Please note that the copy function is not enabled for this field.
If you wish to
modify
existing outcomes, please copy and paste the current outcome text into the Update field.
LOGIN
CREATE ACCOUNT
LOGIN
CREATE ACCOUNT
MY TRIALS
REGISTER TRIAL
FAQs
HINTS AND TIPS
DEFINITIONS
Trial Review
The ANZCTR website will be unavailable from 1pm until 3pm (AEDT) on Wednesday the 30th of October for website maintenance. Please be sure to log out of the system in order to avoid any loss of data.
The safety and scientific validity of this study is the responsibility of the study sponsor and investigators. Listing a study does not mean it has been endorsed by the ANZCTR. Before participating in a study, talk to your health care provider and refer to this
information for consumers
Download to PDF
Trial registered on ANZCTR
Registration number
ACTRN12624000528550
Ethics application status
Approved
Date submitted
29/11/2023
Date registered
28/04/2024
Date last updated
28/04/2024
Date data sharing statement initially provided
28/04/2024
Type of registration
Retrospectively registered
Titles & IDs
Public title
Comparison of video laryngoscope-guided D-blade and adult-blade versus standard digital technique for Proseal Laryngeal Mask Airway placement in patient under general anesthesia : a randomized controlled trial
Query!
Scientific title
Comparison of fibreoptic score between video laryngoscope-guided D-blade and adult-blade versus standard digital technique for Proseal Laryngeal Mask Airway placement in patient under general anesthesia : a randomized controlled trial
Query!
Secondary ID [1]
311059
0
None
Query!
Universal Trial Number (UTN)
Query!
Trial acronym
Query!
Linked study record
Query!
Health condition
Health condition(s) or problem(s) studied:
Participants who underwent elective surgery that need Laryngeal mask airway insertion for ventilate during intra-operative period
332180
0
Query!
Condition category
Condition code
Anaesthesiology
328898
328898
0
0
Query!
Anaesthetics
Query!
Intervention/exposure
Study type
Interventional
Query!
Description of intervention(s) / exposure
- Participants will be randomly allocated to 1 of 3 groups for Proseal LMA insertion:
Group S (control group) - standard digital technique
Group D - under C-MAC laryngoscopic guidance using a D-blade
Group A - under C-MAC laryngoscopic guidance using an adult blade
- In the operating room, standard anesthetic monitoring was applied with electro- cardiogram, non-invasive blood pressure, and peripheral oxygen saturation monitoring.
- Participants will breathe 100% oxygen gas through a face mask for 3 minutes. Induction of anesthesia was carried out with propofol 1.5-2.5 mg/kg intravenous bolus, succinylcholine 0.5 mg/kg intravenous bolus and fentanyl 0.5-1 mcg/kg intravenous bolus. The patients were ventilated with a facemask until conditions were suitable for laryngeal mask airway(LMA) insertion (loss of eyelash reflex, jaw relaxation, and the absence of movement). Additional boluses of 0.5 mg/kg intravenously propofol were given as required until an adequate level of anesthesia was achieved for LMA placement.
- A lubricated LMA was inserted by experienced anaesthetist (who experienced LMA insertion more than 3- times) using the standard digital technique in Group S .under C-MAC laryngoscopic guidance (D-blade) in Group D and under C-MAC laryngoscopic guidance (adult-blade) in Group A. Selection of the LMA size was based on the body weight of the patient. Laryngoscope blade was placed in the vallecula and the epiglottis was identified; then, both the tongue and epiglottis were lifted anteriorly. It was not necessary to visualize the tracheal opening or vocal cords. The LMA was pressed with the index finger and forwarded around the palatopharyngeal curve until the resistance was felt
- After the LMA was inserted, the cuff was inflated with air based on the amount of air proposed by the manufacturing company. With the cuff manometer pressure was set to 60 cmH2O.
- A well-lubricated gastric tube (14 French) was inserted along the drainage tube.
- A fiberoptic scope was passed through the LMA tube and the fiberoptic position was evaluated using the fiberoptic scoring system: 4, only the vocal cords seen; 3, vocal cords plus posterior epiglottis seen; 2, vocal cords plus anterior epiglottis seen; 1, vocal cords not seen.
- During the procedures, anaesthesia was maintained with sevoflurane in air in oxygen keep end-tidal gas (Etgas) 1-1.2 minimum alveolar concentration (MAC)
- At the end of the surgery, all patients received ondansetron 4-8 mg intravenously and removed the LMA after the patient gained consciousness, and collected data on the following adverse events: sorethroat, hoarseness, dysphagia
- Monitor adherence to the intervention by review of anaesthesia records.
Query!
Intervention code [1]
327505
0
Treatment: Devices
Query!
Comparator / control treatment
a) Control group: Proseal LMA insertion using standard digital technique. The standard digital technique was performed according to the manufacturer’s instructions by pressed with the index finger and forwarded around the palatopharyngeal curve until the resistance was felt. The LMA was inserted by an experienced anesthetist.
Query!
Control group
Active
Query!
Outcomes
Primary outcome [1]
336708
0
The fiberoptic position score
Query!
Assessment method [1]
336708
0
Fiberoptic scoring system
Query!
Timepoint [1]
336708
0
immediately after complete LMA insertion (the capnography tracing was obtained and orogastric tube is inserted)
Query!
Secondary outcome [1]
429384
0
First attempt success rate
Query!
Assessment method [1]
429384
0
rate of success LMA insertion in 1st attempt, recorded in operation report by the anaesthetist.
Query!
Timepoint [1]
429384
0
after LMA insertion
Query!
Secondary outcome [2]
429385
0
The time taken for LMA insertion
Query!
Assessment method [2]
429385
0
The time the anaesthesiologist picked up the LMA till the capnography tracing was obtained recorded by digital stopwatch in operation report by the anaesthetist.
Query!
Timepoint [2]
429385
0
the duration from the time the anaesthesiologist picked up the LMA till the capnography tracing was obtained.
Query!
Secondary outcome [3]
429386
0
The insertion of the orogastric tube
Query!
Assessment method [3]
429386
0
Subjective scoring by anaesthetist on the scale of easy, difficult, impossible.
Query!
Timepoint [3]
429386
0
During OG insertion
Query!
Secondary outcome [4]
429387
0
Blood pressure change during LMA insertion
Query!
Assessment method [4]
429387
0
The sphygmomanometer was used to record the change of blood pressure starting from baseline before the LMA insertion and during LMA insertion as timepoint indicate.
Query!
Timepoint [4]
429387
0
1, 3, and 5 minutes after LMA insertion.
Query!
Secondary outcome [5]
429388
0
postop. complication: blood-stained LMA after remove LMA, sore throat, hoarseness, dysphagia
Query!
Assessment method [5]
429388
0
blood-stained LMA: yes, no
sore throat : numerical rating scale (NRS)
hoarseness, dysphagia: mild/moderate/severe
Query!
Timepoint [5]
429388
0
1 hr- post.op at post-anaesthesia care unit (PACU)
24 hr-post op. at in patient department (IPD) ward
Query!
Secondary outcome [6]
432412
0
Heart rate change during LMA insertion
Query!
Assessment method [6]
432412
0
The vital sign monitor equipment was used to record the change of heart rate starting from baseline before the LMA insertion and during LMA insertion as timepoint indicate.
Query!
Timepoint [6]
432412
0
1, 3, and 5 minutes after LMA insertion.
Query!
Eligibility
Key inclusion criteria
American Society of Anesthesiologists (ASA) physical status of I-II
Aged between 18 and 65 years
Scheduled for elective surgery in the supine position under general anesthesia using the Proseal LMA for airway management
Query!
Minimum age
18
Years
Query!
Query!
Maximum age
65
Years
Query!
Query!
Sex
Both males and females
Query!
Can healthy volunteers participate?
No
Query!
Key exclusion criteria
Patients with predicted difficult airway (Mallampati score > 2 or mouth opening < 3 cm, BMI > 35 kg/m2),
Pregnant
Patient with oropharyngeal pathology
Patient with co-morbidities: CAD, uncontrolled-HT
Query!
Study design
Purpose of the study
Treatment
Query!
Allocation to intervention
Randomised controlled trial
Query!
Procedure for enrolling a subject and allocating the treatment (allocation concealment procedures)
central randomisation by computer
Query!
Methods used to generate the sequence in which subjects will be randomised (sequence generation)
Block randomisation using a randomisation table created by computer software
Query!
Masking / blinding
Blinded (masking used)
Query!
Who is / are masked / blinded?
The people receiving the treatment/s
The people assessing the outcomes
The people analysing the results/data
Query!
Query!
Query!
Query!
Intervention assignment
Query!
Other design features
Query!
Phase
Not Applicable
Query!
Type of endpoint/s
Safety/efficacy
Query!
Statistical methods / analysis
Statistical method in this study starting with pilot study of 12 patients to find value of minimal clinical difference of each group which is 30% , then the value was used to calculated. Sample size 50 per group (total 150 people) was indicated in this study.
Query!
Recruitment
Recruitment status
Recruiting
Query!
Date of first participant enrolment
Anticipated
Query!
Actual
25/08/2023
Query!
Date of last participant enrolment
Anticipated
25/08/2024
Query!
Actual
Query!
Date of last data collection
Anticipated
25/11/2024
Query!
Actual
Query!
Sample size
Target
150
Query!
Accrual to date
35
Query!
Final
Query!
Recruitment outside Australia
Country [1]
25998
0
Thailand
Query!
State/province [1]
25998
0
Bangkok
Query!
Funding & Sponsors
Funding source category [1]
315316
0
Hospital
Query!
Name [1]
315316
0
King chulalongkorn memorial hospital - Ratchada fund
Query!
Address [1]
315316
0
Query!
Country [1]
315316
0
Thailand
Query!
Primary sponsor type
Hospital
Query!
Name
King chulalongkorn memorial hospital
Query!
Address
1873 Rama IV Rd, Khwaeng Pathum Wan, Khet Pathum Wan, Krung Thep Maha Nakhon 10330
Query!
Country
Thailand
Query!
Secondary sponsor category [1]
317368
0
None
Query!
Name [1]
317368
0
Query!
Address [1]
317368
0
Query!
Country [1]
317368
0
Query!
Ethics approval
Ethics application status
Approved
Query!
Ethics committee name [1]
314238
0
The Institutional Review Board of the Faculty of Medicine, Chulalongkorn University, Bangkok, Thailand,
Query!
Ethics committee address [1]
314238
0
1873 Rama IV Rd, Khwaeng Pathum Wan, Khet Pathum Wan, Krung Thep Maha Nakhon 10330
Query!
Ethics committee country [1]
314238
0
Thailand
Query!
Date submitted for ethics approval [1]
314238
0
04/04/2023
Query!
Approval date [1]
314238
0
06/07/2023
Query!
Ethics approval number [1]
314238
0
0310/66
Query!
Summary
Brief summary
To compare proportion of proper Proseal LMA position (using fiberoptic score) between D-blade videolaryngoscope-guided, adult-blade videolaryngoscope-guided and standard digital technique.
Query!
Trial website
Query!
Trial related presentations / publications
Query!
Public notes
Query!
Contacts
Principal investigator
Name
130902
0
Miss Chonchaya Tangnopphapaton
Query!
Address
130902
0
King Chulalongkorn Memorial hospital, 1873 Rama IV Rd, Khwaeng Pathum Wan, Khet Pathum Wan, Krung Thep Maha Nakhon 10330
Query!
Country
130902
0
Thailand
Query!
Phone
130902
0
+66 899493489
Query!
Fax
130902
0
Query!
Email
130902
0
[email protected]
Query!
Contact person for public queries
Name
130903
0
Chonchaya Tangnopphapaton
Query!
Address
130903
0
King Chulalongkorn Memorial hospital, 1873 Rama IV Rd, Khwaeng Pathum Wan, Khet Pathum Wan, Krung Thep Maha Nakhon 10330
Query!
Country
130903
0
Thailand
Query!
Phone
130903
0
+66 899493489
Query!
Fax
130903
0
Query!
Email
130903
0
[email protected]
Query!
Contact person for scientific queries
Name
130904
0
Chonchaya Tangnopphapaton
Query!
Address
130904
0
King Chulalongkorn Memorial hospital, 1873 Rama IV Rd, Khwaeng Pathum Wan, Khet Pathum Wan, Krung Thep Maha Nakhon 10330
Query!
Country
130904
0
Thailand
Query!
Phone
130904
0
+66 899493489
Query!
Fax
130904
0
Query!
Email
130904
0
[email protected]
Query!
Data sharing statement
Will individual participant data (IPD) for this trial be available (including data dictionaries)?
No
Query!
No/undecided IPD sharing reason/comment
Query!
What supporting documents are/will be available?
No Supporting Document Provided
Results publications and other study-related documents
Documents added manually
No documents have been uploaded by study researchers.
Documents added automatically
No additional documents have been identified.
Download to PDF