and scientific validity of this study is the responsibility of the study sponsor and investigators. Listing a study does not mean it has been endorsed by the ANZCTR. Before participating in a study, talk to your health care provider and refer to this
information for consumers
Download to PDF
Trial registered on ANZCTR
Registration number
ACTRN12623001315606p
Ethics application status
Not yet submitted
Date submitted
20/11/2023
Date registered
15/12/2023
Date last updated
15/12/2023
Date data sharing statement initially provided
15/12/2023
Type of registration
Prospectively registered
Titles & IDs
Public title
Do synbiotics reduce infections after bowel surgery?
Query!
Scientific title
Do perioperative synbiotics reduce postoperative infectious complications in patients undergoing elective colorectal resection?
Query!
Secondary ID [1]
310959
0
None
Query!
Universal Trial Number (UTN)
U1111-1300-3532
Query!
Trial acronym
Query!
Linked study record
Query!
Health condition
Health condition(s) or problem(s) studied:
Colorectal disease
332040
0
Query!
Postoperative infection
332042
0
Query!
Colorectal cancer
332043
0
Query!
Condition category
Condition code
Surgery
328766
328766
0
0
Query!
Other surgery
Query!
Infection
328767
328767
0
0
Query!
Studies of infection and infectious agents
Query!
Oral and Gastrointestinal
328768
328768
0
0
Query!
Other diseases of the mouth, teeth, oesophagus, digestive system including liver and colon
Query!
Oral and Gastrointestinal
328769
328769
0
0
Query!
Inflammatory bowel disease
Query!
Cancer
328943
328943
0
0
Query!
Bowel - Back passage (rectum) or large bowel (colon)
Query!
Intervention/exposure
Study type
Interventional
Query!
Description of intervention(s) / exposure
The intervention is a synbiotic powder manufactured by the Sydney based company ProGood. Synbiotics are a combination of probiotics and prebiotics. Probiotics and synbiotics are classified as food supplements, not medicines.
The selected synbiotic product is called 'ProGood Original' and it contains the following probiotics and prebiotics:
- 15 billion Lactobacillus acidophilus
- 15 billion Bifidobacterium lactis
- Arabinoglobulin
- Inulin
This synbiotic product was selected because of the presence of two commonly used probiotic species (Lactobacillus acidophilus and Bifidobacterium lactis) that appeared to be less prevalent as sources of bacteraemia in case reports, as opposed to other probiotic species. Of note, probiotic-induced bacteraemia is a rare outcome with documentation in isolated case reports and often in patients with severe immunosuppression. Nonetheless, we wanted to focus on selecting a synbiotic product that was as safe as possible for our randomised controlled trial.
Participants randomised to the intervention group will be given a plain container containing 105g of synbiotic powder, and a scoop. They will be asked to take orally 5 grams (approximately 1 heaped teaspoon) synbiotic powder mixed in with a glass of water once daily for 1 week before surgery, in their own home. They will not take the synbiotic powder on the day of surgery, but they will bring the container to hospital for storage. They will take the synbiotic powder for two weeks after surgery. If they are nil by mouth after surgery due to a complication such as an ileus, they will not be required to take the powder on the days that they are nil by mouth. Instead, they will return to taking it when they are able to tolerate oral medications. Nursing staff will assist with administration of the synbiotic powder in hospital. The container will be required to be stored in a refrigerator to ensure that the synbiotic powder is stored at a temperature under 8 degrees. If the participant is discharged before two weeks after surgery, they will be given their synbiotic container to complete the two week course at home.
Participants will be provided with a chart to document days of successfully taking the synbiotic powder. The synbiotic container will be collected by the researcher at the end of the participant's three week course, to assess adherence.
Query!
Intervention code [1]
327391
0
Prevention
Query!
Comparator / control treatment
Participants randomised to the control group will be given a plain container containing 105g of maltodextrin powder as placebo. They will be asked to take orally 5 grams (approximately 1 teaspoon) maltodextrin powder mixed in with a glass of water once daily for 1 week before surgery. They will not take the maltodextrin powder on the day of surgery. They will take the maltodextrin powder for two weeks after surgery. If they are nil by mouth after surgery due to a complication such as an ileus, they will not be required to take the powder on the days that they are nil by mouth. Instead, they will return to taking it when they are able to tolerate oral medications. Nursing staff will assist with administration of the placebo powder in hospital. The container also be stored in a refrigerator at a temperature under 8 degrees. If the participant is discharged before two weeks after surgery, they will be given their placebo container to complete the two week course at home.
Participants will be provided with a chart to document days of successfully taking the placebo powder. The placebo container will be collected by the researcher at the end of the participant's three week course, to assess adherence.
Query!
Control group
Placebo
Query!
Outcomes
Primary outcome [1]
336575
0
Total postoperative infections within 30 days of surgery, calculated by the summation of the following infections and assessed as a composite outcome:
- Superficial incisional surgical site infection
- Deep incisional surgical site infection
- Organ/space surgical site infection (inclusive of intra-abdominal abscess and anastomotic leak)
- Pneumonia
- Urinary tract infection
- Peripheral line infection
- Central line infection
- Clostridium difficile colitis
- Sepsis of unclear cause
Query!
Assessment method [1]
336575
0
Total postoperative infection rates will be prospectively measured by analysing clinical notes when the patient is in hospital, and by analysing whether they have presented to a healthcare professional in the community and received antibiotics or other treatment, in the period from discharge to 30 days. This will done by analysis of clinical records for community dispensing of antibiotics, and participants may be contacted for further detail e.g. if a participant has been prescribed a one week course of oral augmentin in the community, the researcher will contact the participant to clarify which type of infection.
Healthcare providers will be given a list of standardised definitions for the aforementioned postoperative infections based on symptoms/signs, laboratory investigations and radiological investigations, however the diagnosis for each postoperative infection will be at the discretion of the treating team.
Our sample size calculation has been performed based on total postoperative infection rates, but we will also present data on individual infections in our results.
Query!
Timepoint [1]
336575
0
Prospectively daily reviews of clinical notes while participants are inpatients following surgery, and at 30 days following surgery, the clinical notes will be comprehensively reviewed to ensure all postoperative infection data has been collected.
Query!
Secondary outcome [1]
428856
0
Prolonged postoperative Ileus
Query!
Assessment method [1]
428856
0
Rates of prolonged postoperative ileus as per a predefined definition circulated to treating teams, presence of ileus will be reviewed based on analysis of clinical notes.
Query!
Timepoint [1]
428856
0
Prospective daily reviews of clinical notes while participants are inpatients following surgery, and assessment of clinical notes at 30 days of surgery to assess for evidence of prolonged postoperative ileus.
Query!
Secondary outcome [2]
429033
0
Time to first flatus (days)
Query!
Assessment method [2]
429033
0
Analysis of this will be based on documentation of time to first flatus in clinical notes, and it will be documented based on days, not hours.
Query!
Timepoint [2]
429033
0
Prospective daily reviews of clinical notes while participants are inpatients following surgery, and analysis of clinical notes at 30 days following surgery to assess for documentation of time to first flatus.
Query!
Secondary outcome [3]
429034
0
Time to first bowel motion
Query!
Assessment method [3]
429034
0
Analysis of this will be based on documentation of time to first bowel motion in clinical notes, and it will be documented based on days, not hours.
Query!
Timepoint [3]
429034
0
Prospective daily reviews of clinical notes while participants are inpatients following surgery, and analysis of clinical notes at 30 days following surgery to assess for documentation of time to first bowel motion.
Query!
Secondary outcome [4]
429035
0
Hospital length of stay (days)
Query!
Assessment method [4]
429035
0
Total hospital length of stay (inclusive of preoperative and postoperative) will be documented based on clinical notes.
Query!
Timepoint [4]
429035
0
Prospective daily analysis of clinical notes and a dedicated analysis of clinical notes at 30 days following surgery to determine hospital length of stay in days.
Query!
Secondary outcome [5]
429036
0
Duration of postoperative antibiotics (days)
Query!
Assessment method [5]
429036
0
Review of clinical notes (including eMedication charts such as MedChart) to assess for use of postoperative antibiotics separate to prophylactic antibiotics. This will be documented in days.
Query!
Timepoint [5]
429036
0
Prospective daily analysis of clinical notes and a dedicated analysis of clinical notes at 30 days following surgery to determine duration of postoperative antibiotics in days.
Query!
Secondary outcome [6]
429039
0
Return to theatre within 30 days of surgery
Query!
Assessment method [6]
429039
0
Review of clinical notes and acute theatre lists to assess for return to theatre within 30 days of surgery.
Query!
Timepoint [6]
429039
0
Prospective daily analysis of clinical notes and a dedicated analysis of clinical notes at 30 days following surgery to assess for return to theatre within 30 days of surgery.
Query!
Secondary outcome [7]
429047
0
Readmission within 30 days of surgery
Query!
Assessment method [7]
429047
0
Review of clinical notes including assessment notes and discharge summaries to assess for readmission within 30 days of surgery. Note same-day discharges from the Emergency Department will not be classified as an admission. If a participant is admitted to the ward or is required to stay one or more nights in hospital, this will be classified as an admission.
Query!
Timepoint [7]
429047
0
Dedicated analysis of clinical notes at 30 days following surgery to assess for readmission over this period.
Query!
Secondary outcome [8]
429048
0
Comprehensive Complication Index (CCI)
Query!
Assessment method [8]
429048
0
Relevant data on postoperative complications will be collected in order to grade severity using the Clavien-Diendo classification system. Following this, data will be inputted into the Comprehensive Complication Index online calculator in order to provide a calculation of overall morbidity following surgery.
Query!
Timepoint [8]
429048
0
Data will be collected prospectively on daily reviews of clinical notes, and a dedicated analysis will be performed at 30 days following surgery - at which time, the CCI will be calculated.
Query!
Secondary outcome [9]
429049
0
Mortality within 30 days of surgery
Query!
Assessment method [9]
429049
0
Review of clinical notes and discussion with colorectal nurse specialists to assess for mortality within 30 days of surgery, of which all-cause mortality would be classified as a postoperative complication.
Query!
Timepoint [9]
429049
0
Dedicated analysis of clinical notes at 30 days following surgery to assess for mortality within this period.
Query!
Secondary outcome [10]
429050
0
Change in gut microbiome on metagenomic analysis of stool specimens
Query!
Assessment method [10]
429050
0
A subset of participants at Te Whatu Ora - Counties Manukau will be asked to provide two stool specimens. The first stool specimen will be provided prior to receiving the intervention/placebo in order to establish the participant's 'normal' gut microbiome. Another stool specimen will be provided after surgery whilst in hospital, at approximately postoperative day 3 but will be dependent on return to physiological bowel function. Stool specimens will be sent to the Liggins Institute for metagenomic analysis to compare participants' changes in gut microbiome. Metagenomic analysis will be performed in conjunction with the Liggins Institute.
Query!
Timepoint [10]
429050
0
As described previously, the first stool specimen will be provided prior to commencing the intervention/placebo, and the second stool specimen will be provided after surgery when physiological bowel function has returned (approximately postoperative day 3).
Query!
Eligibility
Key inclusion criteria
- Adult patients undergoing elective colorectal resection for malignant or benign conditions at selected trial sites in New Zealand.
- Elective colorectal resection includes surgical planning for anastomosis +/- stoma formation.
Query!
Minimum age
18
Years
Query!
Query!
Maximum age
No limit
Query!
Query!
Sex
Both males and females
Query!
Can healthy volunteers participate?
No
Query!
Key exclusion criteria
- Patients undergoing acute or emergency operation
- Patients not receiving an anastomosis
- Patients undergoing surgical planning to remove all of their colon
- Intolerance to probiotics or synbiotics
- Unwilling to provide informed consent after discussions held in the participant's preferred language
- Unable to take more than 60% of the 3 week course of intervention/placebo
- Development of acute pancreatitis during the clinical trial
- Severe immunosuppression with neutrophils less than 1 prior to enrollment in the clinical trial
Query!
Study design
Purpose of the study
Prevention
Query!
Allocation to intervention
Randomised controlled trial
Query!
Procedure for enrolling a subject and allocating the treatment (allocation concealment procedures)
An independent unblinded research assistant will be responsible for allocation concealment. They will have access to the randomly assigned dataset, and will be responsible for providing participants with either intervention or placebo container, as per the randomly assigned dataset. The containers will look indistinguishable from each other and will be numbered for identification purposes. However, the participants, investigators and healthcare professionals will not be able to establish which group an individual has been allocated to. The appropriate numbered container will be provided to the blinded investigator to give to participants.
Participants and outcome assessors (the investigators) will both be blinded to the allocation, as will treating healthcare providers. Group allocations will be unblinded at the end of the study.
Query!
Methods used to generate the sequence in which subjects will be randomised (sequence generation)
Permuted block randomisation with variable block sizes, stratified by hospital site, will be performed using 'Sealed Enveloped', the online random sequence generator. This will be executed by another research assistant who will be unblinded. They will be responsible for providing the main researcher with intervention or placebo containers, based on which arm the participants have been allocated.
Query!
Masking / blinding
Blinded (masking used)
Query!
Who is / are masked / blinded?
The people receiving the treatment/s
The people administering the treatment/s
The people assessing the outcomes
The people analysing the results/data
Query!
Query!
Query!
Query!
Intervention assignment
Parallel
Query!
Other design features
Query!
Phase
Not Applicable
Query!
Type of endpoint/s
Safety/efficacy
Query!
Statistical methods / analysis
We estimate that there is a 40% incidence of total postoperative infections following elective colorectal resection. This is based on reviewing local Middlemore Hospital postoperative infection rates, data on Bowel Cancer Outcomes Registry (BCOR), other relevant randomised controlled trials and accounting for the prospective nature of this study
In order to halve this incidence of 40%, to reach a 20% incidence of total postoperative infections, with a power of 0.8 and alpha of 0.05, and a 1:1 allocation ratio, and accounting for an attrition rate of 10%, the following is calculated:
- Intervention n = 92
- Control n = 92
- Total n = 184
Hence, we are aiming for 185 participants.
We plan to undertake statistical analysis on our outcome data according to the following principles:
- The main researcher will perform the statistical analysis while blinded, assisted by a biostatistician from the University of Auckland.
- R will be used as the statistical analysis software, given this is the software that the main researcher has taken a health statistics postgraduate paper in.
- Categorical outcome data (such as total postoperative infection rates) comparing intervention and control groups will be analysed using Fisher's exact test.
- Continuous outcome data (such as length of stay in hospital) comparing intervention and control groups will be visualised using histograms, and depending on whether the datadisplays a normal distribution or not, parametric (independent t-test) or non-parametric (Mann Whitney U) tests will be utilised.
- Metagenomic analysis of stool specimens will be performed in conjunction with the Liggins Institute scientists.
Query!
Recruitment
Recruitment status
Not yet recruiting
Query!
Date of first participant enrolment
Anticipated
5/02/2024
Query!
Actual
Query!
Date of last participant enrolment
Anticipated
3/02/2025
Query!
Actual
Query!
Date of last data collection
Anticipated
7/03/2025
Query!
Actual
Query!
Sample size
Target
185
Query!
Accrual to date
Query!
Final
Query!
Recruitment outside Australia
Country [1]
25976
0
New Zealand
Query!
State/province [1]
25976
0
Query!
Funding & Sponsors
Funding source category [1]
315218
0
Government body
Query!
Name [1]
315218
0
Health Research Council of New Zealand
Query!
Address [1]
315218
0
South Tower Level 1/110 Symonds Street, Grafton, Auckland 1010
Query!
Country [1]
315218
0
New Zealand
Query!
Primary sponsor type
University
Query!
Name
The University of Auckland
Query!
Address
85 Park Road, Grafton, Auckland 1023
Query!
Country
New Zealand
Query!
Secondary sponsor category [1]
317289
0
None
Query!
Name [1]
317289
0
Query!
Address [1]
317289
0
Query!
Country [1]
317289
0
Query!
Ethics approval
Ethics application status
Not yet submitted
Query!
Ethics committee name [1]
314142
0
Northern A Health and Disability Ethics Committee.
Query!
Ethics committee address [1]
314142
0
133 Molesworth Street, Thorndon, Wellington, 6011
Query!
Ethics committee country [1]
314142
0
New Zealand
Query!
Date submitted for ethics approval [1]
314142
0
20/12/2023
Query!
Approval date [1]
314142
0
Query!
Ethics approval number [1]
314142
0
Query!
Summary
Brief summary
Bowel surgery is a common procedure and is associated with relatively high rates of postoperative infections which results in longer hospital stays and increased costs. Probiotics are thought of as 'beneficial bacteria', and prebiotics are thought of as 'food for probiotics'. Synbiotics are a combination of probiotics and prebiotics. Some studies have been published which suggest that synbiotics are associated with improved outcomes after surgery, but the evidence is not yet conclusive. This randomised clinical trial is investigating whether taking synbiotics before and after bowel surgery is associated with a decrease in postoperative infections, when compared to placebo, in the New Zealand context.
Query!
Trial website
Query!
Trial related presentations / publications
Query!
Public notes
Query!
Contacts
Principal investigator
Name
130566
0
Dr Claudia Paterson
Query!
Address
130566
0
South Auckland Clinical Campus, Level 2, North Wing, Esme Green Building 30, Middlemore Hospital, 100 Hospital Road, Otahuhu, Auckland 2025
Query!
Country
130566
0
New Zealand
Query!
Phone
130566
0
+64 9 276 0044
Query!
Fax
130566
0
Query!
Email
130566
0
[email protected]
Query!
Contact person for public queries
Name
130567
0
Dr Claudia Paterson
Query!
Address
130567
0
South Auckland Clinical Campus, Level 2, North Wing, Esme Green Building 30, Middlemore Hospital, 100 Hospital Road, Otahuhu, Auckland 2025
Query!
Country
130567
0
New Zealand
Query!
Phone
130567
0
+64 9 276 0044
Query!
Fax
130567
0
Query!
Email
130567
0
[email protected]
Query!
Contact person for scientific queries
Name
130568
0
Dr Claudia Paterson
Query!
Address
130568
0
South Auckland Clinical Campus, Level 2, North Wing, Esme Green Building 30, Middlemore Hospital, 100 Hospital Road, Otahuhu, Auckland 2025
Query!
Country
130568
0
New Zealand
Query!
Phone
130568
0
+64 9 276 0044
Query!
Fax
130568
0
Query!
Email
130568
0
[email protected]
Query!
Data sharing statement
Will individual participant data (IPD) for this trial be available (including data dictionaries)?
Yes
Query!
What data in particular will be shared?
A de-identified dataset will be made available to researchers working in this field on request.
Query!
When will data be available (start and end dates)?
Data will be available following completion of this trial - anticipated start date: 01/03/2025. This data will be available for the next 10 years (under storage at the University of Auckland as per the current local data management policy).
Query!
Available to whom?
Researchers in this field that request and demonstrate interest in progressing this field.
Query!
Available for what types of analyses?
Researchers in this field wishing to undertake meta-analyses or similar projects.
Query!
How or where can data be obtained?
Via contacting Dr Claudia Paterson (PhD Candidate) at
[email protected]
Query!
What supporting documents are/will be available?
No Supporting Document Provided
Results publications and other study-related documents
Documents added manually
No documents have been uploaded by study researchers.
Documents added automatically
No additional documents have been identified.
Download to PDF